I would define distance education as a method of collaborative learning using interactive
telecommunications involving teachers and students in different places, times, and intellectual skills. Learning could occur in a synchronous or asynchronous time frame based on curriculum setup and interaction necessary. There would be some intellectual skill difference between the teacher and students for learning to take place and initially encourage potential students to participate. However, the learning should being reciprocal to the teacher through the social and cultural applications the students bring into the environment. This definition fits the criteria suggested by Garrison and Shale (as cited in Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, Zvacek, 2012. p. 36). These three criteria are: - Majority of communication occurs noncontiguously - Involves two way communication - Uses technology to mediate the necessary communication The definition is similar to the one stated by Scholosser and Simonson (as cited in Simonson et al, 2012, p. 7) in including the learning group being separated and a telecommunication systems used to link participants and resources. The definition vary a little in in requiring collaborative learning as opposed to a teacher-led lecture that might be experienced in a traditional lecture face-to-face class that has simply been modified for online delivery. The definition above also includes a difference in intellectual skills to act as a focus for the enrollment in the class. This definition does not distinguish between a distance education class being sustaining or disruptive in nature. By the nature of a distance education the class should be disruptive in the variety of students that could benefit from the number of offerings over that of traditional face- to-face offerings on a campus (Simonson et al, 2012, p. 11). As new technology is developed and implemented the interaction methods might change but the basic principles included in the above definition would remain. However, more specialized offerings might make the reciprocal learning portion of the definition impossible. For example, the training done by the U.S. Army Interactive Teletraining Network or NASAs Digital Learning Network would be specialized system learning that might not permit reciprocal learning to occur. References: Simonson, M., Smaldino, S, Albright, M & Zvacek, S (2012). Teaching and learning as a distance: Foundations of distance education (5 th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.