The Times of India

Title : The BJP's New Shah

Author : Nalin.Mehta@timesgroup.com
Location :
Article Date : 08/11/2014

Amit Shah's ascent and appointment as party president signifies a new wave of social engineering
The last time a newly appointed BJP president al luded to his hum ble origins be fore the party's national
council was on August 3, 2002. An emotional Venkaiah Naidu broke down at the Talkatora Stadium
while talking about being born to ``a farmer's family in a remote village far down in the south'' and
declared that ``this kind of amazing journey from being an ordinary party worker in a hamlet to leading
the party at the national level is perhaps possible only in BJP''.
Cut to 2014 and Amit Shah began his first presidential address to the same body with a very similar
message, albeit in much more measured, calculated terms: ``There are more than 1,200 political parties
in India,'' he declared. ``But there is hardly any party where a worker could be elevated to the highest
position of national president.'' Irrespective of ideological filters and discomfort in the liberal
intelligentsia about the new Modi-Shah combine now leading BJP into its future, there is a powerful
message of upward social mobility wrapped in this packaging. At 49, Amit Shah is not only the
youngest party president ever of India's ruling party, his age is also much closer to the Indian median
age of 27.
In an intensely political country where 65% of the population is below the age of 35, BJP is also
positioning itself as an open house for an aspirational youth bulge where talent, of whatever shade and
hue, can and does rise. Notwithstanding the ever-present shadow of the Sangh, it is certainly a much
more open house than its contemporaries, barring AAP.
In contrast, accession to elite levels in the six other national parties is a relatively closed shop. Congress
remains hostage to dynasty, not only at its apex level but at state levels too where access and patronage
arguably remain far more important than winnability. Nationalist Congress Party has the same problem
and BSP remains Mayawati's personal fiefdom despite its crushing loss in UP. Communist parties are
more structured but much more secretive with power residing in closed cabals. Go further down the
pecking order and in state after state, regional parties are essentially family-controlled units: from
Parkash Singh Badal's Akali Dal to Mulayam Singh's Samajwadi Party and of course the Dravidian
parties.
Keeping aside the visual imagery of BJP's ``man of the match'' of 2014, as PM Modi called him, there is
a much more structural transformation that his ascent signifies.
``Social engineering'' is a term he stressed in his inaugural speech and its success in UP in the general
election and the manner in which it was pushed through signifies a major shift in BJP's politics.
To be sure, social engineering is now new to BJP. Social scientists have long documented the strategies
of identity-building and appropriation of lower castes that the broader Sangh Parivar adopted in the
1980s in the wake of the Ramjanmabhoomi movement and Mandal agitation, which took BJP from a
paltry two seats in the 1984 Lok Sabha elections to Raisina Hill in the mid 1990s. Its successes in
Gujarat and Chhattisgarh, in particular, owed to a systematic co-option of adivasis and dalits within the
broader frame of a Hindu identity, which supplanted older notions of `suvarna'.
Spearheaded by the likes of Kalyan Singh in UP, these were the fruits of BJP's first wave of social
engineering. These gains, however, were frittered away almost immediately thereafter amid party
Page 1 of 3
8/11/2014 http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=The-BJPs-New-S...
factionalism, the headiness of power under the Vajpayee regime and a general drift in direction after the
shock of the 2004 defeat.
What Amit Shah is now promising is a second wave of social engineering. This is what is so different
about BJP this time and UP was the first test of this new thrust.
In the first wave of social engineering, while backward caste voters moved towards BJP, their real
influence remained limited. Social scientist Christophe Jaffrelot has shown that their proportional
representation in the party's national executive and that of MPs returned from the Hindi belt did not
change significantly in the 1990s.
In contrast, in UP in 2014, Amit Shah spearheaded a realignment which saw the projection of Modi as
India's first OBC prime minister, the promising of a Bharat Ratna for Kanshi Ram, and a concerted
effort to break the dalit vote. This meant replicating older BSP strategies of venerating dalit icons,
except that BJP chose to focus on communities like Valmiki, Pasi, Sonkar and other non-Jatav
categories that were unhappy with Jatav dominance in Mayawati's BSP. This was combined with
ruthless ticket selection, a tech-savvy rural communications campaign and 27 seats to OBC candidates
despite strong opposition by local apparatchiks. The result was an unprecedented 73 seats.
This second wave of social engineering is different because it is backed by a newfound layer of
managerial efficiency , and a ruthless clarity of purpose about ideology and its goals.
This is why both Amit Shah and his mentor, Narendra Modi, stressed the idea of what they called
Congress-mukt Bharat.
How their equation and this project unfolds could fundamentally refashion long-held certainties about
Indian politics. BJP's new president is a man to watch and his rise necessitates an intellectual rethinking
in other political parties.


Page 2 of 3
8/11/2014 http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=The-BJPs-New-S...




Page 3 of 3
8/11/2014 http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=The-BJPs-New-S...