English Methodology II

Prof: R Correa
(adapted from Prof . James Lett)
2009

REACTION PAPERS: SOME GUDELINES

The topic for a Reaction Papers is very straightforward: you simply have to read
the assigned text or chapters, think about what you have read, and then put your
thoughts down on paper. The Reaction Paper is not a research paper that
incorporates other sources of information; instead, it is a paper that contains
nothing other than your own original thought and analysis.

The Reaction Paper gives you the opportunity to demonstrate that you have read
the assigned text or chapters carefully, that you have understood the conclusions
presented in the readings as well as the reasoning that led to those conclusions,
and that you have given careful thought and analysis to the implications of the
textbook's arguments.

Each Reaction Paper should be equally divided between two parts: a Summary
and an Evaluation, labelled as such.

The Summary, which must be half a page (250 words) in length, should
encapsulate the essential ideas from the assigned readings in the textbook.
Imagine that you are writing for an intelligent, curious reader who has no
knowledge whatsoever of the text you're writing about. Your Summary should
make your reader aware of the fundamental ideas presented in the paper under
discussion. What are the main points made by Larsen –Freeman in the assigned
paper? What are her principal arguments--i.e., what are her most important
premises and conclusions? Your goal in your Summary is to convey, in only half a
page, the most significant ideas from the paper, which means you will have to think
very carefully about exactly which ideas are most important and why--your task is
to distill the ideas from several chapters down to their critical essence that can be
expressed in a very brief space. At the same time, your Summary will give you the
opportunity to demonstrate not only that you have a very solid understanding of the
ideas presented in the textbook, but that you can clearly explain those ideas to
someone else.

The Evaluation, which must be (300 words) in length, should present an original
analysis of the assigned reading. What did you think of Larsen-Freeman’s
presentation? What did you think about the quality of her reasoning? Were her
arguments well-supported by evidence? To your knowledge, did she neglect to
consider any significant evidence that would have an important bearing on her
conclusions, either positively or negatively? Were her arguments persuasive? Why
or why not? What questions did Larsen-Freeman leave unanswered? What
questions did she inspire you to want to investigate? Has your thinking or
understanding changed in any way as a result of having read the assignment? If
so, how? Have you changed your mind about anything as a result of having read
the assignment? In short, the Evaluation gives you the opportunity to express the
results of your original thoughtful analysis of the assigned readings.

Assesment:

Your Reaction Paper should take the form of a coherent, well-organized essay,
with a logical structure that is apparent to the reader. You will be graded in part on
how effectively you're able to communicate your ideas in written form, so be sure to
pay close attention to such details as spelling, grammar, punctuation, etc.