Anda di halaman 1dari 5

PENYERAHAN DAN PENILAIAN TUGASAN

ASSIGNMENT SUBMISSION AND ASSESSMENT


_________________________________________________________________________
KOD KURSUS /COURSE CODE : CBID3103
TAJUK KURSUS /COURSE TITLE : REKABENTUK ANTARAMUKA /
INTERFACE DESIGN
SEMESTER /SEMESTER : JANUARY 2013
_________________________________________________________________________
ARAHAN KEPADA PELAJAR / INSTRUCTIONS TO STUDENTS
1. Tugasan ini mengandungi SATU (1) soalan sahaja yang disediakan dalam
bahasa modul bercetak kursus ini. / This assignment contains only ONE (1)
question that is set in the language of the printed module for the course.
2. Jawab dalam Bahasa Melayu !" Bahasa Inggeris. / Answer in Malay or
English.
3. Muat turunkan !#$%&! tugasan versi bahasa yang berkenaan dariada
My!"# untuk enyediaan dan enyerahan tugasan anda. Tugasan anda
hendaklah ditai dengan menggunakan Times New Roman $on sai% 12 dan
langkau 1.&. baris' Download the language version of the assignmen
em!"ae concerned from the My!E for preparation and su"mission of
your assignment. #our assignment should "e typed using $% point Times
New Roman font and $.& line spacing.
(. Tugasan anda hendaklah antara 2'00 ()*++ 3000 atah erkataan !),-
termasuk rujukan. Bilangan erkataan hendaklah ditunjukkan di hujung
tugasan anda. J*+* salin soalan dan arahan tugasan dalam jawaan anda.
/ #our assignment should "e "etween #$%% o &%%% 'or(s e)*"+(ing
references. The num"er of words should "e shown at the end of your
assignment. Do no copy the assignment question and instructions to your
answer.
&. )nda dikehendaki menghantar tugasan *#+),) ONLINE melalui My!"#. *ila
rujuk keada ortal untuk arahan mengenai rosedur menghantar tugasan
anda secara on-line. )nda dinasihatkan menyiman senaskah tugasan yang
diserahkan untuk rujukan sendiri. / #ou must su"mit your assignment
ONLINE via the My!E. Refer to the portal for instructions on the procedures
to su"mit your assignment on'line. #ou are advised to (eep a copy of your
su"mitted assignment for personal reference.
.. )nda hanya boleh menghantar tugasan SEKALI sahaja dalam SATU $ail. '
#ou can su"mit your assignment ONCE only in a SINGLE )le.
/. Tugasan anda hendaklah diserahkan ada 2.(/ F#/0 hingga 10(/ M1
2013. *erahan 2#&#%2 10(/0 M1 TIDAK akan diterima. ' #our assignment
must "e su"mitted "etween 2.
!(
F#/0 and 10
!(
M31( 2013, *u"mission
a-er 10
!(
M31( will NOT "e accepted.
0. Tugasan hendaklah disiakan secara individu. )nda dilarang meniru tugasan
orang lain. )nda juga dilarang sama sekali memlagiat kerja orang lain
sebagai kerja sendiri. /
#our assignment should "e prepared individually. #ou should not copy another
person+s assignment. #ou should also not plagiarise another person+s wor( as
your own.
PENILAIAN / E.ALUATION
Tugasan ini menyumbang sehingga 312 dariada jumlah markah kursus
berkenaan dan akan dinilai berdasarkan keada R"/3)- yang dilamirkan0 ' This
assignment accounts for &%/ of the total mar(s for the course and shall "e
assessed "ased on 0e R+1ri*s attached ,
)nda akan diberikan maklum balas tentang tugasan ini sebelum 3eeriksaan
)khir *emester bermula / #ou would "e given feed"ac( on the assignment
"efore the ,inal *emester E-amination commences.
PLAGIARISME: POTONGAN MARKAH / 2LAGIARISM: MAR3S DEDUCTION
A$3*: Tugasan yang diserahkan4 secara automatik4 akan disemak untuk
menentukan kadar ertindihan. Jika lagiarisme dikesan4 markah akan diotong
seerti berikut5 ' 6arning: The submitted assignment will automatically undergo
a similarity chec(. .f plagiarism is detected/ mar(s would "e deducted as follows0
Tugasan dengan ertindihan kandungan antara 10 4 30 2 5 otongan
205 dariada jumlah markah yang dieroleh.
Tugasan dengan ertindihan kandungan antara 31 4 '0 2 5 otongan (05
dariada jumlah markah yang dieroleh.
Tugasan dengan ertindihan kandungan lebih dariada '055 M3-(
2)63 akan diberikan.
Assignments with 1% 4 &% / o5er"a! with others0 #%/ deduction from the
total mar(s scored.
Assignments with &1 4 $% / o5er"a! with others0 6%/ deduction from the
total mar(s scored.
Assignments with more 0an $%/ o5er"a! with others: 7ero mar8 would
"e given.
SOALAN TUGASAN /ASSIGNMENT QUESTION
The objective of this assignment is to analyze the interface design from different
perspectives as you have studied in this course.
Based on the principles of good quality interface design:
a) Review and analyze !" #$) website on e%commerce application. &our analysis
should consider at least '()" #*) discussions on poor implementation of the
quality of interface design of the chosen website and the impact of the
interface to the user.
b) +rovide at least '()" #*) appropriate suggestions to improve the quality of
interface design for the selected website. &our discussion need to include how
to prevent the poor implementation of the interface design.
#,- mar.s)
/012 30R2T T2/2T 4 END OF PAGE
52/+(R2! / ATTACHMENT
R0BR(1 T06232! 4 233(6!/"!T RUBRICS
7riteria 8eight Bad
#- /ar.)
8ea.
#$ /ar.)
/oderate
#9 /ar.s)
6ood
#: /ar.s)
";cellent
#, /ar.s)
Total
/ar.s
#/a;)
(ntroduction on the
selected e%commerce
interface design.
1.5 No introduction
provided
Poor introduction on the
selected interface web
site.
Fair introduction on the
selected interface web site.
Good introduction on the
selected interface web site.
Excellent and clear
introduction on the selected
interface web site.
<
2nalysis of $st poor
implementation of
interface design.
0.5 No analysis provided Poor analysis conducted
on the poor
implementation of
interface desin.
Fair analysis conducted on
the poor implementation of
interface desin.
Good analysis conducted on
the poor implementation of
interface desin.
Excellent and detailed
analysis conducted on poor
implementation of interface
desin.
9
2nalysis of 9nd poor
implementation of
interface design.
0.5 No analysis provided Poor analysis conducted
on the poor
implementation of
interface desin.
Fair analysis conducted on
the poor implementation of
interface desin.
Good analysis conducted on
the poor implementation of
interface desin.
Excellent and detailed
analysis conducted on poor
implementation of interface
desin.
9
2nalysis of :rd poor
implementation of
interface design.
0.5 No analysis provided Poor analysis conducted
on the poor
implementation of
interface desin.
Fair analysis conducted on
the poor implementation of
interface desin.
Good analysis conducted on
the poor implementation of
interface desin.
Excellent and detailed
analysis conducted on poor
implementation of interface
desin.
9
2nalysis of ,th poor
implementation of
interface design.
0.5 No analysis provided Poor analysis conducted
on the poor
implementation of
interface desin.
Fair analysis conducted on
the poor implementation of
interface desin.
Good analysis conducted on
the poor implementation of
interface desin.
Excellent and detailed
analysis conducted on poor
implementation of interface
desin.
9
2nalysis of *th poor
implementation of
interface design.
0.5 No analysis provided Poor analysis conducted
on the poor
implementation of
interface desin.
Fair analysis conducted on
the poor implementation of
interface desin.
Good analysis conducted on
the poor implementation of
interface desin.
Excellent and detailed
analysis conducted on poor
implementation of interface
desin.
9
=iscussion on the
impact of the poor
implementation of
interface design.
!.0 No discussion
provided
Poor discussion on the
impact of the poor
implementation of
interface desin.
Fair discussion on the
impact of the poor
implementation of interface
desin.
Good discussion on the
impact of the poor
implementation of interface
desin.
Excellent and
comprehensive discussion
on the impact of the poor
implementation of interface
desin.
>
=iscussion on the $
st

suggestion to improve
the interface of the
chosen web site.
0.5 No discussion
provided
Poor discussion on the
suestion to improve the
interface of the chosen
web site.
Fair discussion on the
suestion to improve the
interface of the chosen web
site.
Good discussion on the
suestion to improve the
interface of the chosen web
site.
Excellent and detailed
discussion on the
suestion to improve the
interface of the chosen web
site.
9
=iscussion on the 9
nd

suggestion to improve
the interface of the
chosen web site.
0.5 No discussion
provided
Poor discussion on the
suestion to improve the
interface of the chosen
web site.
Fair discussion on the
suestion to improve the
interface of the chosen web
site.
Good discussion on the
suestion to improve the
interface of the chosen web
site.
Excellent and detailed
discussion on the
suestion to improve the
interface of the chosen web
site.
9
=iscussion on the :
rd

suggestion to improve
the interface of the
chosen web site.
0.5 No discussion
provided
Poor discussion on the
suestion to improve the
interface of the chosen
web site.
Fair discussion on the
suestion to improve the
interface of the chosen web
site.
Good discussion on the
suestion to improve the
interface of the chosen web
site.
Excellent and detailed
discussion on the
suestion to improve the
interface of the chosen web
site.
9
=iscussion on the ,
th

suggestion to improve
the interface of the
chosen web site.
0.5 No discussion
provided
Poor discussion on the
suestion to improve the
interface of the chosen
web site.
Fair discussion on the
suestion to improve the
interface of the chosen web
site.
Good discussion on the
suestion to improve the
interface of the chosen web
site.
Excellent and detailed
discussion on the
suestion to improve the
interface of the chosen web
site.
9
=iscussion on the *
th

suggestion to improve
the interface of the
chosen web site.
0.5 No discussion
provided
Poor discussion on the
suestion to improve the
interface of the chosen
web site.
Fair discussion on the
suestion to improve the
interface of the chosen web
site.
Good discussion on the
suestion to improve the
interface of the chosen web
site.
Excellent and detailed
discussion on the
suestion to improve the
interface of the chosen web
site.
9
Recommendations for
preventing the
implementation of poor
interface design.
1 No recommendations
provided
Provided only one
recommendations for
preventin the
implementation of poor
interface desin.
Provided only two
recommendations for
preventin the
implementation of poor
interface desin.
Provided three or more
recommendations for
preventin the
implementation of poor
interface desin.
Provided three or more
recommendations for
preventin the
implementation of poor
interface desin with
excellent and detailed
explanation.
,
7onclusion 0.5 No conclusion iven "ummed up only a few
issues in the assinment
"ummed up many of the
main issues in the
assinment
"ummed up most of the
main issues in the
assinment
"ummed up all the main
issues in the assinment
9
Total +oints4 /ar.s $- ,-

Anda mungkin juga menyukai