Lab section 7, Th 8:00-11:00 Analysis of fat in popular salad dressings Introduction: As consumers demand on health-oriented products spiked within the recent decades, the use of salad dressings, healthy fat-rich condiments, also increased by 2.6% over the past three years (9). Our group decided to study the fat analysis of common salad dressings. We combined extraction method and bomb calorimetry to measure percentage of fat per gram of dressings and the energy produced per gram fat of per serving of three different salad dressings: Caesar, Ranch, Balsamic Vinaigrette, and Thousand Island. This study was at first intended to determine which of these dressings produced the most energy from fat per serving. Due to equipment constraint, we were unable to accurately determine the identity and the amount of fat from dressings, which in fact contributed to the differences in the amount of energy produced. However, we initially hypothesized that Thousand Island will supply the most energy per gram fat based on the total fat content of the main ingredients of these dressings. Caesar had Romano cheese and vegetable oil, Ranch dressing was mainly made of sour cream, Vinaigrette mostly consisted of vinegar and oil, and Thousand Island dressing contained not only oil but mayonnaise, which in fact has more total fat compared to sour cream and Romano cheese (1),(2),(3). The information of calories per serving only provides consumers the overall energy one serving has rather than the exact calories from its fat content. Since fat energy was more significant as it provided even more energy compared to carbohydrates (4) and it aided in vitamins absorbance (5), it was crucial to determine the appropriate dressings to meet each individuals dietary need. Chemistry of fat: Fat is generally a compound of glycerol and fatty acids, the composition of fatty acids will determine if the fat is whether saturated or unsaturated, the hydrogen ions around the double bond can be either on opposite sides (trans) or on the same side (cis). Fat is non- polar so it will dissolve easily in petroleum ether, a non-polar solvent. Fat molecule: Equation for oil combustion: + xO2 (g) yCO2(g) + zH2O(g) + Heat Materials and Methods: With the help of Chemistry department, we obtained four salad dressings of Kens Steakhouse: Caesar, Ranch, Thousand Island and Vinaigrette. These dressings were not only common in daily use but were also good representatives of fat-rich ingredients. Furthermore, each dressing came with different texture, color and primary phase, which suggested a varying result in energy produced. At first we extracted the fat from the dressings using extraction method. By adding 100ml of petroleum ether, a nonpolar solvent that can bond to nonpolar fat molecules and separate the mixture of petroleum ether and fat from the whole solution. This required stirring for at least five minutes on the magnetic stir plate to ensure than petroleum ether and fat had a sufficient time to bond to each other wholly. After five minutes of mixing, we gravity-filtered the mixtures to transfer the petroleum ether-fat layer into new and labeled beakers. With the dressings left after filtering, we added another 50ml of petroleum ether and stirred for another five minutes and gravity-filtered again to maximize the amount of fat that could have been extracted. Then we left those beakers under the fume hood for a week and come back to gather the extracted fat, and did bomb calorimetry and collected data using LoggerPro (8). Data and Results: Despite we followed the same steps for every trial, we found out that the amount of fat extracted varied between trials significantly, especially Caesar and 1000 island. The second key observation we made was that the fat extracted came in as liquid oil instead of solid fat. This suggested that either we could not extract solid fat out of dressings or there was no or too little solid fat in these dressings. The final observation we made was that during bomb calorimetry, the temperature changes were shown on LoggerPro. At first it was stable, at a low constant then after we ignited the bomb, the curve raised up dramatically then reached a constant at the end, forming an S curve. Data recorded: Table 1. Mass of sample and mass of extracted fat from sample A and sample B. Sample A Sample B mraw sample(g) mextracted fat(g) T (C) mraw sample(g)
Base on the change in temperature for each combustion and heat capacity of the calorimeter, we can calculate energy produced per gram of fat by using the bomb calorimetry equations (7). Base on the mass of extracted fat per sample and the mass of that sample, we can calculate the percentage of fat present in our sample by using the percentage equation. Equations: Bomb calorimetry equations: qrxn= -qcalorimeter qcalorimeter = Ctotal x T Ctotal = Ccalorimeter + C H2O CH2O = Cs H2O x mH2O ( Cs H2O =4.184 J/gC) Other equations: Percentage of fat =
Total fat per serving (30g dressings) = Result: Table 2. Average values of percentage of fat, total fat per serving, qrxn per gram of fat and qrxn per serving (30g dressing). Average Percentage of fat (%) Total fat /serving (g) qrxn/gram (kcal/g) qrxn/serving (kcal) Caesar 38.5 11.6 16.9 191 1000 Island 9.03 2.71 16.8 45.6 Vinaigrette 27.4 8.23 17.2 141 Ranch 4.75 1.43 16.3 23.2
Table 3. Values of qrxn per gram of fat and qrxn per serving (30g of dressings) of entire dressings. Sample C qrxn/gram of fat (kcal/g) qrxn/serving (kcal/30 g of dressing) Caesar 11.8 213 1000 Island 8.61 112 Vinaigrette 14.4 144 Ranch 8.90 134
Conclusion: Percentage of fat varied significantly both between trials and between individual dressing, ranging from 4.76 to 38.5. Energy from fat, on the other, was more similar to each other and ranged from 16.3 to 17.2 in kcal/g. Sample A and B, both of which were fat, produced relatively higher energy compared to sample C, which was entire dressing. Our calculated values for percentage of fat and fat calories did not match any of the values obtain from the manufacturers (Table 4) . Possible explanation was unclear source of manufacturers value, as we calculated fat burnt by bomb calorimeter, and the manufacturer might have calculated fat burnt by human metabolism, which must not share the same mechanism and efficiency with a bomb calorimeter. One of the source of error was human calculation, as though the group had three people, still our calculation might not be as precise for all significant figures, which could also contribute to false results. Another possible culprit was the inefficient extraction method, as for previous projects, this method was not meant to be quantitative, because it could not extract fat completely from the dressings but only a small amount for bomb calorimetry. This result gave an answer to our question in the introduction, by stating that Caesar provided the most fat and Vinaigrettes fat produced the most energy. This answer, however, refuted our hypothesis, which suggested Thousand Island to have the most fat and produce the most energy from fat. Table 4. Comparison between calculated and Manufacturers value. Calculated Manufacturers Percentage of fat (%) Fat cal (kcal/g fat) Percentage of fat (%) Fat cal (kcal/g fat) Caesar 38.5 16.9 60.0 8.89 1000 Island 9.03 16.8 43.3 9.23 Ranch 4.76 16.3 50.0 9.33 Vinaigrette 27.4 17.2 33.3 9.00
References: 1. Natural cheese Calories counter.CalorieLab. n.d. Web. n.d 2. Mayonnaise and spread Calories counter.CalorieLab. n.d. Web. n.d 3. Calories content of sauces.AlbertaRose. Anne Collins, n.d. Web. n.d 4. Carbohydrates versus Fats ClackamacCommunityCollege. Sue,E .n.d.Web.n.d. 5. How the body uses fat. Rawfoodexplained. n.d. Web. n.d. 6. Comparison of two fat extraction methods." St.LawrencesChemweb. Francois, B, Michael,B. n.d. Web. n.d. 7. Bunce, D., Schwartz, A.T., Silberman, R., Stanitski, C., Stratton, W., Zipp, A. (Eds.). (1994). Chemistry in Context. England: WM. C. Brown Publishers. 8. Paar Scientific Bomb Calorimetry Manual. 9. Early, Erin. A Market Evaluation of Salad Dressings .n.d.PDF file.