THE FUTURE IS HERE : SOCIAL STRUGGLES IN NORTH AMERICA The Economic Blocks , neighbors associations , seems to stagger with

reference to the case of the European Union ? Resurface nationalism in response to "globalization " apparently failed in their social balances ? Catalonia, Scotland , Northern Ireland , flemish , etc. threaten to fragment Spain , the UK and Belgium, etc. . But it would be a misreading confuse this process with the rest of regionalisms that are manifested in the world , regardless of Blocks Esconmicos formalized ( in Russia , China, Bolivia , etc. ) with varying intensity. The regionalist tensions in the countries involved in Economic Blocs , looking , in the end , just reinserted independently formalized these blocks. These regionalist tensions are already incubated in block of North America (Quebec, The Cascadia on the western border of Canada - United States , in the same border the states and provinces around the Great Lakes , and the mexico border American . Additional processes in the context of globalization in the world are the larvae currently impossible to predict their future evolution . But in any case , nationalism is a regression in a world that needs unified in an efficient geopolitica way to solve social and natural future problems Yes , the Trilateral Commission and its project . , and in general the various world powers , new and emerging , . having geopolitical projects But the future world, if it is to remain , it must conform to the BALANCING in cultural and ecological diversity of diversity. 's religious fanaticism and political origin, racism with its consequent social hegemony , must be combated . and in that sense , defensive, " resistance " is not the best way . What you resist ... the system supports . The best defense is attack : that intercultural unleash processes that floresca cultural diversity around the world track the release of those held in immigration flows straitjackets are the territorial boundaries of nation states . Fall of the borders not only for the Capital, for the money, the direct and indirect investments ; but for population migration. In Mexico , 20 years of NAFTA / NAFTA 's poorest and richest ...! 10 billionaires including the richest man in the world , most of them infants , especially this last , as proceeds from the sale of companies of people mexican, not the mexican goverment. One way primitive of accumulation of stock in Mexico in recent years , driven by politicians and technicians, who apparently only know sell companies of the common people, who are not from the polity or government . We have not an Economic Model in Mexico thirty years of combat statism since 1982. 's " Technical " , economists have learned in American universities ( Miguel de la Madrid , Carlos Salinas de Gortari , Ernesto Zedillo , Felipe Caldern ) before the English Language that economic theories. They have adopted dogmas , economic fundamentalisms : macroecomico balance, zero fiscal deficit , spend only what you have, free market forces to 1

streamline production processes and that's fine. But ... on what economic model? Supported by remittances from Mexican migrants : about 30 million documented and undocumented Mexicans in the United States? More than 20 billion dollars a year more than 50 major U.S. multinational companies and the 100 largest transnational corporations in the world have not been able to contribute as indirect investment in Mexico despite the neoliberal policy in the last 30 years. Lack of security at delicuencial increased violence in the country since the signing of North American Free Trade Agreements (NAFTA) in 1994 , or lack of legal certainty to capital given the expropriation character beats in Article 27 of the Mexican Constitution since 1917 ? Mexican politicians have been diagnosed with the latter, as if China had not " pulled " capitals around the world in a much more aggressive Constitucin to the capital, a Communist Constitution , which does not recognize private property and using state capitalism as va to develop their " productive forces " ; but guaranteed to 100 years foreign inversisones . With the oil reform in Mexico , with amendments to Article 27 of the Constitution mainly expected large direct investment by transnational oil companies , the same that during government of General Lazaro Cardenas in 1938 are expropriated. Dish but still served only those foreign investments if a year will exceed what Mexican immigrants in the U.S. send to Mexico to their families and that the goverment used to maintain the macroeconomic stability of the country. Mexican migrants thus unwittingly deliver a weapon that attacked , expelled to the country economically ; just to keep attacking that : producing more emigrants to the United States. In this perverse game of economics, there is certainly no purpose of the Mexican goverment of "producing " Mexican migrants to support "economic model" ; nor the United States is complicit in this process. In this country happens as the drug is introduced into its territory , but would really like to fight only ends managing the problem if it does not threaten the American people governance . Catch Mexican narcos in their territory within hours when required defensive reactions . For example , attacks against its agents in Mexico , by members of these Mexican cartels operating in its territory. Hence they never agree on U.S. soil no drug dealers or producers , no cartels , no violence in poductores countries ( Colombia ) or distributors (like Mexico ) . And , ultimately, if there narcos in the United States these are at the end of foreign accounts : old or recent immigrants. But these drugs entering U.S. territory , must necessarily have their own distribution chains. The drug is a commodity and moves in a market with own brands market.And grade distribution of a market if we speak , America is master in the world. Drugs are vital to maintaining governable to a segment of American society : about 50 million figure consumidores, sometimes minimized when mainly accounted addicts . But drugs like liquor or snuff , consumers have sybarite.En some American Union states have already legalized marijuana. Therefore, in the case of migration of 2

Mexicans and in the case of drug market that is shaped and expanding in the U.S. , both countries are hostages of an economic process that create macro control agreements like NAFTA , but that eventually cost them both socially and economically in particular. Mexico is already running out parastatals sell the fuel it needs for its " economic model" , and remittances from Mexican migrants in the future will be uncertain if they enter a field of political struggle. U.S. " tolerates " Mexican emigration because in the end its citizens " consume" the undocumented work force not only for economic reasons, its low cost, but by multicultural policy positions and drug trafficking in his country is a lesser evil no is not violent and does not risk governance in its territory. But Mexican emigration is provided indirectly linked with drug trafficking . Two phenomena intensified with the signing of NAFTA and its implementation in 1994. Migration corridors can be identified territory of undocumented immigrants in the United States in a matrix of flows from Mexican border cities , and can be identified in Mexico drug violence in the commercial corridor and rail carrretero NAFTA , from the ports of Manzanillo and Lazaro Cardenas to Nuevo Laredo. It is no coincidence that the states where drug violence more registers are vector axes of these NAFTA Superhighway / NAFTA : Michoacan and Tamaulipas. Colima and Guerrero; Nuevo Leon and Coahuila and Chihuahua including Ciudad Juarez are just random that axis that crosses the country from Mexican Pacific to the Gulf before deep into American territory and Canadian to Toronto and Vancouver bend territories. A Constitution is , before a single paper, a social pact ; is a pacts between winners and losers ; a container of the correlation of forces of a country are given a legal framework for political struggles to govern a people , a country . Depending on who is in the government of a nation is like or not applied the clauses , the articles of a constitution. Either way this is reformed . . Hence the legislative circus in Mexico for the approval of the oil reform in December 2013 Under assumptions under agreements entered legislation and congress deputies in the states of the Mexican federation approved in 20 minutes ... The robbery is consummated : the Permanent Constitution adopted the reform and this is lawfull. A reform process ... illegitimate but that forces currently governing the country have made it lawfull. The current president , current senators and federal and states deputies did not campaign in 2012 taking as flag oil reform : market , where politicians are sold as commodities , which does not fool not sell . There they consult the people, because it can be manipulated for political marketing . And they fear that in a polpular query or break the oil reform , this population can be deceived by his opponents as a very sensitive ( " almost religious " says the current president ) issue in the Mexican population is touched. Last news , to politics, mass media reach is needed. Ideologues do not lack . Marketers are required. A 3

politician who does not appear in the TV, it died . Is that media and the population is bombarded with simple slogans : "The oil is still Mexicans." "It will lower the price of electricity consumption , gas , gasoline ." The robbery is consummated and the people in peace .... hopefully in a better future that has already been sold to them through television. Foucault explaining the meaning of Genealogy ( the origin of things and values ) in Nietzche1 . "In the rules themselves are empty, violent , not terminated ; are made to serve this or that; can be used at the discretion of this or that . The big game ever , is who shall protect the rules, who will take the place of those who use them , who disguise to pervert , to use against the grain, and use them against those who had imposed ; who , entering into the complex apparatus , it will function in a way that will meet the rulers dominated by their own rules. The different emergencies that can not be perceived successive figures of the same significance ; are rather effects of substitutions , locations and displacements, disguised conquests, systematic deviations. If play was slowly clarify a hidden significance in the origin , only metaphysics could interpret the development of humanity . But if interpretation is avail , by violence or surreptitiously , a system of rules that has no essential significance in itself , and to impose a direction, a new fold will make it into another game, and subject to rules seconds , then the future of humanity is a series of interpretations. And should be your genealogy history history of moral ideals, of metaphysical concepts , history of the concept of liberty or of the ascetic life as emergence of different interpretations. This is to make them appear as events in the theater of the proceedings. " This can be useful to understand the constitutional reforms for Energy Reform in Mexico ( December 2013) and therefore to design estretegias for those opposed . The way is forward, not backward. First. Because time is running contrary to the oppositions address, the web of forces that are unleashed reform become more difficult to roll back time , is generating new correlation of forces . This applies to those who dream cancel NAFTA . Second . The "left" , including nationalists have increasingly barriers to their access to national power , presidential power and apply the Constitution as they interpret it . If they say they already did you two frauds, 1988 and 2006, if not continue to make the tune 4

their strategies . Not let them come to power. Fare badly where the subject is seen. If they really made fraud, imposition of the usurpers of state power as the evidence inefficient politically not knowing defend his victory . Marches and protests are not useless : they are inefficient . If fraud did not hear them , but persist in denouncing as a flag of political instability , have led to the deepening of increasingly more unpopular policies related to transnational forces : NAFTA (1994)and War against Drug Trafficking in Mexico(2006) . Modifications to the heart of the Mexican Constitution , Article 27 , is the culmination of that process. Historic U.S. and reactionary forces in the country ( the PAN and the Catholic Church ) have always striven for that character socializing Constitution Article 27 was annulled or modified . Sovereignty question. Blurred as a National Project in which Article 27 is only the knot tying the rest of the articles of the 1917 Constitution , Constitucin very few realize and understand that the masses would hide the project that includes . ? reverse the process and the nationalist "left" Mexican " forces? Socially nothing is irreversible or inamobible , but ... 30 years of political impotence are many. His opponents have gone too far . The networks of power that have tissue will become more difficult to cancel . Third . Facing EE : UU as a monolithic block is a mistake. Must and can find allies in the American society , and I speak only of Mexicans compratriotas or U.S. citizens of Mexican origin. Multicultural currents, swarming all over the United States (and Canada ) are natural allies against state policies of the U.S. government . . were thus no internal enemies of their own countries. The territorial policy integration econmica should be irreversible and social gains to be found in that direction and homogenize in his beyond the differences , racial and cultural specificity. The multidirectional migration should become an object of struggle for the three companies that are embedded in NAFTA . In this sense , the struggle for things ( oil , natural resources ) will be secondary . The bottom should be the welfare of the people in any part of the territory where they are located . There are 30 million Mexicans in the United States, that in 100 years could be 300 million via the natural growth, reproductive va , not documented or undocumented new mass migrations . Since the signing of NAFTA multidirectional migration in the three signatory countries has intensified , formal and informalmente.Canadienses living in the United States and Americans living , over 40 thousand in Canada. The ten or twelve million undocumented Mexicans in that period, not (besides the effort and tenacity of Mexican migrants and unwanted interventions drug cartels with illegal migration become one more of their business ) account without collusion with those American multicultural forces. Mexican migrants are practically in the whole United States , not only in traditional niches border 5

states formerly in Mexico and are cooperating to the aggrandizement of the United States ; while support (more than the transnational capital or oil exports , tourism, maquila , or exports of the automotive industry in Mexico ) the Mexican "economic model" via sending remittances in dollars. Moreover, in Mexico emigration of Americans and Canadians have intensified ; concentrating mainly on the border and the Mexican coast . There are nearly one million Americans living or residing temporarily or completely , in Mexico . Canadians in Mexico , in the same period , totaling more than 250,000 . Mexicans in Canada, is still meager , around 30,000 , and has increased so documented or legal, especially since the beginning of 1994 NAFTA . Who 's afraid of multidirectional migration? Status Quo As each country can scare . Only American Union states that originally joined the 13 colonies resist those Mexican emigration , in varying medida.La migration of Mexicans to the U.S. is reversing the battle hymn of the Marines , from what happened in Mexico in 1847 to explain the expansion of the United States around the world , " from the palaces of Montezuma ..." to reverse it by expansionist conception (yes, it sounds controversial ) some , very few, members of the Constitutional Convention of 1917 advised by Andres Molina Enriquez, and they expected from "The fundamental area of cereals " , the center of Mexico spanning 7 or 8 states, Mexico distributed population throughout America . Agrarian reform focused on the collective ejido and private property rights were conditional touchstones in that project. So it was vital Article 27 before alluding to the land question and natural resources , refers to property rights . That project of revolutionary nationalism which current PRI would not hear, is offset by the economic phase in its history , but not in the social: Mexican nation is already on American soil . Cultural diversity has consequences when populations of the three countries will modify each other and forms of government more suitable to the new emerging cultural patterns are given. Fourth . The political model and the economic model launched at inertia , folding the American system. And here , even Canada, takes losses. Neither Mxico stated. If this country does not realize that Democracy is a shell that hides the true system of governance domain and bipartisanship . Canada is not a republic or it is sui generis . Mexico was a fictitiuos Republic under presidentialism that can be given as deceased in 1994 : the president could no longer impose their candidate or candidate consensual with other sources of power in the country . The finiteness of economic statism and presidentialism political mutually dissolved and that was the work of government from 1988 to 1994 . The invention of bipartisanship , rather than democracy , made under strong philosophical principles Excluding Third and Principle of not Contradiction of Aristotelian origin. 6

That form of government in America is fully and lower average applied in Canada, significant differences despite their common origin : children of the Great Albion. The caste system of bipartisanship is provided in England. It is therefore the type of State ( Republic or Constitutional Monarchy), and form of government, parliamentary or presidential system , which defines hegemony and functionality of these countries is its governance : is bipartisanship . Apparently opposites ( Labour and Conservatives in England or Britain) ; Republicans and Democrats in EE : UU . Matches apparently different , but similar as essential as Coke and Pepsi . In Mexico there is no room in the current circumstances, but to social forces which may be progressive and not dwell on the formal game of Coke and Pepsi . Need something similar to what happened in the period of reforms to the State of the nineteenth mid-century where Mexican society is polarized between Liberals that drove the change and the Conservatives who wanted to preserve what is established . Multiculturalism is in the dynamics of trilateral political system and outlines the strategy. If the policy is just one more manifestation of culture , we may be skeptical about the existence of short -term drivers of such multicultural processes. Fight for multiparty , or PRI tripartism with the center as in the past, would be a misreading of reality , but there may be bogged down in the process Mxico.Las progressive forces should lead you need Mexico and the PRI-PAN is based on a single party to wage a struggle tri level where you must set your sights and goals , and in this context; nationalisms are obsolete. Liberals socially today can not be extreme nationalists . Otherwise, will the PRI and the PAN who will eventually lead the integration process in a subordinate manner . " We want to export goods, not arms," said a former president who now claims that George Bush senior wanted the inclusion oil. From the start of NAFTA in 1994, but he objected to safeguard "national sovereignty " . To curb the pressures , says the president suggested that in return ; if its oil reserves are included , migration agreements between the U.S. and Mexico were included . Yes, Mexico is sovereignty when discussing oil reform the current government. And if the sovereignty of Mexico is being disrupted , the sovereignty of the United States and Canada also be relativized from multidirectional population migrations. That would make politics in our time in Mexico. Is unfortunate coincidence that of the acronym NAFTA means oil. Oil, the main cause of the greenhouse gas and environmental degradation in the world : climate change . The world industry , the automotive industry , requires that energy ( gasoline ) to survive as human needs oxygen. The production methods of automobiles in the world , having added more than 20 million per year. Highest figure every time and every year 400 billion and adds existing accumulated throughout history . This figure accumulated in a century, could double in just the next 10 years , threatening to compete with world population growth is now registers about 3,500 7

million. If someone or something stops the energy change in the world ( the shift to clean energy , mainly solar ) is the automotive industry and its sister twin : the oil industry. But as they say Mexican politicians who have passed the oil reform December 2013 , " the oil in the ground is no good" . There could be no value in an energy change ( a technological revolution based on clean energy ) and the urgent need for the search of global ecological balances. Wisdom or clumsiness . Depends as negotiated with the United States still has locked his immigration reform regarding undocumented Mexicans . With the United States to do business , not war . Since 1994, the U.S. has already absorbed territorially Mexico and Canada via its antomovstica industry sustained by General Motors, Ford and Chrysler. The automotive industry has already made a factory in the three countries . A territorial Production Unit . See figures of foreign trade between the three countries and you will see that about 45% of this trade are exchanges sales and purchases of cars and auto parts that move the U.S. parent companies keep their subsidiaries. But this process is a result of the overall process is automotive branch which divides the world into economic blocks : European Union , Asia - Pacific and NAFTA . In Block the trade war , the U.S. is allied with Japan ( Asia Pacific head before it emerged as capitalist economic power China which is still struggling to consolidate a native auto industry ), which is its auto industry to the U.S. so that migration Mexican : support and a risk to the U.S. system that forced him to evolve where do ... ? "I give you this. You give me that. Do not give me this, I not give you that ". Inflexible in the main, slack in the secondary. The negotiation has not essentially irreducible. No focus on the defense of things(the oil and natural resource); but the welfare of the people want in any of the three countries that are .Can the PRI or the PAN do this kind of negotiation?. Is possible but remote . They need the dollar remittances to balance the country macroeconomics. They despise the populace , who entertain kicking the ball , but these are not completely alienated ( or very few presidents and politicians are evident in those stadiums full because that despised mob with whistles ) hinting that may redirect kicks the other way . Despite the " anti-American " subconscious , President Ernesto Zedillo , the first president of NAFTA ( which was " rescued" by the administration of President Bill Clinton after the " December Mistake " that devalued the Mexican currency and plunged the country into one of its most severe economic crisis, which sold or left started selling Mexican banks to foreigners ( USA , Canada, Spain and England), which gave the president power to the PAN in 2000 refusing to play the PRI culture patriotic fraud) ; said that " the Mexican nation expanded beyond its territory ", referring to Mexicans living in U.S. territory . Vicente Fox and Felipe Calderon , the PAN espaolitas vein ( Spain has become the second largest investor in Mexico , after the United States , for their 8

governments ),no Mexicanists or nationalist, dreams of expanding Castilian language , Spanish, and all that that implies culturally composting of Spain . The "new PRI " and the always old PAN , be assimilated to own CONTROLLED DEMOCRACY English political system and assimilated in America va bipartisanship ( the false dilemma between Pepsi and Coke are the same) exercising democracy controlled via INDIRECT democracy pattern to be modified if the integration has to be such and not a ABSORPTION weakest here for more strong. That would be a mistake . A future multicultural society should have a political system based on a multiparty system , but in the process must walk on a bipartite trinationally looking polarize between social forces: multiculturalist against antimulticulturalista . These may be the Liberals and Conservatives today . Of contradiction will be born plurality. And this requires a political strategy. Start masks. Evidence that Coke and Pepsi are the same. Polarize social forces in multiculturalist ( agglutinated in a front of parties inicialemente if necessary ) against antimulticulturalist . The camouflage is going to follow dynamic but multiculturalists and land them in concrete pracices inevitably polarize society : Reconnaissance and advocacy of social equality for women compared to men , defense and protection of minorities, preserving the diversity of plants and animals in ecosystems, ecological sustainability practices that overlap needed on how useful , frugality about consumerism , integrationist against nationalist and regionalist , Latin Americanism is part of these last.etc.etc . How not expect the polarization of forces to new processes, changing and uncertain in its randomness in your goal or purpose ? Diversity and uncertainty are inherent , generate progresitas forces evolutionists and conservative lovers of the known yet if he is adverse . No integration of elites ; yes to the integration of peoples. No to the collapse of barriers to capitalist companies , direct investment; and walls to stop the trinational and muldirideccionales migration. Can there be enough talent to inscribe other social struggles and prioritize low initial guiding principle that what appears to be an irreversible trend of economic, political and territorial INTEGRATION in the current correlation of forces? Does the Mexican political system they regenerate ? In a system always , healthy part ends by removing the damaged part , for survival. The systems are Self-healing : renewing preserved. The opposite process is its collapse ( the failed State ) , its absorption of small system by the large and more powerful systems that recycles its image. The progressive forces , even if they are to emerge from the shells of existing parties that are conducive , or born and consolidated recycling old and outdated must be lucid and efficient.Would be politically disastrous replace inept for another. The progressive forces in multiculturalism in the release of migration flows and to defend their social rights in any of the three countries that are ; its founding flag in the 9

three

countries of NAFTA

: Canada, United States and Mexico .

Acculturation processes are to give, despite attempts hegemonizantes will be felt, in the daily day to day interaction of these three people . And in this direction is already gone way despite the reluctance of the Status Quo in the three countries of North America block . The future is provided in multiculturalism and biodiversity : diversity in unity and unity in diversity .

10