0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
127 tayangan12 halaman
Based on a reconceptualization of the emotional labor construct. Job autonomy and negative affectivity as Antecedents of Emotional Dissonance. Significant relationships with job autonomy, emotional exhaustion, and job satisfaction.
Based on a reconceptualization of the emotional labor construct. Job autonomy and negative affectivity as Antecedents of Emotional Dissonance. Significant relationships with job autonomy, emotional exhaustion, and job satisfaction.
Based on a reconceptualization of the emotional labor construct. Job autonomy and negative affectivity as Antecedents of Emotional Dissonance. Significant relationships with job autonomy, emotional exhaustion, and job satisfaction.
Emotional dissonance in organizations: Antecedents, consequences, and moderators. By:
Abraham, Rebecca, Genetic, Social & General Psychology Monographs, 87567547, May98, Vol. 124, Issue 2 Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection EMOTIONAL DISSONANCE IN ORGANIZATIONS: ANTECEDENTS, CONSEQUENCES, AND MODERATORS Contents 1. The Emotional Dissonance Construct 2. Antecedents, Consequences, and Moderators of Emotional Dissonance 3. Antecedents of Emotional Dissonance 4. Moderators of the Emotional Dissonance-Job Satisfaction Relationship 5. Method 6. Participants 7. Measures 8. Results 9. Discussion 10. REFERENCES ABSTRACT. Emotional dissonance, or person-role conflict originating from the conflict between expressed and experienced emotions, was examined. The study was based on a reconceptualization of the emotional labor construct, with dissonance as a facet rather than a consequence of emotional labor. The effects of emotional dissonance on organizational criteria were isolated, thereby explaining some of the conflicting results of earlier studies. Empirically, job autonomy and negative affectivity as antecedents of emotional dissonance, and emotional exhaustion and job satisfaction as consequences of emotional dissonance, were explored. Self-monitoring and social support were tested as moderators of the emotional dissonance-job satisfaction relationship. Significant relationships with job autonomy, emotional exhaustion, and job satisfaction were found. Social support significantly moderated the emotional dissonance-job satisfaction relationship. THE EVOLUTION OF THE U.S. ECONOMY to a service economy has been rapid. Currently, three fourths of the gross national product and 9 of every 10 new jobs are related to services (Wharton, 1993; Zeithaml, Parasuraman, & Berry, 1990). Concomitant with this transition, there has been a sharp rise in jobs requiring direct, face-to-face interaction with the final customer. Because customers' perceptions of quality are partly contingent on the expressed emotions of service providers, organizations attempt to control the emotional displays of their employees. Adelmann (1989) estimated that the jobs of fully one third of U.S. workers incorporate elements of emotional barter: Workers are rewarded specifically for overt displays of feeling. For example, bill collectors are expected to be hostile, funeral home directors somber, and health service workers nurturing and caring. The act of expressing organizationally desired emotions during service transactions is termed emotional labor (Morris & Feldman, 1996). In an assessment of seven job classes spanning the breadth of employment in the service sector, Hochschild (1983) identified 48 occupational categories as high in emotional labor, including nursing, therapy, personnel administration, table serving, and teaching. A study of emotional labor is warranted from both practical and theoretical perspectives. From a practical standpoint, organizations need to be aware of the impact of emotional labor in order to maximize the effectiveness of individuals in frontline, boundary-spanning positions who act as corporate representatives to the final customer. Theoretically, it is important to place emotional labor within a contingency framework in order to assess situational influences, including the impact of job characteristics, personality variables, and organizational characteristics. In earlier studies, emotional labor was envisioned as a unidimensional construct solely concerned with the intensity and frequency of emotional displays. In separate studies, researchers investigated the consequences of frequent, organizationally mandated emotional displays in high-emotional-labor jobs such as flight attendants (Hochschild, 1983), table servers (Adelmann, 1989), police ofricers (Stenross & Kleinman, 1989), students (Smith & Kleinman, 1989), and supermarket clerks (Tolich, 1993). In her seminal work, Hochschild (1983) observed deleterious mental health effects of high emotional labor, including drug and alcohol abuse, headaches, and absenteeism. Richman (1988) found psychological distress among female medical students confronted with chronically ill patients. In an extension of those findings to an organizational context, Adelmann (1989) theorized that high emotional labor is concomitant with job dissatisfaction. Empirical investigations of job satisfaction, however, did not lend support to that hypothesis. Employees who "tuned out" organizational demands or used emotional labor to reduce ambiguity by avoiding embarrassing situations experienced increases in job satisfaction (Ashforth & Humphrey, 1993; Morris & Feldman, 1996). Tolich (1993) described supermarket clerks who genuinely enjoyed displaying organizationally prescribed emotions in the form of jokes, entertainment, and special services for customers who chose their checkout lines. These findings suggest that the construct of emotional labor is inherently more complex than was originally envisioned and that rival studies measure different underlying dimensions. In a recent reconceptualization, Morris and Feldman (1996) posited that the frequency and variety of emotional displays may evoke positive reactions, whereas emotional dissonance, or the conflict between expressed and experienced emotions, may cause dissatisfaction. For example, organizational display rules that require an employee to smile may generate two possible reactions. If the individual has a natural inclination to smile, this demand is unlikely to have any adverse consequences. On the other hand, if the individual's experienced emotional displays do not include smiling, a conflict between expected and experienced emotions may result. In other words, emotional dissonance as a form of person-role conflict (Kahn, Wolfe, Quinn, Snoek,& Rosenthal, 1964) between personal and organizationally mandated emotions is a facet of emotional labor that is distinct from the amount and frequency of emotional expression. As a stressor with potentially deleterious effects, emotional dissonance is worth investigating because greater understanding may permit managers to develop effective coping strategies. My primary purpose in this research was to study the antecedents, consequences, and moderators of emotional dissonance. The participants were drawn from a cross-section of industries, so that the results could be more generalizable than is possible from existing studies, which have focused on specific, high-emotional, labor-service providers, including table servers (Adelmann, 1989), flight attendants (Hochschild, 1983), and supermarket clerks (Tolich, 1993). The Emotional Dissonance Construct Emotional dissonance occurs when an employee's expressed emotions are in conformity with organizational norms but do not represent his or her true feelings (Rafaeli & Sutton, 1987). Dissonance may originate from faking in good faith--workers accept prescribed emotions even though those emotions are in conflict with the workers' true beliefs. Whether the effect of such dissonance on mental well-being is a threat or a palliative appears to be a function of the depth of emotion involved (Rafaeli & Sutton, 1987). Hochschild (1983) found that the mental health of seemingly cheerful flight attendants who accepted the importance of friendliness, but internally hid their contempt for passengers, was adversely affected. In contrast, Maslach (1978) asserted that for health service workers, acceptance of emotional detachment as the standard of behavior prevented burnout that could have been induced by devotion to terminally ill patients. The other source of emotional dissonance, faking in bad faith, has more serious negative consequences. Faking in bad faith occurs when employees reject the norms of prescribed behavior-- for example, employees who believe that "pasting on a smile" should not be part of their jobs (Rafaeli & Sutton, 1987). At the very least, such individuals are likely to be poor employees because they most likely conform to organizational dictates only when they are being closely monitored. Research in role theory suggests that such dissonance is a form of person-role conflict, in which a person's response conflicts with role expectations of the desired level of emotion (Kahn et al., 1964). If the preferred response is compliance, it may be associated with strong feelings of duplicity. If the preferred response is resistance, organizational pressure to conform may be progressively increased until capitulation occurs. In either event, psychological well-being may be threatened (Adelmann, 1989). Antecedents, Consequences, and Moderators of Emotional Dissonance What causes emotional dissonance? What is the impact of emotional dissonance on organizational criteria? To what extent do self-monitoring and social support effectively buffer and (thereby) reduce the harmful effects of emotional dissonance on job satisfaction? Exploration of these questions requires the identification of job autonomy and negative affectivity as antecedents, and emotional exhaustion and job dissatisfaction as consequences of, emotional dissonance, with self-monitoring and social support set forth as moderators of the dissonance-job satisfaction relationship. These relationships form the emotional dissonance component of Morris and Feldman's (1996) emotional labor model (see Figure 1). Antecedents of Emotional Dissonance Job autonomy. Job autonomy consists of the degree to which an employee has freedom, independence, and discretion in performing job tasks (Hackman & Oldham, 1975; Morris & Feldman, 1996). In an autonomous environment, the voluntary rather than the involuntary performance of emotional displays leads to the suggestion that the service provider has discretion in either superseding acceptable organizational norms or modifying unacceptable display rules to conform to experienced emotion, in turn reducing emotional dissonance. Case studies of voluntary performance of emotional displays have revealed that U.S. meat cutters and Turkish butchers, enjoined to value their work, upheld it as being honorable (Meara, 1974). Likewise, Tolich (1993) found manifestations of autonomy among supermarket clerks in the form of inquiries about family members, expedient processing, and the sharing of intimate personal details with preferred customers (referred to as "my customer," reciprocating with "my checker"). In both of these cases, autonomy permitted the service provider to reduce dissonance by exceeding organizational requirements and acting in a manner that conformed to his or her own experienced emotions. As an example of the latter form of dissonance reduction, Rafaeli and Sutton (1989) cited cases of restaurant managers who implicitly condoned the behavior of waiters and waitresses who displayed annoyance toward difficult customers, in violation of norms of friendliness. In such situations, internal feelings have a stronger influence over expressed emotions than norms do. Miles's (1980) analysis of boundary spanning established the theoretical framework for the job autonomy-dissonance relationship. Exceeding organizational norms is the domain of boundary spanners, like supermarket clerks, who are granted discretion to deal with unexpected problems as they strive to maintain relationships with long-term customers. Discretion of waiters and waitresses to display true feelings to difficult customers may stem from management's recognition that these are nonroutine situations for which appropriate standardized responses are nonexistent, rendering it infeasible for management to prescribe and employees to adhere to standards of behavior. In the only empirical study exploring the emotional labor-job autonomy relationship, job autonomy was found to moderate the relationship between emotional labor and well-being among individuals with high job autonomy who experienced fewer negative effects of emotional labor than those with low job autonomy (Erickson, 1991). The potential of job autonomy to reduce emotional dissonance (as a facet of emotional labor) and, consequently, improve well-being may have been responsible for this moderator effect. This finding led to my first hypothesis: Hypothesis 1: Job autonomy has an inverse relationship with emotional dissonance. Negative affectivity. Affectivity is defined as a general tendency to experience a particular mood (e.g., to be happy or sad) or to react to objects (e.g., jobs, people) in a particular way or with particular emotions (Lazarus, 1993; Morris & Feldman, 1996). In a series of studies, Watson and Clark (1984) observed that individuals with high negative affectivity take a negative view of life in terms of both self-perception and the perceptions of others. Over time, such individuals are apt to experience anxiety and report feelings of distress, discomfort, and dissatisfaction, irrespective of any external source of stress. Moreover, negative affectivity is the predisposition to accept negative emotions. Conceptually, individuals who have a predilection toward experiencing negative emotions in organizations where the display rules require positive emotions are more likely to find divergence between experienced and prescribed emotions (Morris & Feldman, 1996). Hypothesis 2: In organizations with positive display rules, negative affectivity has a direct, positive relationship with emotional dissonance. Emotional exhaustion. Rafaeli and Sutton's (1987) basic argument was that emotional dissonance is a form of role conflict. Because role conflict has been found to be antecedent to emotional exhaustion, it follows that emotional dissonance is, in turn, a predictor of emotional exhaustion. By virtue of its origination from a clash between personal values (genuine emotions) and role demands of others in the role set (prescribed emotions) manifested as conflicting emotions, emotional dissonance is a form of person-role conflict (Rafaeli & Sutton, 1987). Kahn et al. (1964) operationalized person-role conflict as "feeling that you have to do things on the job that are against your better judgment"; "things on the job" may be considered the display of emotions that are inherently unpleasant. Morris and Feldman (1996) cited the case of debt collectors who experienced dissonance when they felt sympathy for debtors while they were constrained by their employers to be harsh and unmerciful. Person-role stress may generate two possible reactions. An individual with a rigid mental framework may arrive at the conclusion that failure to match his or her standards to display rules stems from aberrations in the rules, which must be rejected. In contrast, a flexible person might internalize the source of emotional discrepancy by attributing it to personal weakness. In either event, there is incompatibility between organizationally mandated and personally experienced emotions, or emotional dissonance. As the pressure for conformity increases with multiple, conflicting organizational demands, continued attempts to meet those demands lead to frustration and emotional distress, culminating in emotional exhaustion (Jackson, Schwab, & Schuler, 1986). This causal sequence may be the underlying reason for research findings that role conflict leads to emotional exhaustion over time among educators (Jackson et al., 1986) and supervisors (Lee & Ashforth, 1993). Lee and Ashforth's comparison of different models of burnout (Golembiewski, Munzenrider, & Stevenson, 1986; Leiter & Maslach, 1988) revealed that the best-fitting model was the revised Leiter and Maslach model depicting role conflict as directly affecting exhaustion. This finding led to my third hypothesis Hypothesis 3: Emotional dissonance has a direct, positive relationship with emotional exhaustion. Job satisfaction. The results of studies that have investigated the emotional labor-job satisfaction relationship have been inconclusive chiefly because emotional dissonance with potentially negative consequences has been confounded with the frequency and variety of emotional labor and the attentiveness to display rules that may be positively associated with job satisfaction (Morris & Feldman, 1996). Morris and Feldman's findings revealed no relationship attributable to emotional detachment (Leidner, 1989; Staw, Bell, & Clausen, 1986; Wharton, 1993); positive relationships attributable to the potential of organizational display rules to reduce uncertainty or avoid embarrassing situations (Ashforth & Humphrey, 1993); and a negative relationship based on employee unhappiness at having to express organizationally desired emotions (Arielmann, 1989). Two studies, one theoretical and the other empirical, provide some clarification of the issue of job satisfaction and emotional labor. Lawler (1973) argued for the use of discrepancy theory in establishing a conceptual framework for studying job satisfaction. In a general sense, job satisfaction arises from differences between actual outcomes received and some other outcome level. Received outcomes below the other outcome level result in job dissatisfaction. By the same token, if received outcomes include genuine emotions and other outcomes consist of norms for emotional expression, their mutual discrepancy or dissonance results in job dissatisfaction. Rutter and Fielding (1988) identified sources of job stress among British prison officers and the impact of that stress on job satisfaction. As a source of job stress, the need to suppress emotions was found to be significantly inversely correlated with job satisfaction. Hypothesis 4: Emotional dissonance has an inverse relationship with job satisfaction. Moderators of the Emotional Dissonance-Job Satisfaction Relationship Self-monitoring. Synder (1974) defined self-monitoring as the ability to control expressive behavior to match the expression and self-presentation of others in social situations. The construct of self- monitoring is multidimensional, with components of acting and other-directedness (Riggio & Friedman, 1982), both of which are necessary to reduce the harmful effects of dissonance. Other- directedness results in social sensitivity and knowledge of established practices, leading to the internalization of prescribed norms for emotional expression. Acting refers to posed responsiveness-- that is, the adjustment of behavior to conform to norms. Intuitively, if behavior takes the form of emotional expression, people who are high self-monitors will use cues based on emotional appropriateness to bring their own emotional displays into convergence. The innate desire and ability to conform, even in situations with considerable emotional dissonance, may, at least partly, alleviate job dissatisfaction. In an investigation of the performance of boundary-spanning field representatives, Caldwell and O'Reilly (1982) observed that successful performance was contingent on self-monitoring capability. People who were high self-monitors used persuasion more effectively to communicate with multiple groups, including franchisees, managers, and suppliers. Caldwell and O'Reilly conjectured that the superior performance of high self-monitors could be partly attributed to greater job satisfaction. Hypothesis 5: Self-monitoring moderates the relationship between emotional dissonance and job satisfaction; high self-monitors experience less job dissatisfaction resulting from emotional dissonance than low self-monitors do. Social support. Researchers on stress have documented numerous cases in which the support provided by large social networks of family, spouse, and friends has had a buffering effect on stress, because those networks afford protection from the harmful effects of stressful conditions. Individuals confronted with multiple demands that strain their coping capabilities have drawn on the support of social networks to avoid being overwhelmed by feelings of helplessness and loss of self-esteem (see Cohen & Wills, 1985, for a review). House (1981) posited that harmonious interactions between group members may have been the source of increased productivity at a Volvo plant where work-flow processes were redesigned from single task per worker to group projects. Cobb and Kasl's (1977) profile of workers who had recently become unemployed showed substantially less psychological distress and fewer physical disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis and high cholesterol, among terminees with higher spousal and family social support. It follows that boundary spanners subjected to conflicting personal and organizational emotional demands may seek counsel from and vent their true feelings to colleagues, thereby preventing dissonance from adversely affecting job satisfaction. Hochschild (1983) cited examples of informal meetings among groups of flight attendants, who lifted restraints on their own behavior by openly exhibiting anger and annoyance as they exchanged anecdotes about difficult passengers. Hypothesis 6: Social support moderates the relationship between emotional dissonance and job satisfaction; individuals with high levels of social support are less likely than those with low social support to experience negative effects of emotional dissonance on job satisfaction. Method Participants Customer-service representatives (N- 110) in the telecommunications, entertainment, food service, and clothing retail industries in the southeastern United States were asked to participate in the study. A variety of industries were chosen in order to obtain different levels of emotional dissonance. Four research coordinators and I met with groups of participants over a 2-week period. Each group was informed that the focus of the study was emotions; however, to avoid response bias, we did not elaborate. Questionnaires were distributed and responses collected at a single setting for each group. Four surveys were deemed unusable; therefore, the final number of participants was 106. Of those, 44 (41%) were men, 50 (47%) were women, and 12 participants failed to report gender; the mean age was 27.74 years (SD - 8.83). Organizational tenure averaged 6.5 years (SD = 6.0). Measures Age, gender, and organizational tenure were specified as control variables, to control for interrater variability. Hackman and Oldham's (1975) 3-item Job Autonomy subscale of the 21item Job Diagnostic Survey served as the measure of job autonomy. Alpha coefficients in past studies have clustered at .73 (Dunham, 1976; Pierce & Dunham, 1978); the alpha coefficient (.74) for the present study was comparable, indicating acceptable reliability. Construct validity of the Job Diagnostic Survey with component subscales of Skill Variety, Task Identity, Task Significance, and Job Autonomy has been established through four factor structures converging to the requisite dimensions (Abdel-Halim, 1978; Dunham, Aldag, & Brief, 1977; Katz, 1978). Holbrook's (1981) four-item, 7-point bipolar Affect Scale measuring both positive and negative affectivity was used in accordance with Watson and Clark's (1984) and Watson and Tellegen's (1985) contention that the two forms of affectivity are bipolar dimensions of a single construct. Construct validity was established by a unidimensional factor structure with all items loading on a single factor (Holbrook, 1981). The scale has high reliability: alpha values of .83 to .95 were reported in the present and earlier studies (Holbrook, 1981; Leigh, 1984). Emotional dissonance was measured with two categories of items from Adelmann's (1989) Emotional Labor Scale. The first category measured the extent to which emotional expression was expected as part of the job. Items included "To what degree do you think making the customer feel important is expected of you as part of your job?" and "To what degree do you think concealing any negative feelings about the customer is expected of you as part of your job?" The second category consisted of identical questions rephrased to reflect the degree to which the respondent would actually display prescribed emotions. Corresponding items included "To what degree do you think you should actually make the customer feel important, or conceal negative feelings about the customer?" The differences between parallel items from the two categories were computed; dissonance was the degree to which the intensity of actual feelings was less than expressed feelings. The 21-item Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI; Maslach, 1978), with three constituent subscales measuring emotional exhaustion, personal accomplishment, and depersonalization, were the basis for the measurement of emotional exhaustion. The Emotional Exhaustion subscale is a nine-item, 7- point measure anchored by intensity ratings ranging from very mild, barely noticeable (1) to major, very strong (7). The use of this scale in numerous studies (see Maslach & Jackson, 1985, for a review) has confirmed its reliability and validity. For example, Iwanicki and Schwab (1981) obtained a three-factor structure with negative correlations between the Personal Accomplishment subscale and the other subscales, with internal consistency reliability estimates averaging from .89 to .90 for the Emotional Exhaustion subscale. Job satisfaction was measured by Hackman and Oldham's (1975) five-item, 7-point Job Satisfaction subscale of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Cronbach's alphas of .76, .77, and .74 in successive studies confirmed internal consistency reliability (Hackman & Lawler, 1971; Hackman & Oldham, 1976; Wall, Clegg, & Jackson, 1978). Self-monitoring was measured by Synder's (1974) 25-item, Self-Monitoring Scale. Synder (1974) obtained a Kuder-Richardson 20 reliability value of .70 and a test-retest reliability of.83, similar to the .75 value obtained in the present study. Discriminant validity was established through negative correlations with the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (q & Marlowe, 1964) and with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Psychopathic Deviate Scale, and because there was no relationship with the Machiavellianism (Christie & Geis, 1970), Achievement Anxiety (Alpert & Haber, 1960), and Inner-Other Directedhess (Kassarjian, 1962) scales. Other validity evidence consists of high self-monitoring scores for stage actors and low scores for patients in psychiatric wards. Social support was measured by 17 items pertaining to support and understanding from family and friends from Caplan's (1976) Social Support Scale. Directions were modified, with co-workers forming the source of social support. Reliabilities were acceptable: The present study's estimate was equivalent to Jayaratne and Chess's (1984) value of .87. Results Hypotheses 1 through 4. were tested with structural equations; Hypotheses 5 and 6 were tested with moderated hierarchical regressions. The proposed model depicted in Figure 1 consists of 2 exogenous variables (job autonomy and negative affectivity) and two latent endogenous variables (emotional exhaustion and job satisfaction). The Amos 3.6 computer program, providing maximum likelihood estimates of parameters in path models, is a more realistic data analysis procedure for the social sciences, based on its capacity to incorporate measurement error and correlate residuals (Erickson, 1991; Lavee, 1988). As the most widely used test statistic, a statistically significant chi-square in structural equations models suggests a significant discrepancy between the data and the hypothesized model. Models that have significant chi-square values are deficient. Other measures include fit indices that are more robust measures than the chi-square, because they are less influenced by sample size and are resistant to multinormality (Joreskog & Sorbom, 1984). Fit index values above 0.9 are prerequisite for satisfactory model fit. With relative fit and Tucker-Lewis indices below 0.90 (RFI = 0.60, TLI = 0.61) and a significant chi[2](5,N = 106) = 151.743, p < .011, the proposed model was rejected. The model was revised with the omission of negative affectivity (the only parameter estimate that failed to achieve significance in the proposed model; see Table 1). The revised model achieved adequate fit, with an insignificant chi[2](1,N = 106) = 2.467, p > .05, and all fit indices above the threshold of 0.90. All remaining parameter estimates, including autonomy to dissonance, dissonance to exhaustion, and dissonance to job satisfaction, were significant (p < .05) in the hypothesized direction, supporting Hypotheses 1, 3, and 4. Hypothesis 2, pertaining to the explanation of dissonance by negative affectivity, was rejected. Two moderated hierarchical regressions were performed, with self-monitoring and social support as respective moderators of the dissonance-job satisfaction relationship. The procedure involves the stepwise entry of blocks of variables with control variables entered first, followed by main variables at the second level, and interactions at the third level. These are highly restricted regressions, with any variance attributable to the moderator effect's being measured only after accounting for all the variance attributable to main effects. Age, gender, and organizational tenure were entered at the first level, followed by emotional dissonance and self-monitoring or social support at the second level, and finally, the dissonance-self- monitoring or dissonance-social support interaction. Self-monitoring failed to explain a significant amount of the variance in job satisfaction, with the overall R[2] of this model being a marginal 2% (see Table 2). Hypothesis 6 was supported: Social support explained 16% of the variance in job satisfaction, t(91) = 4.97, p < .01, and the emotional dissonance-social support interaction explained a significant 6% of the variance in job satisfaction, t(91) = 2.65, p < .01. Both linear and curvilinear forms (quadratic and cubic functional forms) were tested for both regressions. None of the curvilinear functional forms contributed to more variance than the linear models did. A separate regression containing both self-monitoring and social support as predictors was used to test the significance of the emotional dissonance/self-monitoting/social support interaction. No significant interactions were found. To explore the moderator effect of social support, I divided the sample into high- and low-social- support groups. Regressions were repeated for each subgroup, with the high-social-support subgroup exhibiting a positive relationship between emotional dissonance and job satisfaction (see Figure 2). As a coping strategy, high social support is powerful enough to prevent dissonance from adversely affecting job satisfaction. The model depicting all significant relationships in the revised model, with moderator effects, is shown in Figure 3. Discussion This study has provided evidence that establishes emotional dissonance as an independent construct, distinct from the frequency and variety of emotional labor. In other words, the results attest to the robustness of the Morris-Feldman (1996) conceptualization of emotional labor as a facet rather than a consequence of emotional labor, with its unique antecedents, consequences, and moderators. Cognitively, the existence of emotional dissonance in organizational life leads to personal fragmentation of the self. Because external behavior, with its emphasis on controlled emotional displays, is primarily an artifice, an individual's personal repertory of emotions becomes estranged from the true self (Erickson, 1991). Over time, this estrangement may lead to emotional exhaustion and job dissatisfaction. In an era of corporate downsizing, restructuring, and rapid technological change, society may be experiencing rising levels of emotional dissonance as employees strive to bring felt emotions into convergence with norms for the sake of job security. With the inevitable onset of job dissatisfaction and emotional exhaustion, organizations must determine whether they are willing to accept the costs of widespread emotional estrangement and alienation, or if they wish to be proactive in preventing the harmful effects of emotional dissonance. Two methods for possibly reducing dissonance include granting greater job autonomy and encouraging social support. Research has demonstrated that job autonomy reduces dissonance and moderates the emotional labor/psychological well-being relationship (Erickson, 1991). In addition, the beneficial impact of job autonomy on job satisfaction and well-being has been demonstrated (Kalleberg & Griffin, 1978) through its potential to bolster confidence and self-efficacy (Bandura, 1977; Erickson, 1991). Erickson distinguished between lack of control in manufacturing from service industries, with the former creating powerlessness over the immediate work process and the latter producing the more debilitating powerlessness over the self and emotions. To the extent that job autonomy permits a restoration of control over emotions, it may serve to prevent the fragmentation of the self and estrangement. Social support emerged as a strong moderator of the emotional dissonance-job satisfaction relationship. The emotional support provided by co-workers may reverse the deleterious 'effects of emotional dissonance. Organizations should provide opportunities for socialization through the formation of informal networks for the expression of genuine emotion. Future studies should empirically investigate the impact of dissonance, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally, on other organizational criteria, including self-esteem, anxiety (Morris & Feldman, 1996), turnover, and absenteeism. The placement of emotional dissonance within the framework of role theory as a form of role conflict suggests that reactions to dissonance may be contingent on personality and that personality may act as a moderator of relationships between emotional dissonance and organizational outcomes. Kahn et al. (1964) found that extroverted and flexible individuals suffer less loss of confidence, respect, and trust in the organization and less tension in high-conflict situations. Both extroverts and flexible (other-directed) individuals become more sociable under conditions of high conflict, suggesting the effective use of social support as a coping strategy. It follows that emotional dissonance may have less aversive effects on extroverts and flexible persons. Abraham (1997) found that thinking styles moderate the role conflict-job satisfaction relationship. Thinking styles are based on Sternberg's (1990) theory of mental self-government; Sternberg concluded that contextually intelligent persons seek harmony between their abilities and preferred styles by capitalizing on their strengths and compensating for their weaknesses. The judicial thinking style--the ability to judge and evaluate existing structures--seems appropriate as a coping strategy for dissonance because the judicial stylist is capable of undertaking an analysis and comparison of his or her own emotional displays with prescribed norms. Consequently, the moderation of the relationship between emotional dissonance and job satisfaction, tension, anxiety, self-esteem, and emotional exhaustion by extroversion-introversion, flexibility-rigidity, and thinking styles must be tested empirically. By identifying emotional dissonance as one of the sources of the negative impact of emotional labor on job satisfaction, the present study has partially succeeded in explaining Adelmann's (1989) dissonance-job satisfaction findings; future research should determine the impact of the other facets of emotional labor, namely, the frequency of emotional display, the variety of expressed emotions, and attentiveness to required display rules. The lack of significance of self-monitoring as a moderator of the dissonance-job satisfaction relationship may arise from the sample used; because selfmonitoring is closely related to organizational level, managers and professional staff display stronger self-monitoring capabilities than the lower level service employees who were the participants in this study. There is a need to identify moderators and mediators of the emotional dissonance-emotional exhaustion relationship. In a supplementary analysis, selfmonitoring and social support were both tested as moderators, followed by a test of self-monitoring as a mediator of the dissonance-emotional exhaustion relationship. No significant relationships were found. Hochschild (1983) and Morris and Feldman (1996) conjectured that emotional dissonance may result in role internalization, which may moderate its relationship with psychological wellbeing. If this argument is extended to emotional exhaustion, self-monitoring may be further along the causal sequence from emotional dissonance to psychological well-being. Emotional dissonance may cause role internalization as the individual attempts to absorb organizational display rules; the desire to act according to organizational criteria causes self-monitoring to ensure successful internalization; and self-monitoring, in turn, reduces job dissatisfaction or emotional exhaustion. This study was an initial attempt to define and relate a facet of emotional labor to organizational outcomes. Future research should extend this analysis to other dimensions of the construct in order to develop a comprehensive framework. This study was conducted at the Department of Business and Administrative Studies of the Farquhar Center for Undergraduate Studies, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. The study was supported in part by research funds from the Farquhar Center. Address correspondence to Rebecca Abraham, Farquhar Center for Undergraduate Studies, Nova Southeastern University, 3301 College Ave, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314; email:abraham@polaris.ncs.nova.edu. TABLE 1
Parameter Estimates for Paths in the Proposed and Revised Models
Legends:
A = Path description B = Standardized path estimates: Proposed model C = Standardized path estimates: Revised model
Note. NFI = normed fit index. RFI = relative fit index. IFI = incremental fit index. TLI = TuckerLewis index. CFI = comparative fit index. [*]p < .05. [***]p < .001.
TABLE 2
Summary of Hierarchical Regression Analysis for Variables Moderating the Emotional Dissonance-Job Satisfaction Relationship (N = 160)
Legends:
A = Variable B = Model 1: Beta C = Model 1: t D = Model 2: Beta E = Model 2: t
A B C D E
Step 1 Age .06 -.41 -.06 -.41 Gender .01 .16 .02 .16 Tenure .01 .01 .06 .01 Step 2 Emotional dissonance (ED) -.09 -.83 -.53 -2.79[**] Self-monitoring (SM) .11 1.08 Social support (SS) 1.84 4.97[***] Step 3 ED x SM -.33 -.31 ED x SS 1.74 2.65[**]
Note. For Model 1, R2 = .00 for Step 1; AR2 = .00 for Step 2; AR2 = .02 for Step 3 (ns). For Model 2, R2 = .00 for Step 1 (ns); AR2 = .18 for Step 2 (p < .01); AR2 = .06 for Step 3 (p < .01). [**]p < .01. [***]p < .001. GRAPH: FIGURE 2. Social support as a moderator of the emotional dissonance-job satisfaction relationship. DIAGRAM: FIGURE 1. The proposed emotional dissonance model. DIAGRAM: FIGURE 3. The revised emotional dissonance model. REFERENCES Abdel-Halim, A. A. (1978). Employee affective responses to organizational stress: Moderating effects of job characteristics. Personnel Psychology, $1, 561-579. Abraham, R. (1997). Thinking styles as moderators of role stress-job satisfaction relationships. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 18, 236-243. Adelmann, P. K. (1989). Emotional labor and employee well being. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Alpert, R., & Haber, R. N. (1960). Anxiety in academic achievement situations. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 207-215. Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. (1993). Emotion in the workplace: A reappraisal. Human Relations, 48, 97-125. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. Caldwell, D. F., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1982). Responses to failure: The effects of choice and responsibility on impression management. Academy of Management Journal, 25(1), 121-136. Caplan, G. (1976). The family as a support system. In G. Caplan & M. Killelea (Eds.), Support systems and mutual help (pp. 19-36). New York: Grune & Stratton. Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. San Diego: Academic Press. Cobb, S., & Kasl, S. V. (1977). Termination: The consequences of job loss (HEW Publication No. NIOSH, pp. 77-224). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive. New York: Wiley. Dunham, R. B. (1976). The measurement and dimensions of job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 404-409. Dunham, R. B., Aldag, R. J., & Brief, A. P. (1977). Dimensions of task design as measured by the Job Diagnostic Survey. Academy of Management Journal, 20, 209-223. Erickson, R. J. (1991 ). When emotion is the product: Self, society, and inauthenticity in a postmodern world. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Washington State University, Pullman. Golembiewski, R. F., Munzenrider, R. F., & Stevenson, J. G.(1986). Stress in organizations: Toward a phase model of burnout. New York: Praeger. Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. (1971). Employee reaction to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 259-286. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159-170. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250-279. Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart. Berkeley: University of California Press. Holbrook, M. B. (1981). Integrating compositional and decompositional analyses to represent the intervening role of perceptions in evaluative judgment. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 13-28. House, J. R. (1981). Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Iwanicki, E. F., & Schwab, R. L. (1981). A cross-validation study of the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 1167-1174. Jackson, S. E., Schwab, R. L., & Schuler, R. S. (1986). Toward an understanding of the burnout phenomenon. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71,630-640. Jayaratne, S., & Chess, W. A. (1984). The effects of emotional support on perceived job stress and strain. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 20(2), 141-153. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1984). LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood instrumental variables, and least squares methods. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software. Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. D., & Rosenthal, R. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York: Wiley. Kalleberg, A. L., & Griffin, L. J. (1978). Positional sources of inequality in job satisfaction. Sociology of Work and Occupations, 5(4), 371-400. Kassarjian, W. M. (1962). A study of Reisman's theory of social character. Sociometry, 25, 213-230. Katz, R. (1978). Job longevity as a situational factor in job satisfaction. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 204-223. Lavee, Y. (1988). Linear structural relationships (LISREL) in family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 937-948. Lawler, E. E. (1973). Motivation in work organizations. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole. Lazarus, R. S. (1993). From psychological stress to the emotions: A history of changing outlooks. In L. W. Porter & M. Rosenzweig (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 44, pp. 1-2). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews. Lee, R. T. & Ashforth, B. E. (1993). A longitudinal study of burnout among supervisors and managers: Comparisons between the Leiter and Maslach (1988) and Golemblewski et al. (1986) models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 369-398. Leidner, R. (1989). Working on people: The routinization of interactive service work. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. Leigh, J. H. (1984). Recall and recognition performance for umbrella print advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 13(4), 5-18, 30. Leiter, M.P., & Maslach, C. (1988). The impact of interpersonal environment on burnout and organizational commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9, 297-308. Maslach, C. (1978). The client role in staff burnout. Journal of Social Issues, 34, 111-124. Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1985). The role of sex and family variables in burnout. Sex Roles, 12, 837-851. Meara, H. (1974). Honor in dirty work: The case of American meat cutters and Turkish butchers. Sociology of Work and Occupations, 1, 259-283. Miles, R. H. (1980). Organization boundary-roles. In C. L. Cooper & R. Payne (Eds.), Current concerns in occupational stress (pp. 61-96). New York: Wiley. Morris, J. A., & Feldman, D.C. (1996). The dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of emotional labor. Academy of Management Review, 21, 986-1010. Pierce, J. L., & Dunham, R. B. (1978). The measurement of perceived job characteristics: The Job Diagnostic Survey versus the Job Characteristics Inventory. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 123-138. Rafaeli, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1987). Expression of emotion as part of the work role. Academy of Management Review, 12, 23-37. Rafaeli, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1989). The expression of emotion in organizational life. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 11, pp. 1-42). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Richman, J. (1988). Deviance from sex-linked expressivity norms and psychological distress. Social Forces, 67, 208-215. Riggio, R. E., & Friedman, H. S. (1982). The interrelationship of self-monitoring factors, personality traits, and nonverbal social skills. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 7, 33-45. Rutter, D. R., & Fielding, P. J. (1988). Sources of occupational stress: An examination of British prison officers. Work and Stress, 2, 292-299. Smith, A. C., & Kleinman, S. (1989). Managing emotions in medical school: Students' contacts with the living and the dead. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 66-69. Staw, B. M., Bell, N. E., & Clausen, A. J. (1986). The dispositional approach to job attitudes: A lifetime longitudinal test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 245-268. Stenross, B., & Kleinman, S. (1989). The highs and lows of emotional labor: Detectives' encounters with criminals and victims. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 17, 435-452. Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Thinking styles: Keys to understanding student performance. Phi Delta Kappan, 8, 366-371. Synder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537. Tolich, M. B. (1993). Alienating and liberating emotions at work. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22, 361-381. Wall, T. D., Clegg, C. W., & Jackson, P. R. (1978). An evaluation of the job characteristics model. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 51, 183-196. Watson, D., & Clark, L. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive psychological states. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465-490. Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219-235. Wharton, A. S. (1993). The affective consequences of service work. Work and Occupations, 20, 205- 232. Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L. L. (1990). Delivering quality service: Balancing customer perceptions and expectations. New York: Free Press. ~~~~~~~~ By REBECCA ABRAHAM, Farquhar Center for Undergraduate Studies, Nova Southeastern University
Copyright of Genetic, Social & General Psychology Monographs is the property of Heldref Publications and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.