COM
Sponsored by
Next Page u
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
contents
CLICK ON ARTICLE
page 3
page 8
page 13
page 16
page 21
t Previous Page
Next Page u
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
In Pursuit of
Wet Granulation
Optimization
Dynamic powder testing in process assures tablet CQAs
t Previous Page
Next Page u
WET GRANULATION
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
Figure 1: Basic schematic of the FT4 Powder Rheometer operation. Measuring the resistance the
blade (or impeller) experiences as it moves through the sample quantifies the bulk flow properties
of the granules or powder under test.
Process Parameters
Liquid
Feed
Rate
(g/min)
Granule Properties
Condition
Screw
Speed
(rpm)
Powder
Feed
Rate
(kg/hr)
Moisture
(%)
BFE Wet
Mass
(mJ)
BFE Dry
Granules
(mJ)
BFE
-Milled
Granules
(mJ)
BFE Lubricated
Granules
(mJ)
450
11.25
15.0
8.0
2217
750
20.0
36.7
11.0
2133
1623
1283
1526
1973
1463
1417
450
6.0
20.0
20.0
750
9.0
30.0
20.0
3172
4610
2268
1761
3342
4140
1951
1795
Table 1: Four different processing conditions used to make two distinct groups of granules.
t Previous Page
Next Page u
t Previous Page
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
Figure 2: The BFE of granules produced for the APAP formulation increases with increasing water
content and decreasing screw speed.
Figure 3: The BFE of granules produced for the DCP formulation increases significantly as the feed
rate is reduced.
Next Page u
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
Figure 4: BFE changes significantly during the different stages of granulation, but a distinct difference still exists between granule groups.
Figure 5: A strong correlation is found between the BFE of the granules and final tablet hardness.
t Previous Page
Next Page u
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
VISIT US AT INTERPACK
HALL 16 / B13
1025-Fette-Pharma-mfg-7.875x10_5-efficiency-ad.indd
t Previous
Page
4/16/14 4:10 PM
Next Page u
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
t Previous Page
Next Page u
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
Tablet Manufacturing
Compressed
Air
figure 2.
t Previous Page
Vortex cooler
figure 3.
Next Page u
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
Vortex Coolers
Control
100
80
60
40
20
0
Time Points (min)
Impact of Vortex Cooling During Compression on Tablet Dissolution
figure 4.
t Previous Page
10
Next Page u
t Previous Page
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
11
Next Page u
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
AIR FILTRATION
www.aafintl.com
t Previous Page
12
3/5/14 1:54 PM
Next Page u
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
Understanding
Modified
Release
Technologies
t Previous Page
13
Next Page u
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
log
(1/R)
log
(1/R)
%%
Amorphous
Amorphous
14
Next Page u
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
Membrane
20
Membrane
40
60
80
100
120
140
Time = t
160
Time = t
Drug Reservoir
20
40 60 80 100
120
140
160
Drug Reservoir
Pixels
Figure 3. Cross-Sectional NIR Chemical Image
of Time-Release Bead
The correlation of in vitro or lab results (usually dissolution) with in vivo or clinical results needs to be demonstrated before an NDA or ANDA is approved by the
appropriate Agency (FDA, EMA, etc.). When an appropriate dissolution method is approved for product release,
then the company has a tool for both release and stability.
However, since the dissolution method often takes between
eight and 12 hours, it is hardly an appropriate method for a
PAT or QbD program.
(a)
Occlusive Backing
Drug Reservior
(b)
Rate-controlling
Membrane
Contact Adhesive
t Previous Page
15
Occlusive Backing
Protective Liner
Next Page u
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
120
0.8
100
0.4
0.2
0
-0.4
80
60
40
20
-0.2
1.5
2
2.5
Time [s]
4 6 8 10 12
Frequency [MHz]
2600
]
16
r2=0.9949
r2=0.9972
Amplitude [V]
2800
t Previous Page
Amplitude [a.u]
0.6
Amplitude [V]
The mechanical properties of tablets are important because they are related to their therapeutic
response. Tablets have to be hard enough for later process
stages such as coating and storage. Mechanical failures
can originate from the compaction process as well.
Known as capping and lamination, these issues can cause
tablets to break during coating and packing and cause
serious problems during the manufacturing process.
Traditionally, the mechanical properties of tablets
have been determined using destructive test methods
such as diametrical and bending tests. However, its been
reported that the diametrical test method has its own
limitations, providing an estimation of the crushing
force of tablets.1 Because tablet hardness and capping
and lamination issues are related to the mechanical
properties of tablets, ultrasound (a commonly used test
method used to determine the mechanical properties
of test samples in different kinds of non-destructive
testing applications) may be a useful tool for the nondestructive evaluation of tablets.
Ultrasound is a mechanical wave with a frequency
higher than 20 kHz. In a medium, ultrasound waves
propagate at the speed of sound. Ultrasound is generated
using a transducer that normally transmits a pulse with a
finite length. In addition, the pulse has a nominal center
frequency. An example of an ultrasound pulse and its
frequency spectrum is shown in Figure 1. An ultrasound
pulse is generated via the pulser/receiver unit and the
waveform is acquired using an oscilloscope.
The speed of sound of the material under investigation
is calculated using the thickness of the sample and a
Next Page u
-0
0
20
-0.2
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
-0.4
2800
r2=0.9949
SOS [m/s]
SOS [m/s]
2
3
4
5
6
Tensile strength [MPa]
1450
4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8
Tensile strength [MPa]
DCP
MCC
Figure 3. Speed of sound values as a function of the tensile strength of
12
13
DCP and MCC tablets in (a) and (b), respectively. The error bars show the
defect
defect
12standard deviation and solid lines are the linear fits.
intact
intact
11
11
10
The ultrasound measurements were
made using a
measurement set-up shown in Figure 2. The speed of sound
9
9
was measured using a pair of 10-MHz
contact ultrasound
8transducers. The tablet was placed between the transducers
and a force of 12 N was applied to ensure
proper acoustical
8
7
coupling between the transducers and the tablet. The
6speed-of-sound values were calculated using the measured
7
time-of-flight value and the thickness of the tablet. After
5
the ultrasound measurements, the crushing force of the
6
4tablet F was determined using a mechanical tester and the
tensile strength values were calculated using the equation4
10
a=
2.5
Frame
R
Sync
Thickness [mm]
2.5
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
400
45
15000
Force [N]
3
2
Attenuation [dB/mm]
Attenuation [dB/mm]
r2=0.9972
1500
Tablet
INTACT
1750
1550
1800
Oscilloscope
MCC
1800
1600
2000
Pulser Receiver
Signal
4 6 8 10 12
Frequency [MHz]
1650
2200
1700
2400
2600
10000
5000
0
400
DEFECT
0.01
0.01
0.005
0.005
[V]
t Previous Page
[V]
2
2.5
Time [s]
DCP
3000
a(f) =
Load
cell
1.5
Amplitude [V]
17
Next Page u
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
Porosity
Weight [mg]
Height [mm]
Diameter [mm]
Crushing force
[N]
Tensile strength
[MPa]
Speed of Sound
[m/s]
21.20.3
349.60.8
3.6810.006
10.0190.001
274.44.3
4.740.08
148316
18.60.3
350.20.3
3.5730.013
10.0140.002
311.45.3
5.540.11
157012
16.40.1
350.00.6
3.4800.005
10.0100.001
343.03.3
6.270.06
164015
14.40.1
350.60.5
3.4050.005
10.0080.001
378.75.3
7.080.10
170321
12.50.1
350.10.6
3.3290.005
10.0050.001
409.85.4
7.830.10
178414
20.80.2
351.10.3
2.3310.009
10.0680.010
55.84.1
1.510.12
186642
19.00.3
350.70.3
2.2780.008
10.0650.001
74.34.1
2.060.12
206228
17.50.4
350.21.1
2.2320.010
10.0670.001
95.67.3
2.710.21
224946
15.60.3
350.50.2
2.1830.006
10.0690.001
130.18.2
3.770.25
249440
13.10.2
350.70.2
2.1210.004
10.0710.001
172.611.7
5.150.34
283948
MCC
DCP
Table 1. Calculated porosities, dimensions (weight, height and diameter), crushing forces, tensile strength and speed of sound of tablets and
their standard deviations.
Porosity [%]
Thickness [mm]
Weight [mg]
MCC (intact)
30221761
17.0840.361
3.2440.014
596.34.7
MCC (defect)
303271502
17.6920.556
3.2990.037
602.09.1
DCP (intact)
281861599
19.8710.538
3.1240.034
800.013.7
DCP (defect)
29621291
20.3650.149
3.1690.010
806.93.1
Table 2. The mean values and standard deviations of compression force, porosity, thickness, and weigh of the MCC and DCP tablets.
t Previous Page
18
Next Page u
me
Tablet
Amplitude [V]
0.01 0.4
0.005
0.2
-0.005
-0.2
-0.01
Amplitude [a.u]
7.5 8
MPa]
2 4
-0.4
1
x 10-4
6
8
10
Time [s]
1.5
2
2.5
Time [s]
80
0.01
60
0.005
40
-0.01
12
4
6
8
10
4 6 Time
8 10[s]12
Frequency
[MHz]
x 10-4
8
DCP
1800
2
2800
0
-0.005
20
6
4
3000
DEFECT
1750
r2=0.9949
2 4
6
8
2600 Frequency [MHz]
10
12
1700
6
MCC
Amplitude [V]
Amplitude [a.u]
Amplitude [V]
INTACT
2
r2=0.9972
0
2 4
6
8
Frequency [MHz]
10
The speed
2000 of sound increases with the compression
1500
force and it reaches the maximum value at the
same time
1800 as the compression
1450 force.
2
3
4
5
6
Tensile strength [MPa]
DCP
MCC
12
13
defect
intact
12
defect
intact
11
11
2500
2000
450
5
15000
500
550
Time [ms]
600
1500
10000
5000
0
400
450
400
3500
3000
2500
2000
450
500
550
Time [ms]
600
1500
150006
4
3
2
8
7
6
8
5
4
3
27
2.5
500
550
Time [ms]
600
10000
5000 2
0
400
2.5
450
500
550
Time [ms]
600
8
Thickness [mm]
Figure 5. Ultrasound attenuation values as a function of frequency for DCP and MCC tablets.
7 The
error bars show the standard deviation.
t Previous Page
19
6
5
4
3
2
400
15000
3000
Thickness
[mm] [dB/mm]
Attenuation
3500
400
Force [N]
9
Speed of Sound [m/s]
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
10
10
Force [N]
Attenuation [dB/mm]
Thickness [mm]
4 4.5 5 5.5
[MHz]
MEASUREMENTS DURING
COMPRESSION
-0.005
Oscilloscope
DEFE
-0.005
-0.01
A-0.01
binary
mixture
of
2 4
6
8 MCC
10 and
12
2 4
6
paracetamol (PRC)
was
prepared
by
Time [s]
Time
mixing
of-4MCC and 30% (w/w) of
x 10
x 10-4
PRC8with a mixer. Before mixing, the 8
powders
mass was weighed with an
6
6
analytical balance. The mixing time
was 410 minutes at 22 rpm after which 4
the magnesium
stearate (MS) was
2
2
added in the mixture and mixed again
0
for 20minutes
Then
the
2 at 422 rpm.
6
8
10
2 4
Frequency
Frequenc
mixture was
poured[MHz]
in the feed shoe of
the tablet press. Ten tablets were compacted with the eccentric single station
press using two compression forces
(7500 N and 14800 N) and 10-mm
instrumented punches. Ultrasound
measurements, synchronized with the
compaction force and displacement
measurements, were made during the
compression at an interval of 8 ms.
During compression, the
thickness of the powder bed and
compression force on the upper and
lower punches were measured. The
speed of sound is calculated using
the measured thickness. The speed
of sound values as a function of
time are shown together with the
measured compression forces for the
upper and lower punches
in Figure 6.
3500
8
The speed of sound increases 7
3000
with the compression force and it6
Amplitude [a.u]
SOS [m/s]
SOS [m/s]
1650
2400
Figure 4. Measured ultrasound signals from an intact and a defective DCP tablet and their
1600
frequency spectra.
2200
1550
Load
instrumented
punches and the
cell
Pulser Receiver
force of 210 N was applied and the
T
transmitted
ultrasound signal was
measured. An example of the meaTablet
sured ultrasound signals and their
frequency spectra for DCP tablets is
shownR in Figure 4.
Signal
The ultrasound attenuation was
calculated using the equation1.
In the case of defective tablets,
the amplitude of the ultrasound
signal is smaller than in the case
of intact tablets.
This means that
INTACT
0.01
0.01
ultrasound
attenuates more in
defective
tablets
than
in
intact
0.005
0.005
tablets (Figure 5).
Frame
Amplitude [V]
0.6
Amplitude [a.u]
100
Amplitude [V]
0.8
2500
2000
450
500
550
Time [ms]
600
1500
Thickness [mm]
120
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
Sync
Amplitude [a.u]
10 12
z]
Oscilloscope
5
4
3
2
400
450
500
Next
Page
u [m
Time
15000
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
t Previous Page
3500
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
3000
2500
2000
400
450
500
550
Time [ms]
600
1500
2500
2000
450
500
550
Time [ms]
450
500
550
Time [ms]
600
1500
15000
10000
5000
400
3000
400
15000
3500
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Thickness [mm]
2.5
Force [N]
Thickness [mm]
Force [N]
.5
450
500
550
Time [ms]
600
10000
5000
0
400
600
Figure 6. Speed of sound as a function of the compression time (top) and compression forces of
the upper (solid lines) and the lower punches (dashed lines) (bottom). The blue lines show the
thickness of the powder bed during compression. The area between the red lines is the dwell time.
linen, M., Ketolainen, J., 2010. In-line ultrasound measurement system for detecting
tablet integrity, Int. J. Pharm. 400, 104-113.
6
Simonaho S.-P., Takala T.A., Kuosmanen M.,
Ketolainen J., 2011. Ultrasound transmission
measurements for tensile strength evaluation
of tablets, Int. J. Pharm. 409, 104-110.
References
1
Morisseau, K.M., Rhodes, C.T., 1997. Nearinfrared spectroscopy as a non-destructive
alternative to conventional tablet hardness
testing. Pharm. Res. 14, 108-111.
2
Ragozzino, M., 1981. Analysis of the error in
measurement of ultrasound speed in tissue
due to waveform deformation by frequencydependent attenuation. Ultrasonics 19,
135138.
3
Cobbold, R.S.C, 2007. Foundations
of Biomedical Ultrasound, Oxford University Press, New York. Chapter 1.8 pp. 69-87
4
Fell, J.T., Newton, J.M., 1970. Determination of tablet strength by the diametrical
compression test, J. Pharm. Sci. 59,
688-691.
5
Leskinen, J.T.T., Simonaho, S.-P., Haku-
Equipment
Ultrasound pulser-receiver unit:
5077PR, Olympus- NDT Inc., Waltham,
MA
Oscilloscope: LeCroy Wavesurfer 42Xs-A
(LeCroy Corp., NY
Helium pycnometer: MVP-1: Quantachrome,
Syosset, NY
Compaction simulator: PCS-1 Puuman Oy,
Kuopio, Finland
Contact ultrasound transducers: Olympus
model V112
Mechanical tester: CT-5, Engineering systems, Nottingham, UK
Single-station tablet press: EK-0, Korsch
AG, Berlin
Analytical balance: A200S, Sartorius,
Goettingen, Germany
20
Next Page u
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
Great Expectations
t Previous Page
21
Next Page u
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
t Previous Page
A pharmaceutical dust collection system equipped with passive and active controls. The Ventex
valve on the outlet of the collector is a passive control that prevents a deflagration from traveling
back into the facility. The active controls include a chemical suppression system mounted on the
dust collector and a chemical isolation system mounted on the inlet duct. Triggered by a pressure/
flame detector, it will extinguish a deflagration inside the dust collector and prevent a flame front
passing through the inlet pipe before it goes back into the plant. An active mechanical isolation
device (shown at the far left) can be used in lieu of the chemical isolation option.
22
Next Page u
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
Operators perform a bag-in/bag-out (BIBO) filter change designed to simulate real-world operating
conditions.
355 days
24 hours
3,500 cfm
$0
$80
4 months
$80
8 months
16
$20
$80
$20
$2,600
4.5%
8,064 hours
Yes
A Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) worksheet can be used to compare the costs of operating a dust
collector with different filter types to determine which filter is best for the application.
t Previous Page
23
Next Page u
t Previous Page
www.pharmamanufacturing.com
that predicts the TCO over time for the proposed dust
collection system. This mathematical calculation can be
used to compare the cost of two or three different filter
types to determine which one is best for the application. For
example, a premium filter may carry a higher initial cost
but will save money over time through longer service life,
reduced change-out and disposal costs, and lower average
pressure drop resulting in reduced energy consumption.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
24
Next Page u