Pulished !nline: January 21, 2014 Michael R. Page, PharmD, RPh Compared with previou hypertenion treatment guideline, the Joint !ational Committee "J!C #$ guideline advie higher %lood preure goal and le ue o& everal type o& antihypertenive medication. Patient will %e a'ing a%out the new J!C # hypertenion guideline, which were pu%lihed in the Journal o& the (merican Medical (ociation on Decem%er 1#, 201). 1 *he new guideline emphai+e control o& ytolic %lood preure ",-P$ and diatolic %lood preure "D-P$ with age. and comor%idity.peci&ic treatment cuto&&. *he new guideline alo introduce new recommendation deigned to promote a&er ue o& angiotenin converting en+yme "(C/$ inhi%itor and angiotenin receptor %loc'er "(R-$. 0mportant change &rom the J!C 1 guideline 2 include the &ollowing2 3 0n patient 40 year or older who do not have dia%ete or chronic 'idney dieae, the goal %lood preure level i now 5160780 mm 9g. 3 0n patient 1# to 68 year o& age without ma:or comor%iditie, and in patient 40 year or older who have dia%ete, chronic 'idney dieae "C;D$, or %oth condition, the new goal %lood preure level i 5140780 mm 9g. 3 <irt.line and later.line treatment hould now %e limited to 4 clae o& medication2 thia+ide.type diuretic, calcium channel %loc'er "CC-$, (C/ inhi%itor, and (R-. 3 ,econd. and third.line alternative included higher doe or com%ination o& (C/ inhi%itor, (R-, thia+ide.type diuretic, and CC-. ,everal medication are now deignated a later.line alternative, including the &ollowing2 %eta.%loc'er, alpha%loc'er, alpha17%eta. %loc'er "eg, carvedilo$, vaodilating %eta.%loc'er "eg, ne%ivolol$, central alpha27.adrenergic agonit "eg, clonidine$, direct vaodilator "eg, hydrala+ine$, loop diruretic "eg, &uroemide$, aldoterone antagoint "eg, pironolactone$, and peripherally acting adrenergic antagonit "eg, reerpine$. 3 =hen initiating therapy, patient o& (&rican decent without C;D hould ue CC- and thia+ide intead o& (C/ inhi%itor. 3 >e o& (C/ inhi%itor and (R- i recommended in all patient with C;D regardle o& ethnic %ac'ground, either a &irt.line therapy or in addition to &irt.line therapy. 3 (C/ inhi%itor and (R- hould not %e ued in the ame patient imultaneouly. 3 CC- and thia+ide.type diuretic hould %e ued intead o& (C/ inhi%itor and (R- in patient over the age o& 16 year with impaired 'idney &unction due to the ri' o& hyper'alemia, increaed creatinine, and &urther renal impairment. *he change to a more lenient ytolic %lood preure goal may %e con&uing to many patient who are accutomed to the lower goal o& J!C 1, including the 5140780 mm 9g goal &or mot patient and 51)07#0 mm 9g goal &or patient with hypertenion and ma:or comor%iditie. *he guideline were in&ormed %y reult o& 6 'ey trial2 the 9ypertenion Detection and <ollow.up Program "9D<P$, the 9ypertenion.,tro'e Cooperative, the Medical Reearch Council "MRC$ trial, the (utralian !ational -lood Preure "(!-P$ trial, and the ?eteran@ (dminitration "?($ Cooperative. 0n thee trial, patient %etween the age o& )0 and 48 year received medication to lower D-P to a level 580 mm 9g. Reult howed a reduction in cere%rovacular event, heart &ailure, and overall mortality in patient treated to the D-P target level. *he data were o compelling that ome mem%er o& the J!C # panel wanted to 'eep D-P 580 mm 9g a the only goal among younger patient, citing inu&&icient evidence &or %ene&it o& an ,-P goal lower than 140 mm 9g in patient under the age o& 40 year. 9owever, more conervative panelit puhed to 'eep the target ,-P goal a well a the D-P goal. 0n younger patient without ma:or comor%iditie, elevated D-P i a more important cardiovacular ri' &actor than i elevated ,-P. *he J!C # panelit are not the &irt guideline author to recogni+e thi relationhip. *he J!C 1 guideline author alo ac'nowledged that D-P control wa more important than ,-P control &or reducing cardiovacular ri' in patient 540 year o& age. 9owever, in patient 40 year and older ,-P control remain the mot important &actor. Ather recent evidence ugget that the ,-P goal 5140 mm 9g recommended %y the J!C 1 guideline &or mot patient may have %een unnecearily low. *he J!C # guideline author cite 2 trial that &ound no improvement in cardiovacular outcome with an ,-P target 5140 mm 9g compared with a target ,-P level 5140 mm 9g or 5160 mm 9g. Depite thi &inding, the new guideline do not diallow treatment to a target ,-P 5140 mm 9g, %ut recommend caution to enure that low ,-P level do not a&&ect Buality o& li&e or lead to advere event. *he hi&t to a D-P.%aed goal may mean younger patient will %e precri%ed &ewer medication i& diagnoed with hypertenionC thi may improve adherence and minimi+e advere event aociated with low ,-P, uch a eDual dy&unction. Patients "ith #idney Disease (lthough 1 pot hoc analyi howed a poi%le advantage in 'idney outcome with the lower target o& 1)07#0 mm 9g recommended %y J!C 1, 2 other primary analye did not upport thi &inding. (dditionally, another ) trial did not how an advantage with the 51)07#0 mm 9g goal over the 5140780 mm 9g goal level &or patient with chronic 'idney dieae. ( a reult, the new guideline recommend that patient with chronic 'idney dieae receive medication u&&icient to achieve the higher 5140780 mm 9g goal level. 9owever, in an eDception to thi goal level, the guideline ugget that patient with chronic 'idney dieae or al%uminuria 10 year or older hould receive treatment %aed on comor%iditie, &railty, and other patient.peci&ic &actor. /vidence wa inu&&icient to upport a goal %lood preure o& 5140780 mm 9g in patient over the age o& 10 year with C;D or al%uminuria. Patients "ith Diaetes (dult with dia%ete and hypertenion have reduced mortality a well a improved cardiovacular and cere%rovacular outcome with treatment to a goal ,-P 5160 mm 9g, %ut no randomi+ed controlled trial upport a goal 5140780 mm 9g. Depite thi, the panel opted &or a conervative recommendation in patient with dia%ete and hypertenion, opting &or a goal level o& 5140780 mm 9g in adult patient with dia%ete and hypertenion rather than the evidence%aed goal o& 5160780 mm 9g. $ollo%-up *he J!C # guideline author impli&ied a complicated recommendation &or &ollowup in patient with hypertenion. *he J!C 1 panel recommended that a&ter an initial high %lood preure reading, &ollowup with a con&irmatory %lood preure reading hould occur within 1 day to 2 month, depending on how high the initial reading wa and whether or not the patient had 'idney dieae or end.organ damage a a reult o& hypertenion. >nder J!C #, in all cae, goal %lood preure target hould %e reached within a month o& tarting treatment either %y increaing the doe o& an initial drug or %y uing a com%ination o& medication. Treat&ents Ei'e the J!C 1 panel, the J!C # panel recommended thia+ide.type diuretic a initial therapy &or mot patient. (lthough (C/ inhi%itor, (R-, and calcium channel %loc'er "CC-$ are accepta%le alternative, thia+ide.type diuretic till have the %et evidence o& e&&icacy. *he J!C # panel doe not recommend &irt.line therapy with %eta.%loc'er and alpha. %loc'er due to 1 trial that howed a higher rate o& cardiovacular event with ue o& %eta. %loc'er compared with ue o& an (R-, and another trial in which alpha.%loc'er reulted in in&erior cardiovacular outcome compared with ue o& a diuretic. 0n addition, a lac' o& evidence comparing the 4 &irt.line therapie with carvedilol, ne%ivolol, clonidine, hydrala+ine, reerpine, &uroemide, pironolactone, and other imilar medication preclude ue o& any medication other than (C/ inhi%itor, (R-, CC-, and thia+ide.type diuretic in the vat ma:ority o& patient. -e&ore receiving alpha.%loc'er, %eta%loc'er, or any o& everal micellaneou agent, under the J!C # guideline, patient would receive a doage ad:utment and com%ination o& the 4 &irt.line therapie. *riple therapy with an (C/ inhi%itor7(R-, CC-, and thia+ide.type diuretic would precede ue o& alpha.%loc'er, %eta.%loc'er, or any o& everal other agent. *hee new guideline all %ut eliminate ue o& %eta.%loc'er "including ne%ivolol$, alpha. %loc'er, loop diuretic, alpha 17%eta.%loc'er, central alpha27adrenergic agonit, direct vaodilator, aldoterone antagonit, and peripherally acting adrenergic antagonit in patient with newly diagnoed hypertenion. Caution i warranted in patient who are already ta%le on thee therapie. 'pe(ial Therapeuti( Considerations (C/ inhi%itor and (R- may not %e an ideal choice in patient o& (&rican decent. Reult o& a u%group analyi in the (ntihypertenive and Eipid Eowering *reatment to Prevent 9eart (ttac' *rial "(EE9(*$ &ound that (C/ inhi%itor led to wore cardiovacular outcome than thia+ide.type diuretic or CC- in patient with (&rican ancetry. Depite the u%group analyi o& (EE9(*, reult o& the (&rican (merican ,tudy o& ;idney Dieae and 9ypertenion "((,;$ upport ue o& &irt.line or add.on (C/0 to improve 'idney.related outcome in patient o& (&rican decent with hypertenion, C;D, and proteinuria. ( a reult, the J!C # panelit recommend that all patient with chronic 'idney dieae and hypertenion, regardle o& ethnic %ac'ground, hould receive treatment with an (C/ inhi%itor or (R- to protect 'idney &unction, either a initial therapy or add.on therapy. Ane eDception to the ue o& (C/ inhi%itor or (R- in protection o& 'idney &unction applie to patient over the age o& 16 year. *he panel cited the potential &or (C/ inhi%itor and (R- to increae erum creatinine and produce hyper'alemia. ( a reult, &or patient over the age o& 16 year with decreaed renal &unction, thia+ide.type diuretic or CC- are an accepta%le alternative to (C/0 or (R-. 0n addition, the panel eDprely prohi%it imultaneou ue o& an (C/ inhi%itor and an (R- in the ame patient. *hi com%ination ha not %een hown to improve outcome. Depite the &act that the 2 medication wor' at di&&erent point in the renin.angiotenin.aldoterone ytem, other com%ination o& medication are %etter option, and the imultaneou ue o& (C/0 and (R- i not upported %y evidence. )i*estyle Changes ( in J!C 1, the J!C # guideline alo recommend li&etyle change a an important component o& therapy. Ei&etyle intervention include ue o& the Dietary (pproache to ,top 9ypertenion "D(,9$ eating plan, weight lo, reduction in odium inta'e to le than 2.4 gram per day, and at leat )0 minute o& aero%ic activity mot day o& the wee'. 0n addition, to delay development o& hypertenion, improve the %lood preureFlowering e&&ect o& eDiting medication, and decreae cardiovacular ri', alcohol inta'e hould %e limited to 2 drin' daily in men and 1 drin' daily in women. !ote that 1 drin' contitute 12 ounce o& %eer, 6 ounce o& wine, or 1.6 ounce o& #0.proo& liBuor. Guitting mo'ing alo reduce cardiovacular ri'. Con(lusion *he J!C # guideline move away &rom the aumption that lower %lood preure level will improve outcome regardle o& the type o& agent ued to achieve the lower level. 0ntead, the J!C # guideline encourage ue o& agent with the %et evidence o& reducing cardiovacular ri'. 0n addition, the guideline may lead to le ue o& antihypertenive medication in younger patient, which will produce eBuivalent outcome in term o& cardiovacular event with le potential &or advere event that limit adherence. Michael R. Page, PharmD, RPh, i the clinical editor &or Pharmacy *ime. *hi tory &irt appeared online in Pharmacy *ime on January 4, 2014. +e*eren(es 1. Jame P(, Aparil ,, Carter -E, et al. 2014 evidence.%aed guideline &or the management o& high %lood preure in adult2 report &rom the panel mem%er appointed to the eighth Joint !ational Committee "J!C #$ Hpu%lihed online Decem%er 1#, 201)I. J(M(. doi210.10017:ama.201).2#4421. 2. -rotman DJ, <rot ,D. *he J!C 1 hypertenion guideline. J(M(. 200)C280"10$21)1). 1)14C author reply 1)14.1)16.