Forensic radiology: The role of cross-sectional imaging in virtual
post-mortem examinations Joshua Higginbotham-Jones a, * , Anthony Ward b a Burton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Staffordshire, United Kingdom b The University of Liverpool, School of Health Sciences, Johnston Building, Liverpool L69 3GB, United Kingdom a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Received 9 July 2013 Received in revised form 17 September 2013 Accepted 7 October 2013 Available online 1 November 2013 Keywords: Multi slice computed tomography Magnetic resonance imaging a b s t r a c t Aim: The aim of this review is to assess the benets and limitations of using Multi Slice Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance as non-invasive post-mortem imaging methods. Method: The author utilised SciVerse (Science Direct), Scopus, PubMed and Discover to search for relevant articles. The following search terms were used: virtopsy, minimally invasive post-mortem im- aging, autopsy, Multi Slice Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance. Articles which discussed the use of non-invasive imaging techniques for post-mortem examinations were included in the review. Any articles published before 2003 were excluded with a few exceptions. Findings: The decline in use of the conventional post-mortem method has led to the need for an alter- native method of investigation which increases both sensitivity and specicity, and also is more acceptable to the family of the deceased. Discussion/conclusion: There are numerous factors affecting the usability of these non-invasive post- mortem options including cost and availability. With the price of non-invasive post-mortem examina- tions often rising above 1000, it is considered to be less economically viable than the conventional method. Therefore, further research into this method and its implementation in hospitals has been delayed. 2013 The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Introduction Forensic Medicine can be described as the application of medical knowledge to law. Radiology is widely used in forensic medicine to visualise and document ndings, in the living as well as the deceased. Although radiology alone cannot provide certain infor- mation such as tumour types and other subtle pathological pro- cesses, radiographical techniques have a rmly established position in aiding forensic investigations. 1 General radiography has a number of different applications throughout the forensic medical eld as it is an integral part of the actions that occur during associated enquiries and legal in- vestigations. These include investigating paediatric non-accidental injuries, corpse identication and the cause of death, both singular and in mass fatality disasters. 2 Imaging may also be used in esti- mating age, detecting foreign bodies and visualising difcult areas to reach during a conventional post-mortem, such as the upper neck which is shrouded in soft tissue and bony anatomy. 3 This review will focus primarily on the roles of cross-sectional imaging. The rationale for this is that there has been an increase in demand for a more non-invasive post-mortemtechnique. 4 In the literature it has been suggested that there is some discrepancy in the results found when using cross-sectional imaging for post- mortem investigations when compared to conventional post- mortem techniques. The burgeoning use of Multi Slice Computed Tomography (MSCT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), when imaging corpses forensically, has given rise to the term Virtopsy. The re- sults of these virtopsies have proved somewhat speculative in that they have helped bring to light certain ndings which the con- ventional post-mortem has failed to identify. 5,6 This review will consider the indications, benets, sensitivity, specicity and eco- nomic viability of this method of post-mortem examination. Method The authors utilised SciVerse (Science Direct), Scopus, PubMed and Discover to search for relevant articles. The following search terms were used: virtopsy, minimally invasive post-mortem im- aging, autopsy, Multi Slice Computed Tomography, Magnetic * Corresponding author. Tel.: 44 7534729258. E-mail addresses: joshhiggyjones@aol.com, joshua75@hotmail.co.uk (J. Higginbotham-Jones). Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Radiography j ournal homepage: www. el sevi er. com/ l ocat e/ radi 1078-8174/$ e see front matter 2013 The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2013.10.003 Radiography 20 (2014) 87e90 Resonance Imaging. A range of articles which discussed both the benets and limitations as well as the ethical and legal impact of non-invasive post-mortem methods were included. Any articles published before 2003 were excluded with a few exceptions leav- ing a total of 29 papers meeting the inclusion criteria for this literature review. Literature review Rationale for cross-sectional imaging in post-mortem examinations The reasons for implementing imaging techniques such as MSCT and MRI in post-mortem settings become more apparent when the advantages of such are brought to light. It is felt that cross-sectional imaging may become an option where consent for a conventional post-mortem is withheld by the relatives or next of kin of the deceased. 7 While there is no absolute prohibition of post-mortems in any of the major religions, within some Jewish and Islamic teachings a conventional post-mortem is seen as a violation of human dignity and may hold serious spiritual impli- cations. 8 Other benets are also apparent and these include a decreased risk of transmission of diseases such as hepatitis and CreutzfeldteJakob disease (CJD) 9 and the improved aesthetic appearance of the corpse for the benet of the family and loved ones. 7 Aside from the ethical rationale behind the use of virtual post- mortem techniques, there are also some considerable scientic arguments for the use of this method. The three dimensional (3D) reconstruction available with this form of imaging provides remarkable investigatory potential. An application of this is in road trafc accidents, where 3D post-mortem reconstructions of a corpse can be compared to the corresponding structures within the vehicle helping to map out the course of events that unfolded which may have led to the victims death. Another major advantage of this method, which conventional documentation lacks, is that it allows for the reconstructions of the corpse to be re-investigated years later, and without the demolishing nature of decomposi- tion. 3D reconstructions are also extremely useful when demon- strating medical technicalities to a court of law as they are more easily interpreted by the lay person. 10 The application of MSCT in post-mortem examinations The use of MSCT in virtual post-mortem reconstruction is a valuable tool to augment conventional methods when used to forensically investigate a body as it aids in providing supple- mentary information when traditional techniques are used. It can also be split into a number of different categories in which it is advantageous. This form of imaging within forensic radiology is excellent at detecting and demonstrating fractures or other bony pathology, foreign bodies and the presence of gas or air embo- lism. 11 It has been suggested that this approach is as good as or even better than post-mortem at detecting bone fracture and gas (sensitivity of 100%). 12 A widely reviewed topic in the sub-category of foreign bodies is the use of MSCT in investigating gunshot victims. This modality is utilised to investigate many different aspects of the victims injuries in order to evaluate a cause of death. These include the number and location of entrance and exit wounds, the detection of bullets and bullet fragments, the bullet tracks, associated injuries and nally, the cause of death. 13 Although MSCT is less sensitive to soft tissue than MRI, it is possible to acquire images demonstrating bullet tracks through soft tissue structures. Gunshot tracks through the cerebrum, neck and visceral abdomen can be demonstrated on the 2D cross-sections as linear areas of gas and metallic fragments along the path of the bullet. 14 This is also evident in pulmonary gunshot trauma as the vascular mediastinal and luminal structures are highly vulnerable to trauma. 15 Damage to these structures, identied by cross- sectional imaging, can therefore convey information regarding the direction of the bullet track and so inuence the cause of death stated. Post-mortem CT (PMCT) also has signicant advantages for detecting gas accumulations. Whether traumatic or putrefactive gas, the implementation of PMCT helps determine its origin, the importance of which can ultimately decipher a cause of death. For example, gas accumulation has a strong association with traumatic events as they introduce internal anatomy to the at- mospheric air, and so any gas accumulation evident would have to be accounted for in the post-mortem investigation. 16 MSCT would therefore play a role in detecting this gas within the body and an experienced forensic pathologist or radiologist would be able to interpret the acquired images in order to gauge whether the gas is putrefactive or as a result of a traumatic event leading to the persons death. Contrary to the convincing results MSCT has to offer when investigating bony injuries and bullet trauma, there are major dif- culties when there is the need for vascular demonstration. 5 After death, soft tissue anatomy changes dramatically in shape due to the lack of blood pressure and also certain blood elements sediment out. 17 So in order to adequately demonstrate vasculature in the deceased using MSCT there are techniques involving the use of contrast material, such as a radio-opaque barium sulphate sus- pension liquid, that can be injected into a vascular site shortly prior to imaging. Studies have demonstrated that minimally invasive post-mortemangiography can be performed via access through the iliac arteries where a catheter is inserted which can be manoeuvred up the abdominal aorta to the aortic arch. 18 Conventional injection of the contrast medium at this point under a certain pressure can then be used to demonstrate the cerebral vascular system, the coronary arteries and the peripheral vascular system of both the upper and lower limbs. 19 With the help of MSCT post-mortem examinations can be much less invasive, with the exception of minimal vascular incisions, and the images acquired can lead to more accurate and specic results than conventional examinations which can consequently provide A MSCT 3D bone reconstruction who suffered multiple stab wounds to the left side of her chest (arrows). This image shows the effect of the knife on the ribs and can be used to demonstrate the injuries sustained for instance of court. 10 J. Higginbotham-Jones, A. Ward / Radiography 20 (2014) 87e90 88 useful visualisation for court trial. 5 Furthermore, the digital nature of this method of post-mortem not only allows for the archive of the images but also gives the ndings chance to appear at a later date should the need for it arise. 10 The application of MRI in post-mortem examinations Due to the rapid development of MRI over recent decades the domain of this modality within radiology has extended from the brain, chest and abdomen to the heart and articular regions of the body. However, contrary to the rapid development of clinical MRI, the application of this method of imaging in forensic radiology has trailed far behind its technical developments. 6 The sensitivity of post-mortem MRI is much the same as in- vestigations in the clinical setting. In demonstrating soft tissue injury, organ trauma and other pathology, MRI has a high sensi- tivity and accuracy. 5 However the specicity can often be deemed as relatively low for such an advanced form of imaging, leading to the need for biopsy to provide the diagnosis in many types of neoplasms. 20 The literature suggests that there is also a signicant use of this modality for neurological imaging and foetal (perinatal and neonatal) imaging in post-mortem examinations. Although the specicity of this modality is questioned, in the second trimester foetus, most abnormalities are developmental and often manifest themselves in a macroscopic nature. However, the third trimester and stillborn child, in some cases, present more complicated issues because of a higher prevalence of acquired diseases which are, for example, haemorrhagic, ischaemic or hypoxic in nature. 20 Unfor- tunately there is a paucity of large scale comparative studies on the accuracy of conventional post-mortem examinations when compared to MRI. However, a systematic review of small scale studies on the accuracy of MRI in detecting the cause of foetal death reported a sensitivity of 69% and a specicity of 95%. 21 Given the diagnostic potential and minimally invasive nature of this modality, this post-mortem technique has been suggested as an alternative for conventional post-mortems. This becomes increasingly signi- cant in light of the decline in consented conventional post-mor- tems especially in foetus and neonatal deaths. 22 Post-mortem MRI can provide high resolution, archival and re- sliceable images of neurological specimens as opposed to perma- nent, irreversible and invasive conventional sectioning. This, much the same as CT imaging, dramatically reduces the risk of contrac- tion of neurological diseases and improves the aesthetic appear- ances of the corpses for the benet of the loved ones, with less of the emotional stress attached to the conventional post-mortem method. 23 Whitby et al. (2005) 24 examined the central nervous system (CNS) of 37 in-utero and neonatal post-mortem specimens facilitating MRI in this study. CNS abnormalities account for 20 per cent of congenital deformations and the CNS is one of the more difcult areas to examine in the conventional setting as parents are more inclined to refuse post-mortem examinations once given full disclosure of what the examination entails. The results of this study proved that in some cases, where the results of the post-mortem MRI (PMMRI) were compared to conven- tional post-mortems, PMMRI provided additional information regarding cause of death. The usability of MRI in investigating soft tissue traumatology is a well-established subject and has been successfully adopted into forensic investigations. It has been reported that MRI has a sensi- tivity of 100% when detecting subcutaneous uid/haemorrhage and a sensitivity of 89% when detecting intramuscular bleeding. 12 Given its high sensitivity to soft tissue anatomy and its 3D rendering ca- pabilities, accurate and precise images can be obtained and displayed in such a fashion as to help the reporting radiologist in reducing any limitations brought about prior to image viewing. Other advantages of using certain digitally programmed techniques include road-mapping and layering whereby certain tissue struc- tures can be either included or excluded when the images are being interpreted depending on which region of the body they are investigating. 25 MRI has sufcient diagnostic accuracy to be used in conjunction with conventional post-mortem methods, and has a high potential to develop into a more commonly used method of the least invasive virtual post-mortems. However, there are some limitations of using MRI as a diagnostic tool on corpses, which in some cases reduces the continuity of the results found when compared to the con- ventional post-mortemndings. For example, while imaging of the CNS is very accurate when using MRI, body imaging, especially of the heart, proves to be potentially problematic due to the small vascular coronary structures not being well visualised. 21 Another limitation of using MRI as a post-mortem service is the cost effec- tiveness. In comparison to the traditional post-mortem, the cost (in Manchester, UK, 2012) of a post-mortem MRI scan can climb to a considerable amount more than that of the traditional method. Depending on the relative regions of the body being investigated costs range between 995 and 1350 for a PMMRI scan. Compared to the cost of a conventional post-mortem ranging between 177 and 342, PMMRI alone can prove to be quite costly. 26 Discussion The comparison of PMCT and PMMRI results has been a widely reviewed topic. It is evident that PMCT or PMMRI in conjunction with conventional post-mortem examinations provides more in- formation than either examination alone 3,5,25 leaving the topic of whether cross-sectional post-mortem imaging will replace con- ventional methods up for debate. Reecting on the results of the many studies undertaken involving these two minimally invasive post-mortem imaging methods, there seems to be a realistic potential that they can be utilised as a helpful adjunct to the conventional method. There is little in the literature that suggests these virtual post-mortem re- constructions have replaced the routine job of the forensic pa- thologists; however there is overwhelming evidence available that would suggest these methods of obtaining a cause of death could be evermore utilised. The topic of replacing traditional post-mortem methods with cross-sectional methods has already been discussed within the National Health Service (NHS UK). Professor Guy Rutty had made the recommendations in late October 2012. He outlined the need for funded research to produce an evidence base to expand the types of death amenable to the use of a non-invasive post-mortem method. He also agrees that this method of exami- nation is important for the benet of religious, cultural and hu- manitarian groups as there may no longer be the need to undertake invasive post mortems in certain types of death. 26 With the increasing use of cross-sectional imaging techniques in post-mortem examinations comes the need to further educate and train medical personnel in order to accommodate the needs of this extremely difcult and specialised eld. The interpretation of cross- sectional post-mortem images can vary, to some degree, to the evaluation of clinical images as a result of chemical and morpho- logical changes that affect the body after death. 17 Therefore, the training of radiologists and radiographers in this eld would give thema sound knowledge base for ndings that should be expected, which are essential to the forensic expert. 27 Regarding the economic evaluation of PMCT and PMMRI in the forensic setting, the cost of minimally invasive post-mortem ex- aminations varies from around 950 to over 1000 in 2009, which J. Higginbotham-Jones, A. Ward / Radiography 20 (2014) 87e90 89 in some countries is not too dissimilar to the cost of a conventional post-mortem. 21,25 However, when using the more time and energy consuming virtual MRI technique more extensively, the cost can rise to well above 1000. 28 Another study by Yen et al. (2004) 29 concluded that virtual post-mortem examinations can take up to a maximum of 5 with a cost double that of the conventional method, when MRI is used depending on accessory regions of in- terest or special protocols. A review of the advantages and disadvantages of MRI and MSCT virtopsy Conclusion While the conventional post-mortem examination remains the gold standard in most hospitals around the world, the decline in conventional post-mortem rates due to a lack of informed consent suggests that this important examination is in considerable need of either an alternative or supplementary methods. If cross-sectional imaging is to provide this then, besides the general technical lim- itations, in order to improve the outcome of cross-sectional forensic investigations, there is a need for more direct training of either forensic pathologists or clinical radiologists to provide themwith a sound forensic background. With regards to the authenticity of the cross-sectional imaging methods in post-mortems and the results they convey, it has been made clear that there is no other modality with such investigatory potential similar to that of the conventional method. Both modal- ities 3D rendering, digital nature and non-invasiveness increase the chance of further bettering their own sensitivities and speci- cities as the dimensions and exploratory potential of the virtual post-mortem continue to expand far beyond that of the conven- tional post-mortem. This is evidence of a promising facilitation to the post-mortem, meaning this priceless asset may no longer become bereft of a method in years to come. Conict of interest statement None. References 1. Stark MM. Clinical forensic medicine [electronic book]: a physicians guide. Totowa, NJ: Springer ScienceBusiness Media, LLC; 2011. p. 3. 2. Beck J JW. What is the future of imaging in forensic practice? Radiography 2011;17(3):212e7. 3. Hayakawa M, Yamamoto S, Motani H, Yajima D, Sato Y, Iwase H. Does imaging technology overcome problems of conventional post-mortem examination? A trial of computed tomography imaging for post mortem examination. Int J Legal Med 2006;120(1):24e6. 4. Aghayev E, Staub L, Dirnhofer R, Ambrose T, Jackowski C, Yen K, et al. Virtopsy e the concept of a centralized database in forensic medicine for analysis and comparison of radiological and autopsy data. J Forensic Legal Med 2008;15(3): 135e40. 5. Thali MJ, Jackowski C, Oesterhelweg L, Ross SG, Dirnhoffer R. VIRTOPSY-The Swiss virtual autopsy approach. Legal Med (Tokyo, Jpn) 2007;9(2):100e4. 6. Cha JG, Kim DH, Kim DH, Paik SH, Park JS, Park SJ, et al. Utility of post mortem autopsy via whole-body imaging: initial observations comparing MDCT and 3.0T MRI ndings with autopsy ndings. Korean J Radiol 2010;11(4):395e406. 7. Hughes N, Baker M. The use of radiography in forensic medicine. Radiography 1997;3(4):311e20. 8. Rosenbaum GEM, Burns JM, Johnson JJ, Mitchell CR, Robinson MM, Truog RDM. Autopsy consent practice at US teaching hospitals, results of a National Survey. Arch Intern Med 2000;160(3):374e80. 9. Pinto S, Schub T. CreutzfeldteJakob disease. Glendale, California: Cinahl Infor- mation Systems; 2012. 10. Bolliger SA, Thali MJ, Ross S, Buck U, Naether S, Vock P. Virtual autopsy using imaging: bridging radiologic and forensic sciences. A review of the virtopsy and similar projects. Eur Radiol 2008;18(2):273e82. 11. Grabherr S, Stephan BA, Buck U, Nther S, Christe A, Oesterhelweg L, et al. Virtopsy e radiology in forensic medicine. Imaging Decis MRI 2007;11(1):2e9. 12. Christe A, Ross S, Oesterhelweg L, Spendlove D, Bolliger S, Vock P, et al. Abdominal trauma e sensitivity and specicity of postmortem noncontrast imaging ndings compared with autopsy ndings. J Trauma Injury Crit Care 2009;66(10):1302e7. 13. Andenmatten MA, Thali MJ, Kneubuehl BP, Oesterhelweg L, Ross S, Spendlove D, et al. Gunshot injuries detected by post-mortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT): a feasibility study. Legal Med 2008;10(6): 287e92. 14. Levy AD, Abbott RM, Mallak CT, Getz JM, Harcke T, Champion HR, et al. Virtual autopsy: preliminary experience in high-velocity gunshot wound victims. Radiology 2006;10(240):522e8. 15. Thali M, Schweitzer W, Yen K, Vock P, Ozdoba C, Spielvogel E, et al. New ho- rizons in forensic radiology - the 60-second "Digital autopsy e full-body ex- amination of a gunshot victim by multi slice computed tomography. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2003;24(1):22e7. 16. Gebhart FTF, Brogdon BG, Zech W, Thali MJ, Germerott T. Gas at post mortem computed tomography e an evaluation of 73 non-putreed trauma and non- trauma cases. Forensic Sci Int 2012;222(1e3):162e9. 17. ODonnell C, Woodford N. Post-mortem radiology, a new sub-speciality? Clin Radiol 2008;6(11):1189e94. 18. Jackowski C, Sonnenschein M, Thali MJ, Aghayev E, Von Allmen G, Yen K, et al. Virtopsy: post mortem minimally invasive angiography using cross section techniques e implementation and preliminary results. J Forensic Sci 2005;50(5):1175e86. 19. Saimanen E, Jarvinen A, Penttila A. Cerebral cast angiography as an aid to medicolegal autopsies in cases of death after adult cardiac surgery. Int J Legal Med 2001;114(114):163e8. 20. Grifths P, Paley M, Whitby EH. Post-mortem MRI as an adjunct to fetal or neonatal autopsy. Lancet 2005;365(9466):1271e3. 21. Thayyil S, Chandrasekaran M, Chitty LS, Wade Angie, Skordis-Worrall J, Ben- nett-Britton I, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses, children and adults: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol 2010;10(7):1e7. 22. Thayyil S, Sebire NJ, Chitty LS, Wade A, Olsen O, Gunny RS, et al. Post mortem magnetic resonance imaging in the fetus, infant and child: a comparative study with conventional autopsy (MaRIAS Protocol). BMC Pae- diatr 2011;11(120):1e10. 23. Pfefferbaum A, Sullivan EV, Adalsteinsson E, Garrick T, Harper C. Post mortem MR imaging of formalin-xed human brain. NeuroImage 2004;21(4):1585e95. 24. Whitby EH, Paley MN, Cohen M, Grifths PD. Post mortem MR imaging of the fetus: an adjunct or replacement for convention autopsy? Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2005;10(5):475e83. 25. Yen K, Lvblad K, Scheurer E, Ozdoba C, Thali MJ, Aghayev E, et al. Post-mortem forensic neuroimaging: correlation of MSCT and MRI ndings with autopsy results. Forensic Sci Int 2007;1(173):21e35. 26. Rutty G. Can cross-sectional imaging as an adjunct and/or alternative to the invasive autopsy be implemented within the NHS?. Leicester, England: NHS Implementation Sub-group; 2012 October. 27. Stawicki PS, Gracias VH, Schrag SP, Martin ND, Dean AJ, Hoey BA. The dead continue to teach the living: examining the role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the setting of post mortem examinations. J Surg Educ 2008;65(3):200e5. 28. Weustink AC, Hunick M, van Dijke CF, Renkin NS, Krestin GP, Oosterhuis JW. Minimally invasive autopsy: an alternative to conventional autopsy. Radiology 2009;250(3):897e904. 29. Yen K, Vock P, Tiefenthaler B, Ranner G, Scheurer E, Thali MJ, et al. Virtopsy: forensic traumatology of the subcutaneous fatty tissue; multi slice computed tomography(MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as diagnostic tools. J Forensic Sci 2004;49(4):1e8. Advantages Disadvantages Precise, objective and clear documentation of forensic ndings for the court MRI more expensive than conventional post-mortem 3D demonstration and archive of ndings MRI is more time consuming than conventional post-mortem Helpful adjunct to the conventional method Further training needed in the acquisition and interpretation of images Reduction of psychological trauma for the family and friends of the deceased Within MSCT vascular demonstration requires the introduction of vascular material Approval in cultures with low autopsy acceptance Availability of technology Decreased risk of transmission of disease J. Higginbotham-Jones, A. Ward / Radiography 20 (2014) 87e90 90