0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
30 tayangan1 halaman
Tranexamic acid (TXA) is well-established as an antifibrinolitic agent commonly used in major orthopedic surgery. However the frequency of postoperative complications in spine fusion surgery due to the use of TXA has not been well documented.
Tranexamic acid (TXA) is well-established as an antifibrinolitic agent commonly used in major orthopedic surgery. However the frequency of postoperative complications in spine fusion surgery due to the use of TXA has not been well documented.
Tranexamic acid (TXA) is well-established as an antifibrinolitic agent commonly used in major orthopedic surgery. However the frequency of postoperative complications in spine fusion surgery due to the use of TXA has not been well documented.
Tranexamic acid (TXA) is well-established as an antibrinolitic
agent commonly used in major orthopedic surgery. However the frequency of postoperative complications in spine fusion surgery due to the use of TXA has not been well documented. Results TXA Non TXA TXA Non TXA TXA Non TXA TXA Non TXA Postoperative anemization (g/dl) Blood units
Material & Methods - Prospectively study - n = 59 patients underwent posterior spinal fusion. - Statistical analysis: bivariate and a logistic regression model Intravenous tranexamic acid protocol 1st: 10 minutes before skin incision: 10-15mg/kg bolus 2nd: Until the end of the intervention: 2 mg / Kg /h continuous infusion TXA Non- TXA Sex Age BMI ASA Charlson Diagnosis Levels instrumented Type of surgery Operative time Independent Variables Perioperative complications Intrapostoperative blood loss Transfusion requirements Local and systemics complications Hospital lenght stay Dependent variables Figure 1: Seroma Figure 2: Seroma Conclusions
The use of intravenous tranexamic acid in spinal fusion surgery increases the frequency of postoperative seroma 41,17% vs 14,3% with a statistically signicant difference (p = 0,039) Theres differences between both groups regard to: Increase hospital length stay Reduction blood loss transfusion requirements Reduction intraoperative blood loss References Aguilera-Roig X, Jordn-Sales M, Natera-Cisneros L et al. cido tranexmico en ciruga ortopdica. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 2014;58:52- 6. Li ZJ, Fu X, Xing D,et al. Is tranexamic acid effective and safe in spinal surgery? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Spine J. 2013 Sep;22(9):1950-7. Yang B, Li H, Wang D et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative intravenous tranexamic acid use in spinal surgery. PLoS One. 2013;8(2) Farrokhi MR, Kazemi AP, Eftekharian HR, et al. Efcacy of prophylactic low dose of tranexamic acid in spinal xation surgery: a randomized clinical trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2011 Oct;23(4):290-6. Tse EY, Cheung WY, Ng KF et al. Reducing perioperative blood loss andallogeneic blood transfusion in patients undergoing major spine surgery. J BoneJoint Surg Am. 2011 Jul 6;93(13):1268-77 Shapiro F,Zurakowski D, Sethna NF. Tranexamic acid diminishes intraoperative blood loss and transfusion in spinal fusions for duchenne muscular dystrophyscoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Sep 15;32(20): 2278-83 Wong J, El Beheiry H, Rampersaud YR et al. Tranexamic Acid reduces perioperative blood loss in adult patients having spinal fusion surgery. Anesth Analg. 2008 Nov;107(5):1479-86 Elwatidy S, Jamjoom Z, Elgamal E, et al A.Efcacy and safety of prophylactic large dose of tranexamic acid in spine surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Nov 15;33(24): 2577-80. Efcacy and safety of tranexamic acid in spinal fusion surgery Cervn A.M, Pascual F.J. Rodrguez J.M , Ortega J.A. Andrs-Cano P, Guerado E. Departament of Orthopedic Surgery. Hospital Costa del Sol, University of Mlaga. Marbella. Mlaga. Spain. Objective To determinate if intravenous tranexamic acid is a modicable risk factor in: Development of perioperative complications Hospital length stay TXA Non TXA Seroma Surgical site infection Reintervention Urinary tract infection Deep vein thrombosis p = 0,671 p = 0,476 p = 0, 721