0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
226 tayangan243 halaman
This is composed by some Shibhaakaramitra. He belongs to the school of rhetoricians who, while implicitly accepting the authority of Dhvani doctrine, yet hark back to rhetoricians like Dandin, Bhamaha, and Rudrata, who looked upon tropes and figures as supplying in a dominant measure the principal element of charm and interest in poetry. Some of the views in Ratnakara were accepted by later writers. It is worth reading.
This is composed by some Shibhaakaramitra. He belongs to the school of rhetoricians who, while implicitly accepting the authority of Dhvani doctrine, yet hark back to rhetoricians like Dandin, Bhamaha, and Rudrata, who looked upon tropes and figures as supplying in a dominant measure the principal element of charm and interest in poetry. Some of the views in Ratnakara were accepted by later writers. It is worth reading.
This is composed by some Shibhaakaramitra. He belongs to the school of rhetoricians who, while implicitly accepting the authority of Dhvani doctrine, yet hark back to rhetoricians like Dandin, Bhamaha, and Rudrata, who looked upon tropes and figures as supplying in a dominant measure the principal element of charm and interest in poetry. Some of the views in Ratnakara were accepted by later writers. It is worth reading.