3. Motor skills may become impaired – The individual may experience difficulty
with movement, especially fine coordination and control of the hands and arms.
If the individual does show signs of in-coordination and lack of control with
movement, deficits may be seen in dressing tasks, eating, writing, opening and
closing small/tight containers, etc. Sometimes, a person’s brain doesn’t always
tell the hands/body what to do and this can lead to problems as discussed above as
well as difficulty with walking, balance, and planning movements.
These low percentages translate into a high number of people with dementia.
Currently, approximately 4.5 million people in the U.S. have Alzheimer’s (the most
common form of later life dementia). This is likely to increase as the population
continues to age.
• Memory Loss
• Loss of Judgment
• Loss of Abstract Reasoning
• Loss of Sense of Time
• Change in Emotional Responses
• Problems with Speech and Communication
• Loss of Coordination
Stress/Fatigue
Malnutrition
Medications
Other Medical Conditions (e.g. Depression, Delirium, Stroke, Fever)
Motivation (or lack thereof)
Sensory Deficits
Ageist Expectations
WHAT IF IT IS DEMENTIA?
What is the cause of the symptoms?
Many diseases lead to dementia and they differ in the areas they affect and their
symptoms. There are about 100 or so diseases associated with the clinical symptoms of
dementia, including:
Things to Remember:
• People with dementia are still people
• People in the early stages have many remaining abilities
• People are often AFRAID of dementia
• Care giving can be stressful
• Being cared for can be stressful
• Cognitive losses can impact family relationships and roles
• There IS help available
• A person with dementia is still a person with thoughts, feelings, and needs
• A person with dementia may understand much more than they can communicate
• A person with dementia will often understand non-verbal cues long after they can
understand verbal communication (so tone and expression matter!)
• Often times the experience (e.g., a pleasant conversation) is more important than
the content (accuracy and reality can be overrated!)
Clinical Diagnosis of Dementia
When the clinical triggers described in Dementia in Primary Care raise suspicion of
possible dementia, evaluation of the patient should include a history and physical
exam that focus on specific areas of concern. Various diagnostic studies can be used
as well to confirm the problem and assess the differential diagnosis. The physician
also needs to know when referral is appropriate, and to understand that the slow
progression of dementia may mean that a definitive diagnosis can only be made over
an extended period of time.
HISTORY
The history should be obtained from the patient as well as an additional reliable
informant. When diagnosing dementia, the important components of the history
include:
• History of cognitive impairment signs and symptoms, including timing of earliest
effects and rate of progression
• Current and past medical problems, including systemic diseases, neurological
disorders, head trauma, alcohol or substance abuse, infectious or metabolic
illnesses
• Functional status, focused on ADLs and IADLs – see Table A for the ADL and
IADL forms, and Table B for the Functional Activities Questionnaire
• Current medications, with special attention to both prescription and non-
prescription medications that have anti-cholinergic properties
• Family history, especially any early-onset dementia, neurological conditions,
and vascular diseases
• Social history, including:
o Family and social supports
o Educational background
o Literacy
o Preferred language
o Alcohol, tobacco, and other substance use
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public Health
Service Act, as amended.
Rev. 04.02.07
1
PHYSICAL EXAM
DIAGNOSTIC TESTING
The routine laboratory workup for dementia generally includes: CBC with differential,
chemistry profile (with electrolytes, creatinine, calcium, glucose, and liver function
tests), TSH, and vitamin B12 levels. Other laboratory tests may be indicated in
selected patients, including urinalysis, serologic tests for syphilis and/or HIV, tests for
autoimmune diseases and vasculitis, and toxicology screens. Chest x-rays, EEGs,
and exams of CSF (cerebrospinal fluid) are occasionally helpful.
Studies have been mixed about the value of brain imaging in dementia patients, and
clinicians should bear in mind not only that abnormalities found may be unrelated to
the patient’s status but also that interventions may not lead to any improvement in
symptoms. Evaluation of possible interventions related to abnormal imaging studies
should involve experienced experts with a healthy dose of skepticism about the value
of such interventions.
COGNITIVE TESTING
There is no single tool perfect for use in diagnosing dementia. All of the instruments
that have been proposed have limitations. One of the biggest issues is that a tool with
sufficient sensitivity to diagnose early dementia will also have a relatively low
specificity—that is, a high false negative rate. A second major issue is the brevity of
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public Health
Service Act, as amended.
Rev. 04.02.07
2
the tool – an instrument short enough to use in clinical practice by necessity gives up
a certain level of both sensitivity and specificity.
The Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE) (Table A) is the tool most widely used by
healthcare professionals in the U.S., and it is the most comprehensive of the short
tools available for evaluation as it tests multiple domains of cognitive function. The
Blessed Information Memory Concentration (BIMC), Blessed Orientation Memory
Concentration (BOMC), and the Short Test of Mental Status (STMS) are roughly
equivalent to the MMSE though less widely used. It is important to note that all of
these tests require adjustment for educational status, ethnicity, and socioeconomic
status, and that there is no absolute cutoff for distinguishing normal from abnormal
scores in individual patients.
The diagnosis of dementia requires identification of both memory loss and decline in
an additional domain of cognitive function. The MMSE and the other short tests are
excellent for identifying more advanced disease, but may fall short in assessing earlier
symptoms. By necessity, each domain is tested only briefly. Tests of recent memory
are the most discriminating measures overall in identifying dementia, but reliance on
this criterion alone may miss those people for whom loss in another cognitive domain
is the most prominent symptom. Declines in domains such as language ability,
psychomotor performance, or executive function may also be early symptoms of
dementia.
A comprehensive review of instruments was performed by the Agency for Health Care
Policy and Research (now the Agency for Research in Health Care Quality) (Pfeffer et
al, 1982), demonstrating that the presence of cognitive and functional decline can be
documented in many different ways. Key points from that review include:
• The Functional Activity Questionnaire is the single best test for dementia, but it
requires the presence of a reliable informant, usually a family member.
Experts in the Michigan Primary Care Dementia Network have found a variety of
individualized tests to be helpful in early assessment of dementia. None of these
approaches have been rigorously tested in clinical trials:
NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING
We are likely to use neuropsychological testing more often in the future, as patients,
families, and physicians increasingly appreciate the benefits of early diagnosis and
treatment for dementia. Currently, referral for neuropsychological testing should be
considered when:
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public Health
Service Act, as amended.
Rev. 04.02.07
4
DIAGNOSIS “OVER TIME”
It may be difficult to be certain about the diagnosis of dementia in the early stages,
and even the results of neuropsychological testing may be ambiguous. A clearer
picture often emerges over time with repeated assessments. The primary care
physician is in an ideal position for follow-up appointments that can include updated
functional assessments and cognitive evaluation, making progression of disease much
easier to identify.
REFERRAL TO SPECIALISTS
Referral is also indicated when the primary care physician does not feel comfortable
with evaluation or management, or if the patient or family strongly desire consultation.
STAGING DEMENTIA
Criteria for the two most common types of dementia can be found in the NINCDS-
ADRDA for Alzheimer’s and NINDS-AIREN for vascular dementia.
Alzheimer’s http://neurology.org/cgi/content/abstract/34/7/939
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public Health
Service Act, as amended.
Rev. 04.02.07
5
Identifying dementia is usually of greater importance to the primary care physician
than differentiating the precise type and cause of the disease. By far, most cases of
dementia the primary care clinician sees will be caused by Alzheimer’s disease, either
alone or in combination with another underlying cause like vascular dementia.
But in highly unusual cases, the sole source of dementia will be found to be a
reversible condition, and somewhat more commonly, such a condition will coexist with
Alzheimer’s. Those disorders should be recognized and treated separately, even
when Alzheimer’s or another irreversible disease is present. Practitioners should
know that truly reversible dementias are quite rare, especially in those over 65 in the
primary care setting, with one meta-analysis estimating that less than 1% of cases of
dementia have causes that lead to even partial reversibility (Clarfield MA, 2003).
In addition to knowing the difference between signs of dementia and changes that
relate to normal aging, we need to be able to distinguish dementia from mild cognitive
impairment (MCI).
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public Health
Service Act, as amended.
Rev. 04.02.07
6
Additional symptoms that should be
recognized as possibly signs of dementia:
Withdrawal, loss of interest
Mood and behavior changes
Decreased ability to make good judgments
Trouble remembering the date, time or
place
The diagnosis of MCI recognizes that beyond a certain point, cognitive changes in
aging individuals should not be considered normal, even when they do not meet all the
accepted criteria for dementia.
A patient with MCI typically reports problems with short-term memory – such as not
remembering the names of new people, not recalling the flow of a conversation, or
misplacing an object. While these problems are seen in dementia, MCI presents clear
differences. Significant among these is the likelihood that the patient will be the one to
complain of the problem, something that is rarely true in cases of dementia, even in
the early stage. Corroboration from another informant, however, should be taken as a
sign that the patient has MCI rather than memory changes associated with normal
aging. In addition, the patient:
MCI may be a transitional stage. It is estimated that people diagnosed with MCI will
progress to Alzheimer’s at a rate of 10-15% per year as opposed to 1-2% in a healthy
control group. But the cognitive changes found in MCI may never progress to clear-
cut dementia in some cases. In light of the high conversion rate of MCI to
Alzheimer’s, it is especially important to recall that when signs that suggest dementia
are present, reassessment may be needed in order to make a diagnosis over time,
discussed above.
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public Health
Service Act, as amended.
Rev. 04.02.07
7
Delirium and Dementia
Delirium represents the acute or subacute impairment of brain function due to the
effects of physical illness. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual provides criteria for
delirium.
Delirium Dementia
Onset Acute or Gradual, insidious
subacute
Subacute delirium is more common in the elderly than in any other age group. This
subacute presentation can easily cause it to be confused with dementia. Metabolic
disturbances and drug effects are the most common causes of subacute delirium in
the elderly population.
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public Health
Service Act, as amended.
Rev. 04.02.07
8
It is important for the primary care physician to be able to identify delirium as an acute
response to a medical problem that requires urgent treatment. The clinician should
also recognize that delirium can accompany dementia, and effective treatment for the
underlying cause of delirium may still leave dementia that needs to be addressed
separately. Delirium can also be a warning sign for dementia, and should be a trigger
for the physician to investigate possible dementia.
Any patient with delirium should be evaluated for underlying dementia when stable.
Depression in an older patient can be easily mistaken for dementia, and vice versa.
Many of the early presenting symptoms and signs are similar in both conditions:
apathy, neglect of self-care, memory loss, and other impaired cognitive functioning. A
personal or family history of depression may be helpful in recognizing depression; a
first-ever depression after age 60 is unusual in the absence of a clear precipitant like
trauma or grief. However, there are also important differences that can help the
clinician distinguish between depression and dementia as shown in the chart below.
Depression Dementia
Onset More discrete onset Insidious
The Geriatric Depression Scale is a valuable screening tool for depression in the
elderly.
Choose the best answer for how you felt the past week:
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public Health
Service Act, as amended.
Rev. 04.02.07
10
depression, while a score greater than 9 correlates very strongly to depression.
Further assessment is needed to confirm the diagnosis if the GDS is positive.
The primary care physician needs to be able to identify treatable depression in older
patients. Treatment with antidepressants may alleviate all of the symptoms that mimic
dementia, but the clinician should know that depression is also a common co-
morbidity of Alzheimer’s. Depression is a recognized risk factor for dementia as well;
therefore, underlying dementia should be suspected in all elderly patients with
depression. In cases where dementia and depression coexist, it is important to identify
and treat both.
Although dementia has many causes, the three major causes account for almost all of
the cases seen and managed by primary care physicians (see referral criteria above):
Alzheimer’s disease; vascular dementia; and dementia with Lewy bodies.
Alzheimer’s Disease
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public Health
Service Act, as amended.
Rev. 04.02.07
11
Vascular Dementia
The symptoms of vascular dementia are not easily distinguishable from the symptoms
of Alzheimer’s disease, and a significant number of individuals who have dementia
from cerebrovascular causes also have Alzheimer’s. There are differences that can
be identified, however:
However, dementia without sudden onset often goes undiagnosed following a CVA
(cerebrovascular accident, or stroke). In many studies, the rate of dementia after a
CVA is around 30%. And studies have demonstrated that many people diagnosed
with vascular dementia also have clear evidence of Alzheimer’s disease at autopsy.
It is unclear whether dementia with Lewy bodies and dementia associated with
Parkinson’s disease, which has many features similar to Alzheimer’s, are two separate
entities or simply variants of one type. Like Alzheimer’s, DLB is insidious in onset and
progressive, but it may be distinguished by:
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public Health
Service Act, as amended.
Rev. 04.02.07
13
TABLE A
The Mini-Mental Status Exam
Standard version – Folstein, Folstein, McHugh, 1975
(To be completed by a trained clinician)
Sex:
Male
Female
Race:
Caucasian
Black
Hispanic
Asian
Other
Orientation Questions:
Immediate Recall: Ask the subject if you mat test his/her memory. Then say “ball,” “flag,” “tree” clearly
and slowly, about one second for each. After you have said all three words, ask him/her to repeat them.
The first repitition determines the score (0-3), but keep saying them until he/she can repeat all three, up to
six tries. If he/she does not eventually learn all three, recall cannot be meaningfully tested:
11. Ball
12. Flag
13. Tree
Note the Number of Trials: ___________
Attention:
A. Ask the subject to begin with 100 and count backwards by 7. Stop after 5 subtractions. Score the
correct subtractions.
14. “93”
15. “86”
16. “79”
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public Health
Service Act, as amended.
Rev. 04.02.07
14
17. “72”
18. “65”
Serial 7’s Total: ___________
B. Ask the subject to spell the word “WORLD” backwords. The score is the number of letters in the
correct position. For example, “DLORW” is 3, “LROWD” is 0.
Delayed Verbal Recall: Ask the subject to recall the three words you previously asked him/her to
remember.
24. BALL?
25. FLAG?
26. TREE?
RECALL: ___________
Naming: Show the subject a wrist watch and ask him/her what it is. Repeat for pencil.
27. WATCH
28. PENCIL
29. REPITITON
Three Stage Command: Give the subject a plain piece of paper and say, “Take the paper in your hand,
fold in half, and put it on the floor.”
30. TAKES
31. FOLDS
32. PUTS
Reading: Hold up the card reading, “Close your eyes”, so the subject can see it clearly. Ask him/her to
read and do what it says. Score correctly only if the subject actually closes his/her eyes.
Writing: give subject a piece of paper and him/her to write a sentence. It is to be written spontaneously. It
must contain a subject and verb and be sensible. Correct grammar and punctuation are not necessary.
Pentagons: Ask the subject to draw they the two pentagons as they appear on the paper.
35. PENTAGONS
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public Health
Service Act, as amended.
Rev. 04.02.07
15
MMSE
Calculations:
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public Health
Service Act, as amended.
Rev. 04.02.07
16
TABLE B
Flow Chart for Recognition and Initial Assessment of
Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias 1
1
Source: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, 1996.
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public Health
Service Act, as amended.
Rev. 04.02.07
17
References
Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. (1996). Early Identification of
Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias, AHCPR Archived Quick Reference
Guide No. 19. Note: AHCPR (Agency for Health Care Policy and Research) was
renamed and is now known as AHRQ (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality).
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. (1975). “Mini-mental state”. A practical method
for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res, 12:189-98.
Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. (1963). Studies of illness in
the aged. The index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial
function, JAMA, 185:914-9.
Lawton MP, Brody EM. (1969). Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and
instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist, 9(3):179-86.
Pfeffer RI, Kurosaki TT, Harrah CH Jr, Chance JM, Filos S. (1982). Measurement of
functional activities in older adults in the community. J Gerontol, 37:323-9.
Roman GC, Tatemichi TK, Erkinjuntti T, Cummings JL, Masdeu JC, Garcia JH,
Amaducci L, Orgogozo JM, Brun A, Hofman A. (1993). Vascular dementia: diagnostic
criteria for research studies. Report of the NINDS-AIREN International Workshop,
Neurology, 43:250-60.
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public Health
Service Act, as amended.
Rev. 04.02.07
18
Pharmacologic Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public
Health Service Act, as amended.
Rev. 08.14.07
1
experts recommend four week intervals. It comes in 1.5, 3, 4.5, and 6
mg capsules, so titration can be quite slow when needed. It is
recommended that it be taken with food to slow down the rate of
absorption to decrease the GI side effects. The lowest effective dose is
3 mg BID, and the maximum dose is 6 mg BID. There is a good
possibility that an Exelon patch may be available towards the end of
2007.
• Tacrine (Cognex) is rarely used because of its high GI side effects and
significant hepatotoxicity. Tacrine is not suitable for use by most
primary care physicians, and has very limited use even in the hands of
dementia specialists.
It is worth noting that even the “common” side effects of ChEIs are relatively
infrequent, but are seen most often during the titration periods. ChEIs are overall
well tolerated, especially when a slow approach to dose titration is used.
Specialists in dementia report quite low rates of discontinuation of ChEIs because
of side effects in clinical practice. Adverse effects may be gastrointestinal,
cardiovascular, neuromuscular, or related to the central nervous system:
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public
Health Service Act, as amended.
Rev. 08.14.07
2
Adverse event profiles reported in the Physicians’ Desk Reference suggest the
most frequent side effect is nausea. Vomiting and diarrhea were reported more
frequently than anorexia, dizziness or fatigue.
Other side possible side effects are:
We should use caution giving any cholinesterase inhibitor to patients with severe
asthma or COPD as these drugs can cause bronchoconstriction. Close
monitoring of the pulmonary condition will keep serious problems from developing
in most patients. These pulmonary problems are NOT absolute contraindications
to the use of ChEIs – we need to consider the potential benefits as well as the
possible risks. Symptomatic bradycardia is a possible side effect, especially
when combined with digoxin or calcium channel blockers that also slow the
conduction through the AV mode.
A meta analysis (Ritchie 2004) of many of the trials done comparing the three
commonly prescribed ChEIs found that all three drugs showed beneficial effects
on cognitive tests, as compared with placebo. For donepezil and rivastigmine,
larger doses were associated with larger effect. This was not the case with
galantamine. The odds of clinical global improvement demonstrated superiority
over placebo for each drug, with no dose effects noted. Dropout rates were
greater with galantamine and rivastigmine. There was little difference in dropout
rate for each drug at each dose-level, except with high-dose donepezil. In
summary, all three drugs had similar cognitive efficacy, with donepezil and
rivastigmine showing a dose effect across the dosing levels studied. However,
both galantamine and rivastigmine were associated with a greater risk of trial
dropout than placebo, especially at higher dosing levels.
Prices are comparable for all three agents. Donepezil is slightly cheaper by AWP
pricing and slightly higher by Red Book data. As with all drug choices, we need to
consider individual formulary requirements in our selection.
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public
Health Service Act, as amended.
Rev. 08.14.07
3
Donepezil has some perceived advantages over rivastigmine and galantamine:
as the agent longest on the market, it has the most data available. It has the
simplest titration schedule and the lowest GI side effects according to data
presented in the PI.
Although some experts have suggested switching from one ChEI to another if the
expected benefit is not realized, this practice is not supported by either clinical
trials or expert consensus. Switching is sometimes done when one CHEI is not
tolerated over the other, so in essence it may be done for safety purposes.
Keep in mind that many drugs have anticholinergic effects (drugs for overactive
bladder, antihistamines, antidepressants, etc.) that can not only decrease the
efficacy of cholinesterase inhibitors but also independently worsen dementia,
cause delirium and other CNS side effects. Studies suggest that serum
anticholinergic activity (SAA) can be detected in most older persons in the
community and that even low SAA is associated with cognitive impairment
(Mulsant 2003). Many patients with dementia are also using many other
medications for comorbidities. The risks of prescribing cholinesteraise inhibitors
along with anticholinergic drugs needs to be diligently evaluated and monitored. It
is important to consider medications with mild anticholinergic effects along with
those with stronger effects since the anticholinergic burden is cumulative. The
cumulative anticholinergic burden is associated with higher incidence of delirium
and cognitive impairment.
Summary
Many trials, however, have excluded patients with comorbid illnesses, making the
results less representative of the general population of patients with Alzheimer’s.
ChEI therapy is endorsed as standard first-line therapy for patients with mild
to moderate Alzheimer’s disease.
MEMANTINE (NAMENDA)
Some experts are using memantine for the mild stage of disease, both alone and
in combination with a ChEI. However, its use for the mild stage is off label since
the FDA has not approved its use for mild disease and is unlikely to do so in the
future. One U.S.-based trial has suggested it is valuable earlier in the dementia
process, but European studies have been negative.
OTHER AGENTS
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public
Health Service Act, as amended.
Rev. 08.14.07
6
subjects were younger, had more severe dementia, and were not taking
any psychoactive medications.
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public
Health Service Act, as amended.
Rev. 08.14.07
7
Complementary/alternative therapies: There is insufficient evidence to
support the use of any other treatments for dementia. A large NIA trial with
huperizine (an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor found in Chinese Club Moss)
is underway.
• Most experts do agree that ChEIs and memantine should be stopped at the
point that the patient no longer has meaningful function and/or when the
patient is enrolled in hospice services. Is this patient doing anything that
we want to preserve?
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public
Health Service Act, as amended.
Rev. 08.14.07
8
References
American Academy of Neurology. AAN Guideline Summary for Patients and Their
Families: Alzheimer’s Disease. (Accessed 08/08/05 at http://www.aan.com/.)
Espeland MA, Rapp SR, Shumaker SA, Brunner R, Manson JE, Sherwin BB, Hsia
J, Margolis KL, Hogan PE, Wallace R, Dailey M, Freeman R, Hays J. Conjugated
equine estrogens and global cognitive function in postmenopausal women:
Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study. JAMA 2004;291(24):2959-68.
Ritchie CW et al. Meta analysis of randomized trials of the efficacy and safety of
Donepezil, Galantamine, and Rivastigmine for the treatment of Alzheimer
disease. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2004;12:358-69.
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public
Health Service Act, as amended.
Rev. 08.14.07
9
Sano M, Wilcock GK, van Baelen B, Kavanagh S, The effects of galantamine
treatment on caregiver time in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry
2003;18(10):942-50.
Shumaker SA, Legault C, Rapp SR, Thal L, Wallace RB, Ockene JK, Hendrix SL,
Jones BN 3rd, Assaf AR, Jackson RD, Kotchen JM, Wassertheil-Smoller S,
Wactawski-Wende J, WHIMS Investigators. Estrogen plus progestin and the
incidence of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in postmenopausal women:
The Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study: A randomized controlled trial.
JAMA 2003;289(20):2651-62.
Wimo A, Winblad B, Stoffler A, Wirth Y, Mobius HJ. Resource utilization and cost
analysis of memantine in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease.
Pharmacoeconomics 2003;21(5):327-40.
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public
Health Service Act, as amended.
Rev. 08.14.07
10
1
The impact of dementia can also be seen in its incidence, which rises rapidly as
an older adult ages. Studies have shown that from age 65, incidence doubles
every five years, and that up to 50% of those over age 85 are suffering from
dementia.
Today, Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias account for at least 40% and, by
some estimates, up to 60% of nursing home admissions. Dementia is the third
most expensive disease to treat in the United States, after cancer and heart
disease. However, generally diagnoses of dementia are still not made until
patients are quite far into the course of the disease, even though helpful
interventions could be started much earlier.
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public
Health Service Act, as amended. Rev. 02.28.07
2
Dementia is a significant problem for elderly patients, their families and society
as a whole.
Primary care physicians can improve the rate of early diagnosis and treatment.
The insidious onset of dementia is not the only reason it goes undiagnosed.
There are also barriers to diagnosis that relate to patients and their families,
physicians and their practices, and the attitudes of the larger culture. For
example, there are individuals who may be so frightened by symptoms of mental
decline that they deny them, or busy office practices for which the time
commitment to diagnose and manage dementia might seem overwhelming. And
to the degree that the subject of dementia is considered taboo in our society, it is
easy to respond to barriers with silent acquiescence. But to a large extent, these
obstacles and the concerns that lie behind them can be addressed through
education of practitioners and the public.
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public
Health Service Act, as amended. Rev. 02.28.07
3
One of the biggest concerns is that making the diagnosis of dementia will open a
whole Pandora’s Box of troubles – a series of problems that will only expand and
never be resolved. Given the degenerative course of the disease and its
incurable nature, this attitude understandably gives rise to the feeling that the
topic is best avoided. But while the frightening diagnosis of dementia might
suggest a state of affairs that is beyond control, there are steps that can be taken
to improve a difficult situation.
But even when the suspicion is raised by a patient, family or office staff, or
through the use of screening tools, this is only a first step in diagnosis. We must
then ask if dementia really is involved. Or is, perhaps, a condition whose
symptoms mimic dementia, like depression or delirium, involved? Further
evaluation will be required to resolve these questions.
Physicians might also ask whether a patient’s dementia results from Alzheimer’s
disease or some other cause of dementia. Again, additional evaluation can help
provide answers, and these answers will sometimes influence treatment
decisions. But it is important to note that Alzheimer’s is by far the leading cause
of dementia in the population aged 65 and older. Alzheimer’s alone or in
combination with vascular dementia accounts for 70% of dementia in that age
group. A consensus panel representing the American Association for Geriatric
Psychiatry, the Alzheimer’s Association, and the American Geriatrics Society has
recommended Alzheimer’s be considered a “diagnosis of inclusion.” That is,
unless specific, positive findings indicate another form of dementia or a disorder
that mimics dementia, it is appropriate for the physician to make a clinical
diagnosis of Alzheimer’s. It should also be noted that Alzheimer’s disease is often
involved even when other causes of dementia are identified. Clinicians who see
dementia in elderly patients can reasonably assume that Alzheimer’s is what they
should always suspect.
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public
Health Service Act, as amended. Rev. 02.28.07
4
The primary care physician can accurately diagnose Alzheimer’s and other
dementias in an office setting. We simply need to be alert to common triggers
and warning signs of dementia, and to employ easy-to-use cognitive screening
tools (both triggers and tools are discussed in the Clinical Diagnosis section of
this module). When findings are ambiguous, repeated observations and testing
over time will lead to a clear answer. Given dementia’s slow onset, it cannot be
overemphasized that this “diagnosis over time” is central to our ability to correctly
identify and treat it in the primary care setting.
Instances of mild memory loss and cognitive slowing are common as we grow
older and include: forgetting where we placed the car keys, occasionally failing to
remember a name, and slowing down on some problem solving tasks. It may be
hard to distinguish these common losses from the earliest stage of dementia.
A person might forget the location not only of keys, but of valuable objects.
Failure to recall names becomes common, and the patient may have trouble
remembering the names of close family members. Even simple tasks begin to
cause difficulties. As these problems increase, along with declines in
organizational ability and reading comprehension, they become more noticeable
to family members. Additionally, those close to the patient may see signs of
behavior changes that include paranoia, withdrawal or poor hygiene. These
symptoms are not signs of normal aging but of illness, and we ought to replace
old assumptions about what is normal aging with increased clinical suspicion of
dementia.
It stands to reason that if we see no ready benefit, we will be less likely to move
quickly toward a diagnosis of dementia. That’s why it is important to know that
addressing dementia early in its course can have a substantial positive impact on
the lives of patients and families. This applies not only to drug therapies that
might slow disease progression, but to the psychosocial aspects of the illness
such as family stress and the patient’s sense of control, and to physical safety
issues. See the Benefits of Early Intervention section in this module for additional
information.
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public
Health Service Act, as amended. Rev. 02.28.07
6
Without a clear understanding of the benefits that drug treatments and other
interventions can bring to patients with dementia and their families, it is easy to
view dementia disorders in an extremely pessimistic light. That the disease is
incurable and irreversible may come to seem the only facts that count.
Thus, physicians may act or rather fail to act, on the unspoken assumption that
diagnosis does not matter because “there’s nothing to be done.” This message
may in turn be conveyed to patients and families even when it is not explicitly
discussed. A pessimistic outlook leads physicians not to want to talk about
dementia, and families not to want to ask.
The familiar issue of reimbursement that rewards procedures more than thorough
doctor-patient communication can be a disincentive to evaluation and treatment of
dementia. In addition, there are ICD-9 coding issues unique to dementia.
Physicians generally tend to under-code for complex office visits, and are
therefore under-reimbursed. If physicians do not overlook aspects of the
evaluation and management of dementia patients that increase the complexity of
visits, many of visits may qualify for a higher E/M code.
People who begin to experience memory loss and confusion in the initial stage of
dementia can find the experience frightening. Yet it may be hard for them to
share their feelings and worries with family members or health professionals
because they have a sense, as we all have, that naming out loud the thing we
fear will make it so. This is the well-known phenomenon of denial, a defense
mechanism that can certainly play a positive role in people’s lives, allowing them
to digest unpleasant facts at a manageable pace. But when denial becomes fixed
and allows no room at all for reality to settle in, it stands in the way of a timely
diagnosis, and getting the help the patient needs
Just as individuals who suffer from the onset of dementia try to hide the facts from
themselves and others, family members may also practice denial. They too fear
for their loved one’s future, and so they see but refuse to acknowledge the signs
of dementia. They might even compensate for the ill person’s increasing deficits,
offering to “share” tasks but in fact taking them over because the individual is no
longer competent. This can go on for months and years, as the problem only
continues to worsen.
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public
Health Service Act, as amended. Rev. 02.28.07
7
A diagnosis of dementia is most likely to be made well into the course of the
disease, when the patient has begun to have serious trouble carrying out the
activities of daily living and is showing impaired judgment. The disease has
reached a point where family members can no longer ignore or deny it.
What this means in practical terms is that by the time the illness is recognized for
what it is, the family is already in crisis. There may have been an accident or
hospitalization, or a scary episode in which the ill person has become lost. The
patient’s ability to do basic self-care may in practical terms be gone. Patient and
family are understandably confused and frightened, but hardly have room to
respond emotionally because there are decisions that must be made – decisions
they are totally unprepared to face.
At the same time, the physician will realize that the value of medications that
might have slowed the patient’s decline has diminished, and that time has been
irretrievably lost.
When the diagnosis is made early, at a time when symptoms are present put less
severe, it is possible to:
• Reduce family stress and burden
• Empower the person with dementia
• Use medications more effectively to improve status or slow progression of the
disease
• Help insure the patient’s safety
• Identify potentially reversible causes of dementia
• Identify disorders whose symptoms mimic dementia but require a different
treatment
Early diagnosis has many benefits for patients and their families.
With good reason, dementia is often called a family disease. As the patient
declines, family members must face the emotional stress of witnessing that
decline, and they are faced with new challenges of providing care. Early
diagnosis gives individuals with dementia and their families the opportunity to plan
for changes before the need becomes urgent. For families especially, the ability
to anticipate upcoming changes can reduce the stress of facing an uncertain
future, and help them cope with those changes when they do occur.
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public
Health Service Act, as amended. Rev. 02.28.07
8
Education, care training and support groups help family members learn ahead of
time about the best tools for communicating with their loved one, for providing a
safe and comfortable environment, and for controlling difficult behaviors. Studies
have shown that family members who participate in training and support groups
are able to care for the patient at home longer.
Early diagnosis also prepares family members for taking over roles that the
person with dementia has previously been responsible for. And it gives them time
to do financial and end-of-life planning in a thoughtful and considered way, often
in collaboration with the dementia patient.
When faced with an illness whose course is one of continuing losses – losses of
memory, of everyday abilities, of one’s entire sense of self – anything that puts
control in the hands of the ill person is usually welcome. A diagnosis of dementia
made early in the disease process does exactly that, affording patients some
measure of control by giving them the chance to participate meaningfully in
management and planning.
Support groups can help people with dementia adjust to changes brought on by
illness, and empower them to decide for themselves what some of those changes
will be. Patients can take charge by setting priorities and acting on them – by
choosing, to whatever extent circumstances allow, what they will do next.
At this early stage, patients can also meaningfully participate in making plans for
the future related to finances, care giving, and end-of-life decisions.
The initial practice of giving a patient a trial of one of these drugs and then
watching for improvement is no longer appropriate. Every patient who can
tolerate these medications ought to be on them, as they have demonstrated
significant value in slowing decline, including delay in nursing home placement.
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public
Health Service Act, as amended. Rev. 02.28.07
9
It often takes a car accident, or a fall or other mishap at home, to bring families
face to face with the problems that a loved one with dementia is experiencing.
However, even these triggers might not lead to a proper diagnosis if they can be
easily explained away as isolated incidents. But early diagnosis of dementia can
help minimize the possibility these accidents will occur. The patient’s ability to
drive can be carefully assessed, and plans can be made to provide alternative
transportation solutions. At the same time, families can begin to modify the home
environment for safety.
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public
Health Service Act, as amended. Rev. 02.28.07
10
The primary care physician may see patients whose presentation raises suspicion
of dementia, but who in fact are exhibiting signs of another treatable disorder.
Depression and delirium in particular may be mistaken in the elderly for dementia.
Physicians should also be aware that recognizing the dementia syndrome in the
first place is the biggest hurdle they face. The initial step of clearly recognizing
dementia amid the many other details of an elderly patient’s clinical presentation
is not easily done. Once this step has been accomplished, the most set of barriers
have been overcome. Differential diagnosis may bring to light a reversible cause
of dementia or affect the precise course of treatment, yet the steps to be followed
in that state of assessment are relatively easy to lay out.
The Alzheimer’s Association lists ten warning signs of Alzheimer’s disease and
other dementias.
2. Difficulty performing familiar tasks. People with dementia often find it hard
to plan or complete everyday tasks. Individuals may lose track of the steps
involved in preparing a meal, placing a telephone call or playing a game.
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public
Health Service Act, as amended. Rev. 02.28.07
11
What’s normal? Forgetting the day of the week or where you were going.
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public
Health Service Act, as amended. Rev. 02.28.07
12
10. Loss of initiative. A person with Alzheimer’s disease may become very
passive, sitting in front of the TV for hours, sleeping more than usual or not
wanting to do usual activities.
As valuable as these signs can be for family members, they cannot always be
observed in an office visit. However, the clinician is often presented with other
facts about a patient that ought to trigger an evaluation of possible dementia.
These triggers can be grouped into five main categories. Note that the office staff
may also need to be educated about these behaviors that raise the question of
dementia.
Communication
Accidents
Medical Triggers
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public
Health Service Act, as amended. Rev. 02.28.07
13
Cognition Changes
Developed by the Geriatric Education Center of Michigan (GECM), and the Michigan Primary Care Dementia
Network. All GECM activities are funded through a grant from the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health
Resources and Services Administration as authorized through Section 777(a), Title VII of the U.S. Public
Health Service Act, as amended. Rev. 02.28.07
VOLUME 18 NUMBER 1
Summary
• Dementia is a distressing and disabling condition affecting about 700,000 people in the
UK. It is associated with high health and social care costs. The most common cause of
dementia is Alzheimer’s disease.
• A guideline issued by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and
the Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE) provides the framework on which the
delivery of health and social care services should be based for the support of patients
with dementia and their carers in England and Wales. In this Bulletin, only the
recommendations for the treatment of symptoms of dementia (both cognitive and non-
cognitive) are reviewed in detail.
• Although there is only limited evidence to support the use of non-drug interventions, the
NICE-SCIE guideline recommends that people with any type of mild-to-moderate
dementia should be given the opportunity to participate in a structured group cognitive
stimulation programme, irrespective of any drug prescribed for the treatment of their
cognitive symptoms.
• Evidence for the use of drugs in dementia comes mainly from industry-sponsored,
randomised, placebo-controlled trials in Alzheimer’s disease; there are few studies
comparing one drug with another.
– On a population basis, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChIs: donepezil,
galantamine and rivastigmineq) and memantine demonstrate a modest, statistically
significant effect to improve/delay the deterioration in cognitive decline. However,
the drugs are associated with adverse effects, and it is not possible at present to
predict which individual people with dementia will gain any meaningful benefit from
them with regard to their day-to-day functioning and quality of life.
– Based on a detailed cost-effectiveness analysis, NICE guidance recommends that
AChIs are restricted to the subgroup of people with moderate Alzheimer’s disease
(Mini Mental State Examination [MMSE] score of 10–20 points), and that
memantine is only used in moderate-to-severe Alzheimer’s disease within well
designed clinical trials.
• People with dementia who develop non-cognitive symptoms or behaviours that challenge
should only be offered drug treatment ahead of non-drug interventions if they are
severely distressed or there is immediate risk to themselves or others.
– Benefits of antipsychotics are offset by an increased risk of cerebrovascular events
and death, but can be used after full discussion of the risks/benefits with the person
with dementia and/or their carers, and with frequent reviews.
– AChIs are an option for people with Alzheimer’s disease or dementia with Lewy
bodies (any severity) with non-cognitive symptoms causing significant distress,
where non-drug treatments or antipsychotics are inappropriate or ineffective.
However, they should only be used in vascular dementia as part of a clinical trial.
NICE-SCIE guideline recommends that a range guidance limits the prescribing of AChIs to
of psychological interventions (e.g. reminiscence people with moderate dementia in Alzheimer’s
therapy, multisensory stimulation, animal- disease and restricts use of memantine (and
assisted therapy and exercise) and cognitive AChIs for other forms of dementia) to use in
behavioural therapy (CBT) should be considered clinical trials (see Panel 1 on page 5). The NICE
for depression and/or anxiety.1 CBT is a TAG 111 recommendations restricting the use
recognised treatment for depression and anxiety, of AChIs in Alzheimer’s disease were
and may be delivered in outpatient or other challenged unsuccessfully by a number of
community settings on an individual or group pharmaceutical companies, medical and patient
basis, and may involve the active participation of organisations, firstly through the NICE appeal
carers.1 process and then by judicial review. However,
amendments were made to the guidance
For patients with a major depressive disorder, regarding the use of the MMSE to ensure that
antidepressants should be considered according people from different ethnic/cultural
to the NICE guideline for depression8 after a backgrounds, and people with disabilities, have
careful risk-benefit assessment. However, equal access to treatment.11 The NICE
antidepressants with anticholinergic effects, guidance, which is now national policy, should
which may adversely affect cognition, should be be the basis on which prescribing practices for
avoided.1 dementia in the NHS are based.
Carers of people with dementia are at high risk A review of the evidence for the use of drugs
of psychological morbidity and associated in the treatment of the cognitive symptoms of
breakdown in care. A recent systematic review dementia can be found in an Appendix to this
of psychological interventions found that the use Bulletin.
of individual behavioural management therapy
centred on the care recipient's behaviour was Adverse effects of drugs
effective in alleviating caregiver symptoms both
immediately and for up to 32 months. Teaching Anti-dementia drugs can produce a wide range
caregivers coping strategies, either individually of side effects (see the Summaries of Product
or in a group, also appeared effective in Characteristics [SPCs] at www.medicines.
improving caregiver psychological health, both org.uk for details), and these need to be
immediately and for some months afterwards.9 considered when deciding on the most
appropriate treatment. Common side effects
Drug treatments include nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, anorexia,
headache, and dizziness with AChIs, and
Only a few drugs are licensed for the treatment constipation, headache, hypertension,
of dementia. Donepezil, galantamine, and dizziness and drowsiness with memantine.12
rivastigmineq are acetylcholinesterase
inhibitors (AChIs) licensed for the treatment of A meta-analysis of 16 clinical trials (n=7,954)
mild-to-moderate dementia. Memantine, an N- found that significantly more patients given
methyl d-aspartate receptor antagonist, is AChIs suffered adverse side effects (mean
licensed for treating moderate to severe difference: 8%, 95%CI 5% to 11%) and
dementia resulting from Alzheimer’s disease. withdrew because of adverse effects (mean
Rivastigmine is also licensed for treatment of difference: 7%, 95%CI 3 to 10%) compared
mild-to-moderate dementia in Parkinson’s with placebo. Donepezil appeared to be
disease. associated with fewer adverse events than
rivastigmine and galantamine (mean difference
There is considerable and ongoing debate vs. placebo: 6% vs. 8% vs. 12%, respectively)
surrounding the use of these drugs in and for dropouts due to adverse events (mean
dementia. Although they may produce clinically difference vs. placebo: 2% vs. 9% vs. 14%).
significant improvements in quality of life for However, CIs of these estimates were wide,
some patients and their carers, it is currently and higher than recommended doses of
not possible to identify reliably who will gain a galantamine were used in some of the studies.13
worthwhile benefit from their use. On a
population basis, evidence from clinical trials A pooled-analysis of eight six-month clinical
suggests a modest benefit in improving and/or trials in dementia identified no significant
delaying the progression of cognitive decline. differences between memantine and placebo in
However, these benefits may not necessarily the number of patients who experienced at least
correlate with outcomes that are important to one adverse event (72.8% vs. 73.1%; odds
patients, such as activities of daily living.10 ratio [OR] 1.09, 95%CI 0.93 to 1.27; P=0.31).
Significantly fewer patients taking memantine
The use of the AChIs and memantine for experienced agitation as an adverse event
Alzheimer’s disease was the subject of NICE (7.7% vs. 9.3%; OR 0.78, 95%CI 0.61 to 0.99;
technology appraisal guidance (TAG) 111.11 This P=0.04). Data on other adverse events were
was originally published at the same time as the not available for all the studies, although
NICE-SCIE clinical guideline on dementia,1 individual studies reported more somnolence,
which incorporated its recommendations. The constipation, or hypertension with memantine.14
Panel 1: Drug treatments for dementia: cognitive symptoms and maintenance of function11
• Consider the AChIs (donepezil, galantamine and rivastigmine) for moderate Alzheimer’s disease (an MMSE score of
10–20 points) only.*
• Treatment should be started by a specialist in dementia care. The specialist should:
– seek carers’ views on the condition of the person with dementia at baseline
– start therapy with the least expensive drug taking into account daily dose and price per dose
– consider an alternative AChI if the adverse-event profile, concordance issues, comorbidities, possible drug
interactions and dosing profiles suggest it is appropriate
– review MMSE score and global, functional and behavioural assessment every 6 months, and seek carers’ views
on the condition of the person with dementia at follow-up
– continue treatment if the MMSE score remains at or above 10 points and global, functional and behavioural
condition indicates worthwhile effect.
• Any review involving MMSE assessment should be undertaken by an appropriate specialist team, unless there are
locally agreed protocols for shared care.
• Do not use memantine in people with moderately severe-to-severe Alzheimer’s disease except as part of well
designed clinical studies.
• People with mild Alzheimer’s disease currently receiving an AChI, and those with moderately severe-to-severe
Alzheimer’s disease currently receiving memantine, may continue to receive the treatment until they, their carers
and/or specialist consider it appropriate to stop.
• AChIs or memantine should only be prescribed for cognitive decline in people with vascular dementia as part of a
properly conducted clinical study.1
*The NICE guideline advises healthcare professionals of a number of situations (e.g. people with learning or other
disabilities, or language difficulties) where the MMSE score should not be relied on, and suggests other methods are
used for assessment of the severity of disease (see NICE guideline11 for details).
Cost-effectiveness of AChIs and memantine fatigue and urinary symptoms (see SPCs for
in Alzheimer’s disease details).
The economic analysis carried out for the NICE In March 2004, the Committee on Safety of
TAG 111 identified that, for people with Medicines (CSM) advised that olanzapine and
moderate dementia, AChIs were associated risperidone should not be used for the
with a cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) treatment of behavioural symptoms of
gained of £23,000 to £35,000, depending on dementia; there was clear evidence of an
the choice of drug. For mild dementia, increased risk of stroke in elderly patients with
estimates were from £56,000 to £72,000 per dementia, and the risk was considered
QALY gained. For memantine, the cost per sufficient to outweigh likely benefits.18 A meta-
QALY gained for treating people with analysis of four placebo-controlled RCTs in
moderately severe-to-severe dementia was elderly patients (n=1,779) with dementia
estimated as £70,000 to £90,000, depending on carried out by the MHRA identified a three-fold
the patient group or subgroup.11 increase in the risk of stroke or transient
ischaemic attack (TIA) with risperidone (OR
These findings were reflected in the final NICE 3.32, 95%CI 1.43 to 7.70).18 The CSM also
guidance, which considered that treatment of advised that if risperidone was used for the
people with moderate dementia, but not mild management of acute psychotic conditions in
dementia, with AChIs was cost-effective within elderly patients with dementia this should be
the NHS. Further details of the cost- short-term and under specialist advice. Those
effectiveness analyses can be found in NICE patients already being treated with an atypical
TAG 111, which is available on the NICE drug were recommended to have their
website (http://guidance.nice.org.uk/TA111).11 treatment reviewed.18
A Canadian cohort study of 37,241 elderly according to need). Antipsychotics should not
people who were prescribed antipsychotic be prescribed to people with mild-to-moderate
medication identified a greater risk of dying DLB, as these people are particularly at risk of
within 180 days of treatment with typical serious adverse effects.1
compared with atypical antipsychotics (14.1%
vs. 9.6%; mortality ratio 1.47, 95%CI 1.39 to Where non-cognitive symptoms are causing
1.56).20 them significant distress AChIs should be
offered to people with DLB and they are an
Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors option for people with Alzheimer’s disease
Some studies have shown that AChIs may where non-drug treatments or antipsychotics
produce a small yet statistically significant are inappropriate or ineffective. AChIs should
improvement in non-cognitive symptoms of only be used in vascular dementia as part of a
dementia.15 However, a recent RCT of 272 clinical trial.1
patients with Alzheimer's disease, who had
clinically significant agitation and no response to Additional resources
a brief psychosocial treatment program, found
that donepezil 10mg daily for 12 weeks was no NICE-SCIE clinical guidelines for dementia
more effective in reducing agitation than placebo and the NICE TAG 111 for donepezil,
(difference in change of Cohen–Mansfield galantamine, rivastigmine and memantine for
Agitation Inventory scores –0.06, 95%CI –4.35 the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease, and their
to 4.22).21 The cost-effectiveness of AChIs in the associated implementation tools and costing
treatment of people with dementia with severe templates, can be found on the NICE website
non-cognitive symptoms has not been (www.nice.org.uk).
established.3
The Dementia Knowledge Week (Later Life
NICE-SCIE guideline Specialist Library of the National Library for
The NICE-SCIE guideline recommends that Heath, June 2007) contains extensive
people with dementia who develop non- additional information on dementia, pooled
cognitive symptoms or behaviour that from a variety of sources (www.library.
challenges should be offered a pharmacological nhs.uk/laterlife/ViewResource.aspx?resID=26
intervention in the first instance only if they are 2532). Included are listings of the systematic
severely distressed or there is an immediate reviews, meta-analyses and other reviews
risk of harm to the person or others.1 relating to the treatment of dementia, including
internet links to these and other sources of
Drug treatment with an antipsychotic should information.
only be offered after a full discussion with the
patient and/or their carers about the risks and Additonal patient-orientated information can
benefits, especially the risk of stroke/TIA and be found on the websites of charities such as
possible adverse effects on cognition. The dose the Alzheimer’s Society (www.alzheimers.
of antipsychotic should be low initially and org.uk) and Help the Aged (www.helptheaged.
titrated upwards, and treatment time-limited and org.uk).
regularly reviewed (every three months or
References
1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and 16. Shekelle P, Maglione M, Bagley S, et al. Efficacy and
Social Care Institute for Excellence. NICE clinical comparative effectiveness of off-label use of atypical
guideline 42. Dementia. Supporting people with dementia antipsychotics. Comparative effectiveness review No. 6.
and their carers in health and social care. November Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. January
2006. Accessed from http://guidance.nice. org.uk/cg42 on 2007.
10/09/07 17. Schneider LS, Dagerman KS, Insel P. Risk of death with
2. Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School atypical antipsychotic drug treatment for dementia: meta-
of Economics and the Institute of Psychiatry. Dementia analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. JAMA
UK: a report into the prevalence and cost of dementia. 2005;294:1934–43
Alzheimer’s Society 2007. Accessed from www 18. MHRA. Atypical antipsychotic drugs and stroke. March
.alzheimers.org.uk/News_and_Campaigns/Campaigning/ 2004. Accessed from www.mhra.gov.uk/home/idcplg?
PDF/Dementia_UK_Full_Report.pdf on 13/08/07 IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&useSecondary=true&ssD
3. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health. ocName=CON1004298&ssTargetNodeId=221 on 15/
Dementia: full guideline. Supporting people with dementia 08/07
and their carers in health and social care. National clinical 19. European Pharmacovigilance Working Party (PhVWP).
practice guideline 42. January 2007. Accessed from Assessment report: Antipsychotics and cerebrovascular
http://guidance.nice.org.uk/cg42 on 10/09/07 accident, 2006. Accessed from www.mhra.gov.uk/home
4. Department of Health. Government project to produce the /idcplg?IdcService=GET_FILE&dDocName=con2024914
first ever national dementia strategy: work programme. &RevisionSelectionMethod=Latest on 05/11/07
Gateway ref 8634. August 2007. Accessed from 20. Schneeweiss S, Setoguchi S, Brookhart A, et al. Risk of
www.dh.gov.uk/en/Policyandguidance/Healthand death associated with the use of conventional versus
socialcaretopics/Olderpeoplesservices/DH_077211 on atypical antipsychotic drugs among elderly patients.
28/08/07 CMAJ 2007;176:627–32
5. NHS Direct. Dementia prevention. Updated 27th June 21. Howard RJ, Juszczak E, Ballard CG, et al. Donepezil for
2007. Accessed from www.nhsdirect.nhs.uk/articles/ the treatment of agitation in Alzheimer's disease. New
article.aspx?articleId=124§ionId=9 on 05/09/07 Engl J Med 2007;357:1382–92
6. Royal College of Psychiatrists. Forgetful but not forgotten: 22. European Medicines Agency. Draft guideline on medicinal
assessment and aspects of treatment of people with products for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease and
dementia by a specialist old age psychiatry service. other dementias. CPMP/EWP/553/95/ Rev.1. 19th July
Council Report CR119. April 2005. Accessed from 2007. Accessed from www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/
www.rcpsych.ac.uk/files/pdfversion/cr119.pdf on 13/08/07 ewp/055395 endraft.pdf on 14/09/07.
7. Livingston G, Johnston K, Katona C, et al. Systematic 23. Kaduszkiewicz H, Zimmermann T, Beck-Bornholdt H-P, et
review of psychological approaches to the management al. Cholinesterase inhibitors for patients with Alzheimer's
of neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia. Am J disease: systematic review of randomised clinical trials.
Psychiatry 2005;162:1996–2021 BMJ 2005; 331:321–3
8. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. NICE 24. Winblad B, Kilander L, Eriksson S, et al. Donepezil in
clinical guideline 23. Depression (amended): patients with severe Alzheimer’s disease: double-blind,
management of people with depression in primary and parallel group, placebo-controlled study. Lancet 2006;
secondary care. April 2007. Accessed from http:// 367:1057–65
guidance.nice.org.uk/CG23 on 05/09/07 25. Black SE, Doody R, Li H, et al. Donepezil preserves
9. Selwood A, Johnston K, Katona C, et al. Systematic cognition and global function in patients with severe
review of the effect of psychological interventions on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 2007;69:459–69
family caregivers of people with dementia. J Affect Disord 26. Kavirajan H, Schneider LS. Efficacy and adverse effects
2007;101:75–89 of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in vascular
10. Loveman E, Green C, Kirby J, et al. The clinical and cost- dementia: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
effectiveness of donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine and Lancet Neurol 2007;6:782–92
memantine for Alzheimer's disease. Health Technol 27. Wild R, Pettit T, Burns A. Cholinesterase inhibitors for
Assess 2006;10(1). Accessed from www.hta.ac.uk/ dementia with Lewy bodies. Cochrane Database of
project/1398.asp on 18/10/07 Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD003672.
11. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003672
Technology appraisal guidance 111. Donepezil, 28. McKeith I, Del Ser T, Spano P, et al. Efficacy of
galantamine, rivastigmine (review) and memantine for the rivastigmine in dementia with Lewy bodies: a randomised,
treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. (Amended September double-blind, placebo-controlled international study.
2007). Accessed from http://guidance.nice. org.uk/TA111 Lancet 2000;356:2031–6
on 01/11/07 29. Warner J, Butler R, Wuntakal B. Dementia. BMJ Clin
12. British National Formulary. No. 53. BMJ Publishing Group Evid 2006;15:1–24. Accessed from http://clinical
Ltd and RPS Publishing. March 2007 evidence.bmj.com/ceweb/conditions/meh/1001/1001-
13. Lanctôt KL, Herrmann N, Yau KK, et al. Efficacy and get.pdf on 08/10/2007
safety of cholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer’s disease: 30. Birks J, Flicker L. Donepezil for mild cognitive impairment.
a meta-analysis. CMAJ 2003;169:557–64 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 3.
14. McShane R, Areosa Sastre A, Minakaran N. Memantine Art. No.: CD006104. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006104
for dementia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 31. Loy C, Schneider L. Galantamine for Alzheimer's disease
2006, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD003154.pub5 DOI: 10.1002/ and mild cognitive impairment. Cochrane Database of
14651858.CD003154.pub5 Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD001747.
15. Sink KM, Holden KF, Yaffe K. Pharmacological treatment DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001747. pub3
of neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia: a review of
the evidence. JAMA 2005;293:596–608
The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) is associated with MeReC Publications published by the NPC through a funding contract. This arrangement
provides NICE with the ability to secure value for money in the use of NHS funds invested in its work and enables it to influence topic selection, methodology
and dissemination practice. NICE considers the work of this organisation to be of value to the NHS in England and Wales and recommends that it be used to
inform decisions on service organisation and delivery. This publication represents the views of the authors and not necessarily those of the Institute.
© The National Prescribing Centre, The Infirmary, 70 Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L69 3GF
Telephone: 0151 794 8146 Fax: 0151 794 8139 www.npc.co.uk www.npc.nhs.uk
MeReC Bulletin Volume 18, Number 1 7