Anda di halaman 1dari 23

The Magnetocaloric

Properties of CoSiMn
0.95
Fe
0.05
K. Morrison
1
, Y.Miyoshi
1
, J.Moore
1
, K. Sandeman
2
, A. Barcza
2
,
D. Caplin
1
, L. F. Cohen
1
1
Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College, London SW7 2BZ
2
Department of Materials Science, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QZ
Funded by EPSRC

Imperial College
Outline
Introduction
1. What can we learn from magnetic imaging?
Does fragmentation lower H
c
in this system?
2. We can correlate magnetisation, heat capacity and
latent heat measurements.
Summary & Future work

Imperial College
Motivation
RT refrigeration
Application of inverse MCE?
Understanding and improving the magnetic
and thermal behaviour of this family of
materials

Imperial College
Sample Prep & Background
Samples supplied by K. Sandeman,
University of Cambridge
Induction melted
Annealed 950C, 60 hours, slow cooled
[1]
S. Niziol et al., J. Mag. Mag. Mater. 79, 333-337 (1989)
[2]
K. G. Sandeman et al., PRB 74, 224436 (2006)
CoMnGe
CoMnSi
Material
0.89
0.4
m
Co
(
B
)
3.16
2.6
m
Mn
(
B
)
FM-PM c plane
Metamagnetic
(AFM-FM-PM)
ab plane
Transition Localised
Moment
[2]
[1]
Degree of covalent bonding

Imperial College
1 - CoMnSi
0.92
Ge
0.08
:
Bulk M-H Loops
1
st
Order?
2
nd
Order?
The magnetic
processes
involved in this
system can be
uncovered by hall
imaging

Imperial College
CoMnSi
0.92
Ge
0.08
:
From 1st order to 2nd order

Imperial College
Imaging of CoMnSi
0.92
Ge
0.08
From 1
st
order to 2
nd
order
2
nd
Order: (RT)
1.2T 1.5T 1.8T 2.1T 3.5T
1
st
Order: (230K)
2.6T 2.9T 3.2T 3.5T 3.8T

Imperial College
CoSiMn
0.95
Fe
0.05
: Bulk M-H Loops
1
st
Order 2
nd
Order
Similar behaviour to the Ge-doped
sample
Phase diagram closes up
where 1
st
order transition
disappears

Imperial College
Gd
5
Ge
4
: Fragmentation
J. Moore et al., APL 88, 072501 (2006)
Fragmentation reduced
H
c
by ~ 20%

Imperial College
CoSiMn
0.95
Fe
0.05
: Fragmentation
Change in H
c
from
fragmentation less obvious
H
c
varies by ~0.2T
(peak-peak)
for a single fragment

Imperial College
CoSiMn
0.95
Fe
0.05
: Entropy change
S starts to drop off
BEFORE the field limited
temperature is reached
T
H
M T S
c
H

= ) (
dH
T
H) M(T,
H) (T, S
H
H
H
M
2
1

Imperial College
Summary of Magnetisation Data
1
st
order to 2
nd
order magnetic phase transition observed in 2 similar
materials
Hall imaging reveals the mechanism for ferromagnetic growth
Fragmentation lowers H
c
by ~ 0.1T
Gradual decrease in S at low temperatures

Imperial College
2 - SiN Membrane Sensor: (A.C.) Heat
Capacity Measurements
A.C power supplied to the heater of a commercial (TCG 3880) Xensor
nanocalorimeter
Sensitive to small samples (< 100x50m)
Heat equation solved for a point heat source
Minakov et al., Rev. Sci. instrum., 76, 043906 (2005)

i
h
e V i
KP
C =

Imperial College
SiN Membrane Sensor: (D.C.) Latent
Heat Measurements
Y.Miyoshi - to be published
Adiabatic set-up
Measure V
th
as field is ramped
Latent heat causes jump in V
th
Use heat capacity data to convert to T
and S

Imperial College
SiN Membrane Sensor: Observing the
Structural Transformation
A volume change of the sample stretches/relaxes the SiN
membrane
*J. Moore et al., APL 88, 1 (2006)
Minakov et al., Rev. Sci. instrum., 76, 043906 (2005)

Imperial College
The heater resistance changes
R
H
can be measured to give a
qualitative description of the
magnetostriction
*
C switches sign over the region 90-120K
CoSiMn
0.95
Fe
0.05
: Heat Capacity
H
t (DOWN)
H
t(UP)

Imperial College
CoSiMn
0.95
Fe
0.05
: Phase Diagram

Imperial College
CoSiMn
0.95
Fe
0.05
: Latent Heat
200K
90K
120K
215K
205K
(Plotted on same scale)
Y.Miyoshi - to be published
UP field
DOWN field

Imperial College
CoSiMn
0.95
Fe
0.05
: T
Y.Miyoshi - to be published
) , ( T H C
L
T =

Imperial College
CoSiMn
0.95
Fe
0.05
: Correlation of
Measurements
5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0


Q
,

0
H, T
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0.0


R
/
R
,

%
0.696
0.698
0.700
0.702



C
,

J
/
K
0.0006
0.0008
0.0010



M
,

e
m
u
Y.Miyoshi - to be published
Magnetisation
Heat capacity
Structural change
Latent heat
T = 90K

Imperial College
Entropy Measurements: Correlation
Y.Miyoshi - to be published
T
L
S
LH
=
T
H
M T S
c
H M

= ) (
1
2
0
max
) , (
H
H
T
H
HC
dT
T
H T C
S

Imperial College
Comparison of CoMnSi series
K. G. Sandeman et al., PRB 74, 224436 (2006)
Enhanced S
compared to
similar materials
in this family
Reduction of H
c
and shift in T
t

Imperial College
Summary
Iron doping decreases H
c
and T
t
enhancing the low-field behaviour
of S
Comparison of Maxwell and Clausius Clapeyron relations
Decrease in entropy appears to not be limited by field
Correlation of magnetometry, calorimetry and latent heat data
Future work

Imperial College

Anda mungkin juga menyukai