0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
107 tayangan3 halaman
Annotated Bibliography - technolgy
PICO: For inpatients receiving attention in the intensive care setting, does the use of technology to monitor and resuscitate patients hinder nurses’ moral judgments or critical thinking skills compared with relying on acquired skills and nursing intuition?
Annotated Bibliography - technolgy
PICO: For inpatients receiving attention in the intensive care setting, does the use of technology to monitor and resuscitate patients hinder nurses’ moral judgments or critical thinking skills compared with relying on acquired skills and nursing intuition?
Annotated Bibliography - technolgy
PICO: For inpatients receiving attention in the intensive care setting, does the use of technology to monitor and resuscitate patients hinder nurses’ moral judgments or critical thinking skills compared with relying on acquired skills and nursing intuition?
Annotated Bibliography PICO: For inpatients receiving attention in the intensive care setting, does the use of technology to monitor and resuscitate patients hinder nurses moral judgments or critical thinking skills compared with relying on acquired skills and nursing intuition? Browne, M., & Cook, P. (2011). Inappropriate trust in technology: implications for critical care nurses. Nursing I n Critical Care, 16(2), 92-98. doi:10.1111/j.1478- 5153.2010.00407.x Mike Brown, who is a registered nurse and a senior lecturer at Liverpool John Moores University, and Penny Cook, a researcher from the Center for Public Health of Liverpool, composed a research article reviewing intensive care nurses manner in relying on medical equipment to monitor patients. Evidence from their research reveals that nurses are inclined to trust the accuracy of technology, which can be faulty, leading to errors and patient harm. Many works are cited that support the researchers hypothesis, and the authors use those works to present a bias-free and balanced research article that states factual information, making the article relevant. Funk, M. (2011). As healthcare technology advances: benefits and risks. American J ournal Of Critical Care, 20(4), 285-291. doi:10.4037/ajcc2011810 Marjorie Funk is a professor at Yale University School of Nursing and a registered nurse who presented her work about the benefits and risks of technology advances at the AACN National Teaching Institute. The author argues that the use of technology is essential in providing care, especially for critically-ill patients but must also be carefully monitored and used appropriately. She discusses many examples of improper use of Jasmine S470 Summer 2014 Annotated Bibliography technology that she has experienced herself. Additionally, she conducted various experiments that revealed how clinicians have used technology, suggesting that if the equipment is not used appropriately, it may be better to not use the equipment at all than risk the complications from it. Her style of writing was very readable and unbiased, and she indicated her qualifications as she explored topics, making the article very useful in answering the PICO question. Her many references are cited at the end of the article. Lapum, J., Fredericks, S., Beanlands, H., McCay, E., Schwind, J., & Romaniuk, D. (2012). A cyborg ontology in health care: traversing into the liminal space between technology and person-centered practice. Nursing Philosophy, 13(4), 276-288. doi:10.1111/j.1466-769X.2012.00543.x The authors, professors and researchers at various nursing schools in Canada who are all registered nurses, use the analogy of cyborgs to philosophically explore the nursing practice and its relationship with technology. They discuss the idea that clinicians are shaped by the technology that they use, as it facilitates their healthcare practices. So, they encourage practitioners to embrace the fact that technology is unavoidably part of the profession. The article is written at an elevated level and uses much jargon but is relevant to answering the research question, as it is the antithesis to the theory. Since the work is philosophical research, the authors are more biased in their arguments and simply urge readers to accept the integration of technology rather than scrutinize it. The article closes with a citation of many academic sources from which the authors gained information from.
Jasmine S470 Summer 2014 Annotated Bibliography O'Keefe-McCarthy, S. (2009). Technologically-mediated nursing care: the impact on moral agency. Nursing Ethics, 16(6), 786-796. doi:10.1177/0969733009343249 Sheila OKeefe-McCarthy is a registered nurse and a faculty member at the University of Toronto School of Nursing. O-Keefe-McCarthy focuses on the ethical aspects of technology and argues that technology changes the dynamic of the patient-nurse relationship but is vital to patient care in the intensive care setting. In her research, the nurses attention is drawn to the technology, distancing them from the patient and even changing a nurses moral outlook. Further, she believes that since nurses can use technology to ultimately control a patients life, that control can impede a nurses ability to make moral judgments. She reasons that in order to ensure patient-centered care, a nurse can reflect on their own moral practices while using these technologies to do what is best for that patient. The author was unbiased in that she gives factual information, making the article relevant to answering the PICO question. She explores the good and bad that technology can offer, making recommendations for improvement, and cites many sources at the end to support her thesis.
A Study To Assess The Effectiveness of Video Assisted Teaching On Knowledge Regarding Ventilator Operation and Its Mode Among Nurses of Sharda Hospital, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology