0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
476 tayangan79 halaman
The government should be in charge of paying pension for the old to guarantee their lives. Leaving the old unattended means nothing less than giving them a death sentence. Arts still stand on the same significant position in comparison with science and technology.
The government should be in charge of paying pension for the old to guarantee their lives. Leaving the old unattended means nothing less than giving them a death sentence. Arts still stand on the same significant position in comparison with science and technology.
The government should be in charge of paying pension for the old to guarantee their lives. Leaving the old unattended means nothing less than giving them a death sentence. Arts still stand on the same significant position in comparison with science and technology.
TOPIC: Some people say that it is the responsibility of individuals to save money for their own care after
they retire. To what extent
do you agree or disagree? ANSWER: Caring about life after retirement is raising a matter of concern among people. I believe that although individuals need to save some whenever possible, the government should assist its citizens when they get old. To begin with, it is reasonable to say that people deserve to have some forms of welfare, regardless of pension or other financial assistance. As workers pay taxes while they work, they should receive some certain amount of money when they retire. Therefore, it would be unreasonable to say that only individuals are responsible for their lives after retirement; the government should be in charge of paying pension for the old to guarantee their lives. Secondly, the role of government is to take care of its citizens, regardless of who they are. Those who have no job should also be given some financial assistance to ensure that they can afford a basic living because without money, they can risk their lives to rob or commit other associated crimes, and this will be a threat to social security. Moreover, leaving the old unattended means nothing less than giving them a death sentence, raising some questions about moral aspects of the authorities. However, individuals should also be responsible for their lives by saving money whenever it is possible. Because pension cannot be generously given, people have insufficient money to pay for every arisen demand. Therefore, saving may be a solution, especially when it comes to medical care for the old. In conclusion, although individuals should save some for their life after leaving work, I believe that government should take care of its citizens by giving pension. (268 words)
Theo bn, bi vit ny c bao nhiu im? TOPIC: People still value arts (musicians, painters, writers) despite improvements in science and technology. Do you think arts are as important as science and technology? ANSWER: Thanks to the blooming science and technology, human beings are now experiencing modern facilities that help them to enjoy a better life. Some people argue that arts, therefore, play less important role in comparison with science and technology. However, this is not always true because in my opinion, arts still stand on the same significant position. To begin with, it is undoubtedly that science and technology cannot replace arts in humans spiritual life. Technological productions may help to reduce man power and provide a comfortable life but they absolutely are incapable of creating meaningful moments and bringing information . An air-conditioner, for instance, can cool down the temperature when it is hot, yet it cannot relax people as a song does once they are stressful. Similarly, although a washing machine saves a lot of time and energy for human beings, it provides no knowledge and story about things about life as a novelty does . Those examples once again confirm the irreplaceable role of arts in human life. Secondly, it is surprised that arts do have some contribution to the development of science and technology. Indeed, what a painting presents may be seen differently depending on the imagination of the audience. In other words, paintings assist people to build up their mind, thoughts and creativeness which, of course, are essential to develop science . Likewise, the increasing demand of entertaining music has promoted technology in an excellent way. Initially, music could just be heard by live performance, and then radio was invented to broadcast songs widely. Now, as we all know, there are many types of recordings that have brought high quality music to audience worldwide. In conclusion, despite that science and technology have made our life great, arts still are similarly important. Not only does it enrich human spiritual life, art also advances the development of science and technology. (331 words)
Bi vit ny mnh vit t rt lu ri. Band im th chc l cha c 8.0, nhng cc bn c tham kho v cch t chc nh: TOPIC: Nowadays, more people are migrating to other countries than ever before. In order to become integrated into society in their adopted countries, immigrants should abandon their old ways and adapt to local customs and codes of behavior. Do you agree or disagree? ANSWER: Today, the number of people moving and settling in a foreign country is increasing. While some people believe that immigrants should not make any changes in the way they live, I would hold a contrary opinion for the following reasons. To begin with, the primary reason why immigrants should adjust themselves to the new cultures is to reduce the chance of misunderstanding among local residents and newcomers. Sometimes, the roots of conflicts between people are originated from the cultural differences, and this will increase the distance among them. For example, it is considered rude in Japan when people do not bow to each other, or when they speak something impolitely. As a consequence, if the immigrants resist adopting common practices of the local citizens, they are much likely to be isolated from the community. Additionally, it is widely believed that different countries have different codes of conduct, and for this reason people should obey rules and regulations of the host countries. By this I mean some acts can be legal in a society, but they can be regarded as illegal in others. For example, while gambling is permitted in the US as an entertaining activity, it is considered a type of crime in Vietnam, and gamblers are much likely to receive prison sentences for their actions. This explains why in many countries applicants for permanent residency have to pass the tests in legislation and local culture. In conclusion, as a saying goes when in Rome, do as the Romans do, we should change our behaviour and lifestyle to follow local customs when settling in a new society. (267 words)
Chng ta hy cng xem mt template vit bi IELTS Writing task 2, dng "discuss both views" nh. Template ny c trch xut t mt bi vit ca anh Xi mng. bi: Some people say A, others say B. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Template: It is true that ...(gii thiu topic)... While it can be argued that ...(view A)..., I believe that ...(view B).... There are several reasons why (view A)... Firstly. Secondly. Finally. Despite the above arguments, I believe that ... (view B)... In conclusion, ...(view A)..., but ...(view B). Lu : - Body no bn ng th sau. - Cn k nng paraphrase cu hi th vo nhng ch view A, view B pha trn. V d: TOPIC: Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. ANSWER: It is true that some minority languages may disappear in the near future. Although it can be argued that governments could save money by allowing this to happen, I believe that these languages should be protected and preserved. There are several reasons why saving minority languages could be seen as a waste of money. Firstly, if a language is only spoken by a small number of people, expensive education programmes will be needed to make sure that more people learn it, and the state will have to pay for facilities, teachers and marketing. This money might be better spent on other public services. Secondly, it would be much cheaper and more efficient for countries to have just one language. Governments could cut all kinds of costs related to communicating with each minority group. Despite the above arguments, I believe that governments should try to preserve languages that are less widely spoken. A language is much more than simply a means of communication; it has a vital connection with the cultural identity of the people who speak it. If a language disappears, a whole way of life will disappear with it, and we will lose the rich cultural diversity that makes societies more interesting. By spending money to protect minority languages, governments can also preserve traditions, customs and behaviours that are part of a countrys history. In conclusion, it may save money in the short term if we allow minority languages to disappear, but in the long term this would have an extremely negative impact on our cultural heritage.
Bn Hoi Thu lp Academic Writing Online vit bi cho thi IELTS ngy 15/03/2014 va ri. Theo bn bi ny c khong bao nhiu im TOPIC: It is important for all towns and cities to have large public spaces such as squares and parks. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? ANSWER: It is sometimes claimed that large public spaces such as squares and parks are necessary infrastructures for all cities. While I agree that this is a sound argument, I also believe that not all towns can have these spaces. One the one hand, I can understand some reasons why large public areas are important for the towns in term of enhancing peoples health. Firstly, people tend to approach parks for outdoor activities regardless of age or gender, which can help them keep fit and healthy. Adults realize that park is an ideal place to do exercise or socialize with other people while adolescents can find it useful in order to go camping or chatting. In addition, it is true that the trees in the parks can reduce environmental problems such as air or noise pollution; as a result, the health of citizens might be gradually improved. On the other hand, I also recognize that it might be difficult for all towns to have large public areas due to the shortage of land. Some cities have weak long term plans, therefore, they do not have large areas used for parks or squares. For example, two big cities in Vietnam, namely Hanoi and Hochiminh cities, show limited number of parks and squares. The cities have to arrange the large spaces to build up housing and enlarge road systems, which are caused by over-population. Obviously, these problems are more urgent than having parks and squares in the cities. In conclusion, it is necessary for towns to have large public spaces but it also depends on each circumstances, whether or not the towns can afford them.
Mt thi IELTS speaking hm nay (17/03):
Part 1: Where are you living? How long have you lived there? Do you often go to visit your relatives? When was the latest time you visit them? What do you often do when visiting your relatives? Can you compare difference between visiting your relatives and your friends?
Part 2: Describe a website you have used. You should say: How you found that website What that website is about How often you access it and explain how you feel about that website
Part3: Are there any other popular websites in VN? What are the advantages and disadvantages of playing video games? Can you compare differences between shopping online and shopping in the store? What are the advantages and disadvantages of shopping online? What are differences between the method of payment between shopping online and shopping in the store? Does they have any effect on buyers? Speaking test (Ideas only): P1: Study & Sunshine.
P2: Describe a competition (a race, TV show...) you would like to take part in.
P3: Questions about competition (sport, work). Some schools usually use strict rules. What do you think about this? Part 1: + What is your full name? + Do you work or are you a student? + Do you usually like studying this? (cu ny examiner hi sau khi cu trn mnh tr li mnh hc ngnh g) + Do you often travel by train? + When did you first travel by train? + Is there any underground train system in your country? Sau khi mnh bo khng c v ni goverment nn xy dng trong tng lai th examiner hi thm " Why ? " + What do you use the computer for? + When did you first learn to use the computer?
- Part 2: Describe a place you went to that helps you gain experiences about another culture. Thm 1 cu hi sau khi ni xong cue card l Do you enjoy learning about other cultures?
-Part 3 + How can we learn about other cultures ? + Are the ways we learn about cultures today different from that of the past? ( hi changes y) +Is it really necessary to live in a country to explore about its culture? + Do you think that sporting events like Olympic affect globalization? +Cu cui cng ny chc examiner extend ra cho gi, nhng khng hi trong tp u v thy gii thch di di xong mi mnh tr li, i loi cu hi l liu c ng c khc nhng sporting event nh Sochi Nga khng, c phi leaders ca nc ny mun dng Sochi show off sc mnh ca h khng? . Mt IELTS speaking sng nay:
Part 1: - what is your full name? where are you from? what do you do? - do you want to work in the morning or in the afternoon? - what kind of music do you want to listen to? what don't you like? - do you play instruments? - how often do you use dictionary? do you prefer paper or digital dictionary? - writing an dictionary is an interesting job. do you agree?
Part2: Discribe a place that you went to and far away from your home -what the place is -when you come -who you go with -your feeling
Part 3: - What is the reason for people to travel far away from home? - How is the way people travel in the past different from in these days? - How is the feeling of young people about the place they go to different from the feeling of older people?
Bi vit ca mt bn hc lp Academic writing (lp thng 11/2013), cc bn tham kho nh. (y l bn cha c correct nh):
TOPIC: Some people think that computers and the Internet are more important for a child's education than going to school. But others believe that schools and teachers are essential for children to learn effectively. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
ANSWER:
With a number of technological advancements growing apace, it is generally believed that the Internet and computer will supplant the traditional role of teachers in the not-too-distant future. This idea may point out to two main directions, both of which present different arguments
Central to the supporting arguments of this issue is the idea that the global online network is the inexhaustible source of information, which definitely exceeds the fund of knowledge that any veteran teacher can accumulate. Internet and computer also offer a more comprehensive access to knowledge, ranging from visual to aural stimuli, which make learning an ever enjoyable experience, especially for children
On the other hand, critics of this idea maintain that although educational benefits that the Internet may yield are undeniable, some certain shortcomings have still remained . Much information as the Internet may provide, most of the sources are unjustified by experts. As a result, information from those sources is subjected to question Admittedly, the computer can show whether an answer to a particular question is right or wrong but it cannot give as an in-depth explanation as a human teacher can. Through face-to-face communication, teachers can also pinpoint the weaknesses of each student and therefore, adjusting and tailoring their teaching methods to meet the levels or the demands of those students. This is where the computer proves to be incompetent.
In short, although both sides have their equally valid arguments. I am inclined to think that although Internet can be a useful tool for education, it will never can play the unique role of human teachers.
(261 words - by c Hng)TOPIC: Children educating is expensive. In some countries, the government pay partly or all education fees. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? (IELTS question 22/02/2014)
ANSWER:
In many countries, education fees for children are partly or fully supported by the government. While this may cause some potential problems, I believe that the benefits are greater than the drawbacks.
There are a number of positive impacts when the government provides some financial support for childrens education. Firstly, governmental subsidy will encourage more children to go to school and eventually reduce illiteracy rate. It is true that children are the future of a country, so the greater investment we make in their education, the better workforce we have in future, which is the precursor of economic growth. Secondly, governmental funding for educating children will relieve some financial burdens for parents, so they have more money to spend on better nutrition and health care for children.
On the other hand, when governments subsidise tuition fees for children, several problems can be anticipated. The main disadvantage of this would be that some important sectors of the economy, such as infrastructure and agriculture, will be insufficiently invested in; as a consequence, the economy will be held back from development. Another drawback is that some taxpayers, especially those who live alone or who are childless, may feel unfair because part of their money is paid for educating other peoples children. However, these negative consequences can be negated by the contributions that children make to their country when they grow older.
In conclusion, although spending the national budget on the education of children may have potential problems, I believe that its advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
(252 words written by ielts.vinh@gmail.com with the help of all members of the writing class of November 2013).
}y l{ b{i vit ca mt bn hc lp intensive thng 08/2013 vi mnh. cc bn sau kha hc bn y t bao nhiu im writing? Cc bn s khng tin c }u, kh ch c c li bi ny chc cng s khng nhn ra :))
TOPIC : The number of people not knowing their neighbors is increasing. What are the causes? What are the solutions?
ANSWER:
It is true that nowadays people tend to move to big cities; however , many of them donot have any contact with their neighbors, and they seems to be more isolated than ever before. This modern lifestyle probably contributes to the lost of commnity sense . It is the goal of this article to outline several reasons for the issue as well as suggest certain ways to address it.
To begin with, there are several reasons why people donot have any contact with neighbors. Firstly, business from job is one main reason that leads to the indifference among neighbors. As people leave for work early in the morning and come back home late in the evening, they are too tired to have time for paying attention to their neighbors. Secondly, the development of information technology has contributed to the lost of community sense. With the birth of social networks such as facebook or twitter, people donot have to go out but sit in their own rooms and they can get contact with people living far away. As a results, people in many big cities seem like Robinson in their own houses.
Having said that, I believe some remedies can be used to address this problem. Firstly, local authorities had better organize weekly activities such as running teams or singing clubs. Such leisure activities will create chances for people to gather, to talk and connect with each others. Gradually, their sense of community will be mature. Secondly, at the heart of the matter is people responsibility to tackle the problem. Human being is a society where people are independent of each others; therefore, they should make their own effort to become responsive residents.
In conclusion, the above-mentioned facts have given us an outline of the causes and suggestions for indifference among neighbors. Admittedly, such solutions would be not easy to be implemented in real life; however, they should be done to solve at the roots of the problem. }y l{ b{i essay band 9 ca anh Simon, mt bi mnh rt chi l thch:
TOPIC: Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
ANSWER:
It is true that medicines and other products are routinely tested on animals before they are cleared for human use. While I tend towards the viewpoint that animal testing is morally wrong, I would have to support a limited amount of animal experimentation for the development of medicines.
On the one hand, there are clear ethical arguments against animal experimentation. To use a common example of this practice, laboratory mice may be given an illness so that the effectiveness of a new drug can be measured. Opponents of such research argue that humans have no right to subject animals to this kind of trauma, and that the lives of all creatures should be respected. They believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused, and that scientists should use alternative methods of research.
On the other hand, reliable alternatives to animal experimentation may not always be available. Supporters of the use of animals in medical research believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be justified if human lives are saved. They argue that opponents of such research might feel differently if a member of their own families needed a medical treatment that had been developed through the use of animal experimentation. Personally, I agree with the banning of animal testing for non-medical products, but I feel that it may be a necessary evil where new drugs and medical procedures are concerned.
In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be wrong to ban testing on animals for vital medical research until equally effective alternatives have been developed. C ci template ny cho bi "Discuss both views and give your opinion" hay pht, cc bn c th tham kho nh:
One of the most controversial issues today relates to . . In this essay, I am going to examine this question from both points of view
On one side of the argument there are people who argue that the benefits of considerably outweigh its disadvantages. The main reason for believing this is that . It is also possible to say that .One good illustration of this is .
On the other hand, it is also possible to make the opposing case. It is often argued that in fact .. People often have this opinion because A second point is that ..A particularly good example here is..
As we have seen, there are no easy answers to this question. On balance, however, I tend to believe that ..
i khi chng ta nhn li nhng bi vit essay u tin t tay vit s thy nhiu iu tht |ng yu ^^
Gii thiu vi cc bn, }y l{ b{i vit essay u tin ca mnh, t rt lu lm ri. Gi mnh vn cn gi lm k nim ^^
---------------- TOPIC: In many countries children are engaged in some kinds of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility.
What are you opinions on this?
ANSWER:
Some people may not agree with the idea that children should be engaged in some kinds of paid work. They think children should spend more time on studying, playing rather than working. As far as I am concerned, I am at the opposite side with them.
First of all, in terms of gaining experience, children who have paid work are more senior than the others. Lets take shoe-cleaning job as an example. Children who do this work will have chances to communicate with prospects to offer them a service. Therefore they are more confident and experienced than the others who just stay at home and do nothing. Furthermore, when clean shoes, children will know how to improve their skills to serve clients better, then they will get more work.
Regarding to learning, we can see the same point: children learn a lot when they work and get paid for it. Cleaning shoes not only bring them some money but also teach them to be patient in work and respect every coin they earn. This will help them understand the value of money because if they are given money easily, they will lavish them upon their pleasures.
Last but not least, working makes children be responsible. Turning back to the above example, its obviously that when children get paid, they have to clean shoes carefully. If they dont do it properly, they will loose prospect and money. All these things mean that children will gradually lean to be responsible for what they serve.
To sum up, with above evidences and explanation, I totally disagree with the idea that children should not have any kind of paid work. They are young and working will grow them up with a lot of experience, learning and responsibility.
(293 words) ANSWER:
Although living in urban areas brings to dwellers prosperity and more convenient life (1), I would contend that it also has drawback (2). First of all (3), due to emission (4) from private cars and toxic fume (5) from industry chimney, citizens have to encounter polluted environment (6) daily (7) which ( 8 ) contribute to the high risk of suffering from illness such as cancer, breath related disease (9). Secondly, the fact (10) is that congestion, especially in rush hours, is considered as (11) alarming issue in big cities and impacting on (12) citizen's life. To illustrate, so long are the traffic jams (13) that there are many cases of late for work or missing valuable contracts (14). Finally, it (15) is no doubt that the crime rate (16) in big cities is always extremely higher than that in rural. This increase (17) nervousness of urban people while rural dwellers more satisfy to social security.
(1): V trc ca cu khng lin quan n topic -> B. (2): Drawback l danh t m c, khi s dng dng s t phi c a/the i ng trc. Mt cch khc trnh l s dng dng s nhiu, v chng ta ko ni n 1 drawback. (3) Firstly. T First of all s dng trong vn ni (4): emission l danh t m c, chuyn sang dng s nhiu trng hp ny. (5): fume cng l danh t m c, li ging vi li s 2 v s 4. (6): Cm encounter polluted environment khng hp l. Em s dng encounter environmental problems thay th. (7): daily l tnh t. Thay bng everyday. (8): Phi c du phy trc which, v mnh sau ang b ngha cho c cu trc. (9): diseases l danh t s t. Li ging s 2, 4 v 5. (10): Fact no? Trnh tuyt i cch dng ny. (11): Cu trc: X consider Y Z. Khng c 'as'. Danh t ng sau cn c thm mo t. (12): Nu dng impact vi dng verb th ko c 'on' (13): jam l informal. Thay bng traffic congestion. (14): contracts no? Please specify. (15): There is no doubt that... (16): crime rateS. (17): S-V agreement.
TOPIC: Caring for children is an important thing of the society. It is suggested that all mothers and fathers should be required to take childcare training courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
ANSWER:
Children represent both the present and the future. In recent years, there has been a surge of interest in transforming childcare into a formal subject of academic studies. Traditional childcare skills, which are passed on from one generation to another through oral and informal instruction, are not sufficient to guarantee quality care, so parents' participation in care training is advisable.
Many parents might be accustomed to the idea that childcare is all about love, but this notion is misleading. While it is easy to admit that parents are responsible to attend to children's needs, it is also important to note that children are too often insatiable. Unlike adults, they have no idea of what their behaviours lead to. For example, children are candy lovers without knowledge that candy can cause obesity and tooth damage. Parents should not respond to children's needs for candy permanently. Parents who give whatever children want, known as indulgent parents, can be blamed for their children's behaviour problems and unhealthy habits. Childcare training teaches parents how to take a holistic approach to care for their children and prevents them from answering children's inappropriate needs
Another misconceived idea of childcare is that it is a simple process of feeding children and making them sleep regularly. Contemporary childcare is not limited to this. Equally important for this science are emotional and mental wellbeing. For example, some children's first step comes earlier than other children's which cannot be explained with simple knowledge. Childcare is a complex science that goes beyond nutrition. Whether parents have helped children improve motor skills and cognitive skills accounts for children's overall wellbeing.
To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that successful childcare does not lie only in love but also in skills. Children's healthy development is measured not only by physical wellbeing but also by growth in other dimensions. With these borne in mind, parents might now be compelled to join childcare training. Topic:Some people think that politicians have the greatest influence on the world. Other people, however, believe that scientists have the greatest influence. Discuss both of views and give your opinion.
ANSWER:
People have different views about greatest influences on the world. Although there are several brilliant arguments in favor of politicians influence, I mainly believe that the impact of scientists on humanity is huge.
To begin with, the main reasons why people believe that politicians have the greatest influences vary. Firstly, it is widely believe that all the laws of nations is created by politicians. The law is a powerful tool for government to manage a country, and it is mandatory for all citizens to abide law. Secondly, politicians play a significant role in building a nation. For instance, Lincoln is a famous president who leads United State to be an equality country for everyone with every skin color.
On the other hand, I would content that scientists have large impacts on humanity. There is no doubt that science creates medicine to treat people disease for centuries. Many cures have been developing to treat dangerous diseases such as H5N1 and SAR for example. Without cures, thousands of peoples life or more in every nations will be put on a considerable risk of wide spread diseases. Additionally, in the era of technology, scientists role become more important for human. From beginning of 21 century till now, forms of communication between people significantly change. For instance, instead of using pens and papers to write a letter, almost all people today use email or messages because the higher speed in transferring.
In conclusion, even though influences of both scientists and politicians is large, and influences of them clearly force humans life to be innovated . Scientists tell us that some activities are good for health and others are bad. Despite knowing that, million of people still continue doing unhealthy activities. What are the causes and what are the sollutions for this?
Body 1: Causes: - Life becomes busier -> fast food and junk food -> obesity. - Life is more stressful -> drink beer/wine for relaxation. - Being addicted to games, television, computer -> sedentary lifestyle -> deterioration in health.
Body 2: Solutions: - Individuals spend more time on the preparation of healthy meals and diets. - Do physical exercise instead of the intake of alcohol drink. - Joining outdoor activities rather than bury in technology devices. TOPIC: In many countries, young people leave rural areas to study or work in cites. What do you think are reasons of this ? Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
ANSWER:
Introduction: - In many parts of the world, young people are migrating into cities for better job opportunities and better education. - In my opinion, this has both benefits and drawbacks.
Body 1: Reasons for the trend: - Better job opportunities. - Higher education.
Body 2: I believe that this trend has both positive and negative impacts. - Positive: Better workforce for society, better life. - Negative: Crowded population in cities, lack of workforce in rural areas.
Conclusion: employment and education are two main reasons, and this has both advantages and disadvantages as discussed above.
TOPIC: Economic progress is one way to measure a country's success. Some people believe that there are other factors should be considered when measuring the success of a country. What are the other factors? Do you think there is a factor that is more important than the others?
ANSWER:
Among the number of factors in evaluating the success of a country, education and health care systems are proved to be equally important as economic growth. Personally, I believe that none of them are more crucial than others.
There are several reasons why education is a contributing element in the success of a society. Firstly, when people have a chance to access education, they are much more likely to find a job, meaning that they can make a living without resorting to robbery or theft, for example. Secondly, efforts to improve research and development activities will be hampered if there is a shortage of students enrolling in academic courses. Finally, one of the main goals of education is to improve peoples general awareness, which is the major difference among underdeveloped, developing and developed countries.
Equally important, a good health care system also plays an important role in measuring how great a country is. Obviously, a healthy population can make great contributions to the development of the country, and it would be impossible to expect the same thing in regions where people are suffering from health problems and diseases. To illustrate, fatal diseases such as HIV and malaria are destroying African communities, militating against economic development and efforts in improving education quality in these areas. Therefore, providing vaccines, drugs and medical treatments to cure people should be given an equal consideration as education and economic growth.
In conclusion, I believe that each of three factors mentioned above makes different contributions when judging the success of a country, and there will be no scale that can indicate which one is more important than others.
(272 words - written by ielts.vinh@gmail.com)
[Bi vit mu cho thi IELTS 26/10/2013]
TOPIC: A rise in the standard of living in a country often only seems to benefit cities rather than rural areas. What problems might this difference cause? How might these problems be reduced?
ANSWER:
The rapid economic growth in many countries has led to a widening gap between cities and rural areas. This also causes a corresponding increase in the number of problems that need to be tackled, as now will be discussed.
Perhaps the most severe consequence is that people living in rural areas tend to move to city centres for a better life, causing an overload on infrastructure and services. For example, in Vietnam, there are a growing number of people migrating into Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City to access better education and medical care. As a result, there will be an overcrowded population in these areas, putting considerable strains on traffic and hospital services that are already limited.
Furthermore, there will be an unbalanced workforce between urban and rural areas. Hoping for a better career path, many new graduates decide to settle in big cities, and this will make the job market become more competitive. Meanwhile, many sectors in the countryside experience a labour shortage, which will eventually holds the local economy back from development.
I believe that several remedies can be used to address the issues. One measure would be for the government to make a greater investment in improving conditions in rural areas. For example, schools and hospitals should be built to make education and health care more accessible in those areas. Another solution is that incentives can be offered to attract business investment, generating more jobs for the locals. Finally, teachers and doctors should be required to spend part of their lives working in rural areas.
In conclusion, a rise in standards of living has resulted in overpopulation in big cities and an unbalanced workforce in different areas of a country. However, there are a range of options available to handle the problems described above.
(298 words written by ielts.vinh@gmail.com)
TOPIC: Some people say that men should not advise women when making a decision. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
ANSWER:
It has recently been feverishly argued that females advice may cause many negative effects on their partners lives. As a result, it is thought that men should make their own decisions without asking their wives. However, some others take an opposing perspective. The attitude might be biased if the issue is not thoroughly discussed.
What is first at the forefront in my mind is that womens advice is the most worthy to take into consideration when a decision is made. A recent research of a top- notch scientists group has shown that it is a complicated process of series difficult skills such as gathering the fact, quality assessment and especially wife persuading. If there is a need of advising, it should be wives advice rather than experts. Bill Clinton asked his wife to run for the USA President while Adolf Hitler listened to his military advisors to conquest the world and we all knew the results.
Another opinion that deserves public consideration is that males lives will become uncomfortable if they do not consult females whether it is right or wrong. You do not respect me; you do not love me anymore and thousands of meaningless words like that will be thrown into a mans ears along with biting and scratching just because we boil an egg without asking his wife recipe. An ancient philosopher named Chu Cuoi, a typical example in Vietnam, had always asked his female partner and doing the way around and was punished with a life sentence in the Moon.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that men should consult or at least pretend to consult women in all circumstances. We are deserved a happy life. For the men of 21th century, shut up and do exactly what are your female partners saying! Do you think you will happy if your wife is angry?
TOPIC: Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
ANSWER:
A childs education has never been about learning information and basic skills only. It has always included teaching the next generation how to be good members of society. Therefore, this cannot be the responsibility of the parents alone.
In order to be a good member of any society, the individual must respect and obey the rules of their community and share their values. Educating children to understand the need to obey rules and respect others always begins in the home and is widely thought to be the responsibility of parents. They will certainly be the first to help children learn what is important in life, how they are expected to behave and what role they will play in their world.
However, learning to understand and share the value system of a whole society cannot be achieved just in the home. Once a child goes to school, they are entering a wider community where teachers and peers will have just as much influence as their parents do at home. At school, children will experience working and living with people from a whole variety of backgrounds from the wider society. This experience should teach them how to co-operate with each other and how to contribute to the life of their community.
But to be a valuable member of any community is not like learning a simple skill. It is something that an individual goes on learning throughout life and it is the responsibility of every member of a society to take responsibility for helping the younger generation to become active and able members of that society TOPIC: When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
ANSWER:
Nowadays, technological advances and their rapid and wide applications are having a significant impact on a nations traditional skills and ways of life. Some argue that such impact is so extraordinary that it would make conventional skills and life styles obsolete. However, I believe they would continue to thrive by providing alternatives to modern ways of life, and innovative ideas for modern technologies.
First of all, traditional skills and ways of life are becoming an alternative solution to the problems caused by mainstreamed ways of life which are greatly influenced by modern technologies. For instance, a cozy restaurant where traditional, home-brewed beer is served, offers another experience to people who are bored with branded beers that have the same flavor and come out of mass production with new technologies. It is in such a venue where traditional skills are preserved, people become relaxed and educated. Providing diversity and thus enriching modern ways of life, such traditional skills and ways of life would continue to have their place.
Furthermore, conventional skills provide innovative ideas to the development of modern technologies. For example, sparkled by how the word Love is traditionally knitted into a sweater by some ethnic minority women in some parts of Asia, some business managers from textile industry have developed some production lines by applying the traditional skills to Computer-Aided Designs (CAD). The products have boosted the companies sales which in turn have increased their investment in preserving traditional skills for further developing their technologies.
To conclude, traditional skills and life styles are increasingly becoming a useful alternative to the homogeneity brought by global applications of modern technologies. However, the evolution of technologies is a selection process, whereby some would become obsolete, but there is no doubt that some would thrive when their roles are appreciated.
Feedback:
This is a good essay. The requirements of the task statement are covered, the arguments make sense and are presented in a coherent, easy to follow way, the range of vocabulary is wide enough and the writer shows fluency and flexibility. There are only a few errors (mouse over the words underlined in blue shows suggested corrections). Overall this looks like an IELTS Band 8 essay [Writing band 8]
}y l{ mt bi vit Band 8 mnh nht c t internet - chng ta cng phn tch nh:
TOPIC: Popular events like the Football World Cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tension and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way. Do you agree or disagree?
ANSWER:
Every four years, the whole world stops to watch international sporting events such as the Olympics and the Football World Cup in which athletes show their best performance to make their country proud. These sporting occasions have proved to be helpful in easing international tension in difficult times when powerful leaders were trying to control the worlds economy and other governments were fighting over the land.
The Olympic Games are one of the best examples which prove how sporting events can bring nations together, at least temporarily. From the ancient History, when Greeks and Romans would interrupt battles to participate in the games, to the more recent international disputes, when athletes from Palestine and Israel would forget their differences, compete peacefully and even embrace each other after an event. Moreover, these popular events have called the worlds attention to the terrible consequences of wars; thus some leaders have tried to reach agreements to end their disputes and live peacefully.
Similarly, international sporting events show benefits in some developing countries which live in a daily internal civil war. For example, Brazil has a high rate of unemployment, lack of education, hunger, crime, poverty and corruption which leads to an immense embarrassment of being Brazilian and a low self-esteem. However, when the Football World Cup starts, the Brazilian squad, which is considered the best team in the world, provokes an amazing feeling of pride in their country. Most people seem to forget all their problems and even the criminal activity decreases. They paint roads with the national colors, wear the Brazilian team shirts and buy national flags. Moreover, the competition brings families and neighbors together and even rival gangs watch the games and celebrate peacefully.
In conclusion, popular sporting events play an important role in decreasing international tensions and liberating patriotic feelings as history has shown.
-------------
y l nhn xt ca ngi chm bi:
This is a great essay, the ideas, language, structure of paragraphs and sentences, and your grammar show a good command of the English language. In my opinion it is Band 8. Keep up the good work.
------------------
C nhn mnh cho rng nguyn nhn chnh ti sao bi ny 'ch' xng ng 8.0 ch khng phi 9.0 l Body 2. Ngi vit b lan man v khng bm .
Hi vng mi ngi c th hc hi c mt cht g t bi vit ny ^^ Topic: Some people think that international travel will broaden knowledge while others think it will lead to tensions between local residents and travelers. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
ANSWER:
Never before has international travel flourished like now. While some people assert that travelling abroad would expand the knowledge of the tourists, the opponents argue that international tourism is the source of clashes between the locals and the tourists. I find the former more convincing.
There is little doubt that exposure to an alien country will broaden the horizon of peoples mind. Travelling offers exceptional opportunities to experience new culture first-hand. Escaping from the familiar surroundings, the Western travelers, for example, have chances to dwell in huts near the exquisite tropical beaches or stilt houses in the remote mountainous area in Vietnam, which they would hardly experience in their civilized country. Similarly, exotic taste of local cuisine and traditional music lingering on is also unforgettable. Such aspects of foreign culture will enrich the travelers life and concurrently, help them to develop an appreciation of their own culture. The introduction to external culture will hit the visitors that their own culture is unique and urge them to discover more about it.
On the other hand, tourism can irrefutably result in undesirable friction between the natives and the tourists. In the limited time span of the trip, it is fairly difficult for tourists to acclimatize to the local culture. To illustrate, Westerners in casual clothes visiting the religious temples might offend the locals. Also, language barrier can cause misunderstandings. Different places have its own communication pattern including gestures and expressions. Unaware that in Bulgaria while a side- to-side nod means a yes, the nod of the head up indicates a no; the tourists may find the Bulgarians obnoxious.
In conclusion, despite cultural misunderstandings or antipathy might arise among between visitors and locals, international travel, in my opinion, can lead to improved understanding and greater cultural awareness.
(293 words) TOPIC: Nowadays, more people are migrating to other countries than ever before. In order to become integrated into society in their adopted countries, immigrants should abandon their old ways and adapt to local customs and codes of behavior. Do you agree or disagree?
ANSWER:
During the last decades, there is a significant number of people migrating to other countries. Whether immigrants remain their original ways of living in their adopted countries is a debate of subject. While some people support this, I would contend that immigrants should abandon their old lifestyles and try to adapt to local values to fit in their new countries.
To begin with, it is obvious that people living in a nation must obey the laws and regulations for the social order of this country no matter what their nationalities are. For example, everyone have to follow the road rules when driving, otherwise they might be punished or injured in accident. There are many differences in the rules and regulations among nations, for instance, in the US, carrying guns or gambling is not forbidden whereas they are strictly illegal in other countries. Thus, it is essential for immigrants to adapt to local laws and customs in their adopted countries even if they are different from their own country.
Some people assert that immigrants should protect and remains their own way of living because of national character. However, although it is true that we should respect and keep our own cultural and local values, I would claim that we must also respect the local customs of our adopted countries. When we live in a country, which means we belong to that society, so it is important for us to overcome the differences and become integrated into that country. I believe that similarities among people bring them together while differences make them apart.
In conclusion, I firmly hold the view that immigrants should abandon their original lifestyles and adapt to local values of their new countries for a sense of unity of a society.
Topic: Some people think that it is better for older schoolchildren to study a large number of subjects and develop a range of knowledge. Others argue that they should study a smaller number of subjects and focus in details. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
ANSWER:
Education is a prerequisite for the better future of any student; however, how many subjects should they study is a contentious issue. Some proponents advocate that the more subjects, the better, whereas other people holding an opposing opinion argue that the students should specialize in a limited number of subjects instead. In my opinion, one should adopt a fair approach, obtaining general knowledge and concurrently seek thorough knowledge in certain subjects.
Labour-intensive economy has recently succumbed to the knowledge-based economy, requiring the labour force to equip themselves with broad knowledge of manifold fields. The students who will soon join the working class, thus, are required to have an excellent command of both natural and social science. Simultaneously, they also need advanced skills in computer as well as foreign languages. The more they acquire, the broader their horizon are. More importantly, exposure to sundry subjects would also present an opportunity for the students to discover their talents and realize which sector they find appealing and would like to pursue further. Every student has different and unique aptitudes of which are not aware by him/her until he/she has a chance to study a variety of subjects. Access to a small range of subjects might limit the students job opportunities. Consequently, they might end up having the occupation which they hardly find any aspiration and in turn, deliver inefficient performance at work, which cause the waste of human resource.
Despite the great value of generalization of knowledge, one should bear in mind the fact that basic knowledge of numerous subjects is not sufficient, especially in high demanding professional environment. Each individual is designated a certain position which entails specific knowledge accumulated in both school and life. The specialization in education, hence, proves its significance. Investing a greater amount of time and effort in subjects considered to be relevant to future career, the students, thereby, could excel in their study and then render their service better.
From what has been discussed, gaining knowledge through different subjects at school is critical to a students success; however, the balance between general knowledge and specialized one should be considered in equal measure. In-depth study in some subjects which the students find interesting and essential for their future profession paralleling acquisition of general knowledge is recommended. Gii thiu vi cc bn mt bi vit hng dn vit IELTS essay 4 on:
--------------------------------
Introduction.
This will be a short paragraph of only 2 3 sentences. It should clearly introduce the topic and claim made in the Task question. And it should clearly state your opinion and general answer to the call-to-action part of the Task question. See How to Analyze the Essay Question and How to write introductions quickly for IELTS Task 2.
First Main Idea.
Here you provide your first main reason of support for your opinion. Add supporting details and examples.
Second Main Idea.
Here you provide your second main reason of support for your opinion. Add supporting details and examples.
Conclusion.
Simply restate your opinion.
---------------------------------------------
Lets look at an example of an Agree/Disagree question:
Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole.
Do you agree or disagree?
Heres how I would structure my essay:
Introduction.
I paraphrase the first sentence about requiring teenagers to volunteer in the community. I state my opinion that I agree because it benefits both the teenager and the community.
First main reason why I agree
it benefits the individual teenager. Explain how it benefits them and give examples opens their eyes to the problems of others, instills discipline and commitment, helps their communication skills as they have to work with others, etc.
Second main reason why I agree
it benefits society as a whole. Explain how it benefits society and give examples helps create stronger bonds within communities if teenagers are involved, communities always need helping hands in various projects clean ups, setting up free events, providing services for elderly, sick or poor, etc.
Conclusion
restate that I believe that community volunteering is important to both teenagers as individuals and to society as a whole. TOPIC: Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
ANSWER:
People have different views about the funding of creative artists. While some people disagree with the idea of government support for artists, I believe that money for art projects should come from both governments and other sources.
Some art projects definitely require help from the state. In the UK, there are many works of art in public spaces, such as streets or squares in city centres. In Liverpool, for example, there are several new statues and sculptures in the docks area of the city, which has been redeveloped recently. These artworks represent culture, heritage and history. They serve to educate people about the city, and act as landmarks or talking points for visitors and tourists. Governments and local councils should pay creative artists to produce this kind of art, because without their funding our cities would be much less interesting and attractive.
On the other hand, I can understand the arguments against government funding for art. The main reason for this view is that governments have more important concerns. For example, state budgets need to be spent on education, healthcare, infrastructure and security, among other areas. These public services are vital for a country to function properly, whereas the work of creative artists, even in public places, is a luxury. Another reason for this opinion is that artists do a job like any other professional, and they should therefore earn their own money by selling their work.
In conclusion, there are good reasons why artists should rely on alternative sources of financial support, but in my opinion government help is sometimes necessary TOPIC 1: It is said that to protect the environment we should reduce air travel. Do you agree or disagree?
ANSWER:
Wether decreasing airplane to defend enviroment against pollution is a subject of debate modern day. Although some people advocate this view, I believe that reducing air plane does more harm than good.
It easily seens that limit of going by plane causes high pressure to other mean of transports like motobike, car, ...if air plane is limitted, they still will use much more other vehicle to meet their demands. It desn't lead to reduce enviroment problem.
Therefore, lliving standard is more worse than in the futureo when we banne going by airplan.one the reason is that many industrial activities need fast mean of transport like air travel to help fast and effective comminication in bussiness or society
In cinclusion, i firmly hold the view that we should be develope air travel particilarly eco- friendly airplane.
-------------------------------
TOPIC 2: Nowadays, there are an increasing number of people who do not know their neighbours. What are the causes? What are the solutions for this?
ANSWER:
It is true that lack of communication and caring each other between neighbours in living region is a crucial issue modern life. This has significant effects on human life in the development. In this essay, I will explore the sources of its causes along with some possible solution to it
To begin with, there are two main reasons why distance between neighbours becomes increasingly alienation. Firstly, people have to work harder than those of previous generation to support family, so they spend a little time for relationships such as neighbours even their family and do not often get on well with neighbours due to a little time to share and take care each other. Secondly, people in over the world become more individual than those in the past because they often put their priorities firstly instead of community. This root of this problem is originated from financial pressure in their family and less time to involve community activities in their life.
In order to resolve this sense of alienation with neighbours, I believe we must first address its root causes. The most effective method of doing this would be for leader of this community which they live to organizate community activities such as: outside parties or clean their streets or share their experience in life. This aims to engage everybody each other through social activities. One further measure would be to promote more interactive leisure activities in the community through public education campaigns.
In conclusion, this is vast oversimplification of the issue. Solutions such as the reintroduction of community activities would be problematic in the past. However, I firmly hold that the simple way is the best way. TOPIC: Airline easy travel, but pollution to the environment. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
ANSWER:
Along with the booming of tourism industry worldwide, air-crafts are obviously seen as one of the best means of transportation. Some people say that flights are easiest way to travel; however, others argue that the environment will be polluted due to huge amount of planes emission. Both sides are reasonable to a certain extent.
Firstly, it stands on reason that air travel is one of the most convenient ways to travel. When it comes to distant places, it is even clearer. One is that many isolated mountains, rivers, jungles or valleys can be easier to visit than they were in the past. Poor roads and infrastructures that frustrates people using cars and trains to get there is now not a big concern for tour operators as they can arrange a direct air-line for passengers to the spots. What is more, tourists can consider air travel the fastest way to visit other countries. Far as the distance is, it seems that buses and trains are not the best choices for the Asian who want to go to European countries. In this case, air plane is undoubtedly the first solution.
However, there are no less convincing arguments to support the opinion that air travelling causes pollution to the environment. In other words, exhausted emission and noise produced by the aircrafts affect seriously the surrounding. When the engines are starting and operating, big amount of fuel is consumed, generating huge exhausted emission directly to the environment. Additionally, noise, loud as it is, is also a headache problem of the plane. Not only does it affect the creatures in the sky, but it also leads to negative impact of the surrounding nearby the airports, especially when it comes to take-on and take-off procedures.
In conclusion, both sides are examined. I am better convinced that airlines offer passengers an easy way to go travel. Admittedly that environmental pollution still remains a big question in our society; however, that problem is not only of air way but also of other means of transportation. IELTS trn th gii (2011-2012) [Phn 2]
1. Some people think the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentence. To what extent do you agree or disagree
2. It is argued that we are living in a throw-away society: people throw away what they use in daily life, instead of recycling or reusing them. Why has this happened and what are the effects of this trend?
3. Some people believe it is better for children to begin to learn a foreign language at primary school than secondary school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
4. Many scientists believe that now we can study the behavior of a three-year-old child to see whether they will grow up to be criminals. To what extent do you think that human nature produces crimes? And how can we prevent children from growing up to be criminals?
5. Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
6. Some people say that the government should change people's lifestyle, while others believe individuals should have their own choice. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
7. Some people think that international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
8. Some people believe that in order to give opportunities to the new generation, companies should encourage high level employees who are older than 55 to retire. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
9. Economic progress is one way to measure the success of a country. Some people believe there are other factors. What other factors should be considered? Which one do you think is more important than the others?
10. Some people think that it is hard to avoid pollution and damage of environment in the process of a countrys development. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Topic: To protect the environment, we should reduce air travel. Do you agree or disagree?
Whether the reduction of air travel contributes to protecting the environment is a subject of debate. Although some people are in support of this, I believe that it is unnecessary to cut down on civil aviation.
To begin with, I would claim that the decrease of air-crafts is in association with the increase of demand on other means of transport, which is by no means conducive to environment protection. It is obvious that when travelling by air is restricted, people would resort to other vehicles such as trains, buses. Those means of transport proved to be a culprit of environmental contamination through the tremendous exhaust fumes and noise they produce daily. Therefore, the environmental pollution caused by plane could be as severe as by the alternatives.
Absolutely there is an undeniable fact that our environment would be fresher if the intensity of air travel is reduced. Nevertheless, it is more important to remember that human are heading for a better life, in which one of the most modern and convenient means of transport is plane. In fact, in terms of long distance journey, the airplane ranks the first place with the comfort and time saving it provides for travelers. Hence, travelling by air has been indispensable part of the modern pace of life. Besides, the severe effects of planes on the environment could be reduced by replacing toxic materials used for engine operation with environment- friendly ones, in which hydro and solar power may be good substitutes.
In conclusion, from above arguments, I firmly hold the view that the decrease in flights would not have significant effect on environmental protection. Instead, some more effective solutions should be adopted before air travel reduction is taken into consideration TOPIC: Smoking can cause serious illnesses and should be made illegal. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Introduction:
Whether smoking should be banned is a subject of debate. Although people have different opinions about this, I believe that smoking should be prohibited because it causes deterioration in health.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, I firmly hold the view that smoking should not be allowed to protect people from associated diseases. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of airplane?
Along with the blooming economies throughout the world, traveling by airplane attract many people because of its advance. However, like in everything else, there undoubtedly two sides to using this kind of transportation. This essay will discuss both positive and negative aspects.
For the first place, there are a number of benefits relate to airplane. The key good point is that going by flight is the most effective way to save time. For example, in Vietnam, it only take about three houts to move from Hanoi to Ho Chi Minh city, while if people travel there by train, they have to spend up to 36 hours on this trip. In addition, many passengers assume that no transport is safer than airplane for long distance at this time. It seems because airports invest much more money for upgrading modern facilities and plots are trained professionally.
In contrast, there are some drawbacks of using airplane. Firstly, it is likely that miserable people do not afford themselves for moving by flight because its tickets are quite expansive. As a result, it is able to cause a class discrimination in society as people believe that airplane prove the caste of the rich. Secondly, these advanced modes is chief culprit of air pollution by releasing toxic emissions. Burning petrol fuel emit carbon dioxide and the proportion of CO2 is increasing rapidly in the atmosphere. They are also linked to global warming phenomenon which is causing natural disaster such as hurricanes or elnino.
In conclusion, although airplane is convenience and safety, it also result in polluted air seriously and discrimination between the affluent and the poor. Whether the upsides outweigh the downsides depend on individuals. TOPIC: Should the government pay the tuition fees for students?
ANSWER:
In recent years, education is becoming an issue of great concern in many countries, because it plays an important role for the development of each country. The question of whether or not the tuition fee should be covered by the government remains controversial. Personally, I strongly believe that students should pay their own university education because of three following reasons.
The first reason for my belief is the limitation of governments budget. To be more specific, they have to pay for many other essential aspects, such as health care, environment, national security, science, and so on. Furthermore, the government has already invested in building schools, libraries, and supported for equipment, books, and the like. Students nowadays just pay tuition fees for salary of teaching staff and for improving of learning facilities.
Secondly, paying their own education fees may lead to better studying. Indeed, almost all people are often more responsible when they have to give out something. Students will be more likely to attend classes and try hard for studying. Therefore, they will have better academic results. In addition, universities usually have scholarships for good students, hence, if they want to get money back, they have to study much more in order to get best marks to achieve the scholarship.
Finally, students tend to find a part-time job when the government does not cover tuition fees. Because some students cannot afford their education fees, they have to earn money to pay for study materials. When they do part-time jobs, they will gain more experience which helps their future career.
In conclusion, its my opinion that the educational authority should not cover the tuition fees for students. Money that students and their family have to pay brings many benefits not only for their countrys development, but also for themselves.
Bi vit hay qu! :)
TOPIC: Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
ANSWER:
It is true that medicines and other products are routinely tested on animals before they are cleared for human use. While I tend towards the viewpoint that animal testing is morally wrong, I would have to support a limited amount of animal experimentation for the development of medicines.
On the one hand, there are clear ethical arguments against animal experimentation. To use a common example of this practice, laboratory mice may be given an illness so that the effectiveness of a new drug can be measured. Opponents of such research argue that humans have no right to subject animals to this kind of trauma, and that the lives of all creatures should be respected. They believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused, and that scientists should use alternative methods of research.
On the other hand, reliable alternatives to animal experimentation may not always be available. Supporters of the use of animals in medical research believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be justified if human lives are saved. They argue that opponents of such research might feel differently if a member of their own families needed a medical treatment that had been developed through the use of animal experimentation. Personally, I agree with the banning of animal testing for non-medical products, but I feel that it may be a necessary evil where new drugs and medical procedures are concerned.
In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be wrong to ban testing on animals for vital medical research until equally effective alternatives have been developed.
(270 words, band 9 - by IELTS Simon) TOPIC: Some people think that families have the most powerful influence on a child's development, while others think other factors such as television, friend, music, etc have biggest effects. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
ANSWER:
In the modern society, children approach the exciting world around by interacting with not only their parents but also their friends and through multiple channels. Although families have a tremendous effect on childrens development, I believe that they are more affected by other factors such as television, music and friends.
It is undeniable that families are in the closest proximity to their offspring. There is no doubt that children tend to intimate the manners of elder family members. For example, children have respect for adults when witnessing that parents are respectful of the elder like grandparents. Bad habits of parents, also, exert adverse impacts on children, for instance, parents who are spendthrifts cannot educate their children to adopt a saving lifestyles. Moreover, children are likely to be oriented by parents as they are too young to realize what is right or wrong and what is good for them, which is the reason why families play a significant role in childrens maturity.
However, I would contend that social relationship with friends and other channels such as television and music make more profound effects on childrens development. When getting older, children socialize with friends and spend most of time at schools and on other activities outside the scope of families. By interacting with their peers, their communication and team work skills that is important for their later life can be improved. Additionally, children can enrich their knowledge through educating TV programs with interesting image of the universal around, which their families in many cases are not capable of showing them. Finally, listening to music, which is proven good for brain, nourishes children soul, contributing to the overall development of children.
In conclusion, I hold the firm belief that other factors such as television, music and friends have the most momentous influence on children development over their families.
(304 words) Some people think that families have the most powerful influence on a child's development, while others think other factors such as television, friend, music, etc have biggest effects. Discuss both views and give your opinion. TOPIC: Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
ANSWER:
As a result of constant media attention, sports professionals in my country have become stars and celebrities, and those at the top are paid huge salaries. Just like movie stars, they live extravagant lifestyles with huge houses and cars.
Many people find their rewards unfair, especially when comparing these super salaries with those of top surgeons or research scientists, or even leading politicians who have the responsibility of governing the country. However, sports salaries are not determined by considering the contribution to society a person makes, or the level of responsibility he or she holds. Instead, they reflect the public popularity of sport in general and the level of public support that successful stars can generate. So the notion of fairness is not the issue.
Those who feel that sports stars salaries are justified might argue that the number of professionals with real talent is very few, and the money is recognition of the skills and dedication a person needs to be successful. Competition is constant and a player is tested every time they perform in their relatively short career. The pressure from the media is intense and there is little privacy out of the spotlight. Therefore, all of these factors may justify the huge earnings.
Personally, I think that the amount of money such sports stars make is more justified than the huge earnings of movie stars, but at the same time, it indicates that our society places more value on sport than on more essential professions and achievements.
(250 words band 9)
Top Job Interview Questions and Sample Answers: (Part 1)
-Ti-
1. Tell me about yourself. (Hy k ti nghe v bn i) - Cu ny gn nh lun gp khi phng vn, rt quan trng nh cc bn.
Be brief! Keep this answer to 30-45 seconds max or you will lose the employers attention very quickly. Remember, tell me about yourself doesnt mean they want your life story. Summarize your skills and experience in a way that make you stand out and show why you are the best person for the job.
(ng di dng! C gng tr li trong khong 30 - 45 giy thi nu ko s lm mt s ch ca ngi phng vn bn nhanh chng. Nh l "tell me about yourself" ko c ngha l{ h mun nghe chuyn v cuc sng ca bn. Hy tm tt nhng k nng, kinh nghim theo mt cch m lm cho bn vt tri hn nhng ngi khc)
Sample Answer: Firstly I would like to thank you for giving me such a wonderful opportunity and it's my pleasure to introduce myself. I'm Raginee More. I'm 21 years old. I have completed graduation from Mumbai University in 2012. I live in Mumbra with my family. I'm currently working in sales tax as a clerk on contract basis since 1 year. I have basic computer knowledge. I have also done Ms-cit , tally, basic software diploma in computer application. I have done English Marathi and I can type 40 wpm. I'm a very simple, honest and loving person. I'm a good listener as well as good learner. I always try to learn new things when given the opportunity. I can work hard to achieve my target in time. I'm self confident and patience. I have ability to lead and manage people. My hobbies are to observe people, listen to music and net surfing. I like to talk, I like to watch tv, and whenever I'm alone I like to think.
(Cu tr li mu: Trc tin ti xin cm n v ~ cho ti c hi v vinh d t gii thiu mnh. Ti tn l Raginee More, 21 tui. Ti ~ tt nghip i Hc Mumbai nm 2012. Ti sng Mumbra vi gia nh. Ti hin ang l{ nh}n vin thu bn hng theo hp ng t 1 nm. Ti c kin thc c bn v my tnh. Ti cng ~ ho{n th{nh Ms-cit, kim ton, ng dng phn mm c bn trn m|y tnh. Ti cng ~ ho{n th{nh ting ANh Marathi v c th |nh m|y 40 t mt pht. Ti l mt ngi rt n gin, thnh tht v thng ngi. Ti l mt ngi bit lng nghe v hc tp. Ti lun c gng hc nhng iu mi khi c c hi. Ti c th lm vic ct lc t mc tiu trong thi gian cho php. Ti kh t tin v kin nhn. Ti cng c kh nng l~nh o v qun l nhn lc. S thch ca ti l quan st ngi khc, nghe nhc & lt internet. Ti thch ni v xem tv, v khi no mt mnh ti thng hay suy ngh. )
2. What about this job interests you? (Bn c hng th g i vi cng vic n{y?/iu g khin bn chn cng vic ny?)
The interviewer is listening for an answer that indicates youve given this some thought and are not sending out resumes just because there is an opening. Be clear about why you are interested in the job and the value you can bring to their organization.
(Ngi phng vn ang lng nghe bn a ra mt cu tr li m ch ra rng bn thc s c mun lm vic ny ch ko phi ch np h s xin vic v c tuyn dng. Hy ni r rng l do ti sao bn c hng th vi cng vic ny v ch ra nhng gi tr m bn c th mang li cho h)
Sample Answer: Ive applied to companies where I know I can get excited about what the company does. Your company is one of my top choices. This job is really attractive to me because it combines my interest and experience in logistics and security with work in a more global business environment.
(Cu tr li mu: Ti xin vo nhng cng ty m ti c th cm thy hng th vi nhng g h lm. Cng ty ca ng l mt trong top nhng la chn ca ti. Cng vic ny thc s hp dn ti bi v n kt hp gia s hng th v kinh nghim mt cch c khoa hc & m bo lm vic vi mi trng kinh doanh quc t)
TOPIC: Some people think that it is better for older schoolchildren to study a large number of subjects and develop a range of knowledge. Others argue that they should study a smaller number of subjects and focus in details. Discuss both views and give your opinion. (IELTS 27/04/2013)
ANSWER:
In recent years, the number of subjects at school has become an issue of widespread public concern. There are conflicting views toward this growing trend of whether it is necessary to offer a wide range of subjects for children. However, others argue that children should study a smaller number of subjects to specialize in intensive fields. Advocates for both sides are reasonable to some certain extent as now will be explained before a final conclusion is reached.
On the one hand, those against this practice may argue that there are enormous benefits for older schoolchildren with studying a variety of subjects at school. This is especially true when it comes to eastern societies, where it has long been perceived that students are encouraged to study a large number of subjects such as math, history, geography and physics in order to have comprehensive developments rather than just study some courses and focus in details. Because of this, children can handle complicated problems in their life with extensive knowledge and essential skills from accessing different fields. It is understandable why the variety of chosen subjects at school is of significant importance to ensure the wholesome development as well as heighten their employability and success in later lives.
On the other hand, there are no less convincing arguments to say that studying a limited number of subjects has considerable advantages. Firstly, learning smaller range of subjects help children to study more effective. It is true that focusing on fewer subjects lessens the pressure of studying for many exams and also reduces the distraction since their brain does not have to handle multi-questions of different fields. Secondly, children can choose a set of subjects that they like or they are good at. In fact, once they are able to learn what they want, their higher motivation will surely enhance their academic results. With this support since children are young, they are likely to develop fully in their own fields, which leads to higher probability of success in the future.
From what has been discussed, one can reach a conclusion that it is hard to choose a suitable number of subjects for children at school because the ability of individuality is different. However, I believe that it is better for children to study a limited number of subjects at school. HOT HOT HOT!
Di }y l{ hai b{i vit cho thi IELTS 27th April 2013. Bi vit u tin ca mt c gio dy IELTS, bi vit th hai l ca mnh. Bn h~y c v cho mnh bit feeling ca bn v c hai bi vit, v bn thch cch vit n{o hn nh:
TOPIC: Some people think that it is better for schoolchildren to study a large number of subjects and develop a range of knowledge. Others argue that they should study a smaller number of subjects and focus in details. Discuss both views and give ur opinion.
ESSAY 01:
That older schoolchildren learn a larger or smaller number of subjects remains controversial. Some people think that the more subjects they learn, the more they become confident in work environment while others claim that they may grow stressed with too much to learn. Each idea has its own value.
On one hand, the input of various subjects at school provides older schoolchildren numerous benefits. By accessing different fields of life, they can gain more knowledge, skills and handle complicated problems that they may encounter in later life. In addition, no sooner are they supplied with a bigger world of knowledge than they can widen their vision and discover their potentials. Meanwhile, those children who learn a limited number of subjects hardly realize their favorite field and often follow a certain subject of being imposed by schools. In addition, after graduation, if older schoolchildren enter work environment and desire to gain promotion and respect from colleagues, they should be adaptable, versatile and knowledgeable. This, in fact, results from their absorption of various fields during school years. Equally important, in countries which supply older schoolchildren with an increasing quantity of subjects to choose and learn, their labor grows more high-skilled while their economy is more diverse. Even new fields are born thanks to this. Facts have shown that here in developed world, students are able to access strange but exhilarating subjects like paleontology, ornithology, astronomy, horticulture and others, giving birth to wonderful inventions and ensuring sustainable development.
On the other hand, the introduction of a smaller range of subjects has its own advantages. As a consequence of cramming themselves with mountains of books and exercises, hardly do children have time to relax, let alone to work out to nurture their physical health. According to a study, there are a growing number of children suffering obesity and poor eye sights due to their sticking to computer screens to finish their assignments and thick books up to thousands of pages. The pressure of exams and overloaded schedules at school, in some worse cases, may deprive children of all ages of real student life, sleep, willingness to socialize with others and lead to a number of collective suicide cases among those of eighteen. In addition, seldom do parents expect to pay a huge amount of money, with an escalating amount of knowledge required. To some extent, is that necessary for older children to study while such savvy can prove slightly practical in work environment? Surveys have shown that companies still have to pour a large budget into re-training graduates , despite the latters absorption of various fields. It is better for these children to specialize in certain fields, instead of jacking of all trades, mastering of none, as there goes a saying.
In brief, it is up to children to study a small or large number of subjects. As long as they are eager to learn, let them access more, but if they rather lead a life of harmonious combination between learning and entertainment, they will have their own choice of subjects.
(508 words)
ESSAY 02:
It is true that teaching a large number of subjects to children remains a controversial topic among people. Although reasons can be given to justify this, I believe that children should be taught fewer subjects.
On the one hand, it is understandable why many people feel the need to teach children as many subjects as possible. Firstly, an exposure to different subjects would bring children opportunities to grow up socially and naturally. For example, while science lessons give children knowledge of how things are formed and evolved, arts subjects enrich students mind and soul. Secondly, children may discover their potentials when trained a variety of subjects. Sometimes we do not recognize what we do best until we have experience with it, and so do children. By studying various things, perhaps children find their interest in a particular field and pursue it as their later career path.
On the other hand, those who believe that children should not be taught many subjects are also reasonable. The main arguments of this opinion base largely on reducing pressure for children and improving education quality. As fewer subjects mean fewer exams, children can ease some worries about the score at the end of every semester so that they can focus on details of the lectures. Additionally, when the subjects are limited in number, chidren have more time to ponder on the lessons that they are taught in the class. This will enable them to fully acquire the knowledge rather than just understanding general concept, and thus education quality will eventually be improved.
In conclusion, although there are convincing arguments for teaching a great number of subjects at school, I would contend that fewer subjects prove to be better for the study of children.
Some people say that in our modern age it is unnecessary to teach children about the skills of handwriting. To what extent do you agree or disagree? (IELTS question 2011)
Before the age of information, handwriting skills were so vital for human beings when they want to write something. However, things were changed since the invention of computers and recorders because these devices can totally replace pens and papers. Thus, I personally believe that writing techniques will no longer need to be taught to children.
To begin with, it can be obviously seen that computers are more convenient for people to note something. All what people can write on papers can easily be typed; using keyboard and software that sometimes to produce documents with a good view and ease to copy. For example, many high schools in Hanoi have changed their method of teaching from writing on the blackboard to presenting the lectures by computers and projectors. At the end of each lesson, the teaching materials are sent to students via e-mail to review at home.
Secondly, many types of recording equipment have offered a great solution for people to save information instead of writing by hand. Sound recorders, for example, deal with troubles that journalists may encounter when they are incapable of noting what have been mentioned in a long speech, or in the situations that absent students want to recap knowledge provided by the professors. Similarly, a camera helps to record not only voice but also body language of the interviewees, which cannot be achieved by handwriting techniques.
Having said that, some people still believe that handwriting skills are sometimes useful, especially when it comes to blackout and no electrical device works. However, this argument merely explains why more and more money are being invested in Research and Development sector. As a result, generators, batteries and other source of green power like solar power are being produced, providing energy for computers and recorders. Therefore, the argument for supporting handwriting should be stopped.
All in all, although I do not mean to say that handwriting is some kind of bad, it can be replaced by modern technology. People in the future may not know how to write, but they are supported by much more convenient equipment.
TOPIC: Some people think that smoking should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
ANSWER:
In many countries, people have become more concerned of a controversial issue that smoking should be prohibited. Although smokers have their own justifications for cigarette intake, I would argue that it is better to forbid the consuming of these sticks.
Firstly, our health is put at risk by absorbing the smokes from cigarettes. When a cigarette is burnt, it releases cancer-causing chemicals, nicotine and other poisons into the air. In this way, chemicals in cigarette smoke are harmful to people, causing many diseases, including cancer, heart diseases and various lung diseases. This is the reason why we can easily see the warnings of these risks printed on cigarette packages. For the heavy smokers, they keep smoking as a part of their daily routine despite the alerted harm. As a result, doctors revealed that many patients are struggling with diseases related to their long-term smoking habits.
Secondly, smoking costs health as well as your money. As smoking habits may lead to threatening diseases, in a particular situation when smokers are diagnosed with smoking-caused diseases, they have to take responsibilities for their medical bills. The costs varied on the different severe levels of their health status. They would not have to pay for that amount of money if they did not engage in smoking. In other words, they could spare those expenses for saving. Thus, its undeniable that smokers absorb the risks from smoking in terms of money and health.
In conclusion, I firmly hold the view that cigarettes should not be allowed.By doing so, we can create a more healthy environment for our future lives.
Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
ANSWER:
When they finish school, teenagers face the dilemma of whether to get a job or continue their education. While there are some benefits to getting a job straight after school, I would argue that it is better to go to college or university.
The option to start work straight after school is attractive for several reasons. Many young people want to start earning money as soon as possible. In this way, they can become independent, and they will be able to afford their own house or start a family. In terms of their career, young people who decide to find work, rather than continue their studies, may progress more quickly. They will have the chance to gain real experience and learn practical skills related to their chosen profession. This may lead to promotions and a successful career.
On the other hand, I believe that it is more beneficial for students to continue their studies. Firstly, academic qualifications are required in many professions. For example, it is impossible to become a doctor, teacher or lawyer without having the relevant degree. As a result, university graduates have access to more and better job opportunities, and they tend to earn higher salaries than those with fewer qualifications. Secondly, the job market is becoming increasingly competitive, and sometimes there are hundreds of applicants for one position in a company. Young people who do not have qualifications from a university or college will not be able to compete.
For the reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that students are more likely to be successful in their careers if they continue their studies beyond school level.
(Mnh cha tin nu tc gi ca bi vit ny nh, cc bn c mnh dn on bi ny c khong my chm nh ^^) TOPIC: Some people think that the governments spent money on artists would be better than on more important things. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
ANSWER:
Art is crucial to the development of countries. Some people claim that governments' support for art industry is of great value to social growth while others claim that this can put national economy in danger. I strongly agree with the former view for the following reasons.
Admittedly, as a result of investing immense budget in this industry, other key fields are left abandoned. Particularly, in developing and underdeveloped world where millions of people are in abject poverty, it sounds irrational for this field to be heavily addressed. Besides, if people are obsessed with the artistic world, they may soon forget the real life and become unproductive. After all, a strong economy is the one in which people work hard to produce actual products while artistic items are believed to be of intangible value.
On the other hand, there are numerous benefits of financially sponsoring arts. First, arts such as poem, music and pictures are to color the world. Listening to songs or writing poems, people grow more attached to emotional world and stay away from mundane worries of life. Their creativity is also nurtured through their imaginative minds in the production of artistic works. Second, with more budget poured, artists are increasingly motivated to give birth to wonderful works. Surveys have shown that due to being underpaid in this field, a great number of people leave for other more fertile pastures such as business, technology and the like, despite their years of pursuing and airing past strong passion for it. I still recalled the story of a man who died in rags while endeavoring endlessly to write this last work, which he believed as the only masterpiece of his life. Sometimes, the harsh materialistic life deprives these artists of the source of inspiration and love for going beyond the uncharted territories. Equally important, no sooner are artistic works highly received by the mass than national image of the entire country is promoted. Several countries like America where a significant amount of profit is allocated for the development of this field actually generate huge profit. The successive shows and exhibitions of artistic masterpieces around the world have financially benefited both artists and governments, undeniably.
In brief, there are more pains than gains in the decision to earmark more budget for arts, since writers, musicians and drawers are inspired to beautify the world and enrich national budget. TOPIC: Human has made a great technological process in the last hundred years. However, this progress has negative effects on peoples lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
ANSWER:
Some people believe that the development of technology offered huge benefits for human being during the last ten decades, whereas others would contend that this progress causes adverse effects on human lives. As far as I am concerned, I am for the former group because of the following reasons.
To begin with, there is no doubt that technology helps to improve living standard. Firstly, thanks to development of technology, an increasing number of vehicles such as cars, motorbikes help peoples lives become more convenient. Moving from this place to another place comfortably, people can save amount of time, and goods are delivered rapidly to customers. Secondly, technology stimulates the development of medical research , and this helps to cure people from fatal diseases such as cancer and heart attack. As such, many lives can be saved, and life expectancy is increasing as a result.
At the same time, some people believe that the progress of technology leads to may negative effects on peoples lives. This view has a root in polluted environment caused by technology development. However, it will be soon flawed because scientists are endevouring to find various green energy such as solar and wind energy to replace fossil fuel. In addition, technology applied in recycling process helps people reduce a huge number of rubbishes thrown into the environment. Most people hope that environmental standard will be improved in the near future by innovation of technology.
In conclusion, there are convincing arguments both for and against the development of technology, but I firmly hold the view that this progress offers many benefits for humans.
(265 words)
A: Are you ok, baby? You don't look well. - Em c sao ko? Nhn em ko c n lm.
B: I'm ok. I'm just a little bit tired. Maybe I drank too much. - Em ko sao. Em thy hi mt thi. Hnh nh em ung hi nhiu. :3
A: Would you like something to eat? I know this place. They're famous for noodle soup. - Em mun n cht g ko? Anh bit ch ny. Ph y ni ting lm.
B: I guess not. I just want to go home and take a rest now honey. - Chc ko u anh. Gi em ch mun v nh ri nm ngh thi.
A: Yeah, It's quite late now. We better go home. That's enough for today. - Uhm, cng hi tr ri. Ti mnh nn v thi. Hm nay nh vy vui ri.
B: Yeah, go get your motorbike, I'll wait here honey. - a, i ly xe i anh, em i.
(On the way home...) - Trn ng v... :3
B: It's quite chilly today. Can you drive slower honey? - Hm nay lnh gh, chy chm cht c ko anh?
A: You should hug me if you don't want to get cold. - m anh i cho lnh n em :)
B: (Smile & pinch his hip) You just want to take advantage of me. - (Ci & nho eo anh ta) li dng... :3
A: You know what, you're so beautiful tonight! - Ti nay em p lm bit ko ^_^
B: Really? You must have told many girls that. - Thit ko? Chc gp c no anh cng ni vy ch g.
A: No baby, you're the only one. (Hold her hand) - u c, c mnh em thui . (Nm tay c ta) ^_^
(After driving for a while...) - Sau mt lc li xe...
B: I'm so tired honey. Can you find a place to rest. I'm not feeling well. - Em mt qu anh i. Tm ch no ngh cht i anh. Em thy kh chu qu...
A: Are you ok? It's because of the wine, I guess. Hold on a second, there's a motel over there... We should take a short rest before going back home. Your mom's gonna get mad seeing you drunk. - Em c sao ko? Chc l do ru . i cht, c nh ngh ng kia. Mnh nn ngh mt cht ri v. M em m thy em say th cht. :3
B: I think so. Let's go honey... - Em cng ngh vy, i thi anh. :) }y l{ b{i dch ca an vn bng ting Anh phn di. Xin h~y c cng rt b ch cho sc khe ca chnh mnh.
Ch cn thi 2-3 lt chanh mng v{ vo trong mt cc cha nc ung. Nc s tr nn nc kim. Ung c ngy, ch vic thm nhiu nc hn. Dng n nh l{ nc ung hng ngy. N tt cho sc khe. iu ny mi nht trong y hc, c hiu qu cho bnh ung th! H~y c k v t thm nh.
Vin Khoa hc Y t, 819 N. L.L.C. Charles Street Baltimore, MD 1201.
Chanh (Citrus) l mt sn phm k diu tiu dit cc t b{o ung th. N mnh hn ha tr liu 10.000 ln. Ti sao chng ta khng bit v iu ? Bi v c cc phng th nghim quan tm trong vic a ra mt phin bn tng hp s mang li cho h li nhun khng l. By gi bn c th gip mt ngi bn c nhu cu bng cch cho anh ta / c y bit rng nc chanh c li trong vic ngn nga bnh. Hng v ca n d chu v n khng to ra nhng t|c ng khng khip ca ha tr. C bao nhiu ngi s cht trong khi b quyt n{y c gi cn mt khi phng hi n ngun li bc triu ca cc tp o{n khng l? Nh bn ~ bit, cy chanh c bit n qua cc ging chanh (xanh) v chanh (vng). Bn c th n tr|i chanh bng nhng cch khc nhau: bn c th n mi chanh, nc p, lm thc ung, kem nc |, b|nh ngt, vv... N c cho l c rt nhiu dc tnh, nhng hiu qu th v nht l{ t|c ng ca n trn cc u nang v khi u. Loi cy ny l mt phng thuc cha tr chng t chng li c tt c cc loi bnh ung th. Mt s ngi ni n rt hu dng trong tt c cc bin th ca bnh ung th. N cng c coi nh phng thuc chng li nhim trng do vi khun v nm, c hiu qu chng li k sinh trng ni tng v{ giun s|n, iu ha huyt p qu cao v chng trm cm, chng cng thng v ri lon thn kinh. Ngun tin ny rt hp dn: do mt trong nhng nh sn xut thuc ln nht th gii, ni rng sau khi kim tra hn 20 phng th nghim t nm 1970, cc cht chit xut cho thy rng N ph hy cc t bo c tnh trong 12 bnh ung th bao gm c i trng, v, phi, tuyn tin lit v tuyn ty.
Cc hp cht ca cy ny cho thy, 10.000 ln tt hn thuc driamycin, mt loi thuc thng c s dng ha tr liu trn th gii, lm chm s tng trng ca t b{o ung th. V{ iu cn |ng ngc nhin hn: loi tr liu vi chit xut chanh ch ph hy cc t b{o ung th |c tnh v{ n khng nh hng n cc t bo khe mnh.
Vin Khoa hc Y t, 819 N. L.L.C. Cause Street, Baltimore, MD1201 Hy nh chia s cho cc bn b.
Just cut 2-3 thin slices of lemon and put it in a cup containing driking water. The water will become "alkaline water". Drink for the whole day, just by adding more water. Take it as drinking water everyday. It is good for health. This is the latest in medicine, effective for cancer! Read carefully & you be the judge.
Lemon (Citrus) is a miraculous product to kill cancer cells. It is 10,000 times stronger than chemotherapy. Why do we not know about that? Because there are laboratories interested in making a synthetic version that will bring them huge profits. You can now help a friend in need by letting him/her know that lemon juice is beneficial in preventing the disease. Its taste is pleasant and it does not produce the horrific effects of chemotherapy. How many people will die while this closely guarded secret is kept, so as not to jeopardize the beneficial multimillionaires of large corporations? As you know, the lemon tree is known for its varieties of lemons and limes. You can eat the fruit in different ways: you can eat the pulp, juice press, prepare drinks, sorbets, pastries, etc... It is credited with many virtues, but the most interesting is the effect it produces on cysts and tumors. This plant is a proven remedy against cancers of all types. Some say it is very useful in all variants of cancer. It is considered also as an anti microbial spectrum against bacterial infections and fungi, effective against internal parasites and worms, it regulates blood pressure which is too high and an antidepressant, combats stress and nervous disorders. The source of this information is fascinating: it comes from one of the largest drug manufacturers in the world, says that after more than 20 laboratory tests since 1970, the extracts revealed that It destroys the malignant cells in 12 cancers including colon, breast, prostate, lung and pancreas. The compounds of this tree showed 10,000 times better than the product Adriamycin, a drug normally used chemotherapeutic in the world, slowing the growth of cancer cells. And what is even more astonishing: this type of therapy with lemon extract only destroys malignant cancer cells and it does not affect healthy cells.
Institute of Health Sciences, 819 N. L.L.C. Cause Street, Baltimore , MD1201 Remember to share with your friends. Khi mun ni xin li v mt vic lm sai:
Thn mt
Im sorry Im late. Xin li ti n tr.
Im so sorry I forgot your birthday. Xin li anh qun ngy sinh nht ca em.
Trang trng
I beg your pardon madam, I didnt see you were waiting to be served. Ti xin li b, ti khng nhn thy b ang ch c phc v.
Im awfully sorry but those tickets are sold out now. Ti thnh tht xin li nhng nhng v c bn ht ri.
I must apologise for my childrens rude behaviour. Ti phi xin li v hnh vi v l ca cc con ti.
II. Khi mun ni xin li a ra l do
Thng thng khi xin li, chng ta a ra l do cho hnh vi ca mnh:
Im sorry Im late but my alarm clock didnt go off this morning. Ti xin li n tr v ng h bo thc ca ti khng reng vo bui sng ny.
Im so sorry theres nothing here you can eat, I didnt realise you were a vegetarian. Ti tht xin li khng c g bn c th n c. Ti khng bit l bn l ngi n chay.
III. Khi mun ni xin li v ngt ngang ai
Excuse me, can you tell me where the Post Office is please? Xin li, ng c th ch cho ti Bu in u khng?
Im sorry but can I get through? Ti xin li nhng ti c th i qua c khng?
IV. Khi mun ni xin li khi vic bun xy ra vi ai : Im sorry to hear youve not been feeling well. Ti tht bun khi nghe bn khng c khe.
Im so sorry to hear your dad died. Ti thnh tht chia bun khi cha anh qua i.
I heard you failed your driving test. Im really sorry but Im sure youll pass next time. Ti nghe ni bn trt k thi li xe. Ti chia bun nhng ti chc bn s u vo ln sau.
V. Khi mun ni xin li yu cu ai lp li vic g:
Excuse me? Xin li?
Excuse me, what did you say? Xin li, bn ni g?
Im sorry? Xin li?
Im sorry, can you say that again? Xin li, bn c th lp li khng? Pardon? Xin li?
VI. Khi mun chp nhn li xin li
chp nhn li xin li, chng ta c th ni cm n hoc c gng lm cho ngi i phng d chu bng cch no .
1. V d 1
Im so sorry I forgot your birthday. Anh tht xin li qun ngy sinh nht ca em!
Oh dont worry, theres always next year! khng sao, mnh ch nm sau! 2. V d 2
Im sorry to hear youve not been feeling well. Ti tht bun khi nghe bn khng c khe.
Thanks. I think Ive just picked up a bug at the office. Its nothing too serious. Cm n. Ti ngh ti b ly bnh trong vn phng. Khng c g nghim trng. 3. V d 3
Im sorry Im late but my alarm clock didnt go off this morning. Ti xin li n tr v ng h bo thc khng reng vo bui sng ny.
Thats OK. Weve only just started the meeting. Khng sao. Chng ti ch mi bt u bui hp. To begin with, I would claim that ________________. One reason is that ________________. ___[Example/Argument]____. Another justification is that ___________________________. [Example/Argument] _______________________. It is thus arguable/understandable why/that _________________.
Chng ta hy th nhn v d p dng ca dng paragraph ny nh:
To begin with, I would claim that sports players deserve high incomes. One reason is that they often have a shorter career path than other occupations. For example, those footballers who are over 40 seem to be unskillful and not strong enough to continue playing the games. Another justification is that sports professionals are likely to be under threat of injury, which may seriously damage their health. This can be obviously seen in boxing matches where a head accident can lead to brain damage or even death. It is thus understandable why athletes receive large sums of money.
[written by vinh@eclass.com.vn] TOPIC: Home schooling belongs to the past and is unacceptable in the modern society. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?
ANSWER:
It is true that parents in the past preferred to teach their children at home. However, in the modern society, I believe that this approach of education is no longer an effective method.
Firstly, there are many reasons why teaching children should be conducted by professionals. Many qualified teachers in different fields are working in education, and this is the reason why I believe that children are taught at schools better than at home. As these staffs at the school often have many years of experience teaching, they consider carefully what are good to be taught. Another reason is that a good education system is planned deliberately by professionals before teaching children. As such, knowledge that children obtain from schools is organized to be suitable for each childrens period.
Secondly, not all parents are qualified to teach their children. As a saying goes the blind cannot lead the blind, many fathers and mothers do not know enough to educate their children. For example, a father who is good at literature can find mathematics or physics hard, and this leads to his failure of teaching these subjects to his children. As no one is perfect for all fields, parents cannot have enough abilities to educate all subjects to their children as well as professionals at schools do. Additionally, even if those parents succeeded at schools, they might forget the knowledge that they leant; that is, teaching their children becomes a hard work, if not impossible task.
In conclusion, although homeschooling might be a choice in the past, I firmly believe that this practice is unsuitable in todays world. Life is tough! - Cuc sng tht kh khn/phc tp 2. Please help yourself! - Bn c t nhin! 3. No means no! - bo ko l ko! 4. I was just daydreaming - Ti ch ng tr cht thi 5. It's none of your business - Khng phi vic ca bn 6. Absolutely! - Chc chn ri 7. You better believe it! - Chc chn m! 8. There's no way to know. - Lm sao m bit c 9. I can't say for sure. - Ti ko th ni chc. 10. This is too good to be true. - Chuyn ny kh tin qu.