0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
21 tayangan3 halaman
Antimicrobial peptides of the southern bell frog can neutralize bacterial endotoxins in vitro. Frog pathogen Klebsiella pneumoniae and human pathogen Escherichia coli were tested. These skin antimicrobials have potential for non-specific LPS neutralization in vivo in the skin of infected frogs and for development of anti-endotoxin agents.
Antimicrobial peptides of the southern bell frog can neutralize bacterial endotoxins in vitro. Frog pathogen Klebsiella pneumoniae and human pathogen Escherichia coli were tested. These skin antimicrobials have potential for non-specific LPS neutralization in vivo in the skin of infected frogs and for development of anti-endotoxin agents.
Antimicrobial peptides of the southern bell frog can neutralize bacterial endotoxins in vitro. Frog pathogen Klebsiella pneumoniae and human pathogen Escherichia coli were tested. These skin antimicrobials have potential for non-specific LPS neutralization in vivo in the skin of infected frogs and for development of anti-endotoxin agents.
antimicrobial peptides Ermin Schadich, Drusilla Mason and Anthony L. Cole School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand ABSTRACT The ability of skin antimicrobial peptides of the southern bell frog, Litoria raniformis, to neutralize in vitro the endotoxin, proinammatory lipopolysaccharide (LPS) complex, from two different gram negative bacterial pathogens, human pathogen Escherichia coli (0111:B4) and frog pathogen Klebsiella pneumoniae, was investigated. The LPS neutralization activity of the natural mixture of skin anti- microbial peptides was measured using chromogenic Limulus amebocyte lysate assays. These skin antimicrobial peptides neutralized the LPSs from both pathogens at physiologically relevant concentrations (IC 50 < 100 g/mL) showing their potential for nonspecic LPS neutralization in vivo in the skin of infected frogs and for development of antiendotoxin agents. Key words antimicrobial peptides, bacterial lipopolysaccharide, inflammation. In various vertebrates, neutralization of the endotoxin, LPS complex, of the outer membranes of gramnegative bacterial pathogens is important for protection against excessive inammation during bacterial infections of a variety of tissues (1, 2). The most signicant LPS neutralization mechanism in human blood is the acute phase protein named LBP (3), whereas related antimi- crobial peptides operate in other tissues (4). Both LBP and antimicrobial peptides interfere with the proin- ammatory effects of LPSs on macrophages by binding to its lipid component and thereby precluding its interaction with TLR4 and associated pathways of production of the proinammatory and chemotactic cytokines interleukin1, interleukin6 and tumor necro- sis factor (3, 4). They are essential for regulation of subsequent neutrophil responses and activation of the complement lytic system. Any pathogenic process that results in insufcient amounts of these factors is associated with dysregulation and overrated responses leading to intensive tissue inammation and damage and endotoxic shock (2). Although LPS induces inammatory responses in ecto- thermic vertebrates like frogs, it has little toxicity in these animals (5, 6). Surprisingly, although the sequences of genes orthologous to the human LPB have been found in genomic DNAintwo frog species, Xenopus laevis and Silurana tropicalis (7), its protein product has not yet been identied either in blood or liver. This is intriguing as it raises the question of how frogs protect themselves from LPS. One possible LPS neutralization mechanism in frogs is antimicrobial peptides from skin granular glands, stomach and intestinal tissues (810). These peptides have positively charged amino acid sequences that are required for interaction with negatively charged compo- nents of microbial membranes and lysis of microbial cells (11). A previous study by Schadich showed that antimicrobial peptides from skin granular glands of different frog species have activity against different human and frog bacterial pathogens, an activity which strongly correlates with resistance to bacterial disease (12). Moreover, researchers have also demonstrated the ability of skin antimicrobial peptides to bind to LPS from Correspondence Ermin Schadich, School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, NewZealand. Tel: 64 3 364 2500; fax: 64 3 364 2590; email: ermins@gmail.com Received 28 September 2012; revised 11 November 2012; accepted 25 November 2012. List of Abbreviations: E. coli, Escherichia coli; K. pneumoniae, Klebsiella pneumoniae; IC 50 , values of peptides peptide concentration at which 50%of LPS is neutralized; LAL, Limulus amebocyte lysate; LBP, lipopolysaccharidebinding protein; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; L. raniformis, Litoria raniformis ; TLR4, Tolllike receptor 4. Microbiol Immunol 2013; 57: 159161 doi: 10.1111/1348-0421.12012 2012 The Societies and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 159 different human bacterial pathogens (13, 14), and this suggests their possible role in the LPS neutralization mechanism. Skin antimicrobial peptides could therefore provide protection from the toxic effects of endotoxins in frog skin. This study aimed to determine whether skin antimicrobial peptides of the New Zealand introduced species, the southern bell frog (L. raniformis) can neutralize LPS from different bacterial pathogens in vitro. We tested skin antimicrobial peptides from L. raniformis for their ability to neutralize LPS from the human pathogen E. coli (0111:B4) and the frog pathogen K. pneumoniae. We collected a natural mixture of skin antimicrobial peptides from adult L. raniformis by using norepinephrine injections and partially puried it by using C18SepPak cartridges (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) as described by Schadich (12). We conrmed its content of speciesspecic aurein peptides by liquid chromatogra- phy mass spectrometry analyses (12). Polymixin Bsulfate, a reference control peptide with known ability to neutralize endotoxins from gramnegative bacteria and endotoxinfree water were purchased from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO, USA). We generated peptide digests to provide a negative control for studies of the activity of the skin peptides. We incubated the peptide mixtures (1 mg/mL) with pronase E, a protease mixture that degrades peptides completely (Sigma Chemical), at a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL in ammonium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) at 37C for 20 hrs. After digestion, we inactivated the protease by heating it at 90C for 10 min. Using a modied phenolwater technique as previ- ously described (15), we isolated LPS from overnight colonies of K. pneumoniae collected from the wild brown tree frog, Litoria ewingii in Oxford forest, Zealand, and grown on bloodagar plates. We purchased the LPS of E. coli (0111:B4) from Cambrex Bio Science (Walkersville, MD, USA). We tested all solutions to ensure they were endotoxin free by measuring the concentration of LPS using chromogenic LAL assays (QCL1000 kit, Cambrex Bio Science). We sterilized all pyrogenicfree consum- ables by heating them for 3 hrs at 180C. We assessed neutralization of LPS by skin antimicrobial peptides by measuring their free concentrations using LAL assays after incubating them with skin peptides as described by Ried et al. (16). We incubated the peptides dissolved in endotoxinfree water at different concen- trations of peptide (0300 mg/mL) with 150 pg/mL of bacterial LPS in 50 mL reactions at 37C for 30 min. The blank controls included the same concentration without the LPS. Subsequently, we incubated 50 mL of the LAL reagent containing proenzyme at 37C for 10 min in 96 well microtiter plates. Next, we added 100 mL of the LAL substrate to each sample and incubated them at 37C for an additional 6 min. We stopped the reactions using 100 mL of 25% acetic acid and read the absorbance of each reaction at 405 nm using a microplate reader. We used the absorbance values for curve analyses. We performed three assays for both tested peptides and controls and tested three replicate reactions for each peptide concentration. We automatically adjusted all curves required for estimation of IC 50 values of peptides (peptide concentration at which 50% of LPS is neutral- ized) by nonlinear regression using Graph Pad Prism 4. The peptide mixture from L. raniformis neutralized the LPS of the standard reference strain E. coli (0111:B4) and the isolate K. pneumoniae in a concentration dose dependent manner comparable to the reference control polymyxin B (Fig. 1). Their IC 50 values for neutralization of LPS of E. coli (0111:B4) and K. pneumoniae were below Fig. 1. Neutralization of (a) Escherichia coli (0111:B4) and (b) Klebsiella pneumoniae lipopolysaccharide (LPS) by skin anti- microbial peptides of Litoria raniformis frogs and polymyxin B. E. Schadich et al. 160 2012 The Societies and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 100 g/mL (Table 1). The peptide digests did not neutralize any of two bacterial LPSs. Skin antimicrobial peptides of L. raniformis neutralized the LPS from bacterial pathogen K. pneumoniae in vitro at physiologically relevant concentrations (IC 50 < 100 mg/ mL; Table 1), suggesting that they may be an LPS neutralization mechanism in infected frogs. This activity is not restricted to frog pathogens since the LPS from human pathogen E. coli (0111:B4) was also neutralized (Fig. 1, Table 1). Such nonspecic in vitro activity could be an effective, broad and rapid mechanism for neutralization of LPS from different bacterial pathogens in vivo in the skin of infected frogs. The peptide mixture of L. raniformis was not as active as polymixin B in neutralizing LPS; this may have been due to dilution of the mixture by inactive peptides. Thus, one direction of future studies should be also to analyze the effects of single isolated peptides in order to show their potential in LPS neutralization. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Andrew Bagshaw, University of Otago for useful comments on this manuscript. This study was supported by a Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden Grant (M1069). DISCLOSURE All authors have no conict of interest. REFERENCES 1. Chilton P.M., Embry C.A., Mitchell T.C. (2012) Effects of differences in lipid A structure on TLR4 proinammatory signaling and inammasome activation. Front Immunol 3: 17. 2. Karima R., Matsumoto S., Higashi H., Matsushima K. (1999) The molecular pathogenesis of endotoxic shock and organ failure. Mol Med Today 5: 12333. 3. Shumann R.R., Leong S.R., Flaggs G.W., Gray, P.W., Wright S.D., Mathison J.C., Tobias P.S., Ulevitch R.J. (1990) Structure and function of lipopolysaccharide binding protein. Science 249: 14,29331. 4. Levy O., Ooi C.E., Elsbach P., Doerer M.E., Lehrer R.I., Weiss J. (1995) Antibacterial proteins of granulocytes differ in interaction with endotoxin. Comparison of bactericidal/permeability increasing protein, p15s, and defensins. J Immunol 154: 540310. 5. Bicego K.C., Steiner A.A., AntunesRodrigues J., Branco L.G. (2002) Indomethacin impairs LPSinduced behavioral fever in toads. J Appl Physiol 93: 51216. 6. Bugbee T.M., Ruben L.N., Beard M.E., Zettergren L.D. (1983) Antibody production by different sites and cyclophosphamide induced immunosuppression of the TNPLPS response in the grass frog, Rana pipiens. Dev Comp Immunol 7: 56974. 7. Klein S.L., Strausberg R.L., Wagner L., Pontius J., Clifton S.W., Richardson P. (2002) Genetic and genomic tools for Xenopus research: The NIH Xenopus initiative. Dev Dyn 225: 38491. 8. RollinsSmith L.A., Reinert L.K., O'Leary C.J., Houston L.E., Woodhams D.C. (2005) Antimicrobial peptide defenses in amphibian skin. Integr Comp Biol 45: 13742. 9. Moore K.S., Bevins C.L., Brasseur M.M., Tomassini N., Turner K., Eck H., Zasloff M. (1991) Antimicrobial peptides in the stomach of Xenopus laevis. J Biol Chem 266: 1985157. 10. Reilly D.S., Tomassini N., Bevins C.L, Zasloff M. (1994) A Paneth cell analogue in Xenopus small intestine expresses antimicrobial peptide genes: conservation of an intestinal hostdefense system. J Histochem Cytochem 42: 697704. 11. Conlon M.J. (2011) Structural diversity and species distribution of hostdefence peptides in frog skin secretions. Cell Mol Life Sci 68: 230315. 12. Schadich E. (2009) Skin peptide activities against opportunistic bacterial pathogens of the African Clawed Frogs (Xenopus laevis) and three Litoria frogs. J Herpetol 43: 17383. 13. Matera G., Cook J.A., Geisel J., Ashton S.H., Wise W.C., Foc A., Berkowitz B.A., Halushka P.V. (1993) Effects of two magainin peptides on eicosanoid release from rat peritoneal macrophages. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 37: 39397. 14. Nan Y.H., Jeon Y.J., Park I.S., Shin S.Y. (2008) Antimicrobial peptide P18 inhibits inammatory responses by LPS but not by IFNgammastimulated macrophages. Biotechnol Lett 30: 118387. 15. Johnson K.G., Perry M.B. (1976) Improved techniques for the preparation of bacterial lipopolysaccharides. Can J Microbiol 22: 2934. 16. Ried C., Wahl C., Miethke T., Wellnhofer G., Landgraf C., SchneiderMergener J., Hoess A. (1996) High afnity endotoxin binding and neutralizing peptides based on the crystal structure of recombinant Limulus antilipopolysaccharide factor. J Biol Chem 271: 2812027. Table 1. Lipopolysaccharide neutralization activity of skin antimicro- bial peptides of Litoria raniformis and polymixin B LPS IC 50 of peptides L. raniformis Polymixin B E. coli (0111:B4) 64.5 1.1 2.0 1.2 K. pneumoniae 55.8 1.2 1.7 1.0 2012 The Societies and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 161 LPS neutralization by frog peptides