Anda di halaman 1dari 2

PROFESSIONAL SPORT

REWARDING AND PUNISHING THE SAME


BEHAVIOUR
Q1. What type of reinforcement schedule does random drug testing
represent? Is this type schedule typically effective or ineffective?
Ans: The reinforcement schedule does random drugs testing represent
variable interval. And it is not sufficient because in random testing there should
be possible to testing of those player that does not used steroids and other
player will not be caught that used it.
Q2. What are some examples of behaviors in typically
organizational that supervisors reward but that may actually be
detrimental to other or to the organization as o whole? As a
manager, what might you do to try to avoid this quandary?
Ans: Some examples of behaviors in typically organizational that
supervisors reward but that may actually be detrimental to other or to the
organization as a whole taken by the player but it is unethical behavior of the
organization. And they give medicine to own player and they mixed the
steroids in the medicine for the better performance. But the player dont
know about this unethical behavior.|
As a manager we will take the responsibilities himself by checking all the
medicine of player own duties and also give punishment which violate the
rules.

Q3. if you were the commissioner of baseball, what steps would you
takes to try to reduce the use of steroids in baseball? Is punishment
likely to be the most effective deterrent? Why or why not?
Ans :If I am commissioner of the baseball I will take the following step for
reduce the use of the steroids:
I will give the three year suspension and also fine equal to one year annual
income for the first time.
I will give the five year suspension and his hitter reward also removes from the
record list and also fine equal to two year annual income for the second time.
yes this punishment is sufficient for reduce the use of steroids because in this
condition player avoid to use it.
Q4. is it ever okay to allow potentially unethical behaviors, which
on the surface may benefit organization, to persist? Why or why
not?
Ans:Yes, it is ever okay to allow potentially unethical behavior for the
benefit of the organization because for the better performance of own player
and get the reward record
but it is not good for the society because they cheat to society and own player.
But in some cause if this organization caught in steroids used they lose own
goodwill in society.