j.
The strain rate achieved during the impact test (
j) can be
estimated as
[18,19]
[2]
where
W specimen width;
S span of loading points (40 mm for Charpy test);
Q 1.94 and 2.57 for V-notch and fatigue-pre-
cracked Charpy specimens, respectively; and
load point displacement rate.
Equation [2] yields
LEFM:
4
p
a
K
Q
s
#
j
yd
b
2
B, a
0
, (W a
0
)
Table II. Dynamic Fracture Toughness and Corresponding Plastic Zone Size Calculations for Fatigue-Precracked
Impact Tests
Impact Plane
Energy Strain Validity
Grain Thickness Width (J)
K
ID
Plastic Criteria
Size Temperature a
avg
(B) (W) P
max
(Dial (MP a Zone Size (L)
(mm) (C) (mm) (mm) (mm) (kg)* Reading) **) (mm)
(mm)
L B L a
avg
L (W a
avg
)
40 195 5.9 10.4 10.1 314.1 3.1 41.4 91 2.2 Y Y Y
40 150 5.5 9.3 10.1 299.3 3.1 39.1 119 2.9 Y Y Y
40 125 5.6 10.4 10.2 329.8 4.4 38.2 142 3.4 Y Y Y
40 75 5.0 10.4 10.2 288.2 12.2 27.5 102 2.5 Y Y Y
40 75 5.7 10.3 10.1 297.9 5.3 36.7 182 4.4 Y Y Y
40 50 6.0 10.3 10.1 309.5 8.1 43.1 291 7.0 Y N N
40 50 5.1 10.3 10.1 337.1 16.4 33.7 178 4.3 Y Y Y
40 25 5.6 10.4 10.1 315.4 13.9 37.6 260 6.2 Y N N
40 25 5.4 10.3 10.1 373.4 18.6 41.8 321 7.7 Y N N
40 0 3.8 10.3 10.1 540.3 35.6 37.2 297 7.1 Y N N
40 25 4.4 10.4 10.1 423.1 77.6 34.8 302 7.2 Y N N
105 195 5.6 10.5 10.2 351.2 3.4 40.6 88 2.1 Y Y Y
105 125 5.4 10.4 10.2 354.3 4.4 38.1 113 2.7 Y Y Y
105 75 5.3 10.3 10.1 316.9 9.8 34.0 156 3.7 Y Y Y
105 75 4.8 10.3 10.1 351.4 4.6 32.6 144 3.4 Y Y Y
105 50 5.3 10.4 10.2 322.7 13.7 33.9 180 4.3 Y Y Y
105 25 4.6 10.4 10.2 358.4 14.6 30.9 149 3.6 Y Y Y
105 25 5.0 10.3 10.1 368.2 22.4 35.9 237 5.7 Y N N
105 0 4.7 10.3 10.0 378.6 37.8 34.7 258 6.2 Y N N
105 25 4.4 10.4 10.2 396.2 41.0 31.8 253 6.1 Y N N
*Instrumented tup reading.
**Using P
max
j 6(10
4
) s
1
).
yield stress at 196 C (approximately 730 MPa) is well
below the cleavage fracture stress (i.e., 1150 to
1500 MPa), as determined elsewhere.
[7,8]
2. Notched charpy specimens
The two important considerations in analyzing the tran-
sition behavior of Charpy impact specimens are (a) the
distribution of stress ahead of the notch and (b) the criti-
cal cleavage fracture stress as a function of test tempera-
ture. Prior to general yield, the strain rate (
j) experienced
by the specimen can be estimated using Eq. [2] and the
measured velocity of the impacting tup (i.e., 5.24 m/s),
producing
j value of 380 s
1
, several orders of magnitude
higher than that experienced during a static test. There-
fore, the effect of changes in strain rate on the stress dis-
tribution ahead of the notch and s
F
is required. Green and
Hundy
[29]
have studied the profile of the stress field ahead
of a Charpy notch under static and impact conditions and
showed that the stress field ahead of the notch is unaf-
fected by the impacting conditions, provided the mode of
deformation was unaltered. However, the increase in the
yield stress due to the increased strain rate experienced by
the material in the vicinity of the notch increases the mag-
nitude of stresses ahead of the notch tip.
More recent finite element model work
[30]
has charac-
terized the magnitude and distribution of stresses in a
notched Charpy bar loaded in 3PB to various fractions of
general yield, analogous to work by Griffith and Owen
[31]
on notched four-point bend bars. The maximum stress in-
tensification for a notched Charpy bar at general yield was
shown to be 2.57 for the slip line field solution,
[32]
while
an analysis of a notched four-point bend specimen tested
to general yield for a material with moderate linear work
hardening revealed the maximum stress intensification to
be 2.6.
[31]
Other work
[33,34]
on notched four-point bend
bars has shown that higher rates of linear or power-law
work hardening, beyond those exhibited presently, in-
crease these values. The maximum stress intensification
at general yield in a notched Charpy bar calculated using
three-dimensional FEM
[30]
for a material with power-law
hardening (i.e., n 0.15) was 2.5. This information is
used subsequently to estimate the Nil Ductility Tempera-
ture (NDT) and is then compared to the present results.
At the NDT, the conditions for general yield and brit-
tle fracture are satisfied
[28]
:
[3]
[4]
where
maximum stress intensification ratio ahead of
a Charpy notch,
maximum principal stress along the direction
of loading,
dynamic yield strength, and
cleavage fracture stress. s
F
s
yd
s
max
11
R
R
s
max
ll
s
yd
Rs
yd
s
F
METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS A VOLUME 34A, APRIL 2003975
Fig. 12SEM photograph of the fracture surface of a Nb
cp
105-mm
Charpy impact test specimen tested at 25 C. The presence of a stretch
zone prior to cleavage fracture nucleation is clearly evident.
Considering that Cottrells model for grain size control
of the brittle fracture stress is obeyed for Nb as shown
earlier,
[7]
it is estimated that the s
F
values for 40- and
105-mm grain size Nb
cp
specimens are approximately 1800
and 1300 MPa, respectively. Using the values for s
F
(i.e.,
1800 MPa and 1300 MPa) and the values for R (i.e.,
approximately 2.6) in Eq. [3], calculated values for s
yd
at
the NDT are 690 and 500 MPa for Nb
cp
Charpy specimens
having 40- and 105-mm grain size, respectively. From
Nemat-Nasser and Guos work,
[18]
the yield strengths of
Nb
cp
at 100 C and 25 C are approximately 675 and
525 MPa, respectively, at a strain rate of 380 s
1
(Figure 6).
Similarly, from Briggs and Campbells experimental
data,
[12]
the yield strengths of Nb at 75 C and 25 C
are found to be 706 and 517 MPa, respectively, at a strain
rate of 100 s
1
. This estimates that the NDT of a 40-mm
grain size Nb
cp
should lie in the vicinity of 75 C, whereas
the NDT of 105-mm grain size Nb should be near 25 C.
The data reported in Figure 4 are qualitatively consistent
with the preceding arguments. The NDT, defined as the
temperature at which the Charpy impact energy first be-
gins to rise, appears to be near 50 C for the 40-mm grain
size Nb
cp
and is near 25 C for the 105-mm grain size
Nb
cp
. Quantification of the amount of cleavage vs ductile
fracture present on fracture surfaces
[16]
indicated that the
transition from predominantly cleavage fracture to ductile
fracture occurred between 50 C (i.e., 80 pct cleav-
age) and 25 C (i.e., 100 pct ductiledid not fail) for
the 40-mm grain size Nb
cp
. In contrast, the 105-mm grain
size Nb
cp
Charpy specimens revealed this fracture mode
transition occurred between 25 C (i.e., 75 pct cleav-
age) and 0 C (i.e., 100 pct ductiledid not fail).
[16]
In
the present studies, the transition from lower shelf to upper
shelf for Nb
cp
40-mm grain size occurs at approximately
50 C to 25 C and takes place between 25 C and
0 C for 105-mm grain size material. Fracture surface
analyses revealed that all the Charpy specimens fractured
via cleavage mode at test temperatures below the NDT.
However, as the test temperature increased beyond the
NDT, specimens of both grain sizes showed appreciable
amounts of stretch zones immediate to the notch tip
(Figure 12). In addition, increasing amounts of local
plasticity were observed at the apparent cleavage fracture
nucleation sites (Figure 13), where evidence of limited
amounts of ductile fracture was present both at the ap-
parent nucleation site (Figure 13(a)) and along one of the
cleavage river lines (Figure 13(b)). Such features were
nonexistent at the lower temperatures. In the upper shelf
region, impact specimens exited the machine intact due to
the extensive plasticity exhibited (Figure 4).
The profiles of load vs time obtained from the
instrumentation package for tests conducted at temper-
atures up to the NDT were linear to maximum load. In
these cases, the maximum load (L
max
) recorded during
the impact tests conducted below the NDT can be con-
sidered as the load at which cleavage fracture started to
initiate/propagate. Using L
max
, the nominal applied stress
at fracture for each of the test conditions can be calcu-
lated as
[35]
[5] s
nom
6M
b(W a)
2
[6]
where
M bending moment experienced by the bar (N.m),
B specimen thickness (m),
W specimen width (m),
a notch depth (m),
L
max
load to failure (N), and
S span of loading in Charpy impact test (m).
Using this approach, it is possible to qualitatively
compare the location of apparent sites of cleavage frac-
ture nucleation with that of the peak stress in a manner
described elsewhere
[7]
for specimens loaded under sta-
tic conditions. Recent work on Nb
[18]
is combined with
presently reported effects of changes in strain rate on
yield stress in Figure 7, showing reasonable justifica-
tion in using an empirical prediction of yield stress of
Nb
cp
as a function of strain rate and test temperature.
[18]
Using Eq. [5] and [6] and the yield stress of Nb
cp
at 380
s
1
(during the Charpy test), the s
nom
/s
y
values are com-
puted for Nb
cp
specimens having 40- and 105-mm grain
size for test temperatures near and below the NDT. Com-
bining this information with the stress field analyses of
Wang et al.,
[30]
the distances of the potential nucleation
sites are calculated and summarized in Table III(a); the
experimentally observed distances of fracture nucleation
sites are found to be close to the location of the peak
tensile stress, providing evidence of a tensile stress con-
trolled brittle fracture process, in agreement with sev-
eral investigators.
[7,15,23,31]
As the test temperature is in-
creased above 196 C, the yield stress decreases and
a higher nominal bending stress needs to be applied in
order to achieve the temperature-independent critical
brittle fracture stress (s
F
) for Nb.
[7]
Thus, s
nom
/s
y
in-
creases and the location of the peak tensile stress moves
farther away from the notch tip, consistent with the data
presented in Figure 10(a).
M
L
max
S
4
976VOLUME 34A, APRIL 2003 METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS A
(a) (b)
Fig. 13Higher magnification view of a cleavage fracture nucleation site in a Nb
cp
105-mm Charpy impact specimen tested at 25 C, illustrating
local plasticity (inside the boxes): (a) nucleation site and (b) cleavage river line.
3. Fatigue-precracked charpy specimens
From the plot of absorbed impact energy (normalized
by initial uncracked ligament area) vs test temperature
(Figure 5), it appears that complete transition into the duc-
tile regime is not achieved even at room temperature for
the fatigue precracked specimens. Furthermore, when
compared with the absorbed energy values from the V-
notch Charpy tests normalized by initial uncracked liga-
ment area, it is clear that for a given grain size, the tran-
sition temperature of Nb
cp
specimen is higher for the
precracked specimens tested in impact. This is consistent
with the higher stress intensification (R) achieved in a
precracked impact test due to the very small root radius
(r V 1 mm) of the fatigue precrack in contrast to that of
a Charpy notch (r 250 mm). The location of apparent
cleavage sites ahead of the fatigue precrack (Table III(b))
is discussed in Section B.
B. Dynamic Plane Strain Fracture Toughness (K
ID
)
It appears from Table II that the LEFM criteria (calcu-
lated using the s
y
values at a strain rate of 500 s
1[18]
are
only violated for specimens tested at temperatures above
50 C and 25 C for Nb
cp
specimens having 40- and
105-mm grain size, respectively. In addition, the load-time
history of the specimens tested at 50 C for the 40-mm
grain size Nb
cp
specimen did not exhibit any nonlinearity
prior to fracture. In contrast, the instrumented load-time
trace for specimens tested at 25 C revealed some evi-
dence of nonlinearity, indicative of plasticity or stable
crack growth. Similar observations were made for the 105-
mm grain size Nb
cp
specimens tested at 25 C or higher
temperatures. Beyond the LEFM validity regime, the K
ID
values probably underestimate the actual dynamic tough-
ness of the material due to the increased plasticity or sta-
ble crack growth.
Over the range of LEFM validity (i.e., 196 C to
50 C for 40-mm Nb
cp
and 196 C to 25 C for
105-mm Nb
cp
), Figure 7 revealed that K
ID
is virtually in-
dependent of test temperature and grain size. Over that
range, Figure 10(b) further revealed that the location of
the apparent cleavage fracture nucleation sites were not
as affected by changes in test temperature as demon-
strated in the notched Charpy specimens shown in Fig-
ure 10(a). This observation can be rationalized following
arguments used in the cleavage fracture of steels
[23,3638]
and for polycrystalline Nb,
[7,8]
where a specimen having
a sharp crack, as in the case of a fatigue precrack, would
fail via cleavage when the maximum principal tensile
stress (s
max
yy
) ahead of the crack exceeded the critical
cleavage fracture stress (s
F
) over a microscopically sig-
nificant (characteristic) distance. The severity of stress
state provided by a sharp crack results in high stress in-
tensification ahead of the crack tip. Finite element analy-
ses of the stress field ahead of a sharp crack
[39,41,42]
show
that the maximum stress intensification achieved in a
specimen having a sharp crack is higher than in a blunt-
notched specimen, and depends on the work-hardening
behavior of the material. Thus, the issue of exceeding the
s
F
becomes secondary, while extending the s
max
yy
above
the s
F
over the characteristic distance becomes the con-
trolling event.
To rationalize the results of the present investigation
in light of the preceding arguments, it is important to con-
sider the distance of apparent cleavage fracture nucleation
sites from the crack tip (x). From fracture surface analy-
ses of fatigue-precracked specimens (Figure 10(b) and
Table III(b), it appears that x is slightly dependent on test
temperature in the range 196C to 25C for speci-
mens having 40- and 105-mm grain size. At the highest
test temperatures, this probably arises due to crack tip
blunting and the appearance of stretch zones at the crack
tip (Figure 12). In precracked specimens, the cleavage
fracture can nucleate, stochastically, anywhere in the re-
gion where s
max
yy
exceeds the s
F
. Thus, it is reasonable to
argue that x is indicative of the characteristic distance.
Previous work has shown that s
F
is independent of tem-
perature for Nb.
[7]
The present work indicates that the
METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS A VOLUME 34A, APRIL 2003977
Fig. 14Comparison of the experimentally obtained dynamic fracture
toughness (K
ID
) data with the predicted values using Traceys stress field
analyses.
[39]
global stress (i.e., applied dynamically) required to prop-
agate a crack in a brittle manner is unaffected by changes
in test temperature (in the range-196 C to 25 C), pro-
ducing a nominally temperature-independent value for the
dynamic fracture toughness over the range of tempera-
tures tested.
Early work
[37]
has suggested that the plane strain frac-
ture toughness (K
IC
) of metals that fail via slip-induced
cleavage can be predicted using s
F
, x, and the distribu-
tion of stress field ahead of the crack. The stress analysis
due to Tracey
[39]
is used for the present estimation in the
manner used previously by Samant and Lewandowski:
[7,8]
for static fracture toughness measurements made on es-
sentially identical Nb materials. It should be noted that
the work-hardening exponent (n) has a strong effect on
the stress field profile. From the tensile tests in the pre-
sent investigation, n was found to be between 0.05 and
0.08 in the temperature range of 196 C to 125 C and
between 0.15 to 0.2 in 75 C from room temperature.
Based on this, n is assumed to be zero for the test
temperature range of 196 C to 125 C and 0.2 for
higher test temperatures. The yield stress (at 500 s
1
) val-
ues used in the estimation are calculated using the em-
pirical equation from Nemat-Nasser and Guos work.
[18]
The temperature-independent s
F
values for the 40 and
105-mm grain size specimens are estimated from data
from Samant and Lewandowski
[7]
as discussed earlier in
this article.
Figure 14 compares the effect of changes in test tem-
perature and grain size on the predicted plane strain dy-
namic fracture toughness (K
ID
) and the experimentally ob-
tained data shown earlier in Figure 7. It is evident that
Traceys model predicts reasonably well for the low-
temperature (196C to 75 C) tests. This is consistent
with the observations of catastrophic crack propagation,
without any stable crack growth at these temperatures.
However, at higher temperatures (i.e. T 25 C), the
models prediction of fracture toughness is significantly
higher than that obtained experimentally. At these temper-
atures, the criteria for linear elastic fracture mechanics are
violated, as shown in Table III, and the experimentally ob-
tained K
ID
values underestimate the predicted toughness in
the manner demonstrated by Samant and Lewandowski
[7,8]
for static tests on similar materials. Attempts at using crack
gages to document/record any stable crack growth during
the instrumented impact tests at 75 C were unsuccess-
ful due to the difficulty and space limitations provided by
the impacting tup and specimen holder.
[16]
However, crack
gages were successfully used to record stable cracking of
these materials at high testing velocities and low tempera-
tures on a servohydraulic testing machine. These tests were
not conducted under the impact conditions used presently
and are reported elsewhere.
[16,40]
V. CONCLUSIONS
1. Smooth Nb
cp
tension specimens having grain sizes
ranging from 40 to 165 mm exhibited ductile fracture
when tested at a strain rate of 6(10
4
) s
1
over the test
temperature range of 25 C to 196 C. Over this
range, the HallPetch slope (k
y
) was found to vary be-
tween 2.65(10
4
) and 5.6(10
4
) N m
3/2
.
2. The ductile-to-brittle transition temperature of notched
Nb
cp
Charpy specimens was grain size dependent. The
NDT of 40-mm grain size Nb
cp
Charpy specimens was
near 50 C, while that of 105-mm grain size Nb
cp
Charpy specimens was near 25 C. The NDT of the
fatigue-precracked impact specimens was much higher
than that of notched Charpy specimens, consistent with
the differences in stress state between the specimens
tested.
3. All specimens tested at temperatures below the NDT
exhibited cleavage fracture with multiple sites of ap-
parent cleavage fracture nucleation located ahead of
the notch tip, consistent with tensile-stress-controlled
cleavage fracture. Increases in test temperature pro-
duced large increases in the distance ahead of the
notch where the apparent cleavage nucleation sites
were located, in rough agreement with the location
of peak tensile stress available from FEM analyses.
At temperatures above the NDT, local plasticity at
the notch and at the apparent cleavage fracture nu-
cleation sites was clearly evident. Extensive plastic-
ity was exhibited on the upper shelf without cata-
strophic fracture.
4. The plane strain dynamic cleavage fracture toughness
(K
ID
) was essentially independent of test temperature
(over the range 196 C to 50 C for 40-mm grain
size Nb
cp
and 196 C to 25C for 105-mm grain
size Nb
cp
) and grain size (40 to 105 mm). Despite the
predominance of cleavage fracture, the dynamic
cleavage fracture toughness was approximately 37
4 MPam.
5. The average distances of apparent cleavage fracture nu-
cleation sites from the fatigue precrack exhibited a
slight dependence on test temperature and grain size
over the range tested. At the highest test temperatures,
this likely results from crack-tip blunting and the
changes in stress distribution that are produced. Com-
parisons to available models of cleavage fracture
toughness revealed reasonable agreement for temper-
atures below the NDT.
978VOLUME 34A, APRIL 2003 METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS A
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank AFOSR (Grant No. F49620-96-1-
0164 and F49620-00-1-0067) for partial support of this
work. Partial support by Reference Metals Company
and supply of materials by Cabot Corporation are also
appreciated.
REFERENCES
1. M.G. Mendiratta and D. Dimiduk: Scripta Metall. Mater., 1991,
vol. 25, pp. 237-45.
2. M. Mendiratta, D. Dimiduk, and J.J. Lewandowski: Metall. Trans.,
A1991, vol. 22A, pp. 1573-84.
3. J.D. Rigney and J.J. Lewandowski: Metall. Mater. Trans., 1996,
vol. 27A, pp. 3292-306.
4. J. Kajuch, J. Short, and J.J. Lewandowski: Acta Metall., A, 1995,
vol. 43, pp. 1955-67.
5. W.A. Zinsser, Jr. and J.J. Lewandowski: Metall. Mater. Trans.,
A1998, vol. 29A, pp. 1749-57.
6. B.P. Bewlay, J.J. Lewandowski, and M.R. Jackson: JOM, 1997,
vol. 49, pp. 44-45.
7. A.V. Samant and J.J. Lewandowski: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1997,
vol. 28A, pp. 389-99.
8. A.V. Samant and J.J. Lewandowski: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1997,
vol. 28A, pp. 2297-307.
9. M.A. Adams, A.C. Roberts, and R.E. Smallman: Acta Metall., 1960,
vol. 8, pp. 328-37.
10. A.A. Johnson: Acta Metall., 1960, vol. 8, pp. 737-40.
11. A.T. Churchman: J. Inst. Met., 1960, vol. 88, pp. 221-22.
12. T.L. Briggs and J.D. Campbell: Acta Metall., 1972, vol. 20, pp.
711-24.
13. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1994,
vol. 03.01.
14. J. Srawley and W. Brown: ASTM Special Technical Publication 410,
ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1966.
15. J.J. Lewandowski and A.W. Thompson: Metall Trans. A, 1986, vol.
17A, pp. 1769-86.
16. D. Padhi: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, un-
published research, 2000.
17. T.L. Anderson: Fracture MechanicsFundamentals and Applica-
tions, 2nd ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1995.
18. S. Nemat-Nasser and W. Guo: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1999, vol. 284,
pp. 202-10.
19. R. Sandstrom and Y. Bergstrom: Met. Sci., 1984, vol. 18, pp. 177-86.
20. P. Ludwik: Z. Ver. Deut. Ing., 1927, vol. 71, pp. 1532-36.
21. A.H. Cottrell: Trans. TMS-AIME, 1958, vol. 212, pp. 192-203.
22. J.W. Taylor: J. Inst. Met., 1958, vol. 86, pp. 456-63.
23. J.F. Knott: J. Iron Steel Inst., 1966, vol. 204, pp. 104-11.
24. R.W. Armstrong, G.R. Irwin, and X.J. Zhang: George R. Irwin
Symp. Cleavage Fracture, K. Chan, ed., TMS, Warrendale, PA,
1997, pp. 51-58.
25. R.W. Armstrong: Phil. Mag., 1964, vol. 9, pp. 1063-70.
26. R.W. Armstrong: Metall. Trans., 1970, vol. 1, pp. 1169-76.
27. N.J. Petch: Acta Metall., 1986, vol. 34, pp. 1387-95.
28. J.F. Knott: Fundamentals of Fracture Mechanics, Butterworths,
Boston, MA, 1979.
29. A.P. Green and B.B. Hundy: J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1956, vol. 4,
pp. 128-44.
30. G.Z. Wang, J.H. Chen, and J.G. Wang: Int. J. Fracture, 2003, in press.
31. J.R. Griffiths and D.R.J. Owen: J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1971, vol.
19, pp. 419-31.
32. R. Hill: Mathematical Theory of Plasticity, Oxford University Press,
London, 1950.
33. D.R.J. Owen, G.C. Nayak, A.P. Kfouri, and J.R. Griffiths: Int. J.
Num. Meth. Eng., 1973, vol. 6, pp. 63-73.
34. D.J. Alexander, J.J. Lewandowski, and A.W. Thompson: J. Mech.
Phys. Solids, 1986, vol. 34, pp. 433-54.
35. J.M. Alexander and T.J. Komoly: J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1962, vol.
10, pp. 265-75.
36. T.R. Wilshaw and P.L. Pratt: J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1966, vol. 14,
pp. 7-19.
37. R.O. Ritchie, J.F. Knott, and J.R. Rice: J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1973,
vol. 21, pp. 395-410.
38. R.O. Ritchie, B. Francis, and W.L. Server: Metall. Trans. A, 1976,
vol. 7A, pp. 831-38.
39. D.M. Tracey: ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 1976, vol. 98, pp.
146-51.
40. D. Padhi and J.J. Lewandowski: Case Western Reserve University,
Cleveland, OH, unpublished research, 2002.
41. J.W. Hutchinson: J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1968, vol. 16, pp. 13-31.
42. J.R. Rice and G.R. Rosengren: J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1968, vol. 16,
pp. 1-12.
COPYRIGHT INFORMATION
TITLE: Effects of Test Temperature and Grain Size on the
Charpy Impact Toughness and Dynamic Toughness (KID)
of Polycrystalline Niobium
SOURCE: Metall Mater Trans Part A 34A no40 Ap 20032000
The magazine publisher is the copyright holder of this article and it
is reproduced with permission. Further reproduction of this article in
violation of the copyright is prohibited. To contact the publisher:
http://www.springerlink.com/content/1073-5623/