Running head: ADMINISTRATIVE ETHICS PAPER 1

Administrative Ethics Paper

Juliet Jettel
HCS/335
February 20 2012
William Bross
ADMINISTRATIVE ETHICS PAPER 2


Administrative Ethics Paper
The privacy of patients has been a main issue for patients and health personnel for several
years. The privacy of patients goes hand and hand with the privacy rule of HIPPA. This protects
the confidentiality of all health information about a person (U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services 2010). A study conducted by Zogby Internation show an additional 2000 adults
were studied to get their views on privacy of the patient. The result of these studies determined
that those would somewhat have their own choice and be in charge of private health information
as a replacement for of others being in charge of making a decision (Patient Privacy 2010).
Profacgillies editorial subject is what really constitutes confidential information and right
to use the responsive information. These concerns are extremely serious for numerous persons.
These issues involve the total public that is express. There is no definite person that is affected.
There appear to be additional persons who are troubled with these issues. The people that have a
variety of health reports and health information are more disturbed about their privacy than
others who have less information on their health report (Profacgillies 2009).
It is a lawful and ethical task to keep personal information confidential regarding the patient.
With reference to lawful issues they are diverse according to the facility. They will not be similar
at any one facility. Unlike ethical issues could get in the way. The privacy of a patient is a good
example to use when speaking of ethical issues. A previous patient of the doctor was warned
about fertility management that could possibly take her life. The doctor found out that she was
expecting and seeing a different doctor from the sister of the woman that is taking fertility
management in spite of the serious side affect connected with the treatment. The doctor also
found out that the current doctor was not aware of the previous doctor recommendation that the
person should not take fertility treatments because it could end her life. The previous doctor took
ADMINISTRATIVE ETHICS PAPER 3


this information about the person not letting the new doctor know of her previous issues and the
recommendation the prior doctor had made to the Medical Organization Compliance Officer who
suggested him to contact his past patient and go over the concerns with having fertility
management that could take her life. Another concern was did her current doctor know what the
recommendation were for using this treatment.
Making medical decisions can be difficult at times for health professionals but one must
keep in mind there are laws to go by and as long as they are followed you will feel like it is the
correct thing to do is to tell a different individual (Report of Patient Privacy 2010).
While being an administrator it is vital to follow all laws and policy as well as the health
organizations policy and set of laws rules and ethical values. The tasks are to care for the patient
as well as have high opinion for the privacy of the patient. The supervisor is accountable for the
information acknowledged and should respect and do what the law says regardless if they feel
like it is not the right thing to do. There can be numerous projected solutions to this type of
problem. It should be clear on what information is private and never shared because sometimes
when information has been shared it is not clear if it was private (Report of Patient Privacy
2010). A plan solution to this matter would be to have a thorough record of information that is
private as well as having it in the health charts. Information that is sensitive information does
not seem to be hard to access. A solution to this problem would be to secure the system by
needing a password which would make it not to be easy for anyone to access the patient health
information.
In the piece of writing it talks about there is a commitment to use as small as possible of the
patient individual information. The problem with this is that if a person or association would
eliminate a name and address from a patient medical record this would still not make it private or
ADMINISTRATIVE ETHICS PAPER 4


unidentified. There are additional factors that can still identify this person such as social security
number and date of birth. It would be tough to recognize a person that has been analysis with a
very familiar disease such as asthma but if the conclusion were developed and shared with other
factors such as age sex and race of someone can offer a report of the person who can currently be
recognized. Health reports have prepared information to be controlled and more organized but it
is also easier for any person in the business to see personal information of the individual. Anyone
that is interested in the health records with a password can see this private information and this
can be staff from within the business. This problem can be prevented if physicians are given a
certain password for each patient file or even a password that permits only the doctor to have
accessibility to the files. There may also be doctors that do not wish to view patient medical
information from a different doctor. This concern would be difficult to approach a solution to the
issue because of the diverse group who will require to right to use patient health report.
This piece of writing has revealed how diverse issues involving the privacy of the patient can
be delicate. There is constantly the inquiry about what the correct thing is to do but there are
also laws and rules that HIPPA has set to be followed. Various projected solutions can help with
problems but occasionally there is no means of solving these problems. The privacy of a patient
is a subject of these days and will likely to always be an interesting subject.




ADMINISTRATIVE ETHICS PAPER 5


Reference
Patient Privacy Rights/ Zogby International (2010) New patient Privacy Role Retrieved February
19, 2012 from http://patient privacy rights.org/ (2012)
Profacgillies (2009) Maintaining the Confidentiality of Patient Records Retrieved on
February19, 2012 from http:// wwwbrighttub.com/health/technology/articles/9027.aspx
Report on Patient Privacy (2010) HIPPA Compliance Strategies Retrieved on February 19, 2012
from http:// wwwaishealth.com/Compliance/HIPPA/RPP Stump Privacy Officals.htm
US Department of Health and Human Services (2010) Health Information Privacy, Retrieved on
February 19, 2012 from http:// www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/