Coyles first chapter of his work The sweet spot presents his conclusions on expertise achievement and talent acquisition after having explored the way nine different talent hotbeds around the world operate in order to improve their students performances. Contrary to the traditional belief that talented people were born and not made Coyles main argument claims that talent is something achievable by means of specific training programs and more precisely a particular practice which he christens Deep Practice.
!n short deep practice consists in trying to reach a goal "ust beyond our skills which would force us to operate at the edge of our abilities. !t is based on the idea that struggling in certain targeted ways operating at the edge of your ability, where you make mistakes makes you smarter. #
$ccording to this theory the efficiency in our learning efforts depends on finding and being aware of our sweet spot which %obert &"ork the Chair of psychology at 'C($ defines as the optimal gap between what you know and what youre trying to do 2 . !t is crucial to perform in that middle area that borders our comfort )one with the yet unknown or unmastered since it is there where the learning process takes place. *oving in our comfort )one wouldnt increase our level of knowledge whereas trashing blindly towards a goal laying far away from our current capabilities would represent a senseless struggle which would decrease our motivation and self+confidence. This method requires analy)ing the technique we want to acquire into its main components and performing them meticulously repeatedly with an intense grade of focused concentration until we get familiar with it and can perform it somehow naturally or spontaneously. Experiences where youre forced to slow down, make errors, and correct themend up making you swift and grateful without your realiing it. , -truggling and accepting our errors as learning opportunities are the engines that push us forward our learning goals. $nother important aspect of Coyles approach is that deep practice efficiency is quite independent from both the field of knowledge and the social conditions where it is used. To support this argument Coyle introduces us the examples of &runnio a ## year old &ra)ilian footballer . / 0ennie a 1. years old singer 2 / -imon Clifford a football trainer who introduced futsal in 3ngland to improve &ritish footballers skills 4 / and 3dwin (inks flying trainer 5 . These are examples on how people at any place no matter how skilled and talented they are can improve their way of performing "ust by means of practicing deeper. (imits of Coyles approach # Code Daniel. The Talent Code 6ew 7ork8 &antam 199: page #; 1 !bid. page #: , !bid. page #; . !bid. page #, 2 !bid. page #, 4 !bid. page 1. 5 !bid. page 19 !saac %ubio Coyles The Talent Code Draft ! am not quite sure about the transferability of this method to any field of knowledge. ! believe practicing deeper as Coyle suggests might offer good results in areas where improving means mastering certain techniques which are easy to extract and decompose in their main components. <owever ! really doubt deep practice can work out in complex fields of knowledge such as improving our communication skills in a =oreign language in which several skills and factors interact and have an influence on each other. !n these cases context play an essential role and the learning contents can not "ust be abstracted sequenced and trained separately. -ocial background cultural context and emotional features are decisive aspects which interfere in communication and can dubiously be extracted and drilled. !nteresting aspects Coyles theory agrees in many aspects with a constructivist learning approach which ! consider specially relevant when thinking about how acquiring knowledge takes place. There are three ideas in the proposal introduced in this first chapter which ! find specially useful and therefore ! would like to highlight8 #.+ The need to set achievable goals and sequence our learning process taking into account our current knowledge and previous experiences. Coyle follows the constructivist learning approach when he stresses 1.+ One learns by means of practicing. $lthough stopping concentrating and thinking are necessary learning needs practicing and performing to take place. *aking mistakes and the experience of our current limitations are therefore two aspects we must learn to deal emotionally with in order to keep our motivation and self+confidence. ,.+ Making mistakes in a process of targeted struggle is meaningful. *istakes allow us to assess our learning process and they represent therefore an opportunity to improve the way we perform. !saac %ubio