SUBMITTED BY:
MR. BISHAL BHARI (115461)
Group Members
Ms. Suchanya Wongrod (115474)
Ms. Nguyen Nhat Huynh Mai(115488)
SUBMITTED TO:
DR. OLEG SHIPIN
MISS SALAYA PHUNSIRI
1. Introduction
The chemical oxygen demand (COD) is a measure of the oxygen equivalent of the organic
matter in a sample that is susceptible to oxidation by a strong oxidizing agent. This test is widely
used to measure the organic strength of domestic and industrial wastewater, and it can be related
empirically to BOD, organic matter and organic carbon. In short, COD measure those substances
which can be chemically oxidized. The main advantage of the COD method is that it is rapid; it
takes only a few hours to complete compared to 5 days for BOD. The COD of wastewater is
generally higher than the BOD because more substances can be chemically oxidized than can be
biologically oxidized. It is possible to correlate COD with BOD for many types of wastes, and
the COD test can then be used as a quick substitute for BOD. Also, wastewaters containing
compounds toxic to microorganisms can be analyzed for COD.
Furthermore, the COD method yields more reproducible results than the BOD method. One
disadvantage of the COD test is that it cannot differentiate between biologically oxidisable and
biologically inert organic matter. It is therefore less relevant to natural processes than the BOD
test. Additionally, COD values can characterize the degree of pollution and self-purification of
various waters. National and international standards and guidelines have been set for COD. The
COD test is useful for monitoring and control after correlation with sources of organic matter has
been established.
Generally, COD values are higher than BOD values. The reason is that biochemical oxygen
demand measures only the quantity of organic material capable of being oxidized, while the
chemical oxygen demand represents a more complete oxidation. Typical COD values for
domestic waste range from 200 - 500 mg/l.
2. Objective
a) To determine the Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) value of the sample by Closed
reflux method.
b) To prediction the relationship between COD values and the probable BOD5 of sample.
3. Methodology
3.1 Principle
The given sample was refluxed on strongly acid solution with a known amount of K2Cr2O7. After
digestion the remaining unreduced K2Cr2O7 was titrated with FAS to determine the amount of
K2Cr2O7 consumed. Oxidizable organic matter was then calculated in term of O2 equivalent
3.2 Procedure
The sample was diluted to 1:50 and 1:100
10 mL of diluted sample was then placed in the culture tube (25 x 150 mm)
The cap tubes were tighten and the solution was mixed completely
The tube was then kept in 150oC oven and refluxed for 2h
It was then titrating with 0.10 M FAS (Color change from blue-green to reddish brown)
3.3 Calculation
COD, mgO2/L = (A-B) x M x 8000
mL of sample
Where,
4.
Molarity of FAS
Presentation of Results
Dilution
1:50
Dilution
Titration
No
1
2
1
2
1
Volume
of FAS
6.0
5.9
4.5
5.85
5
Average
Remark
5.95
This dilution result was
rejected due to bias result
5.125
5.25
Calculation
Calculation:
COD, mg O2/L
(A-B) x M x 8000 * DF
ml of sample
Where:
A = ml of FAS used for blank
B = ml of FAS used for sample
M = Molarity of FAS
DF= Dilution Factor
COD, mg O2/L
(A-B) x M x 8000 * DF
ml of sample
=
4.2
Probable BOD
Given :
BOD/COD = 0.4
Therefore,
Estimated BOD = 6600 x 0.4 = 2640 mg/l
5. Discussion of Result
COD value of the sample CBD10 was calculated to be 6600 mg O 2/L which is quiet high
concentration. This value is defined as the amount of a specified oxidant that reacts with the
sample under controlled conditions. The quantity of oxidant consumed is expressed in terms of
its oxygen equivalence.
This result is used to estimate BOD value of the unknown sample. COD measurement helps to
determine the fraction of dilution of BOD. The typical ratio of COD to BOD for this sample is
0.4 hence the probable BOD can be calcualted to be 2640 mg/l.
3
If there are some organic substances, such as molecule fatty acid which can not be
oxidized by Cr2 O7-2, this will result in higher COD value than the exact value.
ii.
If the sample consists of chloride and nitrite, it can react with the Cr 2O72-. This can cause
the COD value to be higher than exact value. However HgSO 4 and sulfamic acid was
used to get rid of them.
iii.
iv.
Error due to cleaning operation: Improperly cleaned tubes and cap can also result in
erroneous result.
v.
Oven temperature is required to be 150 degree celcius for 2 hour. However, the oven
operation by the entire group was not syncronised and it was opened and closed several
time during the 2 hour interval. This might result in erroneous result.
References
Sawyer C.N et.al, Chemistry for Environmental Engineering: 5th edition Mc.GrawHill;2002
1. Introduction
Dissolved oxygen is the measure of the amount of gaseous oxygen (O 2) dissolved in an aqueous
solution. Dissolved Oxygen determinations are usually used for checking water quality of rivers
and wastewater from wastewater treatment plant, checking the dissolve oxygen of organic matter
in the plant. Moreover, Dissolve Oxygen determination is a basic of BOD test.
D.O. can be measured by Winkler titration. Measurements of D.O. can be made more
conveniently with electrochemical instrumentation. "D.O. meters" are subject to less interference
than the Winkler titration. They are portable and can be calibrated directly by using the oxygen
in the air.
DO is operational parameter in wastewater treatment process. Sufficient D.O. is essential for the
proper operation of many wastewater treatment processes. Activated sludge tanks often have
their D.O. monitored continuously. Low D.O values may be set to trigger an alarm or activate a
control loop which will increase the supply of air to the tank.
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) is defined as the amount of DO consumed in 5 days when
the waste is incubated in the dark at 20 0C in the presence if suitable stabilization microorganism.
It is the oxygen required by bacteria for stabilizing decomposable organic matter under aerobic
conditions. The BOD test is a bioassay procedure involving the measurement of oxygen
consumed by living organisms while utilizing the organic matter present in a waste, under
conditions as similar as possible to these that occur in nature. The BOD test may be considered
as a wet oxidation procedure in which the living organisms serve as the medium for oxidation of
the organic matter to carbon dioxide and water. The oxidation reaction involved in the BOD test
is a result of biological activity, and the rate at which the reaction proceeds is governed to a
major extent by population numbers and temperature. Temperature effects are held as far as
natural bodies of water are concerned. Normally, we use BOD5 or the 5 days incubation period
because we need to minimize interference from oxidation of ammonia. During 5 days, BOD
values follow first order reaction. The BOD test is used to evaluate the pollution strength of
domestic and industrial waste in the terms of Oxygen that they will require if discharge into
natural watercourses in which aerobic condition exist.
2. Objective
i.
ii.
3. Methodology
DO Determination (Azide Modification Method)
O.2, 0.5 and 1 mL of sample was added in each BOD bottles of size 300 mL using the
following table
Table: BOD measurable with various dilution of sample
Using percent mixture
% Mixture
Range of BOD
ml
Range of BOD
0.01
0.02
0.05
0.10
0.20
0.50
1.00
2.00
5.00
10.00
20.00
50.00
100
20,000 70,000
10,000 35,000
4,000 14,000
2,000 7,000
1,000 3,500
400 1,400
200 700
100 350
40 140
20 70
10 35
4 14
0-7
0.02
0.05
0.10
0.20
0.50
1.00
2.00
5.00
10.00
20.00
50.00
100
300
30,000 105,000
12,000 42,000
6,000 21,000
3,000 10,500
1,200 4,200
600 2,100
300 1,050
120 420
60 210
30 105
12 42
6 21
0-7
Supersaturated oxygen distilled water was shiponed up to 300 mL and its cap was closed
BOD sample was then incubated for 5 days (DO5) in refrigerator at 20oC
Add 1 ml conc. H2SO4 (allowing the acid to run down the neck of the bottle) and mix
several times till precipitate disappear.
The remaining solution of 201 ml was titrated with 0.025 M Na2S2O3 to pale straw color.
Few drops of starch solution was added and it was immediately titrated from blue color to
colorless.
Blank determination was done in the same manner by using only supersaturated oxygen
distilled water.
Calculation BOD
BOD5 (mg/l) =
4.
Presentation of Results
4.1
Dilution
Volume
of sample
(ml)
BOD5
7.6
0.2/300
1200
7.6
0.2/300
1200
7.2
0.5/300
720
6.8
0.5/300
960
6.55
1/300
555
8.2
6.2
1/300
660
8.4
8.4
8.8*
8.4
300/300
300/300
DO0
(mg/l)
Avg
10
0.2
20
0.5
Blank
8.4
8.8
*
8.5
9.8
*
8.2
Remark
DO5
(mg/l)
8.4
Rejected as
depleted
DO is less
than 2 mg/l
Can be
used
4.2
BOD
COD
Calculated
BOD
Dilution
10
20
30
D
O0
DO5
10
20
BOD5
30
Remark
10
20
30
GR 1
7400
0.4
3000
0.2
0.5
8.4
5.3
6.2
4650
1320
720
GR 2
8200
0.4
2880
0.2
0.5
8.3
7.8
7.3
5.8
600
600
750
GR 3
5680
0.4
2500
0.2
0.5
8.3
8.0
7.25
6.7
450
630
480
GR 4*
6600
0.4
2640
0.2
0.5
8.4
7.6
7.2
6.2
1200
840
660
GR 5
6000
0.6
3600
0.2
0.5
8.5
7.7
7.10
6.25
1200
840
675
GR 6
5400
0.6
3240
0.2
0.5
8.7
8.6
7.55
6.5
75
720
660
GR 7
4000
0.6
2400
0.2
0.5
8.5
8.0
7.6
6.4
750
540
630
GR 8
4932
0.6
3000
0.2
0.5
8.6
8.5
7.55
6.55
675
630
615
GR 9
4053
0.8
3050
0.2
0.5
9.2
8.0
7.62
6.6
1500
1068
960
GR10
2880
0.8
2300
0.2
0.5
8.3
8.05
7.1
6.3
375
810
600
GR11
3600
0.8
2900
0.2
0.5
9.0
8.05
7.6
6.25
1425
820
825
5. Discussion of Result
The BOD test was carried out after COD test. COD value was 6600 mg/L. Probable BOD of the
sample was calculated to be 2640 mg/l with the help of provided BOD to COD ratio of 0.4
established for the sample provided. Dilutions were then chosen as reference to lab instruction
sheet which were 0.5 mL, and also one above (0.2 mL) and one below (1 mL).
After 5 days of incubation, the BOD5 of the sample CBD10 was calculated to be 660 mg/l. Only
one result out of all the sample dilution could be used as only its DO delpletion was more than 2
mg/l. Hence the BOD5 was calculated to be much lower than the probable BOD which signifies
that the BOD to COD ratio was much lower than the 0.4 and the actual BOD to COD ratio of the
sample CBD10 can be calculated to be 0.1. Such a low ratio signifies the presence of inorganic
or resistent material thus we can conclude that the sample source cannot be biodegraded. Such a
low BOD to COD ratio also suggests the toxic nature of the sample.
Considering all the group data almost all the group had to use the 1 ml dilution DO 5 data for the
calulation of BOD5 hence the BOD5 of the entire groups lies between 600 to 2100 mg/l. The
BOD to COD ratio provided to the entire groups was much higher than the actual value. Hence
that was the reason that there lied a marginal gap between probable BOD and the actual BOD.
During the BOD test, errors can occur due to either human, instruments or the unpredictable
biological activities. Therefore, cares should be taken as follows:
Clean BOD bottle properly with detergent to eliminate all previous and accumulated
organic matter and microorganism. Rinse with distilled water and let dry to minimize
toxic from chlorine residue from tap water.
Some inhibitors, such as heavy metal and some toxic, can inhibit micro organism growth
or may kill micro organism.
References
Sawyer C.N et.al, Chemistry for Environmental Engineering: 5th edition Mc.GrawHill;2002
Appendix
a)
Write chemical equations for all the essential reactions of the Winkler method.
MnSO4
+ I2 + 2H2O + K2SO4
4. When titrating with Na2S2O3, Iodine will react with Na2S2O3 and form NaI.
2Na2S2O32- + I2
Na2S4O62- + 2 Na I
b) Explain why oxygen should be fixed in the field, when making determinations of DO in
streams, lakes, etc.
Water sample have bacteria that can degrade organic matter by using oxygen in water. This can
cause the reducing of dissolved oxygen. On the other hand, Oxygen in the air can penetrate into
water sample. Therefore, the best way to keep oxygen at the same amount of initial value is
fixing by MnSO4.
c) Why do you use Azide modification of the Winkler method?
Nitrite is one of the main interference involving DO measurement by Winkler method. During
titration process, nitrite oxidizes I- to I2, thus giving a very high result of DO. Nitrite can exist
in effluent from wastewater treatment plant, natural stream, lake, etc. The chemical reactions
involved in this process are as follows:
NaI + NO2-
N2O2 + I2
Further, N2O2 is oxidized by oxygen can give NO2 again. This can be a cyclic reaction.
N2O2 + 1/2 O2 + H2O
2 NO2- + 2 H+
To solve this problem, the modification method use sodium azide (NaN 3) to capture NO2, and
make it into N2 and N2O.
2HN3 + Na2SO4
N2 + N2O + H2O
d) Draw up a table showing five substances which interfere with the Winkler test and
indicate the modification designed to overcome these interferences.
Interference
substances
Chemical
Used
Method
Chemical Reactions
NO2-
NaN3
SAM
kMnO4
RSM
Fe2+
kMnO4
RSM
Fe3+
kF
Aldehyde
kMnO4
Fe3+ + 3F- Fe F3
RSM
Suspended solids
AFM
Sulfite,
trio sulfite,
AHM
polythiosulfate
Note: SAM - Sodium Azide Modification
RSM - Rideal Stewast Modification
AFM -Alum Flocculator Modification
AHM- Alkaline - hypochlorite Modification
BOD (mg/L) =
DOb
= Percent dilution
( DO0 - DOs )
P
DO of diluted sample at initial day 0
DOs =
------- (2)
In equation (1), when value of DO b equals to DOs the last term can be neglected, and thus the
equation becomes.
BOD (mg/L) =
=
( DOs - DOi )
P
( DO0 - DOs )
P
--------- (3)
--------- (2)
10
11
L (1-10-kt)
Ultimate BOD
Constant Value
(= 0.15)
Time
(=5 days)
So,
Y
Where,
Y
(1-10-kt)
200
243.3 mg/L
(1-10-(0.15x5))
Thus, the Ultimate BOD is
243
mg/L
2. b) Two wastes of equal volume have different BOD values, one with 350 mg/L. and
another 650 mg/L. Draw a graph to show how the oxygen sag curves would differ in the
receiving streams, assuming that stream flows and other conditions are identical.
1
DO (mg/L)
Point of discharge
reacts with
So, 62.66 g/L of mercuric sulfate should be added to eliminate 15 g/L. of chloride ion .
4. What is the theoretical COD of samples containing 300 mg/L of
a) Ethyl alcohol
b) Glucose
2
2 CO2 + 3 H2O
use O2 ( 3 mole) 96 g
C2H5OH
use O2
300 mg/L
= 96 300
46
So, the theoretical COD of sample = 626 mg/L
626 mg/L
6 CO2 + 3 H2O
C6H12O6