0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
89 tayangan3 halaman
Few sad events in my life have struck me as hard as the December 11, 1995, death of Dr. Greg L. Bahnsen, my teacher, mentor, and friend. I had long known of his congenital heart defect and his increasing health problems. But I had seen him, by the grace of God, weather many physical storms over the years. Now, however, God in His all-wise providence has called Greg home to glory.
As a believer in the sovereign Christ of Scripture whom Greg loved and whose will he vigorously promoted I have to remind myself that Paul's testimony in Philippians 1 has two sides, both being glorious. In applying Paul's comments to Greg's untimely departure, my immediate thoughts and hopes were on the one side: to remain in the flesh is more needful for you (v. 24). Greg's continuing ministry had been so significant in my own personal spiritual growth and pastoral ministry and not just mine but many, many others. Consequently, I had to struggle to recognize the greater truth for Greg himself: to be with Christ is far better (v. 23). Greg has now heard those glorious words of Christ: "Well done, thou good and faithful servant."
Few sad events in my life have struck me as hard as the December 11, 1995, death of Dr. Greg L. Bahnsen, my teacher, mentor, and friend. I had long known of his congenital heart defect and his increasing health problems. But I had seen him, by the grace of God, weather many physical storms over the years. Now, however, God in His all-wise providence has called Greg home to glory.
As a believer in the sovereign Christ of Scripture whom Greg loved and whose will he vigorously promoted I have to remind myself that Paul's testimony in Philippians 1 has two sides, both being glorious. In applying Paul's comments to Greg's untimely departure, my immediate thoughts and hopes were on the one side: to remain in the flesh is more needful for you (v. 24). Greg's continuing ministry had been so significant in my own personal spiritual growth and pastoral ministry and not just mine but many, many others. Consequently, I had to struggle to recognize the greater truth for Greg himself: to be with Christ is far better (v. 23). Greg has now heard those glorious words of Christ: "Well done, thou good and faithful servant."
Few sad events in my life have struck me as hard as the December 11, 1995, death of Dr. Greg L. Bahnsen, my teacher, mentor, and friend. I had long known of his congenital heart defect and his increasing health problems. But I had seen him, by the grace of God, weather many physical storms over the years. Now, however, God in His all-wise providence has called Greg home to glory.
As a believer in the sovereign Christ of Scripture whom Greg loved and whose will he vigorously promoted I have to remind myself that Paul's testimony in Philippians 1 has two sides, both being glorious. In applying Paul's comments to Greg's untimely departure, my immediate thoughts and hopes were on the one side: to remain in the flesh is more needful for you (v. 24). Greg's continuing ministry had been so significant in my own personal spiritual growth and pastoral ministry and not just mine but many, many others. Consequently, I had to struggle to recognize the greater truth for Greg himself: to be with Christ is far better (v. 23). Greg has now heard those glorious words of Christ: "Well done, thou good and faithful servant."
December 11, 1995, death Of Dr. Cireg L. Bahnsen, my teacher, mentor, and friend. I had long known of his ' ' congenital heart defect and his increasing health problems. But I had seen him, by the ,grace of Ciod, weather many physical storms over the years. Now, however, (jod in His all-wise providence hascaUed Cireg home to glory. As a believer in the ' sovereign Christ of Scripture" whom Cireg loved and ,,' whose will he vigorousiy promoted" I have to remind myself that Paul's testimony in Philippians 1 has two-sides, both being glorious. In applying Paul's under Cireg Bahnsen for two years at Reformed Seminary in the late 1970's. The three theologians who have most influenced my personal life, biblical faith, and pastoral practice are: John Calvin, Cornelius Van Til, and (ireg Bahnsen. They have shown me that Calvinism is Christianity come into its own. And I praise Ciod for their ' ministerial labors. Paul tells us of the victory associated with Christ's entry into heaven. At that glOrious covenantal nature of Clods dealings with man. I can thank the writihgsof O. T. Allis and Loraine Boettner, as instrumehts'in the hand of ' Ciod, for initially showing' iTIe the light and glorY of reformed theology. these encourage4. my disrriissal' of dispensationalism and sparked in mea desire to seek a reformed theological education. In 197{11 transferred'!o Reformeq Seminary in Jackson, MississiPpi. And as , have it, I was there for almostthe entire tenure of Bahnsen with that institution. But those two years were of dramatic life-changing and comments to Cireg's c;:;================ ministry-encouraging untimely departure, my immediate thoughts and hQpes were on the one side: to' remain in the flesh is more needful for you (v. 24). Cireg's continuing ministry had been so significant in my own' personal spiritual growth and pastoral ministry " and not just mine but many, many others. Consequently, I had to struggle to recognize the greater truth ' for Cireg himself: to be With Christ is far better (v. 23). Cireg has now heard those glorious words of Christ: "Well done, thou good and faithful servant.' I thank Ciod that, by His providence, I was able!o study event He poured out abundant ,and glorious gifts upon men (Eph. 4:8ff). One of those important gifts for the ongoing life and ministry of the Church is the,gift of teacher (Eph. 4:11). I count Cireg Bahnsen as one of the great gifts of (iod to the Church in our tirne. He Will be sorely missed. In my circuitous route to reformed theology and the Presbyterian pastorate, I had come out of a dispensational household, through a dispensational college (Tennessee Temple College) and seminary (Ciract, Theological Seminary), to the growing conviction of the 8 f THE COUNSEL of Chalcedoll f January! February, 1996 consequence because of Cireg Bahnsen. Whenl firsfenrolJed in a Bahnseh class, I admit that I was noipieased: I was becoming knoWn as fable tennis player of sorts at RTS. I was spending lnuch tiine in the Whife House on theRTS . . . . I campus challenging fellow students in this SP9rt. But upon entering Bahnsen's class I found rigorous demands for more diligent study laid on me. At first these were frustrating; I had fared well with an average amount' of effort. Now aU that had changed. Bahnsen's approach to ' academic instruction reqUired great effort of the student. for anyone who would would like to relate just one Table tennis would have to promote qod's Word anecdote regarding his wail. according to the Pauline remarkable cognitive abilities. But thank qod for the directive in .'2 Corinthians While he, R. 1. Rushdoony, mind-expanding, 10:4-5. qary DeMar, Joe Morecraft, ministry-altering experience! Over the years it has been Byron Snapp, I, and others Initially I resisted Bahnsen's my joy and privilege to have were speakers at the 1994 unusual positions of qreg stay in my home on Chalcedon Christian postmillennialism and several occasions, to have him Leadership Conference, we theonomic ethics. In fact, I set proclaim the Word of qod in witnessed his remarkable about to challenge those my two pastoral charges, to intellectual powers. During positions among my fellow co-author a book with him, one of the question and students. But anyone who has and to appear on the same answer sessions someone Bahnsen's platform with him at asked the simple question: instruction, however, "Dr. Bahnsen, what knows that he was so version of Scripture careful in his ' do you use and presentation, so logical recommend?" qreg's in his argumentation, response sounded as so biblical in his if he were reading a foundations, and so well-prepared lecture forceful in his on textual critical conclusions that all theory, linguistic hope of credible analysis, and resistance was futile. I conferences. And to continue interpretation theory. He went eventually was swayed by his to grow under his ministry. I through brief discussions of presentations and adopted his am thankful for the enonnous each of these factors in positions. And I have never influence he has had, and for choosing a version, then regretted having done so. the large collection of tapes suggested his own study Intellectually, he taught me (over 1800) that are and will preference: The American to study and to think, continue to be available and Standard Version of 1901. pastorally, he showed me the circulating among qods Moderator Joe Morecraft gc,>t relevance of Scripture for all of people. My only up after qregsat down and life; personally, he encouraged disappointment is that playfully rebuked him for not me to stand finn in my circumstances did not allow being thorough enough il1,his convictions and to trust in qod him time to produce more ' answer! Who could think off against all opposition. I will books. the top of their head like that? never cease to be amazed at I hope and pray that Who could respond With such the incredible breadth of someone will see that qreg's insight and clarity as hel In my knowledge he possessed, at the notes are collected and experience, he was without ease with which he could compiled as books. That his peer in his intellectual abilities. analyze and respond to lectures are transcribed as It is my unshakable questions and arguments, both articles. His teaching ability conviction that qods ways are phi!osophica!lyand was unsurpassed in my right and His wisdom Scripturally. He,is an example experience. In this regard I inscrutable. Therefore, I January/ February, 1996 THE COUNSEL of Chalcedon 9 humbly; even if sorrowfully, accept Ciods providential taking of Cireg Bahnsen from toe earth. I pray that we will see and experience the wisQ.om of Qod in all ofthis with a renewed interest in Cireg's tapes and writings. May the Lord bless Cireg's legacy withfruit.Q Apologist, Thconomist, 'vVarrioT, [-'riend Steve M. Schli66el I first met Dr. qreg L. Bahnsen on the phone. I was . emerging from a rather fathers. Cireg became a personal tutor, instructing me in the apologetic of Cornelius Van Til and the theology of the Westminster Confession and Catechisms. From that phone call in 1983 until today; our Father in heaven used Cireg to feed me, and a great number beside. Dr. Bahnsen's contributions to the Kingdom and church are significant. An ordained minister serving the Orthodox Presbyterian Church for the last twenty years, Cireg had ' wide-ranging opportunities to . serVe Christ. Afterrecelving , ' (simit14lneously) the tv\. Div. and Th. M.degrees from Westminster Theologi\:al Cireg's gifts and calling; he told me that Dr. Bahnsen was the right man to succeed him as chair of apologetics at Westminster . . It has been rumored that when Dr. Bahnsen was interviewed for the job of teaching Apologetics and Ethics at Reformed Theological Seminal)' in Jackson, MS"at least one of the interviewers emerged from the room" dazed by the brilliance of the mind he had just encountered." Cireg had a special gift from Ciod in bringing illumination to some of the thorniest traditional theological problems (call Covenant Tape MinisIJY to order the catalog listing over 1,500 of his audio tapes: 1-800-503- ""..,..,.,.,.",= 3938). At times it seemed as if his mind ' 'f....>' would drape over a rigid conception of the supposed dispensational structure of Ciod's ' revelation and dealings, attempting to grasp that most capaCious of all religions, the RefoTmed faith. I was hungJY for dark problem and
dissolve it into light.
For the last several years he has served as the Scholar-in" residence at the Southern truth. My chosen method in the pursuit 6f it was to contact people who had a reputation fur understanding it arid then "bother" them until they explained it to me. Dr. Cireg L. Bahnsen was not "bothered" by my call. He expressed siilcere,' pastoral concern and a genuine interest in helping me, and Messiah's Congregation, to make a smooth stable transition into the Reformed faith of our Seminal)' in Philadelphia, Cireg went on to earn a Ph.D., in philosophy from the VnivetSity of Southern California, chOOSing for his dissertation topic, a philosophical analysis of the concept of "self-deception." He chose this topic because it would complement, even fill a space, in the comprehensive Christian apologetic of Cornelius Van TiL Dr. Van Til was more than appreciative of 10 THE COUNSEL of Chalcedon January/ February, 1996 California Center fOJ Christian Studies. He traveled around the world preaching, debating and lectUring. Often when he lectured, that wonderful look of "Now I understand!," would spread across the faces in the room like the "wave" at a Pittsburgh Steelers' home game. Though often most closely associated with the issue of the