'^roup of' words thf?:t have meaning lint in bngic statement me-ois s^roiap of words that lias two tci'ina, first term is used imd.tr subject and the second term tinder predicate. he statements in logic arc called propositions or promises. !remises" he premises thai has the major #erm $? called roajor premise and the premise that hue the minor term is coiled minor premise. erm: he. predicate id' major premise i% billed major term and is denoted by ! and its snhjec# ib called minor term and is denoted by S and the terms which are common in both the premises are called middle term wliich is demoted b&- '. for e(ample. Example: )* men are mortal. +'ajor !romise, * tarn is man. +'inor !remise, -am is m ntal +.onclusion, 'ere 'mortal' is major term and its subject is not minor term here because it ie in minor pcniise also so ii i : - in id die berrn. 'inor torn here is -am/ *n login" unit of argument is called proposition or p-cmise and unit of tli ought i s trilled term. ) proposition is different from a sentence that its predicate0 either affirm or cony the subject, i.e., if we s^y thai * have ta1en food. *n #his sentence predicate ncithef affirms nor doilies #hei subject hut if we say that mrm is mui'#al then the word morta t affirms the man so this is a prop tuition and 2* have ta1en food2 is just a senlenc3. 4ow #he 5uestion is how will we identify the 2major and minor premises in a syllmisb +group of logical state me rf.6&. it is. possible by identifying the major and minor terms. 7or tins pmpose study the $st and lnd premises and identify the predicate which has vital and wide fiouciip#. *# will be the major term and the terms winch come in both the premises will $,8 llic middle term?. ). term may have o9j-.' wfird nv more than one word. 'oreover minor tern will he used us ftubjent of the o:iiciusii^^ und its predicate will he the major i ypes of Syllogism: 1. .ategorical: ;ere all the propot?i#ions are categorical in positive or negative form and no donhtfi illness is dean at ail, e.g. <'l graduates a^digib1 +'ajor, "/$$ eligible are rn=n ^ > +'iner, Some in em are graduates. +.one,& 2 . Hypot het i c he syllogism of this #ype uses promise of c.onditionS^ii^he wor1s hard, he will succeed $$ . 7ere the first part is called antecedent- ?ud the Second piirl is called conse5uent. 0r this typo of syllogism the major promise is hypothetical losing sntae thing arid the minoi $ premise v, $ ill bo categorical. e.g. *f *m comas. = 6#all mco# him. *n th:s syllogism. @f he cu m os. ftlajor, shall meet him. +'inor'& 3. :isjunctive: u this type of syllogism the major premise is disjunctive and the nr.hcr two premise6 are ontegorioal e.g. 3ither lie is an hunest man or s lluef. +'ajor, ;e is .an honest man. +'inor, ;e is not. n thief. +.onclusion, *n disjunctive statements two terms opposite in meaning are usr-d. If first is affirmed the secund ni ust be denied. 4. Aelational: ;ere relations between various terms arc showr orderly, B?,C, ) D E. E D .. . D :, So ) D : +conelusion , F. :ilemma.: *n such type of syllogisms *1e major premise is? double hypothetical and minor premise i^ u disjunctive type nnd the conclusion will bo eithera disjunctive Gf +i, *f these boo1s confirm to Huran they are reliable jit bey do not they arc superfluous-, +ii, -if.hei l.;rjy confirm to Huran Gi.' they =o ;G.. U, i j 3ither they tm? reliable or superfluous. n the above e(ample the second nnd third preuijflrp are disjunctive. IJ. .op tile: K he verb used in the promisee in logic is called cnpida, for tins purpose 'is2 sind ''are $ arc generally used and logicians do not uae 'was' and 'w^re $ as copula because logicians always tal1 in terms of the present. Types of Proposiio!s" 1. i^rom the 5ualitative point of viewL froi the 5uality point of view it is of two tvpuii: ). )ffirmative 6 i.t?.., )'l graduates arc me!# !D. Megative - t-.p., Mo man. is $ar%& wor1ing. 2. 'rom $e ()a!iai*e poi! of *ie+: 7rom the 5uantity print ofview it is of two types: +a, #'niversaiLin which t-e subject, is universal and refers to all with mi * e( cop #ion, i.e., human being are morial. +h, !articular - in which tlii^Mubjcrct dues not refer to all, i.e.., mrr.r. people are hard-wor1ing he propositi on which begins with proper noun wiN alec be treated as universal. Similarly, the propositions which uae% phrases li1e ^=l but nne : ', O8P about ,-./ etc, will be treated as paiticulai proposition6, he word?, li1e sums #imes, often, generally,, etc, also main ilmrrupElitjoiis particular6 he propositions which use ivords li1e few, little, hardly, -scarcely, etc. art.' i:rir..sidered tn be negative propylition. Similarly if there fire double negatives used in "i pri.'pi-^iv.vjri rrran tbo proposition will become affirm nerve. Gn the basis of above divisions we 'jB0r. sav ihat there are four types of categorical propositions in logic. 1. Nniversal affirmative -it ir-i culled 2)2 propositions, i.e.j )ll labourers aso hatd--fnr1m^. )ll children y.re true spe. Qi'.cirijj 2. Nniversal MegativeLhev culled 2*t preposition"., i.e., Mo minister is dedicated. L,Mo human beuiC 's hap R.Ry et.r. 3. !articular )ffirmDilii-^^hsy ,nve culled ', propositionS: i.f.'.. -Some men are h,Trd-woi^^.iD. K Some people are lafjuN'-imis. 4. !articular Megative 0'hey ^i-n culled l, 82 proposition0?, i.e., - Some men arc ra: hard wor1ing. Spi!e minister-" arc not honest. :istribution of terms in proposiio!s" *n case of ) propositions only subject is distributed. *n case of 23 prop nation both subject and predicate are distributed. *n case of ' proposition neither subject nor predicate is t i it :.iu bo(ed. tn case of 282 proposition only- predicate is distributed. Mow. the 5uestion is how will the terru be distributed. n1e the mtampltt oi2)' propositiou 2'an is mortal2. ;ere #he term m:m ha^ two meaning. he first js, mail ,Ut? unS =uimaii bftiiiV and the second, is man means animulay, *f tin? term : m^n' has beW used as denotation, i.e., man means human beinC. the iurm man will be distributed Gn the ether hand if man menus" anmiality. i.e.. #ion notation of l.he term, it will not.be distributed because #hore lire uiher animals be7ideii man nnd tht? proposition will nor remain universal. K