Octooor 7, 2013
From
Multiple Study
Agencies of the
Team'
A Case
Project
yO"
.i;GOMERY
COUNTY, MAFIY
toe
~No
KENNEDY CLUSTER
Mc>nllll1l,.f!. Cl!Ull~
Public &huols
Mv11l~<m1cry
C'1tl!ll)' '\
Council
\l1d-Cuunl)
R . ::.:rlonal Lcntct
f11h:r.:.1p.111..'\
<-1ttJ1nati11g
Bua1J
I
/ P/
A!,!.:llLW>
MontgmTlt..'T) County
Department
Prepared
by C1ere Keller
September
2013
Executive
Summary
in education.
Some that
of the
understood
students
by examining tow-income
the
confront
live
African
Hispanic
from
r a rn tu ea,
vvno rn
the
also
in
households
English is a second
language.
In these
with
situations,
solutions
closing
achievement
or
a school system.
As
result, school systems increaslngfy are partnering achievement Montgomery Project. for disadvantaged County Public students.
This
barriers to academic
case study describes the results of a per-t ner shl o between and Montgomery County agencies-the Kennedy C1uster
Schools
(MCPS)
MCPS
initiated
the
Kennedy
C1uster Project
in
2007
to
identify
gap in
MCPS.
Schoots In the Kennedy High School t'eec er area (cluster} were selected as Kennedy cluster were schools enrolled large percentages of Arrican
of' the
project
because the
poor or lived in homes where Spanish was the multi.. agency team representatives provided to
resources tn and out of' school as well as access to health care, programs1 and many other social services.
recreational
Although
the achievement
gap has not closed for Kennedy cluster students, to positive academic outcomes
there
is
has contributed
for individual
Some encouraging
Graduation Kennedy
rates
among
African
American
and
Hispanic
students
at
outpaced
of White
Anecdotal contributed
evidence
suggested that
Kennedy
Ciuster
Project
activities
Over
the
years, the
Kennedy dropout
overall
MCPS
school
Anecdotal
suggested that
Kennedy
.activities
helped to prevent some at-risk students from Over the past two
y ears, the
mobility
rates
of' Arrican
Amerlcan
and
Hispanic students
who attended
Kennedy High Schoof were lower than and Hispanic students, C1uster Project and activities school
MCPS
African American
Kennedy
among
elementary
middle
stay in their
improved
marks.
students'
attendance.
classroom
performance,
and course
In addition team
to
'fostering root
achievement of the
among
African gap
American
and
Hispanic access to
students, services
the that
addressed
causes
achievement
by Facilitating
students'
likelihood of success despite the odds. So me exam pies of the multi-agency contributions
Montgomery
l rr attendance
are:
County
of
Department
cluster
of Recreation
students at
staff
reported
increases
and extra-
Kennedy
recreational
services
level.
that
were
beyond
the
n ee t e
increased
academic
students'
three
performance.
and families
of
hope, wellbeing,
are highly correlated
and engagement,
vvlth
socio.... emotional
that
An unintended
the partners high
Kennedy
professional
development team
for
MCPS
or the
county
The
multi-agency
has a shared
vision,
levels
of
trust
and
interdependence
among
members,
and
creative
problem-solving
Better
and
delivery of educational
during and beyond the
school
Some
examples
are'.
C1uster Project
barriers multi-agency and team collaboration the school reduced system and
The Kennedy
communicatlon county
between agencies,
among
e pe r-c
rne nr s
and
The other
team to
have
built
a professional
and problems
network for
and
call
on
each
questions
students
and families,
School agency
counselors services
increased
their
awareness
of
how
to
access
local
directly.
are
better and
able
to can
link
families
to
specific the
so that
students meeting.
families
be served
without
mutti-
fn
Montgomery
County,
the
gap years,
is the
no
longer
merely C1uster
an
educational
problem. to
It
is
community
problem.
Over
the
Kennedy
Project
has contributed
success
for individual
done to close
students, their
the the achievement gap
families;
gap.
community,
of the case
More
work
needs to be
that progress
evidence
in narrowing
Is possible
through
multi-agency
collaboration.
Background
On
average,
Arrican
than
American
white
and and
Hispanic Asian
students
pe r-f'car- rn
lower
on
measures
Or"
or
academic
achievement
do their
counterparts.
The
performance
differences,
achievement
as ear-l y as Grade
success.
Grade
12.
School-based
efforts
to close the
a broader
some
But
solutions
causes
of the
achievement
gaps
require
Research
shows that
work 'together.
relationships
is that
by the
so u r-c es available
through
their
environments
(Bryan,
2QQ5;
Coleman, Jerry
1987;
Epstein,
1995). In 2007,
D.
Weast
from
MCPS
and Montgomery
formation
of a collaborative
partnership-the
Kennedy C1usterProject-to
racial/ethnic
4,900
"through
students
Includes
Kennedy
High School
as well
to
middfe schools and four elementary schools in the Kennedy High School service area (cluster). Eiementary School serves students Grade
2,
after
which
they
articulate
St:rathmore
3 to 5.
5 students
8 students
At
project
began in
2007,
enrolled
of African
pattern has
e r Hispanic students.
2013.
Compared with
MCPS
OT"'
l}.
Table
1
by Race/Ethn;c;ty
MCPS2013 Omc;a1
Enrollment
%Afr;can Am.
School
% Hispanic
School
vs.
Level Etem e rrce r-y School School
For-e s e
more
2013 20.1 44.7 29.3 36.5 44.7 21.6 37.7 32.6 22.3 37.8
MCPS
+24.6 +9.2 +16.4 +24.6 +16.1 +11.0
+ 15.5 (MSDE).
2013 27 .2 38.5 48.5 44.9 37.6 24.8 39.4 51.7 24.4 45.4
MCPS
+11.4 +21.3 +17.8 + 10.4 +14.6 +26.9 +21.0
M;ddte School
MCPS
Argyle
Lee
MCPS
Kennedy
Source;
Maryland St.ato
Oepartmn't
of' Education
In
2013r
of Kennedy
high
High School
averages
more
than
MCSP
school
elementary
middle
schools.
At Lee Middle
cvvtce
is heavily
impacted
by poverty.
Kennedy cluster
enrollees
are significantly
more
MCPS students
overall
more
in elementary
in
and
2013.
school
level,
where
FARMS
levels,
54.4
of
the students
received
FARMS
services in 2013, a rate nearly twice the MCPS high school average ot"28.2 percent.
Percentage
Level
of'Student
vs.
Eiementary Schoo!
Georgian Strat.hmore
Forest
2013 39.2 67.0 76.9 69.0 62.7 32.6 60.8 66.3 28.2 54.5
MCPS
+27.8 +37.7 +29.8 +23.5 +28.2 +33.7 +26.3
2013 25.3 45.6 34.4 38.9 25.5 8.7 14.5 22.3 5.9 9.1
MCPS
+20.3 + 9.1 +13.6 +0.2 +5.8 +13.6 +3.2
M1dd1e
School
MCPS
A,gye Lee
MCPS
Kennedy
Frae and Reduce-d-pric:<e Limited Eng!l,;h
Mee.is System (FARMS) services. Source; MSDE Prt'iciency (LEP) s e r vtc es , Source: MSDE.
Kennedy cluster
school
enrollees
vver e
signi'ficantly
MCPS
students
overall
ec receive
(LEP}services
(Table
ln
(9.1 25.3
percent)
qualified
2). 2013, a
tvvice the
average
In
of'
f'or
percent
at Strat:hmore
at Bel
serves students
in Grades rate
3 to 5.
of'
younger almost
students
Pre Erementary
School, the
2013 LEP
of
participation
45.6
was
twice
as high as the
MCPS
e le rnentary
sc no o t average
25.3
percent.
how Kennedy
stronger
barriers
success for
e the
project
in other
of the project processes and results will inform clusters and In schools outside
MCPS.
Methodology
C1uster Project
purpose to
mufti-agency
to break
team
down
is a network
inst:ltution,ai out
of
agency
representatives
that
who
work
the
of helping educational
and social
barriers
disaffect provide
student access
In addition
The
resources
in and
of school,
participating
agencies
to
health care, housing, financial assistance, legal aid, recreationaJ programs, and many other social
MCPS the Montgomery County of Health and Human Services,the State's Attorney's Office, the Department of Juvenile
mufti-agency team
includes
representatives
from
the
Montgomery
County
Police
Department,
the
Montgomery
County
Department
of
team meets twice per month to review casesth at are referred by Kennedy cluster schools,
Data Collection
Data for this study were collected collection during a 12-month period from June 2012 to June 2013. unstructured The data multi-
observations of the
agency team
key informants;
13
2012
2013.
Se mt-wt.r uct.ur ec
interviews
were conducted
with
20 Key Informants
from
Key informants responded to slx open-ended questions about their background; the impact of the multiagency team for increasing their e w er eness of root causes of the achievement gap; their awareness of services that are available for students and their families to address the r oot; causes; and their successes and challenges at closing the achievement gap discussed the agency team.
Id entifl ed in
for individual students. In addition, the key informants participation on the multiis
No key informant
the re port.
2013.
dropout,
and
data were
Maryland
(MSDE)
vvebsrt e,
Disaggregated student e nr-c umenc. demographic, and achievement data were Results of the
MCPS.
2012
MCPS
website,
Data analysts
s llterature
review with
results
on student
In addition, and
access to
social capital
informants describes how participation on the multi-agency team enhanced their professional exper-t.la e, capacity and effectiveness, Inferences based on the findings should take into account that the Kennedy
Ciuster Project is one of many programs used by schools to improve student performance {Appendix
A}.
3
Results
2012-2013
were
challenges
such
f'aced by
as poor
In
many
concerns
attendance dynamics.
or course failure
In emotional
distress related
to
For
A
example:
third
grader's attention-seeking
drawing with marker in the
He 1ied
in class,
about then
He
soiled
his pants
kicked vvere
hs clothing separated
under and
a desk father
and did
blame child
other support.
students.
His
parents
his
His
mother
An
eighth
grader for
with
spotty
attendance months
and
assignments
been
was
suspended
thef't,
few
earlier,
his
deported.
Recend~
unexplained
the
young
man
had been
admitted
to
Children's
Hospital
for
an
head
injury.
high
school She
student had
wanted
t:o go to college
but
school Her
wlth
a history
order
vro re nc e in her
father but
a restraining
She
he had stopped
in one
vv es
living
with
mother
and
brother
three
bedrooms of an apartment
Not
al!
of
the
cases Nearly
came
to
the
attention
of had that
the
multi-agency
team
of
problems
with
achievement. because of
half the
issues
t t m e , students
or family crises
satisfactory were
academic the
mentai
health
beyond
control
For
to his
ex.-eimp1e:
third
grader and
was
doing students.
well
but
vv as
verbally
abusive things
teacher
other
to his
teacher like
her son
"I
said t:hat
't; love
her.
An
Ethiopian
school
sixth
grader
and
was a "good
clothing. Her
S1:udent who
mother had
worked
for
hard11 but
asylum
she
needed
supplies
applied
status
and her
three
was approved
they were
not
school
senior
was
a quiet,
,good
student
who
wanted
to
be
the
third
in
his
family
year, senior
to graduate
an injury year,
from
on a Ride-On his
he and
mother
different. students or
across of
a wide
range
of case
many
the
school
counselors
used resources
r e re r r e t e vvlthout
available to them
the need for
through
the
Kennedy
meetlng.
and
make
a multi-agency
multi-agency centered
representatives
to provide
customer
Academic
Indicators
The primary
toward number reviews outcomes this of find
o'f the
has
is to close
because a the
the
achievement
gap.
Measuring
progress
small
been
multi-agency
team
hears of
a relatively
each some
year,
requires
different
interventions, others
Case
immediate and
while that
influence has
years
later.
hearings
t:.he program
rev e t , as well
occurs more
individuals,
Interview receives
school
counselors the
suggests
because when
available to
one student
deal vvith
support
from
mvlti-agency
team,
time
other
students
less pressing
needs.
Graduation Rate
A
high schooi diploma the annual
is a first
income out
step of did
to
financial
security
and e better
is more
quality percent
of
life
On
average,
a high
not
school
graduate
45
higher
individual
who
dropped
and
earn
a diploma
{Figure
1).
school
graduates
vvho enroll
some college,
73
of
percent
those
a high school
benefits
Of in turn
greater
financial
stabillty
social
are
associated with
reliance on social active of
benefits
of less
ae r vi ce s, better"
community
children from to
26,776
18,432
31,906
parents school
high
are
graduate
themselves,
The
MCPS
the
overall
graduatton in the
rate
is
Figure
i.
f.sti-rna;~~
of
e ve req e annual
arnlng:s
by
revet
of
e o uc.ettc rtet
among
highest
nation
attainment.
Buraeu1
2012.
(Education
encouraging differences
Week, is
in
2013).
that
racial/ graduation
More
ethnic rates
MCPS
over
have ye a rs .
narrowed
the
past
three
1 The graduation already rates of African American, than Hispanic, for t:.heir and public White school students
1n
MCPS
and
at
Kennedy
High
School1
significantly
higher
counterparts
nationwide
(Stillwell
&
MSDE
cohort
th
total
number
of' d!plomas
net number
o'f studenr.s.
in the greduet.ion class over tl'ie 'four year period, o'f mc r-ethen
Detailed
rts
95 percent.
Sable,
2013),
have
shovvn most
further to
signs in
of
progress
since
2010.
rates
First, African
over the
American
years
and
students
contributed
increases
MCPS
graduation
past three
Kennedy
graduation
rates
imp roved
more than
four
percentage
points
students.
Second,
African American
of
not statistically
Af'riean
evidence and
American
of" a trend
and Hispanic
toward
in all MCPS
more equitable,
high schools.
high school
The
pattern
of results provides
rates in
higher,
graduation
MCPS
overall,
at Kennedy
High School
in particular,
3 2010
'c o
2012
Rate
School
3-Yeu
African American Nat:ion
MCPS
2011 81.3
MCPS
2012 82.3
MCPS
Trend
MCPS
Kennedy Na-.::ion
-.7
83.9 75.3
2.6
81.5 76.7
MCPS
Kennedy
Asian
Nei:tion
-2.4
74.7 94.3
-.7
76.2 >95%
-.5
+4.3
MCPS
Kennedy Nat:.ion
-3.7
-4.0
93.2 94.0
MCPS
Kenndy
-.5
89.3
2010.
2012.
Note.
MCPS
Although
the Kennedy C1uster Project has not closed has vvo r k e o one student
the
gap in graduation
attain high
the
collaboration
One teenage
needed complete assistance. that she all owed graduated,
mother care,
to
she her
medical
and child
requirements
with
medical
and
rt rr e n cse t
grant Arter
her class
on to receive
study
$6,000
College
t e.cte r to
the
team,
"/wouldn't be where I am now if the project would not have helped me." "I want to thank...[people] who never gave up on me and told me that I was capable of doing many things if I just put effort into it....[school staff] who made sure I had my work donefor all my classes ...helped me
6
get four bridge projects done in five days...and paid for my cap and gown in order for me to walk across the stage at DAR Constitution Hall....[members of the multi-agency team] who helped me with getting my medical insurance ...so I was able to have a gallbladder surgery...and helped with getting my medications, housing, child care, food referrals, and gift cards....n "The KennedyProject isjust amazing.It changespeoples' lives." Dropout Rate
Dropping out of school sets in motion a series of' negative social consequences for dropouts and f'or the
commun!ties St:udents
are
in which
they
live (Fall
&
Roberts,
have rely on
2012;
0ynarski, for
G1eason1 Rangarajan,
and
&
Wood,
1998).
they
without
diploma likely to
greater
public are
risks
earn
less
vvhen
assistance among
heaft,h who
care.The
obtain at on
incarceration students
higher
dropouts families
school
diploma.
When
a cycle
from
low-income
drop
putthemse1ves
vvll l perpetuate
o'f o o v e r ey
Annual
Taole 4 Dropout Rates of MCPS High School Studenu, 2011to2012 Annual Dropout Rate
African Am e r rc e rt
Nation
2011 5.5 <3.0 <3.0 5.0 4.1 3.9 1.9 < 3.0 <3.0
2.3
2012
.r:
<3.0 3.9
nf
e
MCPS
Kennedy
Hispanic
Nation
MCPS
Kennedy Asian
4.4
4.2
Nation..,
-i:
<3.0 <3.0 n/., <3.0 <3.0
In Gr-ad.es n et; avellabfu
MCPS
Kennedy
Wnite
Nation
MCPS
Kennady
Nntron&I dropout; co res1,,1lt;S r reported 1"or public high
12
d1,1rlng the
2010
eeec e
2012
(n/a),
Nationally, to
about out
five
percent year,
of
and
African American
publlc and
high White
school
students
in Grades
12 2013).
drop
each
rates
tvv1ce those
or
Asian
&
Sable,
While the
annual
dropout
MCPS
and
at Kennedy
High School
national
MSDE~alc~!te'I
th
.,,.,nval 'drcpovt.
r:t.9
n.umber
01" dropouts
by nn e
co-cet
enrollment
In Gr6des
9 to 12.
Detll.Jied results
averages,
the
dropout
pattern
American 4).
and
Hispanic
students
dr o p p t nq out
students {Table
One noteworthy
High School that
trend
over the
vvith the
rate
of Hispanic students
the
at Kennedy
suggest dropout
compared
MCPS
rate.
A1though
si9nif'icant1 of the
differences
interventions
may contribute
narrowing
gap in
Hrspanic
rates.
One of the
multi-agency
team
members
p r ovt
of n c vv support African
Ciuster
Project
contributed
to
a long-term
positive
outcome
a 15 .... year
2010.
"Ifirst learned of the case at the Kennedy ClusterProjectwhen hisfather came seeking help in May 2010. Thefather wasfrom Maliin West Africa. He came to the meeting by himself. At that time the father was worried about child's altercationsat school, anger issues, and lack of academicprogress. There was a juvenile case pendingfor the young man, which went to court several times." "In February2013, the young man returned to juvenile court and reported that he had earned a high school diploma, is enrolledat Montgomery College,and is lookingfor a job. The court was so impressed with him, I've never heard of this, the judge came off the bench, closed the case out, and shook his hand.
11
"I was surprised by what happened in court but it is a testament to what can happen. There is the possibilityof success in everyone's life no matter how the situation may look at any one time. If the right resources and support and encouragement get into the young person's life.and he is willingto accept what folks are trying to help him with, he can be successful. I think the help and the support the Kennedy Cluster Project provided was one of the reasons for his success." Mobility
Overall, the research and with theoretical and literature school rootcee.e s that completion, residential mobility urban has detrimental
achievement
high
especially
among
youth
(Voight1
&
Nation,
2012),
Student mobility occurs when students change schools d~ring the school year as rnove, the change In neighborhoods may disconnect them to academic achievement (Leventhal
&
Brooks-Gunn,
2QQQ).
The Kennedy C1usterProject provides Fam I ties with accessto services that make it easier r'o r- th em
in 2011
and
2012,
the mobillty3 rates of Hispanic students vvho attended Kennedy High School vvere
MCPS 2012.
counterparts
(Table
5). The
African American students were lower than the results vvere not statistically significant in
MCPS
MSOE
caiC:ulate<s the
mobility
rate
by dividing (n/r)
els for the school year by the everege deHy enrollment, Results are not eve ueo+e prior to
Detailed
re ss then
five
percent
mobility.
2011.
8
Lack
of" documentation
School
may
contribute
and other
to
among
cfuster.
counselors
members
multi~agency
that may prevent families from accessing support services for issues related to eviction, utility payments,
and other housing crises.
"A lot of my students are not documented so some services are not accessible."
'We work with undocumented community members but we are limited by state andfederal guidelines."
Mobility Rates
of'
Mo bllity Rate
Schoo! vs. School vs.
MCPS
Kennedy
MCPS
-6.6* -2.8* 1 .5 8.1
MCPS
-2.4 -4.0*
MCPS
Kennedy
Asian
MCPS
Kennedy
.r:
8.9
White
MCPS
Kenne-dy
is -statistically slgnif'icent.
6.1 15.0
"" D1ffernce
Addressing mobility prior to high school is essential to stave off long-term school change. Mobility contribute
negatlve consequences of
among elementary students has been linked to learning disadvantages that in the short term and to lower mathematics and reading achievement on
to grade retention
2001;
Mehana
Hinz, Heistad,
t rt mobility
& Masten,
2009).
and elementary schoo1 students in the Kennedy
Wh11ethe
overa11
trends
arnon9 middle
cluster have not changed significantly in the past two years, the case r-e cor ds provide anecdotal evidence that Kennedy C1usterProject activities reduce residential homefess f'amifies to stay in their neighborhoods. mobility and make it easier for low income and
"TheKennedyClusterProjectstarted to wrapservices to keep a family stable and at one middle school. It helped them academically to connect to school. The male student is on the basketball team. Hisgrades have come up, and he was recommended for higherlevelcourses. Hissister has started to achieveas well."
Loss o'f community result in eviction resources is a particular hardship for parents vvho move due to 'financial issues that or homelessness (Kingstey, Smith,
&
Price,
2009;
2012).
The
Kennedy C1usterProject has provided support to reduce mobility among homeless sern utes,
"We had one case of a child who was homeless and was going after school to the Wheaton Libraryto study because that was the only place the family had to go. Theystudied, ate, washed up there, then when the libraryclosed the mother took them to a shelter. The team brought a Jot of support to the family to help with housing,past bills, utilitybills,housing security, and giving the childa home to go to. The child didn't have a home to go to to study. When we provide help with so many of these issues we provide a foundation on which child can build academicsuccess.
11
ClassroomPerformance
Students
other
'failure make
often
face
a complexity
to
of problems
caused
by poverty, Kennedy
social
it dif'f'icu!t
'for them
succeed
in school.
The
C1uster
problems
that
are the
root
causes of the
academic
achievement
gap
in ways that
Interviews
with
team
members
provided
information
about
the
ways
the
Kennedy C1uster
Project
"Certainneeds have to be met before they can focus on academic needs. If they are not eating in the home, their mind is not on school work or homework. Their mind is thinkingabout that they are hungry.
11
"If students' home Jivesare unstable it affects their ability to concentrate. We can bring people together and get families access to things they need and resolvefamily issues.
11
"Often times there are outside factors that impact students' success in school...and [the team can] help to reduce barriersthat interfere with ability to concentrate, attendance, be on time, be motivated to come to school....
11
"When we provide the family with some level of stability with regard to food, living, housing...it allows the child to have a base to begin to focus on their school." "We addressfamily issues that may hinderstudents from being able to focus on school [such as the] chaos of not knowing where your next meal is comingfrom or where you willlive. [Ourhelp]takes pressure and anxiety off the kid and leads to better achievement in school.
11
. [helpingfamilies] has trickleddown to academicsuccess. It is tough to know if it has an immediate academic effect. It has an effect socio-emotionally. Who knows what would have happened if we had not done something. It could be worse."
Counselors
attendance.
provided and
anecdotal
evidence
of the
impact
of the
on students'
academic
perf'ormance,
,ACa he Stu
~'Y of
t:r.e Kenn
>!dy
10
"I've seen kids coming to school that were staying home before." 'The involvement has helped students' situations, grades, coming to school." "There is one family in particular that needed help and did not know where to go. The Kennedy Cluster Project provided assistance to the family as a whole. It got the child back on track and gave the parents a sense of wellbeing. They have utilized everything [the Kennedy Cluster Project] shared with them ....The child is doing a lot better in school now.
0
"One student had a problem with acculturation from Africa and got in trouble with a gun. [The team] supported his mother a lot and he is back at high school and doing average work now.
11
"[He]is doing well. Last quarter there was some concern about one class, but he has all As, and one B. Things have improved [since the multi-agency team provided support six months ago].
11
"[He] is doing pretty well. He is reading on grade level which was a concern earlier in the year."
Social
end
Emotional
lndlcators
While African
the
of the
Kennedy students,
Ciuster
what
Project
has
was
to
focus
on the
barriers project
to
achievement
among of
American that
111spanic
emerged
from
is greater and
awareness
resources impact
promote
academic
resilience.
There is strong
evidence
th.at
social
emotional
factors
academic
outcomes
(After-school
team that
A11iancef
makes foster
2009; At bright,
an important
Weissberg,
contribution
multi-agency to services
access
at-risk
students' likelihood of
&
and
2011;
paying
Murray and
&
Jones,
2000),
with
Participation more
such
as team
higher
sports jobs
mentoring
is correlated Hamann,
positive
(L1eras,
2008;
2013;
&
Pierce,
2007).
risk
Conversely, behavior
spent
predictor
t e n o r e and teenage
(Beuhrlng,
& Jurs, 2002; Ungar & "hanging out" with friends is B1u rn , & Rinehart, 2000).
activities through MCR students Montgomery
The
Kennedy
C1ust:er Project
promotes
engagement services,
in
County range
Department of leisure
(MCR)
collaborations the
opportunities
throughout
interactions
Ciuster
and develop
skills that
the
contribute
to academic resilience.
and fa mi ties to
Data
suggest:
that
the
Kennedy
Project
has increased
access
of students
MCR
services.
"I see actually more families in my center now than I did before [from Kennedy Cluster Project referrals]. 11
11
"...the childrenmany times need an outlet and [MCR}can offer that by giving them something positive to do." "Ihaveformed some friendships with some families that have come through [my MCRprograms].
11
"What has been really helpful is the summer program, the fun center available for youth 5 to 12 years of age that KennedyProjectparticipantscome to." "We have a summer leadershipchallengeprogram whichgives teens [ages 13 to 16} the ability to learnskills they need to be a junior counselorand...is also very important to providethat self esteem piece." Access to Mental HealthServices
Access to students.
mental health
factor
in promoting who
resllience
Between 12 2002).
Most
30
are
percent
of children
are performing
(Becker &
with
associated
disadvantaged
environments.
Even when
rnent at
health
school
personnel
have
"The school system is limited in what we can do...the family therapist can say something that a schoolcounselorcannot say." "Outside therapists see things we don't see in the school. They can do family therapy....The therapist goes to the home...and sees [family}dynamics.
11
During the
the team provided mental health services for students at all grade levels. well despite considerable personal emotional
r
highlight the extent of' the soet at ernot.t o rr at challenges students faced while
A year
had been
the mother's
rr
official, fled
imprisoned
and sentenced
Same
family
members
the country.
For the past eight months, the mother and her son had been living in one room
of a friend's apartment in Silver Spring. The fate of her husband and the
vvhereabouts of her oldest child in Africa were unknown.
"When I had her I was in high school. I was raped.... I haven't been with her as a parent since she was 6 months old." The babywas raisedby her 9rand parents in
Cameroon. mother
In
her
young uncle with whom she grew up, and who was like a sibling to her, was shot
and killed. "When [my daughter]came, she did not talkfor 2 weeks. She did not
know me....After the shooting she started saying that she might take her
12
life...that she does not deserve to Jive. Most of the time she is depressed and won't say anything." Beliefsabout the Future-Hope
Hope is a trait that is characterized
about
to
plan For
Tarter,
about
&
Hoy,
2006).
to
f'eel that
there
are adults
in their.
lives
who
care
them
and when
abilities
solutions job
a good
graduate (Gallup,
2013).
vvho cluster attended in the 'fall
On
schools in the
students
Kennedy
of
2012
rated their
same
feelings
as
of hope at
average
about
the
levels
the
MCPS
that
ratings for
students
at the
same
2).
Kennedy
fost:ered and their
Project
of hope
Figure 2.
Result$
of
2012 G.nup
MCPS.
survey or
student
ratings
or hope ebout
fa m n re s .
One create team hope is by providing students more and equitable families to access access to social
way
the and
team
works
to
meetings and
give
help
address report
problems
provide
referrals
appropriate
services.
Team
members
"A huge barrieris Jackof knowledge about what is out there and what is available.They just need a little bit of help [about]where they couldgo." "[We] identify students and families who are facing challenges inside or outside the
school system and come together to alleviate those problems."
"So many people are right at the edge of falling through the safety net. A lot of times there is a window where you are eligibleand if you don't apply at that time it willfall through. If the family doesn't thinkabout it, the thinqs we takefor granted don't work." "We frequently have those moments when clients [tell us they] are grateful for our assistance". "Parentsfeel hopeful after hearingeveryone...say what they can do to help." Wellbeing
Wellbeing wellbeing involves is a strong how individuals of think academic about and experience their Perez1 lives (Gallup,
2013).
Student
predictor
success
(A1va,
1991;
Espinoza,
Ramos,
Coronado,
&
13
Cortes,
more
2009;
Waxman,
to learn
Gray,
and do
&
Padron,
2003;
Waxman,
vvhen they
Padron,
are
Shin,
&
Rivera,
and
2008).
Children
are
they
available
better
in school
happy,
healthy,
confident that
have family
(Ga11up1
2013).
On
average,
in the
students Kennedy
who
attended
in 'fall
schools
cluster
2012
levels
the
MCPS
[McesMSA::::.:-1
i MCPS HS /w,., v
averages levels
at
the The or
same
grade
3).
of this
cluster
'finding
schools
that
Kennedy
Cruster
Project
contributes
to student
G. fS S..- . ES B.,,P ES
Figure 3.
wellOe!ng,
who
An
Ge11up
surv0y
of"
student. rt!ngs
or
e ve r eu
important step l n that process ls to roster trusting relationships between families, Data suggest that the multi-agency team processes and follow-up build
the school, and the community. trust and enhance wellbeing. from a necvvo r-x that
The
trustlng relationships increase the likelihood that 'Familieswill benefit information, and support that parents can access to
is a source of connection,
create more positive home environments for themselves and their children,
"To help the child, you need to help the families. All the multi-agency representatives are there to help the families be more self sufficient, learn parentingskills,and get resources." "Theprogram began in 2007 with the goal to providesupport to help students achieve their academic potential. But...what I've observed is that for so many of the childrenin the Kennedy cluster and Montgomery County in general, some part of the academic issue, large or small, is based on so many of the other things that surround them likefood insecurity,homelessness, domestic violence, foreclosures... When we provide the family with some level of stability with regard tofood, living,housing, it allows the child to have a base to begin to focus on theirschool." Student and FamilyEngagement
Student engagement in learning activities and the broader school environment is a strong predictor o'f of Students' prior performance or ability (F;nn & Rock, 1997; fantuzzo, 2012; Gonzalez & Padilla, 1997; Masten, Best, & Garmezy, 1990; Reyes & Jason, 1993; Waxman, Padron, Shin, & Rivera, 2008). Students are more likely to be engaged at school when they f ee! sa'fe encouraged, and welcome (Gallup, 2013). The Kennedy Ciuster Project works to enhance academic resilience regardless LeBoeuf, Rouse,
&
Chen,
student
engagement
by providing
mentoring
f'oster school
14
share fears
encourage
and
problems
and to
make connections
with
people
in the
community
who
help
and
them.
Nationally,
and
in
MCPS,
student
engagement
is highest
among elementary
students
and lowest
among
(figure
feelings
4). On
of
2012
rated
their
engagement
MCPS
grade
averages
for students
at the same
levels.
parents,
no
.fl 37
more
likely
higher
grades1
graduate, programs
and enroll
Jn
postsecondary
(Henderson
&
L MS
parents
are
e s p e cl e t+y whose
language differences
figure 4.
Rsults
of
2012 Ganup
su~vy
of studnt
rtings
of sel'\001
important families
Hispanic challenged
students by
barriers
and Fear,
cultural
(Emerson,
The Kennedy Ciuster Project
multi-agency
Fox,
who
&
Sanders,
2012).
in
team includes
are instrumental
care coordinator
to use available
resources to
enhance
their
we11-being.
These
team
members
explained
some of the
barriers
that
"[Manyparents] are afraid, undocumented, scared, have a language barrier ....or are afraid of how information willbe used.u "Some Hispanicfamilies worry about getting a green card if they accept help from the government."
"{one Hispanicparent] thought they would take her to jail [if she talked about the reasonfor her child's truancy]."
"Onemother was homeless with her seven kids and was afraid to tell the school because she thought her kids would be taken away." "When families come in they are overwhelmed with emotions and fear of the unknown." "Oneof the biggest things I saw with a family when Ifirst started and walked in [to the multi-agencymeeting] with her, Isaid to her, 'Ifat any point you want me to ask them to stop let me know.' I saw the fear that was in her eyes when she saw that big groupof people.
11
!5
"Now when I bring them into the room [for the multi-agency team meeting], I say 'Don't get overwhelmed, we are here to support you and link to different resources and see what resourcesyou need.' So I set it up so when they walk in they are prepared."
The last meet:ing of t ne
2013
academic
year
provided
an
example
of
how
multi-agency
team
engagement over the course of the academic year built trust with, and enhanced hope and well-being for, a Hispanic family with a history of domestic violence.
In November,
winter
clothing,
team
~n May,
the
tears,
team
26 years of
past show
domestic vlolence.
was
Her
in the to
but
agency team helped this mother make the contacts she needed to access legal
and social services. In June; the With the
help of' her Spanish translator, she thanked the team f'or their support.
After the last meeting I gained strength and knew that I was not by myself. I got out of my home. My childrenhave changed a lot and are doing better in school. [TheKennedy ClusterProjectcare coordinator]is helping me get my children into summer school programs...J feel stronger and more independent. I couldn't do it by myself. I thank all of youfor your support."
u From Multiple Agencies to a Multi-Agency Team
In 2007,
gaps in
the Kennedy Ctuster Project began to identif'y and address the root causes of' the achievement
MCPS.
Implementing
solutions
to those
root
causes required
multi-agency
team collaboration
about students and their families pfaee restrictions for on the ability
among various service providers. Federal of agencies to County Govern share anything beyond
directory County
;nformation. Ponce
and
In 2008, attorneys
Justice1 vvorked with
MCPS,
Montgomery
appropriate
agency heads to
develop
Understanding
(MQLJ) to
ro r- many
fn
2009,
plans
recommended
Kennedy Ciuster
Project
interventions
muJtl~agency team,
Mr.
Donald
Kress representing
MCPS
school work
year.
team
2007 to 2012
observations
of the
at
in 2012
2013
An
was em bedded
development an
MCPS
lnto
MQLJ
between
a multi-agency
and interdependence,
16
service delivery.
resources and
T earn
utilization
members
of a
greater
their
professional
capacity
services to children
and families.
Ciuster
to
Project
and
alfovvs their
schools
to
take
advantage
of
who
more
coordinatedwith the to
strategy
program
r o rTor
reaching several
children
families. sessions
School counselors
reported
have
worked
and
attended
training
increased a
access
directly
resources
deal with
specific
issues that
do not require
mu!t:J-agency intervention.
"The multi-agency team has held training sessions so that school staff can learn more about county resources available for their students.
11
"The [training] workshop with representatives from different organizations ...was very helpful in getting counselors the resources they could use.
11
"The counselor does not always have the information and connections to answer questions parents have .... [Now] when we talk to parents and teachers we know what services {are available].
11
"It was an eye-opener for the Pupil Personnel Workers.... We became more aware of what services we can offer ourfamilies.
JI
"My previous job looked at welfare services. I didn't know what the achievement gap was about.
JI
"Being a member of the multi-agency team] opened my eyes up to things I was not aware of before. I knew we had county recreation department, for example, but didn't know what they offer." "I have learned so much about the services [other agencies] provide. " "Sitting at the meetings and hearing the members talk about what is available has been an education for all of us." Building Trusting and Interdependent Professional Relationships
Over
would the not
past
rt ve years,
team
members the
have
built
that
typically
have been
possible
without
opportunity
"We developed an ongoing relationship ... we did not have before. " "{Over the years] we began to know who to call and who we can get help from." "I keep their phone numbers near and dear." "It is a lot easier to coordinate services when you can put a face with a name."
17
18
Discussion
Students
in
Kindergarten small
through it
Grade
12 spend
about
20
percent
of' their
waking
hours
in school4.
Given that
percentage,
is not surprising
that
schools
across the
of other
are essential
the
to
provide
gap.
access to
opportunities
that
achievement
team collaboration
reduced
between
and among the school system and county departments more efficient their families delivery of educational
and agencies.
resulted in
and community-based
during and beyond the school day. Services included academic support
to social services and programs that: addressed basic needs related health care, counseling, leisure and recreational activities, and legal aid.
ec o o
insecurity,
A1though academic gaps have not closed, there is evidence that the Kennedy C1usterProject Is making a difference. Statistical and anecdotal evidence suggest that the Kennedy C1uster Project contributed
Trends in graduation were higher and more equitable at Kennedy High Dropout rates of Hispanic students were significantly lower than in
2012
In addition, data showed that the Kennedy Ciuster Project contributed and performance among students at all the cluster
most
rn e y be on
correlated
academic resilience
and achievement,
anecdotal reports provide evidence that program benefits included htgher rates of participation
extra-
curricular activities among students at risk, better accessto mental health services, greater engagement of Hispanic families, and more posit:ive feelings of hope and we11-beir"lg.
For the multi-agency team, the achievement gap is no 1onger rner-e t y problem. Ciosing the achievement gap requires the commitment
of' multiple
vision for how to better deliver social and educational services to students and their 'families. past five years, the Kennedy Ciuster Project has contributed More needs to be done. But because of the commitment
'ta
Over the
of' the- problem, the future- offers promise of continued progress tovvatd a solution,
4 Based
on
where
students
16 ho1,.1rs nd
e:s:tP
for
hours
on
overeg:e.
19
References
Alliance.
Retrieved
I., Weissberg,
L.A.
(2011).
School-Family partnership
children's
social, emotional,
and Youth Violence
Growth. Newton,
Education
Development
A1va,
S. A. (1991}.
B. E., &
Academic
invulnerability
among Mexican-American
students:
The importance
protective
Beck.er,
resources
and appraisals.
HispanicJournalofBehavioralSciences,
Social-emotional e ece c r-s affecting
13(1), 18-34.
achievement outcomes among
Luthar,
S. S. (2002}. &
dil;advantaged 8euhr1ng,
students:
gap.
P.
M.
Structure.
Bryan,
e o uc e et c n a r r-ee uf e rrce
schoor-
J.,
Heaven,
P. C., &
grades
(2007).
and attributional
style
on adolescents'
school
and emotional
Journal of Research in
(1987).
Fa mm es and schools.
M., G1eason,
P,
RangaraJan,
&
Wood,
R. G.
Mathematica
L.,
Fear.
J.,
(2012}.
Bureau:
Lessons f'rom
Epstein,
research.
A report
f'or
Ch11drenand Youth
(ARACY) r-or
Phi De/ta
the Family""Senoo!
and Community
J.L. (1995).
School/family/community
partnerships:
we share.
Roberts,
G. (2012).
High
school
dropouts:
Interactions
between
social
context,
self"-
and student
dropout.
J.,
H., &
Chen,
C.
C.
(2012).
boys: A city-wide,
community-based
investigation
D. A. (1997).
Student
Journal of
T. (2001).
stability,vs.
2006.
Ga11up.
(2013).
students.
Washington,
20
Gonzalez,
R., &
Padilla,
A. M. (1997).
K.
The academic
resilience
of"
Mexican American
action:
high school
students'!
&
Grif'fin,
A.
(2011).
Opportunity
and
Harvard
A. T.. &
(SEDL). K., Tarter,
Mapp,
K.
L. (2002).
community
Laboratory Hoy, W.
connections
on student
A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and achievement. Austin: Southwest: Educat1ona1 Development:
C.
J., &
Hoy, A. W.
(2006).
Academic
of' schools:
A f'orce
for student
J..
Marshall,
A.,
&
Perez,
P. (2011). Programs
Kids in School:
A Study
Examining Rates.
Long-Term
of Afterschool
Enrichment 6(1).
on Students'
High School
Dropout
G. T.,
T.,
Smith,
R.
&
Price,
D.
(2009).
Institute.
&
Brooks-Gunn,
J.
(2000).
The neighborhoods
they
of neighborhood
outcomes.
C. (2008). Do
and behaviors
in high
The contribution
o'f noncognitive
'factors
differences
in educational
attainment
and earnings.
&
Garmezy,
1\1.
(1990).
Resilience
and development:
Contributions 425-444.
from t:he
or children
who overcome A.
adversity. (2004).
Mehana,
J.
School
Children and
Murray resources.
S., Mucherah, W., & Jones, D. S. (2000). Understanding Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR),5(1-2),
The role
of' social
Obradovic,
J.,
Long,
Chan, C.
K., Hinz,
E., Helstad,
D., &
Masten,
achievement of homeless and highly mobile children in an urban school district: Longitudinal
and resilience.
W., Espinoza,
R., Ramos,
&
Cortes,
R.
(2009).
undocumented
Latino students.
exam
In i
ng ra cuo rs
associated
with
academic
success 'for
22(1),
C.,
Hamann,
M. S., and
&
Jurs,
S. G. (2002). synthesis
Evaluations or findings.
of after-school
of methoda1og1es
narrative
Strnwe11, R., and Sa b1e, J. (2013). Public School Graduates and Dropouts from the Common Core of Data: School Year 2009-10: First look (Provisional Data) (NCES 2013-309rev). U.S. Department of' Ectucation.
Washington, DC; Nationa~ Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved 'from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch,
21
Ungar,
M., &
Liebenberg,
L. (2013).
Pierce,
Contextual
22
Appendix
2012-2013 School
Programs
at Kennedy
Ciuster
Project
Schools
c ::.::
" " c
),
O!
<(
-J
a:
co
c ,, ei c 0
c
<:)
--*
Professional Development Programs
.
0
'-'- 0
s:
v v
L
</)
Posit.lv Behoviorol
end
Support:.s {PSIS)
and
Magnet: Progremis
Business Studies
*
(18) D1p1om& Progrem
me
Training Institute
Mul'tJmedia
Novel Junior Reurve Orncer Training Corps (NJROTC) Navo I Ju n io r Reserve Omcer Tr sining Corps (NJROTC)
Duef Language School for Digital Design
and
Development
Academic
Support-locl!lll Support-Federel
I Funds
H.,ad
Scart
Resource {K-5)
Reading/lenguage Ruth Arts Program Ra1&$Reeding Program Dream Academy - 21st Century
*
Com muni1:.y Grant
Pr"ograms
One
Schoot-Bssed Sacond&ry
Eiement:ary Learning
Av't.i-sm
Leernlng end Academia
DisDbiHties
Girted and
Emotional
T alented/Leorning
Disebi!itles
01sebled
Programs
Com ro o nwe
T utorng
School Model
the BeJI
* *
Co1.mi:.y Public
Schoo1/CommunityB"sad
A Case St:udy of
the
23
Page 1of4
~{~,i!{jlli~
_
Objectives/Activities
t 11-21-08 I K dv Clust p tati Pl .itt:at,fe~icdisn_ari/y_ in the Ken)iedfcluster olschools between Afl'ica"B _C.qn :a11'il-Other studentsi-
Cost Estimate
Timeline
Expected Results
Obj. 1: There will be an increase in the use of equitable practices. a. Develop cultural competency for employees and nonprofits. $tbd 9/08continue HHS/OCP/REC Cultural training for employees and non-profits who work in the Kennedy Cluster. Argyle MS will be included in the next middle school cohort of the MCPS Professional Learning Communities Institute. Kennedy HS should be included in the first cohort if/when a high school PLC! curriculum is developed. The responsible offices, principals of the Project schools, and MCEA will agree to staffing policies, procedures, and incentives that will enhance the quality of staff in the Project schools.
b. Include Project secondary schools in the MCPS Professional Leaming Communities Institute
July 2009
$0
2/2/09 4/1/09
Obj. 2: There will be improved student health & well-being. a. Expand Linkages to Learning to all project middle and elementary schools FY'lO (startup. year) - $1,122,591; Year2: $1,358,956 (see attached estimate
I I
#1
b. Schedule fall vision and hearing screenings. 775 students will be screened
$0
Full implement ation of all sites within 6 months of funding becoming available (i.e. 7/1/09111II0). 8/19/0812/31/08
HHS-School Health
$0 Vaccines free
8/26/2008 are
-
HHS-School Health
9119/08
$115,000
Summer
MCPS Food
Non-academic barriers to learning will be addressed for identified students via delivery of prevention, case management, and/or mental health services that seek 12 improve social/emotional well-being, school functioning, and family self-sufficiency. Serves all children/.families in lem and Middle schools. Students will be referred as needed to specialist and will be seated in front of class. Serves all children/families in Elem, Middle, and High School schools. Students who need vac's will have access/all students will be in compliance Serves all children/families in Elem, Middle, and High School schools. Summer Open Lunch
Page 2of4
Programs would operate at Kennedy HS, Argyle MS, Georgian Forest, Bel Pre and Strathmore ESs, with MCPS circulator busses serving each site.
Obj. 3: There will be more parent engagement. a. Providea Parent OutreachCoordinatorat each targetedschool (.5 FTE) $303,811 (annually) salariesand benefitsfor five 0.5 FTE 12monthpositions FY IO MCPS Office of School Performance & Dept. of Family & Community Partnerships Improvedcommunication betweenparents and their child's school Increasedparent involvement at each school On-goingparenteducation opportunitiesat each school Improvedstudentattendance Reductionin student suspensions Increasedstudent achievement Parentswill report an increasedawarenessof how to accesscountyservices
Obj. 4: There will be more students ready to learn. a. Increase universal pre-school opportunities for all 3- and 4-year olds 516,522 fY09 HHS/ESC/MCPS All children ready to learn schoolas definedby the MarylandState Departmentgf Education(MSDE)Children Readyto Learn.da!!!,
#2
Obj. 5: There will be sustained collaboration among partners in providing information and communication that work with Kennedy Cluster students. a. Conduct resource fairs. $800 (printing, water, light refreshments, giveaways for children/famil ies) $43,800 ($20,000 for printing, equipment rental, food, logistics, promotional needs; $23,800 for overtime pay for staff to process extra applications resulting from Resource/Ben efits Fair) Nov 2009 HHS will lead and solicit participation from other relevant private or government reps.
Sept/Oct 2010
HHS will lead but will also solicit participation and resources from other relevant private and community service providers.
150participants attendingthe fair At least20% of the people attendingthe fair will receiveapplicatons to lffiS programs. 20% of benefits applicationsare to be returnedto lffiS within 60 daysof completionof fair At least 15programswill bring informationto the fair. At least 50 % of the attendeeswill completea Surveyto help understandusefulnessof information,and to informthe Benefits EnrollmentFair planned for Fall of2009.
Implementation
Page 3 of 4
# of people referred to services and programs; #of applications completed and submitted at Fair; # of applications approved for services # exhibitors and programs participating
b. Co-locate Gilchrist and Rocking Horse Centers. c. Develop inter-Agency MOU for information sharing.
TBD $0
7109 5/08-10/08
HHS/MCPS
$0
10/08-1010
HHS
Gov't will be able to provide more effective and efficient services through info sharing. Shared project accountability/shared problem solving among azencies
Obj. 6: There will be a rich out-of-schoolenvironment for students. ~ully operationalize Excel Beyond the Bell (EBB) **345,330 FY 2009 and FY 2010 Collaboration Council as the intermediary with a Partnership Group that includes Recreation; DHHS;CUPF; and several other public & private agency representation Increased number of youth participating in quality programs; 2. Increase in the variety quality programs and opportunities; 3.Better allocation of public and private resources to fit comm. needs and youth preferences; 4. Increased funding and sustainability of programs and2}:'.stem infrastructure--All resulting in positive youth development, including physical, social/emotional and academic/iritell~tual growth. The availability of technology within the Project area will be increased through the distribution of refurbished MCPS computers to qualifying families.
#3
ES Coordination and partner building: 300 youth Estimated number of new "slots" to serve children and youth: At least 100-125 (based on $2000-2500/youth for $250,000 requested) Estimated number of out-of-school time providers who participate in professional development activities & accountability (program performance data collection): at least 20 Estimated number of youth impacted by these providers: At least 600 (average of30 youth/provider) b. Provide Refurbished Computers. $20,000 2,000 computers@ $10 each. 1/09
ot
$15,000
FY'lO
Regional Youth Service Center, MCPD, MCPS, HHS, Rec, Collaboration Council, MCPL
Increasedparticipationfrom representativesfromthe public,private,and non-profit sectors( 3 in each areaper meeting) Increaseyouthparticipation (by I0 studentsper meeting) Increasedknowledgeof communityresourcesand assets (participantsto receive no less thantwo additional availableopportunities)We average about 60 (at least 20 of those at students) people
Page 4 of 4
per meeting - 4 meetings per year -- 240 people per year
Program.
$80,000
FY'lO
Rec/DED/OHR
#of youth placed in jobs Skills learned # of job opportunities # of job fairs career knowledge
$60,000 $28,649
After-School Activities Coordinator: $8,049 (using the same stipendas the currentmiddle schoolAthletic Coordinator: $2,683) - Excel Beyondthe Bell alreadyprovides such a positionfor ArgyleM.S. Activity Busses: $20,600 ($75 per activitybus per day; providing service 3 days per week for 32 weeks
FY'lO ASAP
# of programs # of youth served Provide I activity bus to each elementary school and 2 to the middle school for 3 days per week for an additional 4 weeks.
Obj. 7: There will be a decrease in the involuntary housingrelated factors that lead to student mobility. a. . As a component of the Housing First Initiative, collaborate with landlords, property managers and property management firms to engage them in activities that will help them effectively intervene with tenants who are in danger of being evicted. $0 FY 09 HHS/SNH compiling the number of evictions in the Kennedy Cluster area the numbers of meetings held and the feedback received from landlords
b.
Collaborate with HHS Homeless Services to provide housing support for families 30 to 35 families at a time
$101,757
FY09
HHS/SNH
#3
Total $2,989645
Evaluation of project 150,000
TOTAL $3,139,645.00
**EBtB does not include transportation costs or leased space *L TL- includes full 5 day sites at each school with infrastructure