L.P.

Dalal*
PACIFIC P JOURNALS
Asiatic
Journal of
BIOTECHNOLOGY
RESOURCES
Case Study
Available online at www.pacificjournals.com
AJOBR International Quarterly
Journal of Bioscience
Keywords: Stomata, anamocytic, paracytic,
stomatal index, dicot, monocots.
Department of Botany, Jankidevi Bajaj Collegeof Science, Wardha- 442001, India
*Correspondence: L.P. Dalal, Postgraduate Department of Botany, Jankidevi Bajaj College of Science, Wardha-442001, India
Asiatic J ournal of Biotechnology Resources; 2012; 03 (10) 1473-1477
Received on 10 July 2012; Accepted on 26 September 2012
Available online: 30 September 2012
Submitted online at submit@pacificjournals.com
Asiatic Journal of Biotechnology Resources
Asiatic J. Biotech Res. 2012; 03(10) 1473-1477
Published online at http:/ / www.pacificjournals.com/ ajobr
Copyright 2012 Pacific Publishers International. All rights reserved.
2249-2399/ 0976-4992/ AJOBR/ $0.76-doi:09.2012/ MPC:1336114M84
Stomatal variation in Dicot and Monocots - A Case Study
Introduction
Plants are of diverse in nature, diverse in their habit and habitat.
They are simpler to complex in nature as well as single to multi-
cellular in nature. They perform various physiological processes
during days and nights. Most important plant organs which perform
the physiological activity is transpiration and gaseous exchange in
stomata.
Stomata is a minute pore or opening formed in the epidermal
layer in green aerial parts of the plant, particularly the leaves. These
are surrounded by two semi-lunar cells, known as the guard cells.
The term stoma is often applied to the stomatal opening plus the
guard cells. The guard cells are living and always contain chloroplast
and their inner walls are thicker than outer cells. The guard cells are
living and always contain chloroplast thinner. They guard the stoma,
i.e. regulates the opening and closing. Sometimes the guard cells are
surrounded by two or more cells which are distinct from the epidermal
cells; such cells are called accessory cells or subsidiary cells. In
dicotyledonous leaves the stomata remain scattered, while in
monocotyledonous leaves, they are occurs in parallel rows. Stomata
Abstract
An experiment was conducted during the
year 2011-2012 to study the stomatal
indexes of a selected plants namely Hibiscus
rosa sinensis(L.), Lantana camera (L.), Rhoea
discolour (L.) andCommelina sp. (L.) It was
reported that only the plant Rhoea discolour
(L.) shown the paracytic type of stomata,
and majority of plants shown the
anamocytic type of stomatas. It was further
reported that maximum stomatal index in
the upper epidermis of Lantana camera (L.)
i.e. 14.8 and lowest in the Rhoea discolor (L.)
and Commelina sp. (L.) i.e. 0.57 each
respectively. Similarly in the peels of lower
epidermis of Lantana camera (L.) maximum
number of stomatal index were 9.85 and
lowest in the Hibiscus rosa sinensis
(L.)i.e.7.29. Copyright 2012 Pacific
Publishers.
1474
L.P. Dalal
Asiatic J. Biotech Res. 2012; 03(10) 1473-1477 Copyright 2012 Pacific Publishers
are more abundant in the lower epidermis of the dorsi-ventral leaf, none
are present in the upper. In the isobilateral and centric leaves, stomata are
more or less evenly distributed on all sides. In the floating leaves, stomata
remain confined to the upper epidermis alone, in the submerged leaves no
stomata is present. In desert plants they show xerophytic in adaptations,
and the stomata are sunken in pits.
Fowden et al.(1993) reported the different parts of the plant perform
stipulated function as they allotted. One of the part or organ of the plant
is a leaf that plays a vital role for the plant body. It performs the function
of gaseous exchange which includes photosynthesis and respiration. Plant
also transpire, that results in loss of excess of water absorbed from the soil
for this process stomatas are responsible. These stomatas are present in
both dicot and monocot plants and their position in these types are fixed.
The distribution of these stomatas on the surface of the leaf is variable.
Stomatas are made up of two kinds of cells. Depending on their
arrangements, these stomatas are broadly classified into 4-types namely
Anomocytic (Ranunculaceous type), anisocytic or cruciferous type,
Paracytic or Rubiaceous type and diacytic or Caryophyllaceous types.
Metcalfe and Chalk, 1950 distinguished the four types of stomata in
dicotyledons on the basis of the arrangement of the epidermal cells
neighbouring the guard cells. More than one type may sometime occur
together on the same organ (Metcalfe and Chalk,1950; Rao and
Ramayya,1977). In monocotyledons, Stebbins and Khush,(1961) have
distinguished the following 4-types of stomatal complexes and these were
modified by Paliwal, (1969). Stomata are ordered initially and become more
ordered as leaves mature (Sachs, 1988; Kagan and Sachs, 1991; Croxdale
et al.,1992; Boetsch, Chin, and Croxdale, 1995). Depending on when
stomata arrest and their subsequent development, they might not be
recognizable on nature organs. Based on illustrations of monocot and dicot
stomata, 10-50% of the total number of initial stomata arrest. In case of
Ruscus and sansevieria, 30-40% of stomata arrest as reported by Kagan, and
Sachs, 1991; Sachs., Novoplansky, and Kagan,1992. Sebnem Kusvurans,
2012, reported the findings of effects of drought and salt stresses on
growth stomatal conductance, leaf water potential and osmotic potentials
of melon genotypes (Cucumis melo): Sachs, (1979) reported the continuous
short range interaction between the future guard cells and the adjoining
cells, rather than interactions between future stomata or a fixed programme
of development are essential for the formation of the pattern of stomata
in the nature of leaf. Korn, (1993) established models to account for mature
stomatal distribution in Chlorophytumcosmosum, Iris pumila and Alliumcepa.,
and also reported that spatial aspect of stomatal pathway. Chartton, (1990)
suggested the cell cycle regulated stomatal patterning based on two pieces
of evidence: a) the position of stomatal initials at a common boundary in
the leaf base and b) the tendency of stomata and of epidermal cells to
occur in linear groups. He reported that a zone existed at the base of the
leaf where cells are targeted for the stomatal pathway and that the fate of
a cell entering this area is dependent on the cells position in the division
cycle.
1475
L.P. Dalal
Asiatic J. Biotech Res. 2012; 03(10) 1473-1477 Copyright 2012 Pacific Publishers
Material and methods
Leaves of different plant were collected and washed. The leaves were peeled
off by tearing the leaf suddenly and with force with lower epidermis upward
and these peels were taken in the petri-plates containing distilled water for
study. A thin membranous lower epidermis gets separated near the broken
edges. Peels comes out by pulling these into a strips with forceps or fingers.
These uniformed peels were taken on glass slides and a drop of 1% safranin
stain were added, kept for 1 minute, washed with water and then mounted
in a drop of glycerin to prevent the drying. A cover-slip were placed and
excess of water were blotted with the help of blotting paper. These slides
were observed under the microscopes. The data were tabulated and
analyzed.
Where,
I- Stomatal Index.
S- No. of stomata per unit area.
E- No. of epidermal cells per unit area.
Results
The lowest stomatal index (0.57) were reported in the upper epidermal
cells of Rhoea discolour (L.) and Commelina species (L.) leaves. Second increase
in stomatal index were in Hibiscus rosa sinensis (3.15) and Lantana camera
(L.)(14.8). The maximum number of stomatal index were reported in the
lower epidermis peels of Lantana camera (9.85) followed by Rhoea discolour
and Commlina sp. (9.62 each respectively) and lowest number of stomatal
index 7.29 were reported in Hibiscus rosa sinensis (L.). Malone et al.(1993);
Name of the Pl ants
Area
under
observation
Number of
Stomata
(S)
Number of
Epidermal Cells
(E)
Stomatal
index
(l)
Stomatal Type
Hibiscus rosa sinensis (L.)
U.E.
L.E.
92
89
142
139
3.15
7.29
Anamocytic
Lant ana camera (L.)
U.E.
L.E.
12
21
69
192
14.81
9.85
Anamocytic
Rhoea discolor (L.)
U.E.
L.E.
01
18
173
169
0.57
9.62
Paracytic
Commelina species (L.)
U.E.
L.E.
03
21
173
169
0.57
9.62
Anamocytic
Table 1. Showingthe Area, Number of stomata, number of epidermal cells, andStomatal indexes and stomatal types of plants.
U.E.: Upper epidermis; L.E.: Lower epidermis; I : Stomatal Index; S: No. of stomata per unit area; E: No. of
epidermal cells per unit area
Stomatal Index = X 100
S
----------
E + S
1476
L.P. Dalal
Asiatic J. Biotech Res. 2012; 03(10) 1473-1477 Copyright 2012 Pacific Publishers
Beerling, (1993), and Beyschlag et al., (1992) were also reported the same
type of observations.
From the arrangement of guard cells and subsidiary cells or accessory
cells of the stomata of a leaf, it was observed that in the plant Hibiscus rosa
sinensis (L.) Commelina sp. (L.) and Lantana camera (L.) were shown the
Anamocytic arrangements of stomata (Marx, A. and Sachs, T. (1997). Only
one plant in this investigation shown the paracytic type of stomatal
arrangements i.e. Rhoea discolour(L.). Ramonell et al., 1997; Sachs, 1974;
and Weyers, 1997; also reported the same type of the findings.
Conclusion
From the above results, it may be concluded that in the experimental
sampling (Willmer, 1996; Wolf et al., 1986) the majority of stomatal type
were of anamocytic type and less of paracytic type of stomatal
arrangements. It was also then reported that, the maximum stomatal indexes
were reported in the peels of upper epidermal peels of (Beyschlag et al.,
1992) of Lantana camera (L.) (14.8) and Lowest in the Rhoea discolour and
Commelia sp. (0.57 each). The intermittent stomatal indexes were the 7.29
of Hibiscus rosa sinensis. It was further concluded that their was variation in
stomatal indexes, that ranges from plant to plants.
References
1. Fowden,L., Mansfield, T., And J. Stoddart. (1993). Plant adaptation to
environmental stress. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
2. Metcalfe, C.R. And Chalk, L. (1950). Anatomy of the Dicotyledons,
Vols.I and II. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
3. Paliwal, G.S. (1969). Stomatal ontogeny and phylogeny; I, Monocoty
ledons. Acta bot. neerl; 18: 654-68.
4. Rao, S.R.S. And Ramayya, N. (1977). Stomatogenesis in the genus
Hibiscus L. (Malvaceae). J. Linn. Soc. Bot; 74: 47-56.
5. Stebbins, G.L. And Khush, G.S. (1961). Variation in the organization of
the stomatal complex in the leaf epidermis of monocotyledons and its
bearing on their phylogeny. Am. J. Bot; 48:51-59.
6. Croxdale, J., J.B. Johnson., J. Smith, And B. Yandell. (1992). Stomatal
patterning in Tradescantia: an evaluation of the cell lineage theory.
Developmental Biology; 167: 39-46.
7. Boetsch, J., J. Chin, And J. Croxdale.(1995). Arrest of stomatal initials in
Tradescantia is linked to the proximity of neighboring stomata and
results in arrested initials acquiring properties of Epidermal cells.
Developmental Biology; 167: 28-38.
8. Kagan, M.L., And T. Sachs. (1991). Development of immature stomata:
evidence for epigenic selection of a spacing pattern. Developmental Biology;
146: 100-105.
9. Sachs, T. (1988). Epigenic selection, an alternative mechanism of pattern
formation. Journal of Theoretical Biology; 134 : 547-559.
1477
L.P. Dalal
Asiatic J. Biotech Res. 2012; 03(10) 1473-1477 Copyright 2012 Pacific Publishers
10. Kagan, M.L., N. Novoplansky, and T. Sachs. (1993). Variable cell
lineages form and functional pea epidermis. Annals of Botany; 69: 303-
312.
11. Kusvuran, S. (2012). Effect of drought and Salt stresses on growth,
Stomatal conductance, water and osmotic potentials of melon genotypes
(Cucumis melon). African journal of Agricultural Research; 7(5): 775.
12. Sachs, T. (1979). Cellular Interaction in the Development of stomatal
Patterns in Vinca major L. Ann Bot; 43(6): 693-700.
13. Charlton, W. (1990). Differentiation in leaf epidermis of Chlorophytum
comosum-Baker. Annals of Botany; 66: 567-578.
14. Korn, R.W. (1993). Evidence in dicots for Stomatal patterning by
initiation. International Journal of Plant Sciences; 154: 367-377.
15. Beerling, D.J., and W.G. Chaloner. (1993). Stomatal density responses
of Egyptian Olea exropaea L. Leaves to CO
2
Change since 1327 BC.
Annals of Botanty; 71: 431-435.
16. Beyschlag, W., H. Pfanz, And R. J. Ryel. (1992). Stomatal patchiness in
Mediterranean evergreen sclerophylls: phenomenology and
consequences for the interpretation of the midday depression in
photosynthesis and transpiration. Planta; 187: 546-553.
17. Malone, S.R., H.S. Mayeux, B. Johnson and H.W. Polley. (1993). Stomatal
density and aperture length in four plant species grown across a
subambient CO
2
gradiant. American Journal of Botany; 80: 1413-1418.
18. Marx, A. And T. Sachs. (1977). The determination of stomata pattern
and frequency in Anagallis. Botanical Gazette; 138 : 385-392.
19. Ramonell, K., M. Crispi, And M.E. Musgrave. (1997). Changes in
stomatal density in Arabidopsis thaliana L. Heynh. Grown under low
atmospheres. Eight International Conferenceon Arabidopsis Research Meeting
Scheduleand Abstracts; 6-22.
20. Sachs, T. (1974). The developmental origin of stomata pattern in
Crinum. Botanical Gazette; 135 : 314-318.
21. Weyers , J., And T. Lawson. (1997). Heterogeneity in stomatal characters.
Advances in Botanical Research; 26: 318-352.
22. Willmer , C.M., And M.D. Fricker. (1996). Stomata, 2
nd
ed. Chapman and
Hall, London. U.K.
23. Wolf, S.D., W.K. Silk, And R. E. Plant. (1986). Quantitative patterns
of leaf expansion: Comparison of normal and malformed leaf growth
in Vitis vinifera cultivar Ruby Red. American Journal of Botany; 73: 832-
846.