Solutions:

1(a) (i) 1 2i z = + , w =1 +bi

2 2
1 i 1 2i
1 2i 1 2i
(1 i)( 1 2i)
1 2
1 2 i( 2 )
5
w b
z
b
b b
+
=
+
+
=
+
+ +
=


2 3
Im( )
5 5
2 3 1
w b
z
b b

= =
+ = =


(ii) arg( ) arg(( 1 2i)(1 i)) 2.82 zw = + = (GC)
(b)
i
1
2 i
e
z
= +
1
1
1
1
i tan
i( i )
2
1
i tan
i
2
1
i tan
i
2
e 5e
e 5e
e e 5e
a b
a b
b a

+
+

=
=
=

Comparing :
e 5,
1
ln5
2
b
b
=
=
and
1
1
tan
2
a

=

2 (a)


0
0
d d
2 2
a
a
a a
x x k x x

=
} }


2 2
1 3 1 1
( )( ) 2 ( )
2 2 2 22 2
1
4
4
a a
a a a k a
a ka
k
+ =
=
=


2
a
x
a - a
y

2 (b)
(i)
2
d
( sin2 )
d
x x
x
=
2
2 sin2 2 cos2 x x x x +
(ii)
2 2
(2 cos2 2 sin2 )d sin2 x x x x x x x + =
}


2 2
2
2
2
(2 cos2 ) d 2 sin2 d sin2
[ cos2 cos2 d ] sin2
1
[ cos2 sin2 ] sin2
2
1
cos2 sin2 sin2
2
x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x
x x x x x C
x x x x x C
= +
= +
= + + +
= + +
} }
}


2 2
1 1 1
(2 cos2 ) d cos2 sin2 sin2
2 4 2
x x x x x x x x C = + +
}



3(a)
1
0 0
0 1
1 2
2 3
1 1
1 1
e e
2 1
1 1
e e
2 1
1 1
e e
3 2
1 1
e e
4 3
.....
1 1 1
e e e
2 1 2
N N
n n
n
n n
N N N
u
n n
N N N

= =




| |
= +
|
+ +
\ .
= +
+ +
+ +
+
+ + =
+ + +


( )
( )
2
1
1
e 1 1 ...... 2
2!
N
N
N N
+
+
= + + + + > +
1 1
1
1 1 1
e e 0
e 2 2
N N
N
N N

+
= < >
+ +

Hence
0
0
N
n
n
u
=
>

Alternatively, sketch the graph of
1
1
e
2
x
y
x

=
+
for x > 0. The graph
shows that y >0 and hence
0
0
N
n
n
u
=
>

for N >0


3(b)
Let
n
P be the statement
1
1
1
n
r
n
r r
=
=
+

for all n
+
e

When n =1, LHS =
1
1
1
= . RHS =1.
LHS =RHS
1
P is true.





Assume
k
P is true for some k
+
e , ie
1
1
1
k
r
k
r r
=
=
+

.
We need to show
1 k
P
+
is true, ie
1
1
1
1
1
k
r
k
r r
+
=
= +
+

LHS =
1
1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
k k
r r
r r r r k k
+
= =
= +
+ + + +


( )
( )
1
1
1 1
1
1 1
1
1 1
1 RHS
1
k
k k
k k k
k k
k k k
k k
k k k
k
k k
= +
+ +
+ + +
=
+ +
+ + +
=
+ +
+ + +
= = + =
+ +



1 k
P
+
is true.
Since
1
P is true and
k
P is true
1 k
P
+
is true. by mathematical
induction,
n
P is true for all n
+
e .

1 1 1
1 1 1
1 2
n n n
r r r
r r r r r
= = =
> =
+ +


1 1
1 1
2
2
n n
r r
n n
r r
= =
< <



Hence A =2
4(a)





range of values of k is 2or 3 k k s > .





x =3
(2,0)
(0,3)
(-1,0)
y =0
y =-2

4(b)
f ( |2 1|) y x =

















(ii)



















Scale by factor 2 parallel to the x- axis followed by translation by -1 unit in
the direction of x-axis.




















A (3,0)
B (1,1)
y =3
x
y x =1
f ( ) y x =

5 Divide the student population into 2 mutually exclusive subgroups for
example males and females.
Interview any 100 males and 100 females to get a sample size of 200.

List the students in order. By method of counting off, we divide the 1800
students into 200 intervals, each interval with 9 students.
Within the 1
st
interval, choose a random start from the 1
st
to 9
th
student
(inclusive), then take the 9
th
student thereafter.

6
(i) Number of ways =
15
3003
5
| |
=
|
\ .


(ii) Number of ways =
10
15
2
1
3 75072
0
0 =
| |

|
\ .



(iii) Number of ways =
6
15 13
2
2 6
11531520
| || |
|
=
|
\ .\ .
.








7(a) 18.7
80 79.065
20
x

= + =
2
2 2
1 ( 18.7)
[102.5 ] 4.4745 (2.11530)
19 20
s

= = =

1
: 80
: 80
o
H
H

=
<

at the 5% level of significance
test statistic:
~ (19)
X
T t
s
n

=
.
reject
o
H if p <0.05.

79.065 80
2.1153
20
cal
t

=

p =0.03138
As p =0.03138 <0.05, we reject H
o
and conclude that there is significant
evidence that the manufacturers claim is not justified at 5% level of
significance.

Assume that the mass of the buns follow a normal distribution.























(b)
o
2
is known to be 10
2
g ,
~ (80, 0.5) X N or
80
~ (0,1)
0.5
x
Z N

=
At 5% level of significance, reject H
o
if z <-1.645

80
1.645 78.84
0.5
x
x

< <



B1


A1

8

(i)















(ii)




(iii)




As the points do not lie close to a straight lineso linear model is not
suitable.

0.998 r = .
0.998 r = is closer to 1 than the given value which is 0.937 r = .
Hence this model is more appropriate than part (i).


regression line y on t
2.75083 1.66441 y t = +
ln 2.75083 1.66441 x t = +
When x=0.5, ln(0.5) 2.75083 1.66441
0.857
t
t
= +
=

0.857 t =
As t is a controlled variable, we can only use regression line y on t
regardless of whether y is being estimated from t or vice versa.
























t
x

9

(i) Prob reqd =
2 2 21 1 2 4
( 1)
3 3 3 3 33 9
p p p + + = +


(ii) Since 0 1 p < < , thus
4 8
9 9
P < <

(iii) For the match to be fair, P =
1
2
.
Thus
1
8
p = .

(iv)
( )
2
Prob Reqd P(A wins | A won second s
2 1 2
( ) ( )( )( )
3 3 3
4
1
et)
2
2 2
9
p
p
p
p
+
+
' =
=
+
=
+



























A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
2
3

2
3

1
3

1
3

2
3

p
p
1- p
1- p

10(i)






(ii)












(iii)








(iv)
Let A be the mass of an avocado.
( )
2
115 9 A N ~ ,
( ) P 110 115 021074 X < < = .
Required prob= ( )( )
2
3 021074 05 . .
=0.158

Let K be the mass of a kiwi.
( )
2
82 K N o ,
( )
( )
P 90 01055
P 90 08945
X
X
> =
< =
.
.


90 82
P 08945 Z
| |
< =
|
o
\ .
.
8
12508 =
o
.
640 o = . (AG)

( ) ( )
1 2 1 2 3
2
1 1
509 32492
5 5 5
K K A A A
N
+ + + +
| |
|
\ .
, .
( )
1 2 1 2 3
1018 129968
5
K K A A A
N
+ + + +
. , .
1 2 1 2 3
100 0691
5
K K A A A
P
+ + + + | |
> =
|
\ .
.

Let ( ) ( )
1 2 1 2 3
0012 0015 T K K A A A = + + + + . .
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
2 2 2 2
0012 164 0015 345 0012 640 0015 9 T N + + . . , . . .
( ) 7143 0024123 T N . , .
( ) 099 P T a s > .
75403 a > .
lease value of a =8












11 A suitable condition is (either):
(a) The average number of prank call received is constant throughout the
workday and the calls occurs randomly or
(b) The average number of prank call received over non-lapping time
intervals.





(i) Let X be the r.v for the number of prank calls received in a workday,
i.e. X ~P(8)
( )
( )
P 5 0.19124
0.191 3sig. fig.
X s =
=



(ii) Let Y be the r.v for the number of workdays with at most 5 prank calls,
i.e. Y ~B(n, 0.19124)
P(Y

>

2) >0.755
1 P(Y

s

1) >0.0.755
P(Y s

1) <0.245
Using GC: n >

14
Hence, the least value of n is 14 workdays.



(iii) Let U be the r.v. for the number of prank calls received in an hour
i.e U ~P(1).

Using Central Limit Theorem for large n,
( )
1 2 80
........ 1
= ~N 1, approximately.
80 80
P 1.2 0.036819
0.0368
U U U
U
U
+ + +
| |
|
\ .
> =
=


Alternative solution:
1 2 80
........ U U U + + + ~P(80)
( ) ( )
( )
1 2 80
1 2 80
P U 1.2 ....... 96
1 ....... 96
0.035591
0.0356
P U U U
P U U U
> = + + + >
= + + + s
=
=



(iv) P(X >5) =1 P(X s5) =1 0.19124 =0.80876


P(a police report is made in a week) =P(M T W Th or T W Th F or M T
W Th F)
( ) ( ) ( )
( )
4 5
2 0.80876 0.19124 0.80876
0.50966
0.510 3sig. fig.
= +
=
=








[M1]


[A1]
(v) Let V be the r.v. denoting the number of weeks in a year where police
reports are made, i.e. V ~B(52, 0.510)
Since n =52 is large
np =52(0.510) =26.52 >5
nq =25.48 >5
i.e. V ~N(26.52, 12.9948) approximately

( )
( )
( )
P( ) 0.204
1 P 0.204
P 0.796
0.5 26.52
P 0.796 (continuitycorrection)
12.9948
0.5 26.52
0.82741
12.9948
30.003
> >
< >
< <
| |
< <
|
\ .

<
<
V k
V k
V k
k
Z
k
k

Hence, the least value is k =30 weeks.

Alternative Solution:

Let V be the r.v. denoting the number of weeks in a year where police
reports are made, i.e. V ~B(52, 0.50967)
Since n =52 is large
np =52(0.50967) =26.503 >5
nq =25.497 >5
i.e. V ~N(26.503, 12.995) approximately

( )
( )
( )
P( ) 0.204
1 P 0.204
P 0.796
0.5 26.503
P 0.796 (continuitycorrection)
12.995
0.5 26.502
0.82741
12.995
29.984
V k
V k
V k
k
Z
k
k
> >
< >
< <
| |
< <
|
\ .

<
<

Hence, the least value is k =29 weeks.







[B1]





[B1]




[B1]


[A1]