PURSUANT TO THE SCC ORDER TO HEAR

R v TIM FELGER IN THE SCC

WE HEREBY ARE TELLING ANY POLICE OFFICER TO STAY
AWAY FROM OUR PREMISES
AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW [Sec 1 Charter
To get a backgrounder on this above notice read this short article by the Vancouver Sun
http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Supreme+Court+Canada+grants+oral+hearings+bong+shop+owner/10117855/story.html
his story is right " it#s highly unusual $or his case to be reviewed% especially a$ter they#ve served their sentences.
heir de$ence was based on hanging signs saying cops are not welcome and stay away% and SCC wants to
elaborate on this ruling by as&ing $or verbal presentations to be made. his means 'at $ace value( that until told
otherwise% hanging a sign 'li&e above( in any dispensary is a good idea% )*C+,S* until this ruling is clari$ied% it#s
sa$e to assume that this de$ence is now a legal way to protect your dispensary $rom police raids and stings.
-n .ancouver this is important because cops are sha&ing down clubs on a regular basis +/0 it#s basically highway
robbery% and slushed under the carpet as 1no comment% because it#s under investigation2 3 he last sha&e down
had a warrant that read that they were there to investigate a claim o$ there being stolen property on the premises
'which simply was not the case( then the cops stole about 415%000 o$ inventory and cash% and told them to have a
nice day% than& you $or not resisting% we#ll get around to eventually charging you 'and( this legally gives them one
year be$ore the dispensary can start to ma&e a claim to get at least the money bac&. his sign might ma&e any
contravener to thin& twice% because most o$ these clubs have a good lawyer to resolve a case li&e this 5uic&ly.
his case gives .678 an opportunity to $ile our claim to legitimacy by see&ing to have our verbal and/or written
de$ence $or why this hearing can rule on our present -C75 9:8 business model )*C+,S* as we see it:
the similarities between im ;elger#s situation and our present business model are so obvious.
1. <-S /**0S *=8>+-/-/?: +t the time o$ the arrest% im ;elger was the C*@ o$ a 7ariAuana 8arty *0+ %
and he had his dispensary listed as his @$$ices% and his $arm listed as his dispensary#s supplier.
1. his means all his #premises# were covered under a Constitutional blue Bone% because o$ the *0+
status 3 'premises is a tric& word in law " it#s 1
st
and $oremost an idea /belie$% and 9
nd
it#s a building( 3
9. -t#s our contention that " <ad im ;elger been using our -C75 9:8 protocol that he actually would have
been 100C law$ul $or his *0+ to protect their belie$s% because he would have been able to give taD credits
on part o$ the sales o$ cannabis )*C+,S* this taD credit 'by itsel$( ma&es the sale o$ cannabis to
members per$ectly legal% and $ran&ly no one can hold it against him $or not &nowing this loophole% it too& us
103years to $igure it out. +/0 now we might get a chance $or an SCC Eustice to rule on its# application.
F. Gith this new hearing 'on the ;elger case( means the worse that can happen is that this Eustice will say
#no# to our offer to make a submission for Her to review and rule on, AND we are 'banking' on the fact that
[at face value] She just might have done what She did to accommodate our submission
H. @n the @wen Smith <earing% since the Crown#s application to appeal their )CSC ruling has been dropped%
means a )CSC or an SCC Eustice needs to hear Owen Smith's appeal to be heard in the SCC but frankly
[as VQMP sees it] to accept his file in the SCC would mean giving 'ordinary residents' [defined under the
Elections Act] the rights of private individuals [in the larger scope of things not likely to happen]
1. Regardless, we'll be filing papers to appear at these hearings, in order to seek a ruling as a 3
rd
party,
because these cases really are important to fulfilling our rubric [which is to legalize cannabis]
5. ON THIS - Time will tell. One way or another VQMP will be in the SCC sooner than later, by pressing for
this opportunity to legalize our venture with an SCC case-law ruling; these filings just might make it sooner
1. This Hearing happens in mid October AND this is very good timing in pressing our political campaign
1. These Hearings just may be the catalyst for interesting times, because just the re-introduction of
common law rights to any landed Canadian who joins our party will shake the system to the core
Further detail on what VQMP is seeking by filing a motion to be heard in Tim Felgers S!! "earing.
1. he &ey to im#s case is the total abuse o$ power and $orce that +bbotts$ord 8olice dealt him.
1. hey robbed him o$ virtually everything he had including his $arm and $ran&ly he has a last shot at
getting millions o$ dollars in settlement with the SCC and they gave him this chance to press his case.
#. The $1 crime he did was to violate the %lections &ct &'( this needs e)*laining
1. im was busted the day a$ter the deadline $or $iling his candidacy in the 900I election.
9. )J 0*;-/--@/: the sole reason you $orm an *0+ is to enable a social eDperiment 'premise( 'li&e
im was doing% in a 8arty <*+05uarters 'premises( is possible is i$ you do this one thing
1. /+7*>J: when there#s a ?eneral *lection% run a candidate or $ace serious conse5uences
F. he heavy handed level o$ the arresting @$$icers was to show how little respect they had $or him
1. <is *0+ was eventually de certi$ied% and the biggest reason $or this was by not running.
H. )ut under *lection +ct common law% it#s directly prohibited $or any authority to seiBe his real estate.
5. @/ <-S: - o$$ered im and @ur 8arty >eader )lair >ongley with where and how to $ind a paper3
trail to these hidden or non3eDisting documents% and we re$use to believe that they will $ind a lac& o$
proper documentation% which should lead to a multi million dollar pay3out $or his staggering loses.
1. +s i see it% the SCC is as&ing him to do something% and seiBing this chance to properly $ile $or a
damage award is a once in a li$e time opportunity $or him or us to actually $ind some Eustice.
9. ;ran&ly% .678 $eels the good reason $or him getting his day in court is because we had $iled $or a
7andamus to appear be$ore the SCC% last month. ), the ways and means the +? o$ )C handled this
$ile was something the SCC simply cannot ignore 'i#ll not elaborate on this mal$easance in this article(
F. +/0 $ran&ly had we been given a 7andamus in the SCC on short >eave 'at that time( would have resulted
where we would have been in court at about the same time as the SCC reopened this im ;elger case and
the @wen Smith case. +s we see it% we simply have to accept that 'Aust maybe( these two surprise hearing
dates were pressed by the SCC 'right on time( in order to press our case in the SCC and 'on this(
1. +s we see it: $ailing to $ile anything really would be missing a once in a li$e time shot at getting a $ast
trac& decision in the SCC% and $ran&ly the only way to $ind out i$ we can appear% is to $ile some &ind o$
motion% as a third party intervenor% in order to press our desire to have the SCC ma&e a ruling
1. 3 on the grounds that we always have contended that the @wen Smith case was very relevant to
our de$ence +/0 it#s more than a coincidence that the SCC chose this im ;elger <earing% which
also $its into eDactly the case law re$erence that we need to de$end our mandamus.
+. '1
st
on im#s case( @ur de$ense is that hindsight is 90/90 " -t#s sel$ evident that im 'at that time( did not
understand the $undamental $law that can occur $rom not running $or @$$ice. <+ S+-0: it#s sel$ evident
that he lost his case because o$ a $undamental $law in how to press what#s called a letter per$ect de$ence.
1. <-S S+-0: .678 is claiming to be compliant with having a #letter per$ect# plat$orm that should be
recogniBed as positive law. @/ <-S: while $iguring out our letter per$ect status% we saw that there
were many other letter per$ect ways to achieve the same ends. 'on this( his Eustice could be
instrumental in getting a letter per$ect plat$orm that also better $its the SCC#s larger scope o$ things
1. + $air comparission can be made with those new ;ed Courts: /+7*>J: <arper contracted those
Commercial Courts to $orm and regulate a /orth +merican industry that can import/eDport cannabis
9. +/0 we are see&ing basically the same thing $rom the SCC% by enabling them 'li&e <arper is
see&ing $rom the ;*0 Courts( /+7*>J: he SCC can $ine3tune our model by $orming regulations
and set up an in$ra3structure /protocol% in order to operate our enterpriBe under common law.
1. his might sound dawnting but it#s really easyK all they need to do is set the case law re$erences
on how people did commmon law business be$ore Corporations usurped them o$$ the map.
9. >et#s $ace itK there#s nothing new under the sun on this application o$ positive lawK we are Aust
going bac& to be governed under common law practicesK it#s not reinventing the wheel.
F. -n today#s conteDt% we need to protect oursel$ $rom corporate powers by $ollowing a letter per$ect
ways and means to mainly operate good boo&s that preclude paper dragons $rom enchoaching.
1. -n order to accomplish this% we need to eDplain in detail how we intend to protect ourselves
+/0 what we a need to do to be $ree to do what we want% under common law.
9. Ge accept that common law business enterpriBes 'li&e ours( need to operate the sale o$ its#
goods under as a #private members club# under Sec FIL1M and Sec FIL9M CC in order to wor&
-/ @:0*: @ *=8:*SS G<+ G* /**0 @ @8*:+* @,: */*:8:-N* /**0S S@7* *=8>+-/-/?.
5. -n order to do this we#ll start $rom the seed: -n order to be compliant to operating under common law% a
$armer who does not sell any o$ his crop needs to only become an unincorporated *0+ +gent% and in spite
o$ it con$licting with the classic common law territorial rights% we agree that this home3grower needs to be
registered with the local civil authorities% and comply with reasonable $ire and sa$ety codes '$or eDample(.
1. +$ter all common law rules need to be moderniBed in order to comply with 'things li&e( being compliant
with electrical /plumbing /$ire code $or obvious sa$ety reasons because '$or eDample( electricity or cars
were not around when corporations started usurping our real common law rights
9. @/ <-S: ,nder common law% our *0+ agents are not limited to 5uotas o$ how many plants or how
many lights they have because common sense should dictate how many plants is too many plants.
1. )ut again% we realiBe that reasonable maDimum guidelines on this agent may be necessary
F. -n common law% there is no such thing as possessing with the intent to tra$$ic&% this means that i$ an
*0+ agent does sell their goods to especially anyone outside our enterpriBe can result in charges
1. 'on this( <arper is contracting the ;ederal courts to set all &inds o$ sentencing guidelines% +/0 we
need similar common law regulations set by case law 'li&e <arper#s Courts are doing to regulate
the international standards $or commercially supplying cannabis to the ,S+ 3 $or eDample(.
9. +$ter all% we 'as a >oyal @pposition 8arty( can still demand to be treated as e5uals% by the maAority
in 8arliament% even under this very $lawed $orm o$ common law Aurisdiction% +/0 we really need to
protect the people $rom this #by the people $or the economy# bastardiBation o$ 0emocracy itsel$.
F. <-S 7*+/S the C0S+ simply has no Aurisdiction to inter$ere with our common law activities
because we actually are doing everything right to protect our well $ounded multicultural belie$s that
in the beginning% Cannabis was given by ?od the Creator to man&ind as a Sacred gi$t

O. -n order to sell any o$ their crop means this *0+ agent needs to register as a private individual or
partnership or a Co3op% with the )C Societies +ct 'grower and/or dispensary( because they are de$ined as
an individual corporation% 'and on this( we accept that all &inds o$ *lections +ct restrictions on how an *0+
itsel$ can do business with regular corporations will contractually bind and limit a co3op to operate more
li&e an *0+ than a )C co3op can% because they can basically contract with anyone% and an *0+ cannot.
1. +s we see it: Ghen we render the reasoning behind the limitation on doing business with paper
corporations% we see that it#s there to enable *lections Canada#s ability to protect the integrity o$ its#
common law Aurisdiction $rom those paper dragons. 'hey wrote our letter per$ect accounting structure(
9. 'on this( -t#s hard to re$ute that when any -ncorporated *0+ individual entity is complying with *lections
Canada#s practices 'especially by operating under our *;: so$tware( in order to deal on our $inancial
matters% means we are o$$ering the best de$ense possible to protect our -ncorporated +gencies# ability
to say we#re 100C compliant with being a common law enterpriBe. 'i$ it 5uac&s li&e a duc& then...(
F. his means that the growing and sale o$ cannabis as medicine to private club members is 100C law$ul%
as long as everyone belong to a 8rivate 7embers Club# that o$$ers our .678 boo& &eeping structure
H. he entire cannabis industry is 100C legal as long as the growers and the dispensaries are properly
registered with any 7ariAuana 8arty *0+ that understands how to structure /operate good *;: boo&s.
1. Ge o$$er the ways and means to set up *lections Canada /C: Charities *;: so$tware to be the
operating system o$ a very user3$rendly 8@S system. o eDpress how easy it is% i#ll use this analagy
1. 0oing a sales o$ cannabis to a member is as easy has 'a( enter the member#s number and
'poo$( a picture and pro$ile o$ where all that members transactions automatically are $iled in the
right accounting boDes% and the 'b( the dispenser $ills out a bill $or what the member receives.
1. 8ut it this way% the operatng o$ our 8@S system is as easy as ta&ing an order $or a piBBa
9. )y simply entering the sale into the 8@S system results where it registers all the tedious
accounting in a nano second. hen an accountant who is trained to eDtract data $rom any
*;: program has all the data in all the right boDesK in this way% the program itsel$ can prove
that everything about growing and selling cannabis is 100C compliant with operating a
common law business% there$ore impossible to charge anyone who plays by our rules
F. Ghat needs to be accepted is that without this computer program% it would be impossible to
do the mountains o$ accounting $inancial reports that this program does instantly.
H. -t#s ironic that with good boo&ing practices% we can protect our 0emocratic belie$s% because
in so doing% we can claim a legitimate right to operate under common law protection