© All Rights Reserved

13 tayangan

© All Rights Reserved

- YK Liquid Level Sensor Calibration
- Riyanto CV
- Krautkramer DynaMIC Data Sheet
- Gregory J. Harris, Oleg L. Polyansky and Jonathan Tennyson- Opacity Data for HCN and HNC From a New Ab Initio Line List
- Process Mineralogy for Metals
- Aaice Id100 Prod Spec
- Faas
- 2096_MeasurLink
- Calculation of Plant Parameters Corrected.. and Conclusion Done
- Yang1998 Hida
- 11JNN-4143 CdSeQDs
- julsep09
- 10_chapter4
- CHJV03I04P0269
- Acetaldehyde Degradation Under UV and Visible Irradiation Using
- m 0009716
- 203.pdf
- Fundamentals of Mechanical Measurements
- detección de etileno en la cadena de proveedores.pdf
- acsami.5b07685

Anda di halaman 1dari 6

Absorption

Authors

B. E. Limbek

C. J. Rowe

Application Note

Atomic Absorption

Introduction

The Atomic Absorption technique ultimately produces an output measured in opti-

cal units typically, in absorbance units. The operator must somehow convert this

absorbance to concentration units in order to obtain the analytical result.

The absorbance would ideally be linear with concentration if the Beer-Lambert Law

could be applied exactly, but in practice there is always some deviation. Even within

a limited concentration range, calibration curvature is the rule rather than the

exception.

Some of the causes of this curvature are controlled by the instrument design or by

the experimental conditions used. The degree of curvature for nickel at the 232.0 nm

wavelength, for instance, is controlled by the spectral bandwidth chosen on the

monochromator, because the curvature arises from overlap of a nearby non-

absorbed line in the nickel spectrum. At practical instrument settings, it is not

possible to eliminate this curvature completely.

There are also more fundamental causes for calibration curvature, relating to the

degree of overlap in the Voigt profiles of the emission and absorption lines.

Curvature from such causes is not under the control of the operator, and since it

varies from element to element, it cannot be completely removed in instrument

design.

Thus it is not possible to avoid the curvature, and various curve-fitting devices have

been developed to compensate for the curvature and produce calibrated concentration

output from atomic absorption instruments.

Naturally, recent efforts in this direction have been aided by computer and micro-

computer technology. The problem is to produce a suitable mathematical algorithm

which matches the natural calibration curve as closely as possible, so that after ini-

tial set-up the concentration can be computed numerically from the measured

absorbance.

2

tions so that different degrees of curvature are likely in

different laboratories.

For nickel, we prepared 21 accurate standard solutions cover-

ing the range up to 50 g/mL. The calibration points fall on

curves as shown in Figure 1.

At this stage we assumed no knowledge of the causes for

curvature; we were concerned only with the shape of the

curve.

We first considered simple mathematical functions as approx-

imating curves (Figure 2).

All of these would be fairly easy to compute, although the qua-

dratic and cubic polynomials expressed with concentration as the

variable would require iterative computation to convert a mea-

sured absorbance into an unknown concentration after calibration.

Results

Now, using the nickel results at 0.5 nm bandwidth as a typical

example, let us examine the performance of these algorithms.

The quadratic in abs, c = P + Qa + Ra

2

, is not generally

satisfactory (Figure 3).

Investigations

In investigating suitable algorithms, we first considered the

known practical constraints:

1. The algorithm must be accurate within 1% or better, to be

of practical use. Even by manually drawing a calibration

graph, we found we could achieve almost 1% accuracy,

and the algorithm would need to be at least as good as

this to avoid introducing systematic errors into the result.

2. The algorithm must be accurate for all elements, bander

all practical conditions. Thus we considered both gentle

and severe curvatures, whether instrument-related or

more fundamental, as part of the same mathematical

problem.

3. The algorithm must be accurate for all atomizers and all

measurement modes. We commonly measure equilib-

rium absorbance signals from a flame atomizer or peak

signals from a furnace, and in each situation an accurate

concentration output is needed.

4. The algorithm must be accurate over a wide dynamic

range in concentration. The total dynamic range in atomic

absorption is only about 4 orders of magnitude, and to

further restrict this range with a limited curve-correction

formula would be a severe disadvantage.

5. The algorithm must achieve this accuracy with a limited

number of standards. A blank and three standards is a

well-established analytical prescription, and it would be a

significant practical advantage if this prescription could be

followed. It is also desirable to allow less accurate but

more convenient calibration with 1 or 2 standards, and

more accurate calibration with perhaps 5 standards.

For more than 5, the labor in preparation and maintenance

of standards becomes too great to be justified for most

work.

With these constraints in mind, we established the shape of

the curve in detail for a number of extreme and intermediate

cases, ranging from silver determinations in the flame where

the calibration was almost exactly linear up to 2.0 absorbance,

to arsenic determinations where (under the extreme conditions

applied) the calibration curved towards an asymptote at about

0.6 absorbance so that every concentration above 400 g/mL

produced almost the same absorbance.

In this paper we will concentrate on the results obtained for

nickel at 232.0 nm. This is an important practical example,

and it also represents one of the most stringent tests of the

various computation algorithms. The curvature is quite

severe, and the severity depends on the instrumental condi-

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

3

If the concentration range is small, a good fit can be obtained

with well-chosen standards, but this will only apply if the

operator has detailed knowledge of the behaviour of the curve

in advance. For this nickel example we could not obtain a sat-

isfactory fit above 15 g/mL so that two-thirds of the possible

working range must be sacrificed.

The quadratic in conc, a = P + QC + Rc

2

, is a better fit

(Figure 4).

There are, however, two obvious problems. The working range

is again limited, and because the turning point of the parabola

is so close there is a risk of misinterpretation. When a mea-

sured absorbance can correspond to two quite different

computed concentrations, errors are almost certain.

A cubic polynomial is better still. The cubic in abs,

c = P + Qa + Ra

2

+ Sa

3

, can certainly be useful for this curve

(Figure 5).

For more gentle curves, this approximation is excellent, but

for a fairly severe curve such as this, there is a compromise. If

the curve fits well at the top of the range there are errors at

the bottom, and vice versa.

The cubic in conc polynomial, a = P + QC + Rc

2

+ Sc

3

, can

avoid this problem. With the correct choice of standards, a

good fit can be achieved throughout the range (Figure 6).

Again, however, there are possible turning points within the

range if the wrong standards are used, and beyond the last

standard the results are doubtful. For example, if the last

standard used was 40 g/mL the error at 45 g/mL could be

as much as 10%. By using more standards it is possible to

refine either of these cubic approximations. Least-squares

regression, for example, produces a curve such as that shown

in Figure 7 (using 10 standards).

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

4

The nature of the least-squares approach is to produce the

largest benefit with the largest numbers, and here the curve

does indeed fit well at higher absorbance.

However, a cubic function is inescapably cubic, and as in this

example it will always give errors above the last standard. If

anything, the errors are worse using the regression because

the lower part of the curve has been forced into a particular

shape which emphasizes the rate of change beyond the last

standard.

An exponential function has sometimes been recommended

for curve fitting in AA, because conceptually the curve seems

to approach an asymptote. For nickel the fit is quite good

(Figure 8).

Over a limited range, the exponential is a good approximation,

but only two calibration points can be used, and over a wider

range the fit between the calibration points suffers.

To improve this, one instrument company has published a

modified exponential function based on transmittance rather

than on absorbance data. There is a benefit (see Figure 9).

Again, however, only two standards are used and the fit is not

good over a wide range, at least for our data.

A New Method

After considering all of these approximations, we concluded

that none were wholly satisfactory. All of them are useful in a

small working range, but over a wider range all of them have

one disadvantage or another, causing inaccuracies. We con-

cluded that the natural calibration graph (absorbance against

concentration) could not be approximated well enough without

more complex mathematics.

Therefore, we searched for some transformation of the data

which would produce more easily-handled curves. Graphical

trials on several possible transformations revealed that a plot

of a/c against a, or c/a against c, produced pseudo calibra-

tions which had very desirable properties. We chose the a/c

against a plot as the basis for a new calibration algorithm

using the parabolic rational function a/c = P + Qa + Ra

2

. For

brevity we call this the rational method. Looking at the data

for nickel, we can see how this data transformation works

(Figure 10).

In place of the natural calibration curves, we have new curves

with interesting properties. Where the normal calibration is

almost straight (at low absorbance), the transformed data fol-

lows almost a straight line. The transformed data has no par-

ticular physical meaning, but it does allow us to approximate

the calibration with very simple mathematical functions.

Indeed, a straight line is a good fit to the upper part of these

transformed curves (at higher absorbance) and using a

parabola the fit is even better.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

5

As we can see, errors do appear above the top standard, but

these errors are generally quite small. There is no systematic

deviation as there is with the earlier cubic approximations, for

example.

The calibration range can be extended to the fourth order of

magnitude by suitable choice of three standards, as seen

above, but for maximum accuracy over the wider range it is

better to add a fourth or even a fifth standard (Figure 13).

With five standards, a choice arises: least-squares regression

on a single curve, or generation of a family of overlapping

curves. Least-squares regression works best when there is a

statistically significant number of calibration points, but for

four or five standards we prefer to generate a family of over-

lapping parabolas. This method provides an excellent fit to the

actual calibration and allows for the fact that the rational

method transformation does not always provide a simple

curve. There is a degree of S-shape in the curve at high

absorbance which is best approximated by taking a family of

parabolas rather than one.

This rational method is very successful for a large variety of

curves. The most severe curve in our trials was for arsenic

under extreme instrument conditions which resulted in the

calibration curving almost to an asymptote at about 0.6

absorbance (Figure 14).

Applying the rational method to these nickel calibrations, and plot-

ting the results in the more familiar absorbance-concentration

co-ordinates, the fit is obviously very promising (Figure 11).

The errors are less than 1% even over this wide range if three

calibration points are suitably chosen. Even with badly

chosen standards the errors are quite small. For these exam-

ples the standards were at 5, 20, 50 g/mL (good fit) and at

2, 5, 50 g/mL (worse fit but not a natural choice of calibra-

tion points). These curves genuinely possess the characteris-

tics of real calibrations; a benefit which, as we have seen,

cannot be claimed for the earlier approximations.

Over a limited concentration range (say 3 orders of magni-

tude), two or three standards are quite sufficient with this

algorithm (Figure 12).

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

Figure 12.

Figure 13.

www.agilent.com/chem

Agilent shall not be liable for errors contained herein or

for incidental or consequential damages in connection

with the furnishing, performance, or use of this material.

Information, descriptions, and specifications in this

publication are subject to change without notice.

Agilent Technologies, Inc., 1986

Printed in the USA

November 1, 2010

AA058

With five standards, even this curve could be accommodated. In

practice, of course, it is not feasible to use such a calibration at

high concentration because the absorbance difference between

350 and 400 g/mL is almost zero. Over a more limited range

the curve can be accommodated with three standards.

Where the curvature is not so severe, three standards are

almost always sufficient (Figure 15).

For silver and copper there is little curvature and almost any

approximation is good; the rational method is no exception.

For iron, which is an example of moderate curvature typical

of a large class of elements, the fit with three standards is

excellent (the absorbance scale here has been extended to

2.0 absorbance, so that the curvature for iron appears to be

exaggerated).

The same excellent fit is obtained using other atomizers. For

peak height or peak area results in the graphite tube atom-

izer, or with vapor generation methods, the fit is excellent.

Even flame emission results can be accommodated, in spite

of the fact that self-absorption (the major cause of curvature

in flame emission) produces fundamentally different curves

which would not be expected to match the same algorithm

as the atomic absorption curves.

This new algorithm has been chosen as the calibration

method for our atomic absorption products.

We feel that this new rational-method algorithm will pro-

vide consistently better results than any previous method.

It is very quick in computation, involving no iterations or

approximations (unlike exponential methods).

It fits exactly at each calibrating point (unlike regressions

methods), and for all of the elements in our study the accu-

racy was better than 1% at all points with any rational

choice of standards. It allows the entire working range to be

used up to about four orders of magnitude, and it allows for

all types of calibration curvature regardless of the cause.

This Varian Instruments At Work was originally published

in August 1977 as a Lecture Transcript. The rational

method algorithm described here has been used in all Varian

AA instruments produced since then and the method has

consistently proved its accuracy and fidelity.

For More Information

For more information on our products and services, visit our

Web site at www.agilent.com/chem

Figure 14.

Figure 15.

- YK Liquid Level Sensor CalibrationDiunggah olehM
- Riyanto CVDiunggah olehyynk
- Krautkramer DynaMIC Data SheetDiunggah olehm_armouti
- Gregory J. Harris, Oleg L. Polyansky and Jonathan Tennyson- Opacity Data for HCN and HNC From a New Ab Initio Line ListDiunggah olehKmaxx2
- Process Mineralogy for MetalsDiunggah olehJohn Israel R. Catedral
- Aaice Id100 Prod SpecDiunggah olehOrestes Leniz
- FaasDiunggah olehlauradh
- 2096_MeasurLinkDiunggah olehBrandi Dale
- Calculation of Plant Parameters Corrected.. and Conclusion DoneDiunggah olehMahfuzah Mustapha
- Yang1998 HidaDiunggah olehRamiro Saavedra
- 11JNN-4143 CdSeQDsDiunggah olehprakush_prakush
- julsep09Diunggah olehJagannadha Reddy
- 10_chapter4Diunggah olehaq10th
- CHJV03I04P0269Diunggah olehchemistryjournal
- Acetaldehyde Degradation Under UV and Visible Irradiation UsingDiunggah olehDaniel Márquez
- m 0009716Diunggah olehRalph Castino
- 203.pdfDiunggah oleheva refayanti
- Fundamentals of Mechanical MeasurementsDiunggah olehBhargava S Padmashali
- detección de etileno en la cadena de proveedores.pdfDiunggah olehPablo Emilio Rodriguez Fonseca
- acsami.5b07685Diunggah olehNăng Vũ Như
- Analytical Chemistry Jan 2017 - Chapter 3A (AAS)Diunggah olehAmirah
- Judd 1962Diunggah olehRaquel Gamez
- 1-s2.0-S1010603017300205-mainDiunggah olehDuzzys
- A 388Diunggah olehMarcos Verissimo
- Development and Validation of Dimenhidrinat Analysis Method in Tablet With Absorbance Method and Method of Area Under Curve With Ultraviolet SpectrophotometryDiunggah olehHarrizul Rivai
- 6501Diunggah olehrohanmanimani
- jul18_web.pdfDiunggah olehrobert
- JPSBR15RS1020Diunggah olehnish115862047
- Maintenance Guide Clindiag SA 10/20Diunggah olehMr.SD
- 9661 Operation ManualDiunggah olehBudiman Saragih

- Validation of Analytical Methods - PRIMERDiunggah olehkchoksi2011
- lead_blood WHO.pdfDiunggah olehmilossmile
- Measurement Uncertainty and Analytical Decision in AASDiunggah olehmilossmile
- PLANKyDiunggah olehmilossmile
- CalibracionEspectrofotometro_24858Diunggah olehEddie Mendoza
- Pipette-Calibration-Certainty.pdfDiunggah olehmilossmile
- FAO STATISTIKA .docxDiunggah olehmilossmile
- FaoDiunggah olehmilossmile
- Biological Database SpecificationDiunggah olehmilossmile
- Labelling Nutrition-special Groups Food-children-scf Reports 38 EnDiunggah olehmilossmile
- Gta Analytical Methods 0848Diunggah olehmilossmile
- CZ Product Catalogue 2010Diunggah olehEmil
- Lead Blood WHODiunggah olehmilossmile
- Agilent Graphite Tube Atomizer GTA 110GTA 120Diunggah olehmilossmile
- SERBIADiunggah olehmilossmile
- AA058Diunggah olehmilossmile
- EPA Method 349Diunggah olehmilossmile
- 322lmaaDiunggah olehmilossmile
- Doc 1Diunggah olehmilossmile
- Chromatography HPLC za AnđelkuDiunggah olehmilossmile
- 8440total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons by IrDiunggah olehmilossmile
- WHO _ CannabisDiunggah olehmilossmile

- Top Links January 2018Diunggah olehAndrew Richard Thompson
- codigo algoritmoDiunggah olehNilas Arcanister
- Slug Flow Analysis Using Dynamic Spectrum Method in Caesar II-20150911Diunggah olehiaft
- Best PracticesDiunggah olehIndrajit
- x PowderDiunggah olehMoaaz Ahmed
- 5.0amicasportal GuideDiunggah olehmbenson1975
- Research MethodologyDiunggah oleh8866708515
- Polynomials Examination QuestionsDiunggah olehnjenns
- Copy of Noss Matrix L3Diunggah olehIman AJ
- S12CPUV2Diunggah olehRyan Kostrzewa
- Digital QuestionsDiunggah olehVipinkumar Hariharan
- HL7 Conformance Testing with Message MakerDiunggah olehtalvola
- FOS_v6.4.0b_RNDiunggah olehPraveen Kumar
- Digital Government White PaperDiunggah olehchar_lene_c
- E-Admission SystemDiunggah olehInternational Organization of Scientific Research (IOSR)
- string_hDiunggah olehRamarolahy Dadan'i Elia
- Wal-Mart -Supply Chain Mgmt,,NirvanaDiunggah olehNitu Roy
- REEB_4.2_ICT Supported Energy EfficiencyDiunggah olehHaridog
- 4.16 the Gram Schmidt Process With Complex VectorsDiunggah olehArman Khan
- Cnc 2004 (English)Diunggah olehMuhammad Ramadhany
- Lions Book CommentaryDiunggah olehsalem31
- TE ITDiunggah olehAbhishek Shah
- PP DS FLOWDiunggah olehMANI
- Microsoft Office Sharepoint Server 2007 Integration Guide (1)Diunggah olehIan Viana
- LaTeX_Bibliography Management - Wikibooks, Open Books for an Open WorldDiunggah olehVitor Canedo
- Codigos de Leds de HPDiunggah olehanon_804788671
- Guest BookDiunggah olehmpkkbtech
- 13765986-cheap-70642-practice-testDiunggah olehgdygbfegfheurhfurh
- viewpoints_on_latency.pdfDiunggah olehmelfamania
- M24C128-256Diunggah olehMarinaBogao

## Lebih dari sekadar dokumen.

Temukan segala yang ditawarkan Scribd, termasuk buku dan buku audio dari penerbit-penerbit terkemuka.

Batalkan kapan saja.