0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
13 tayangan2 halaman
This document summarizes a research study comparing the effectiveness of trypsin from Atlantic cod and bovine pancreas in extracting carotenoprotein from shrimp waste at low temperatures. The key findings are:
1) Cod trypsin was more effective than bovine trypsin at extracting both astaxanthin and protein from shrimp waste after 24 hours at 4°C, recovering 64% and 81% respectively compared to 49% and 65% for bovine trypsin.
2) Both trypsin sources facilitated carotenoprotein extraction compared to the control with no added enzyme.
3) EDTA was found to aid the recovery of carotenoprotein from shrimp waste during low temperature extraction with or without trypsin.
This document summarizes a research study comparing the effectiveness of trypsin from Atlantic cod and bovine pancreas in extracting carotenoprotein from shrimp waste at low temperatures. The key findings are:
1) Cod trypsin was more effective than bovine trypsin at extracting both astaxanthin and protein from shrimp waste after 24 hours at 4°C, recovering 64% and 81% respectively compared to 49% and 65% for bovine trypsin.
2) Both trypsin sources facilitated carotenoprotein extraction compared to the control with no added enzyme.
3) EDTA was found to aid the recovery of carotenoprotein from shrimp waste during low temperature extraction with or without trypsin.
This document summarizes a research study comparing the effectiveness of trypsin from Atlantic cod and bovine pancreas in extracting carotenoprotein from shrimp waste at low temperatures. The key findings are:
1) Cod trypsin was more effective than bovine trypsin at extracting both astaxanthin and protein from shrimp waste after 24 hours at 4°C, recovering 64% and 81% respectively compared to 49% and 65% for bovine trypsin.
2) Both trypsin sources facilitated carotenoprotein extraction compared to the control with no added enzyme.
3) EDTA was found to aid the recovery of carotenoprotein from shrimp waste during low temperature extraction with or without trypsin.
Extraction of Carotenoprotein from Shrimp Process Wastes
with the Aid of Trypsin from Atlantic Cod A. CANO-LOPEZ, B.K. SIMPSON, and N.F. HAARD ABSTRACT Atlantic cod trypsin or bovine trypsin were used to aid the extraction of carotenoprotein from shrimp wastes at 4C. When 25 mg% cod trypsin was added to extraction medium containing 0.5N ethylene diaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) 64% of the astaxanthin and 81% of the protein of shrimp waste was recovered as carotenoprotein in 24 hr. With 25 mg% bovine trypsin, under otherwise identical conditions, the carotenoprotein recovered represented 49% of the astaxanthin and 65% of the protein of the waste. Semi-purified cod trypsin was not as effective as pure trypsin in facilitating recovery of carotenoprotein from shrimp waste. The recovery of carotenoprotein from shrimp waste, during extraction at 4C with or without trypsin, was facilitated by EDTA. INTRODUCTION CAROTENOPROTEIN, a by-product from crustacean process offal, has potential for use as a feed supplement in rations of farmed fish or as a colorant and flavorant for use in food products (Simpson and Haard, 1985a; Simpson and Haard, 1985b). When the extraction medium includes 25 mg% bovine trypsin, 0.5N ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA), pH 7.7 at 4C as much as 80% of the protein and astaxanthin of shrimp waste can be recovered as a stable carotenoprotein com- plex. At higher temperatures the speed of carotenoprotein ex- traction is increased and EDTA is not required for high yield; however the maximum yields are somewhat lower and the odor and taste of the product is adversely affected. Given the low habitat temperature of Atlantic cod, its trypsin is expected to be a more efficient catalyst than bovine trypsin at low reaction temperatures (Simpson and Haard, 1984a). The present study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of tryp- sin from Atlantic cod pyloric ceca with that from bovine pan- creas in releasing carotenoprotein from shrimp waste at low reaction temperatures. The utility of semi-purified cod trypsin isolates to aid recovery of carotenoprotein from shrimp wastes was also examined. MATERIALS & METHODS Materials Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua), obtained live from holding tanks at the Marine Sciences Research Laboratory, were stunned with a blow to the head and the pyloric ceca was removed and used to obtain trypsin. Raw, frozen shrimp (Pandufus borealis, Kroyer) were do- nated by Fishery Products International, St. Johns, Nfld. Bovine tryp- sin, N-bcnzoylarginine-p-nitroanilide (BAPA), soybean ttypsin inhibitor, EDTA, tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane(Tris), cyanogen bromide- activated Sepharose 4B were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co., St. Author Haard is with the Institute for Marine Resources, Dept. of Food Science & Technology, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616. Author Cano-Lopez is a technical trainee with Canada- Mexico Exchange Program at Memorial University of New- foundland, St. Johns Present address: CIEIAA, Universidad de Guanajuato, CP 38000, Guanajuato, Mexico. Author Simpsons present address is Dept. of Food Science & Human Nutrition, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611. Louis, MO. Polyethylene lauryl ether (Brij 35) was obtained from BDH Chemicals, Dartmouth, N.S. All other reagents were of reagent grade and were obtained from Fisher Scientific, Halifax, N.S. Isolation of trypsin Trypsin, from the pyloric ceca of Atlantic cod, was isolated and purified by a procedure used by us earlier with Greenland cod (Simp- son and Haard, 1984a). The purified trypsin exhibited one band after electrophoresis in the presence or absence of SDS as described by Simpson and Haard (1984a). Trypsin activity was standardized by the amidase reaction as described by Simpson and Haard (1984a). One BAPA unit is defined as an absorbancy change (410 nm) of 2.933/ min at 25C, pH 8.2 in a 3 mL reaction mixture. Extraction of carotenoprotein Carotenoprotein was extracted and isolated from cooked shrimp waste as described by Simpson and Haard (1985a) using 25 mg% trypsin. In certain experiments, when EDTA was not added to the extraction medium, the pH was maintained at 7.7 by titration with OSN HCI using a metrohm autotitration unit. In separate experiments, the Brij fraction or the ammonium sulfate .fraction of semi- pure trypsin, equivalent to 25 mg% pure trypsin on the basis of its amidase activity (after activation) with BAPA substrate at 25C, was used instead of purified cod trypsin. Total astaxanthin and protein content of carotenoprotein The lyophilized carotenoprotein was analyzed for total astaxanthin and protein as described by Simpson and Haard (1985a). The protein and astaxanthin content of carotenoprotein was expressed as % re- covered, i.e. the total astaxanthin (or protein) recovered in the caro- tenoprotein fraction as a per cent of that which was present in the raw shrimp waste prior to extraction. RESULTS & DISCUSSION Amidase activity of Atlantic cod trypsin At 25C the specific activity of purified cod trypsin was 1.14 BAPA units/mg protein, and was similar to that of bovine trypsin, 1.13 BAPA unitslmg protein. The temperature coef- ficients for the amidase reaction catalyzed by cod and bovine trypsin were 1.76 and 2.08 respectively. Thus at Yc, the spe- cific activity of cod trypsin (0.37) was almost 50% higher than that of bovine trypsin (0.26). The relatively low temperature coefficient for Atlantic cod trypsin is similar to that reported earlier by us for Greenland cod trypsin, i.e. 1.62 (Simpson and Haard, 1984a). The specific activities of the Brij and ammonium sulfate fractions, employed as extraction aids, were 0.4 and 0.41 BAPA units/mg protein at 25C respec- tively . Comparison of bovine and cod trypsin as extraction aids The recovery of astaxanthin and protein from shrimp waste when extraction was carried out for various times up to 48 hr at 4C in 0.5M EDTA, pH 7.7 containing either 25 mg% bovine trypsin, 25 mg% pure cod trypsin or no enzyme is shown in Fig. 1. Both sources of trypsin were effective in Volume 52, No. 2, 1987JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE-503 CAROTENOPROTEIN EXTRACTION FROM SHRIMP WASTES. . . 100 , ASTAXANTHIN 0 10 20 30 40 EXTRACTION TIME (h at 4-C) 50 90 90 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 PROTEIN 0 10 20 30 40 50 EXTRACTION TIME (h at 4%) Fig. I-Recovery of astaxanthin and protein from shrimp wastes as carotenoprotein. Extraction was at 4C with 0.5M EDTA, pH 7.7 containing no added enzyme (01, purified Atlantic cod tryp- sin @J, orpurified bovine pancreatic trypsin /mJ. The astaxanthin and protein contents of the shrimp waste employed were 128 mg% and 2.97%, respectively, prior to extraction. Data are the average of duplicate results for one experiment and are repre- sentative of results obtained in two other experiments. aiding the extraction of carotenoprotein compared to the con- trol which did not contain added enzyme. Cod trypsin was more effective than bovine trypsin in aiding pigment and pro- tein recovery. On the basis of the temperature coefficients of BAPA hydrolysis for the two enzymes, the cod trypsin would be expected to be almost 1.5 times as active as bovine trypsin at 4C. Thus Atlantic cod is an advantageous industrial enzyme for use at low temperature as already shown for Greenland cod trypsin (Simpson and Haard, 1986b). Extraction of carotenoprotein at 4C without EDTA Both cod and bovine trypsin were less effective, and did not appreciably differ, in aiding extraction of carotenoprotein from shrimp waste when EDTA was omitted from the extraction medium. The astaxanthin recoveries after 48 hr extraction with cod trypsin, bovine trypsin and control were only 36%, 35% and 18% respectively. The protein recoveries for these samples were 56%, 54% and 31% respectively. Trypsin aided extrac- tion at 4C differs from that carried out at 50C since at the higher temperature EDTA does not have a marked effect on carotenoprotein extraction (Simpson and Haard, 1985b). Semi-purified cod trypsin as extraction aids The AS and Brij fractions of cod trypsin appeared to be very effective in releasing astaxanthin from shrimp waste since the chitinous residue obtained after extraction was ren- Lt 80 8 60 zi ; 40 K x 20 0 10 20 30 40 EXTRACTION TIME (h at 4%) 80 s 60 8 40 2 8 20 PROTEIN 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 EXTRACTION TIME (.h at 4-C) Fig. 2-Recovery of astaxanthin andprotein from shrimp wastes as carotenoprotein. Extraction was at 4C with 0.5 M EDTA, pH 7.7 containing no added enzyme (01, pure cod trypsin @J, Bnj fraction of cod trypsin (*J or ammonium sulfate fraction of cod trypsin PJ. Data are the average of duplicate results for one experiment. dered colorless. However, the pigment released during extrac- tion with semi-purified cod trypsin was not recovered, as completely, in the carotenoprotein fraction compared to pure cod trypsin (Fig. 2). After making the extracts containing semi- purified trypsin to 45% saturation with ammonium sulfate and centrifugation, much of the pigment remained soluble or sep- arated as an oil. These observations indicate that impurities, presumably other proteolytic enzymes or lipolytic enzymes which were not separated from pyloric ceca extracts by the initial purification steps, act to degrade the carotenoprotein. Previ- ously we found that technical grade porcine trypsin or Enzeco protease AP-1 were less effective than pure bovine trypsin in facilitating release of intact carotenoprotein from shrimp wastes (Simpson and Haard, 1985a). CONCLUSIONS THE PRESENT STUDY indicates Atlantic cod trypsin is a more effective extraction aid than is bovine trypsin for re- covering carotenoprotein from shrimp process wastes at 4C when EDTA is present in the extraction medium. Unfortu- nately, the semi-purified cod trypsin fractions tested were not very effective in recovering intact carotenoprotein under the conditions employed in this study. It is likely that use of pure trypsin as an extraction aid would be prohibitive for commer- cial preparation of carotenoprotein because of the expense of purified enzymes. For this reason, additional study should be directed toward finding a practical way of obtaining cod trypsin which does not have residual activity which is autolytic to carotenoprotein. -Continued on page 506 504-JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE-Volume 52, No. 2, 1987