SEM
) 53.6
2.2 years;
mean body mass index (BMI) 28.1
1.0 kg/m
2
) were included.
All chiefly complained of excessive daytime sleepiness and
snoring. Throughout the sleep study, which commenced at
22.00 hours and ended at 07.00 hours, the following variables
were monitored: electroencephalogram (C3/A2 and C4/A1
from the 1020 international electrode placement system),
electro-oculogram, chin and leg electromyogram, ECG (one
modified V2 lead) and body position. Arterial oxygen satura-
tion (SaO
2
) was measured with an ear oximeter. Obstructive
sleep apnoea was diagnosed by the polysomnography study:
apnoea and hypopnoea index (AHI), defined as the number of
apnoeas and hypopnoeas per hour of sleep, which was greater
than 5. Apnoea was defined as cessation of airflow of at least
10 s. Hypopnoea was defined as reduction in airflow or thoraco-
abdominal movements lasting at least 10 s and accompanied
by oxygen desaturation of at least 4%. The minimum SaO
2
during apnoeic or hypopnoeic episodes was recorded, and all
values were averaged, giving an index of hypoxaemia severity
during sleep (mean minimum SaO
2
). For data analysis, AHI
and the mean minimum SaO
2
were taken as indices of the
severity of sleep apnoea. All subjects received a 75-g oral glucose
tolerance test (OGTT), and venous blood samples were taken
for the determination of plasma glucose and serum insulin
concentrations at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min. The diagnosis of dia-
betes mellitus (DM) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) was
performed using the 1997 American Diabetes Association criteria
[9]. The insulin sensitivity index (ISI) proposed by Matsuda
and DeFronzo [10], i.e. 10 000/square root of (fasting glucose
fasting insulin)
(mean glucose
mean insulin during OGTT),
was used as an index of the severity of insulin resistance.
Six patients had DM, 15 patients had IGT, and 17 patients
had normal glucose tolerance. ISI significantly correlated
with the indices of the severity of obstructive sleep apnoea
(
r
=
0.47;
P
< 0.005 for AHI and
r
= 0.44;
P
< 0.01 for mean
minimum SaO
2
). On the other hand, BMI also significantly
correlated with the indices of the severity of obstructive sleep
apnoea (
r
= 0.47;
P
< 0.005 for AHI and
r
=
0.43;
P
< 0.01
for mean minimum SaO
2
). Therefore, we adjusted the relation-
ship between ISI and AHI or mean minimum SaO
2
for BMI.
After this adjustment for BMI, ISI did not continue to make an
independent contribution to the indices of the severity of
obstructive sleep apnoea, but tended to correlate with them
(
r
=
0.31;
P
= 0.07 for AHI and
r
= 0.30;
P
= 0.09 for mean
minimum SaO
2
).
Previous studies reported inconsistent results in terms of
the association between obstructive sleep apnoea and insulin
resistance [1,38]. Some reports showed that there is an effect
of obstructive sleep apnoea on insulin resistance apart from the
effects of coexistent central obesity [1,35]. One of the pos-
sible mechanisms of obstructive sleep apnoea-induced insulin
resistance includes increased sympathetic nerve activity by
nocturnal oxygen desaturations [11]. In terms of the relation-
ship between the severity of obstructive sleep apnoea and the
degree of insulin resistance, there are only two reports by
Tiihonen
et al
. [3] and Ip
et al
. [5]. Our results suggest that the
degree of insulin resistance is possibly related to the severity of
obstructive sleep apnoea through the effects of obesity, which
is inconsistent with their results [3, 5]. The discrepancy may be
derived from the two following reasons. The first is the differ-
ence of subject populations: only 18 patients including two
diabetic patients were enrolled in Tiihonens study [3], and Ip
et al
. [5] excluded the subjects with known DM on medica-
tions. In addition, Ip
et al
. [5] did not evaluate the degree of
glucose tolerance. Second, they used different insulin resist-
ance indices: Tiihonen
et al
. [3] used the product of areas
under glucose and insulin curves during OGTT, whereas Ip
et al
. [5] used the estimation of insulin resistance by the home-
ostasis model assessment method [12]. On the other hand, we
did not investigate the relationship between insulin resistance
in obstructive sleep apnoea and body fat distribution. There-
fore, the distribution of fat should be taken into account in
future studies.
Y. Nagai, Y. Nakatsumi*, T. Abe and G. Nomura
Department of Internal Medicine and
*
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kanazawa
Municipal Hospital, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan
References
1 Grunstein RR, Stenlof K, Hedner J, Sjostrom L. Impact of obstructive
sleep apnea and sleepiness on metabolic and cardiovascular risk
factors in the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) Study.
Int J Obesity
1995;
19
: 410418.
2 Wilcox I, McNamara SG, Collins FL, Grunstein RR, Sullivan CE.
Syndrome Z: the interaction of sleep apnoea, vascular risk factors
and heart disease.
Thorax
1998;
53
: S2528.
3 Tiihonen M, Partinen M, Narvanen S. The severity of obstructive
sleep apnoea is associated with insulin resistance.
J Sleep Res
1993;
2
: 5661.
4 Brooks B, Cistulli PA, Borkman M, Ross G, McGhee S, Grunstein RR
et al.
Obstructive sleep apnea in obese non-insulin-dependent
diabetic patients: effect of continuous positive airway pressure
treatment on insulin responsiveness.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
1994;
79
: 16811685.
2003 Diabetes UK.
Diabetic Medicine
,
20
, 8082
82
Letters
5 Ip MS, Lam B, Ng MM, Lam WK, Tsang KW, Lam KS. Obstructive
sleep apnea is independently associated with insulin resistance.
Am J
Respir Crit Care Med
2002;
165
: 670676.
6 Stoohs RA, Facchini F, Guilleminault C. Insulin resistance and sleep-
disordered breathing in healthy humans.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
1996;
154
: 170174.
7 Vgontzas AN, Papanicolaou DA, Bixler EO, Hopper K, Lotsikas A,
Lin H-M
et al.
Sleep apnea and daytime sleepiness and fatigue: relation
to visceral obesity, insulin resistance, and hypercytokinemia.
J Clin
Endocrinol Metab
2000;
85
: 11511158.
8 Smurra M, Philip P, Taillard J, Guilleminault C, Bioulac B, Gin H.
CPAP treatment does not affect glucose-insulin metabolism in sleep
apneic patients.
Sleep Med
2001;
2
: 207213.
9 The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of
Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis
and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus.
Diabetes Care
1997;
20
:
11831197.
10 Matsuda M, DeFronzo RA. Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from
oral glucose tolerance testing.
Diabetes Care
1999;
22
: 14621470.
11 Fletcher EC, Miller J, Schaaf JW, Fletcher JG. Urinary catecho-
lamines before and after tracheostomy in patients with obstructive
sleep apnea and hypertension.
Sleep
1987;
10
: 3544.
12 Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF,
Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and
-
cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations
in man.
Diabetologia
1985;
28
: 412419.
19 Letter Letters Letters Letters
St Vincents Declaration 10 years on:
outcome of diabetic pregnancies
If no one has put the record straight on the Norwegian data for
the outcome of pregnancy in Norway I should be grateful if
you could publish the following letter.
The article in your March issue St. Vincents Declaration
10 years on: outcome of diabetic pregnancies by Platt
et al
. [1]
reported rather disappointing outcomes in the North-west
of England. In the Discussion the authors quote a paper by
Hawthorne, Irgens and Lie published in the
British Medical
Journal
[2] which states that the outcome of pregnancy for
women in the North-east of England is similar to that in the North-
west, in contrast to the situation in Norway where the outcome
of diabetic pregnancy is similar to that of the general population.
I feel that it is important to set the record straight. As my
colleague, Dr Frank Johnstone, pointed out in his electronic
reply to that paper, there was a huge difference in prevalence
of diabetic pregnancies reported from the North-east of
England (one in 335 pregnant women) compared with Norway
(one in 90 pregnant women). He noted that, in the North-east,
all women were taking insulin before pregnancy, all were
confirmed by clinicians and from examination of the records.
Norwegian data were from a centralized medical birth registry.
When Dr Johnstone and I checked the Scottish register listings
of pregnancy in women with Type 1 diabetes, while preparing
the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines (SIGN), we found that
they were seriously flawed. Most, but not all, women with
Type 1 diabetes were included, but also included were some
women with gestational diabetes, some who had had a glucose
tolerance test which was normal, and even some who only had
a relative with diabetes. We wondered if the same thing could
have happened in Norway.
At a meeting of the North-east and the Norwegian groups,
which I attended, in Newcastle a year ago, it became clear, much
to the embarrassment of the Norwegian group, that that was
exactly what had happened. A Norwegian doctor described
how she had cross-checked the register with her patient records,
as we had done, and found, as we had, that some women with
normal glucose tolerance and some with only a relative with
diabetes had been included on the register. The conclusion was that
the results in Norway are probably no better than those in Britain.
It is clear to anyone looking after women with Type 1 dia-
betes in pregnancy that it would be quite impossible to achieve
an outcome as good as that in the general population. It is like
suggesting that those who have had a myocardial infarct
should live as long as the general population. I am, however,
rather more optimistic than the authors about pre-pregnancy
care. I feel that with increased awareness and enthusiasm of all
those looking after women with diabetes in the reproductive age
group it should be possible, without enormous expense, to increase,
as I have done (> 70% in Edinburgh and now > 60% in Fife), the
proportion of women coming for pre-pregnancy care and hence
to reduce the high incidence of congenital malformations.
J. M. Steel
Department of Diabetes, Victoria Hospital,
Kirkcaldy, Fife, UK
References
1 Platt MJ, Stanisstreet M, Casson IF, Howard CV, Walkinshaw S,
Pennycook S
et al.
St. Vincents Declaration 10 years on: outcomes of
diabetic pregnancies.
Diabet Med
2002;
19
: 216220.
2 Hawthorne G, Irgens LM, Lie RT. Outcome of pregnancy in diabetic
women in Northeast England and in Norway, 19947.
BMJ
2000;
321
: 730731.