Poll of Houston Likely Voters - 12/2/09 thru 12/4/09 MOE +/- 4.

1 Percentage Points

Registered

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid Yes 600 100.0 100.0 100.0

Likelihood

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid V lkly 479 79.9 79.9 79.9
Smw lkly 121 20.1 20.1 100.0
Total 600 100.0 100.0

Party

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid Democratic 261 43.5 43.5 43.5
Republican 213 35.5 35.5 79.0
Independent 126 21.0 21.0 100.0
Total 600 100.0 100.0

4. Who will you vote for in the runoff election for mayor on December 12-- Gene Locke or Annise Parker?

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid Locke 218 36.4 36.4 36.4
Parker 251 41.9 41.9 78.3
Someone else 25 4.1 4.1 82.4
NS 106 17.6 17.6 100.0
Total 600 100.0 100.0

5. Who will you vote for in the runoff election for city controller on December 12--Ronald Green or M.J. Khan?

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid Green 177 29.5 29.5 29.5
Khan 212 35.4 35.4 64.8
Someone else 4 .6 .6 65.5
NS 207 34.5 34.5 100.0
Total 600 100.0 100.0

Zogby International 1 12/4/2009

 Poll of Houston Likely Voters - 12/2/09 thru 12/4/09 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points

6. Favorability - Gene Locke

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid V fav 130 21.6 21.6 21.6
Smw fav 214 35.7 35.7 57.3
Smw unfav 87 14.5 14.5 71.8
V unfav 69 11.4 11.4 83.3
Not familiar 92 15.4 15.4 98.6
NS 8 1.4 1.4 100.0
Total 600 100.0 100.0

7. Favorability - Annise Parker

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid V fav 189 31.5 31.5 31.5
Smw fav 211 35.2 35.2 66.7
Smw unfav 75 12.4 12.4 79.2
V unfav 48 8.0 8.0 87.2
Not familiar 66 10.9 10.9 98.1
NS 11 1.9 1.9 100.0
Total 600 100.0 100.0

8. Is Annise Parker's sexual orientation a factor you will consider in determining which candidate is best fit for mayor?

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid Yes 109 18.1 18.1 18.1
No 459 76.5 76.5 94.6
NS 32 5.4 5.4 100.0
Total 600 100.0 100.0

9. Will Annise Parker's sexual orientation cause you to vote against her?

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid Yes 68 11.3 62.7 62.7
No 35 5.9 32.3 95.0
NS 5 .9 5.0 100.0
Total 109 18.1 100.0
Missing 0 491 81.9
Total 600 100.0

Zogby International 2 12/4/2009

 Poll of Houston Likely Voters - 12/2/09 thru 12/4/09 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points

10. Is Gene Locke's past work and association with Metro and the Harris County -Houston
Sports Authority a factor you will consider in determining which candidate is best fit for mayor?

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid Yes 268 44.6 44.6 44.6
No 289 48.2 48.2 92.8
NS 43 7.2 7.2 100.0
Total 600 100.0 100.0

11. Will Gene Locke's past work for and association with Metro and the Sports Authority cause you to vote against him?

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid Yes 85 14.2 31.7 31.7
No 152 25.3 56.6 88.4
NS 31 5.2 11.6 100.0
Total 268 44.6 100.0
Missing 0 332 55.4
Total 600 100.0

12. Which candidate do you think is better equipped to deal with the financial and economic problems facing the city?

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid Parker 303 50.4 50.4 50.4
Locke 160 26.7 26.7 77.2
Neither 39 6.5 6.5 83.6
NS 98 16.4 16.4 100.0
Total 600 100.0 100.0

13. Which candidate do you think is better equipped to deal with the illegal immigration in the city?

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid Parker 171 28.6 28.6 28.6
Locke 194 32.4 32.4 60.9
Neither 81 13.5 13.5 74.5
NS 153 25.5 25.5 100.0
Total 600 100.0 100.0

Zogby International 3 12/4/2009

 Poll of Houston Likely Voters - 12/2/09 thru 12/4/09 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points

14. Which candidate do you think is better equipped to deal with crime in the city?

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid Parker 187 31.1 31.1 31.1
Locke 259 43.1 43.1 74.2
Neither 43 7.2 7.2 81.4
NS 111 18.6 18.6 100.0
Total 600 100.0 100.0

AgeGroup

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid 18-29 57 9.6 10.0 10.0
30-49 241 40.2 42.0 52.0
50-64 161 26.8 28.0 80.0
65+ 115 19.1 20.0 100.0
Total 574 95.7 100.0
Missing 0 26 4.3
Total 600 100.0

AgeGroup-B

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid 18-24 16 2.7 2.8 2.8
25-34 71 11.8 12.3 15.1
35-54 256 42.6 44.6 59.7
55-69 150 25.1 26.2 85.9
70+ 81 13.5 14.1 100.0
Total 574 95.7 100.0
Missing 0 26 4.3
Total 600 100.0

Education

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid No College Degree 246 41.0 41.2 41.2
College Degree+ 351 58.5 58.8 100.0
Total 598 99.6 100.0
Missing .00 2 .4
Total 600 100.0

Zogby International 4 12/4/2009

 Poll of Houston Likely Voters - 12/2/09 thru 12/4/09 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points

Race

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid White 306 51.0 52.0 52.0
Hisp 88 14.7 15.0 67.0
AfrAmer 159 26.5 27.0 94.0
Asian 18 2.9 3.0 97.0
Other 18 2.9 3.0 100.0
Total 589 98.2 100.0
Missing .00 11 1.8
Total 600 100.0

Income

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid < $25K 63 10.5 12.4 12.4
$25-35K 64 10.6 12.6 24.9
$35-50K 69 11.5 13.6 38.5
$50-75K 87 14.5 17.2 55.8
$75-100K 81 13.4 15.9 71.7
$100+ 144 23.9 28.3 100.0
Total 507 84.5 100.0
Missing 0 93 15.5
Total 600 100.0

Gender

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid Male 289 48.2 48.2 48.2
Female 311 51.8 51.8 100.0
Total 600 100.0 100.0

Zogby International 5 12/4/2009