8
(here7
@ O @ean score
8
O Total of students score
B O Total number of students
2Sugiyono! #$$;! )" 6;3
@ean*hile! the formula used to determine the data into high! a-erage! and
lo* category the follo*ing formula *as used7
@ean 2@13 O
#
%
U 2@a+imum score Q @inimum score3
Standard De-iation 2SD13 O
:
%
U 2@a+imum score A @inimum score3
@i Q % SDi to @i Q & SDi O high
@i A % SDi to S @i Q % SDi O a-erage
@i A & SDi to S @i A % SDi O lo* 2Bur.encana! %;;:! )" =;3
c" The rresearcher calculates the successful of classical
com)leteness
To calculate the successful of classical com)leteness! the researcher used the
formula belo*7
P O
n
s
+ %$$<
&&
(here7
P O The successful of learning
S O The Bumber of students *ho obtain mar. V :$
n O The *hole number of students 2De)di.bud! %;;9! )" #&3
The result of calculation of students/ score from each test *as com)ared in
each cycle" 1t gi-es the descri)tion about the )resentation of increasing the
students s)ea.ing ability through board game"
CHAPTER I"
RESEARCH RESULT AND DISCUSSION
A" A#.4&% 1%* R)5/(.
1n this )art! the researcher )resents the result of the im)lementation of t*o
cycles and data analysis of the achie-ement of the eighth graders of +Ts7 .)
+ajidi in increasing students/ s)ea.ing ability through Board 4ame"
19 C-#() I
19 S./*)%.5 S?)1$4%+ A#64)@)2)%. D1.1
1n this )art! the students *ho follo*ed the test *ere #9 students"
1n this cycle! the -alue of the students/ mean score and standard
de-iation *ere >:":9 and =":9 2A))endi+7 %$3" From the sub?ect! there
*ere %9 students *ho fulfilled the @CC 2@inimum Com)leteness
&6
Criteria3 that *as V :$" 1n other *ord! the )ercentage of students/
successful learning *as :#";: <2 see a))endi+ $=3! so it had not
reached yet the classical successful criterion determined! because the
classical successful learning of the students must be V 9><" This result
denoted that the successful of learning )rocess needed to be enriched to
the second cycle" The follo*ing formula *as used to analye the data of
classical successful learning7
'B O
.
.i
+ %$$<
'B O
< %$$
#9
%9
9
'B O :#";:<
29 T6) R)5/(. &3 O,5)0@1.4&%
1n the obser-ation of learning )rocess! the researcher used chec.
list" The acti-ities of Board 4ame *as rather coo)erati-e but it needed
to increase because the score indicated that the a-erage students *ere
lac. of constructi-e )artici)ation! quality and e+act time to finish their
tas. and arguing their contrary o)inion to the member" Also! the score
of obser-ation described that there *ere >:! 6#< of the students learned
coo)erati-ely 2A))endi+7 %63" Therefore! the acti-ities should be
enriched in the ne+t cycle to attain a good coo)erati-e learning"
39 R)3()#.4&%
Concerning *ith the result of the first cycle! it )ointed out that the
result *as still lo* because there *ere some students *ho did not fulfill
&>
yet the @CC 2@inimum Com)leteness Criteria3 of English sub?ect of
+Ts .) +ajidi and did not reached the classical com)leteness" 1t
means that there *ould be an im)ro-ement of the second cycle to
com)lete the curriculum standard"
,9 C-#() II
19 S./*)%.5 S?)1$4%+ A#64)@)2)%. D1.1
1n this cycle! the means score and standard de-iation *as :6">:
and :"9: 2A))endi+7 %$3" The students *ho fulfilled the @CC
2@inimum Com)leteness Criteria3 *ere ## students" From those
students! the curriculum standard of @CC reached =%"6= <! so it can be
said success because =%"6= < 2see a))endi+ $;3 of the students got V
:$" The follo*ing formula *as used to analye the data of classical
successful learning7
'B O
.
.i
+ %$$<
'B O
< %$$
#9
##
9
'B O =%"6= <
29 T6) R)5/(. &3 O,5)0@1.4&%
Based on the result of obser-ation on the second cycle! the
)rocess of Board 4ame increased" 1n this cycle! the students )artici)ate
more acti-e and )artici)ati-e" 1t can be seen from the result of
obser-ation that the score of their coo)eration increased from &&=! > to
be 6=6! >" 1t means =$! 9> < of the students *ere learning
&:
coo)erati-ely 2A))endi+7 %63" Therefore! Board 4ame might be a good
strategy to increase the learners/ acti-eness in teaching and learning
)rocess"
39 R)3()#.4&%
1n this )art! the data had been gotten in the second cycle
increased so significant" 1t can be seen from the difference bet*een
cycle 1 and cycle 11 *as %="># < that there *as an im)ro-ement of the
classical com)leteness *as! successi-ely! :#";: < to be =%"6= <" And
then the mean score and increased from >:":9 to be :6">: 2A))endi+7
%$3" Furthermore! the result of obser-ation also sho*ed an
im)ro-ement from >:! 6#< to be =$! 9>< or the difference *as #6!
&&< 2A))endi+7 %63" So the result of the second cycle )ointed out that
learning )rocess using Board 4ame can be im)lemented as an
alternati-e *ay to increase students/ s)ea.ing ability"
B9 D45#/554&%
The result of the study should be able to ans*er the )roblems! *hich
had been stated in the statement of the )roblem of this study" The )roblem is
ho* can board game increase students/ s)ea.ing ability for the eighth graders
of +Ts .) +ajidi in the school year #$%#5#$%&8 J
19 B&10* G12) C1% I%#0)15) S./*)%.5 S?)1$4%+ A,4(4.-
1n this research! the researcher used classroom action research"
Based on the )rocedure of classroom action research! this research *as done
for t*o cycles and e-ery cycle *as gi-en the test and monitored through
&9
obser-ation" From those cycles can be seen ho* far teaching and learning
)rocess and the students/ achie-ements" 1n those cycles! the researcher
a))lied Board 4ame to de-elo) students/ s)ea.ing s.ill" @oreo-er! then to
.no* the )rocess of the learning! the researcher obser-ed during those
)rocesses by using chec.list"
Table 6"%
The Score of Speaking Test :ased on Proficiency Description
N&
E()2)%.5 &3
5?)1$4%+
S./*)%.5 5#&0) &% 5?)1$4%+ 1,4(4.-
C-#() I C-#() II
% Accent >% >9
# 4rammar 6=: >:6
& Gocabulary &;% >%#
6 Fluency %96 %;$
> Com)rehension &:9 6#9
Total %6:; %9>$
From the )resented data! the students/ total score of the first cycle
*as %6:;! *hile on the second cycle *as %9>$" From the elements of
s)ea.ing! the students/ score of s)ea.ing test on the first cycle! the
researcher got the accent element increased from >% u) to >9! the grammar
element increased 6=: u) to >:6! the -ocabulary element increased &;% u)
to >%# and the fluency and com)rehension *ere! successi-ely! %96 and &:9
u) to %;$ and 6#9"
Based on the data analysis in each cycle! it can be seen that from
cycle 1 u) to cycle 11 increased" Referring to the data in cycle 1! the result of
the students s)ea.ing test by referring to the com)rehensi-e descri)tion of
FS1 )rocedure as follo*s7 the lo*est and the highest scores of students
accent *ere % and &! the students/ score of grammar! %# *as the lo*est and
&=
&$ *as the highest" Gocabulary score found by the researcher *as = for the
lo*est category and #$ *as the highest! the fluency and com)rehension *as
6 and = for the lo*est category and then = and %; *as the highest category
2A))endi+7 =3"
0n the other hand! in the cycle 11! the students/ scores based on the
data *ere gained as follo*s7 the lo*est and the highest scores for the
students accent *ere # and &! the students/ scores of grammar *ere %# for
the lo*est and &$! for the highest! the lo*est and the highest scores of
-ocabulary *ere %: for the lo*est and #$ for the highest! for fluency and
com)rehension the lo*est scores *ere 6 and %#! and for the highest scores
for both as)ects *ere %$ and %; 2A))endi+7 ;3"
Furthermore! the scores of the students/ s)ea.ing )erformance of t*o
cycles *ere calculated and then the scores *ere con-ersed into *eighting
table of the com)rehensi-e descri)tion of the FS1 )rocedure" 1n cycle 1! the
score *as &; for the lo*est! it means the students le-el of their s)ea.ing
)erformance *ere %Q and the highest total score *as 9#! it means & *as the
le-el of their s)ea.ing )erformance" And then in cycle 11! it *as >$ and =$
*ere the lo*est and the highest! it means! successi-ely! # and &Q *ere the
le-el of their s)ea.ing )erformance" 1t can be deduced that there *ere the
de-elo)ment of students/ )roficiency in s)ea.ing ability" To ma.e clearer!
the follo*ing is a detail descri)tion"
Table7 6"#"
The Score of Speaking Test on ;ycle and ;ycle
C-#() S/,C)#. M)1% FSI L)@)( &3 C1.)+&0-
&;
P0&34#4)%#-
First Cycle #9 >:!:9 #Q A-erage
Second Cycle #9 :6!>: & A-erage
After the score *as classified the researcher calculated the mean
score and standard de-iation of the entire students" 1n cycle 1! the -alue of
the students/ mean score *ere >:":9 and the )ercentage of the learning
)rocess *as :#";: < *hereas in cycle 11! the mean score *as :6">: and then
the )ercentage of the learning )rocess *as =%"6= <" After com)aring those
cycles! it )ointed out that there *ere significant differences of the students/
achie-ement" The students/ achie-ement of English s)ea.ing s.ill can be
seen from the students/ classical com)leteness of both of the cycles
increased %="># <"
Based on the descri)tion of the mean abo-e! the mean score of the %
st
and #
nd
cycle *ere >:" :9 and :6" >: 2A))endi+es7 = and ;3" 1t
indicated the students/ s)ea.ing ability increased 9" =;" And then the mean
score of students/ s)ea.ing s.ill *as bet*een 6&! :9 S 9%! && 2A))endi+7
%%3" 1t means that the le-el of all students/ s)ea.ing ability *as &" 1t
indicated most of students are Jable to s)ea. the language *ith sufficient
structural accuracy and -ocabulary to )artici)ate effecti-ely in most formal
and informal con-ersation on )ractical! social and )rofessional to)icsK" 1t
denotes that students/ s)ea.ing s.ill is a-erage le-el category" This
descri)tion based on the con-ersion of *eighting table of FS1 )rocedure"
0n the other hand! based on the )resented data in each cycle! Board
4ame could u)grade teacher/s strategy in teaching and learning )rocess"
6$
The table 2a))endi+es7 %$ and %%3 )ortrayed bet*een the teacher and
students could coo)erate ma+imally in im)lementing the ste) of Board
4ame model" The result of obser-ation also increased the students s)ea.ing
ability *hen they *ere in grou)s" 1t can be obser-ed that most of the
students could u)grade their )artici)ation and acti-eness in board game"
0n the ether hand! there *as an im)ro-ement of s)ea.ing ability! it
can be analyed from the total score of both cycles from &&=! > became 6=6!
> or the differences *ere %6:" Also! the )ercentage of both cycles *as #6!
&& < 2A))endi+7 %63" 1t means there *as a significant difference" So! the
strategy of Board 4ame could increase students/ enthusiastic and acti-e
)artici)ation in teaching and learning"
1t can be said that Board 4ame is able to be im)lemented as one
of the *ays to increase students/ acti-eness in teaching and learning )rocess!
es)ecially in s)ea.ing s.ill"
6%
CHAPTER "
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
A9 C&%#(/54&%
Based on the obtained data in the )re-ious cha)ter! the researcher
comes to a set of conclusion belo*7
%" Board game is able to increase the students/ English s)ea.ing ability" 1t is
)ro-ed that students/ s)ea.ing ability through board game of the second
cycle *as higher than the first cycle after the score *as con-ersed *ith the
criteria of the *eighting table of the com)rehensi-e descri)tion of FS1
)rocedure" Also! the students are greater change in their s)ea.ing ability
de-elo)ment and the score got"
#" 1m)lementing board game can moti-ate the students to be more acti-e and
contribute )ositi-e de-elo)ment in teaching and learning )rocess"
6#
B9 S/++)5.4&%5
Concerning to the conclusion! the researcher *ould li.e to offer some
suggestions! as follo*s7
%" The head master should moti-ate the teacher to a))ly se-eral of strategy!
techniques! or method in teaching and learning )rocess es)ecially in
teaching s)ea.ing"
#" The English teachers should gi-e the students/ o))ortunity to s)ea. in the
classroom acti-ity! so the students can )ractice their ca)ability in s)ea.ing"
&" The teacher and students of +Ts .) +ajidi should often a))ly the 4ame
to increase the enthusiasm of students/ learning )rocess"
6" Finally! the researcher e+)ects to the further researchers to be more acti-e
in conducting further research to find out more a))roaches and strategies
in de-elo)ing students/ English s)ea.ing ability"
6&
REFERENCES
Carly! Schuna" 2#$%$3" The Ad-antages of Learning 4ames for 'ids. nternet
Tessol. htt)755*"*"*" li-estrong"com
Carol C! 0r*ig" 2%;;;3" S)ea.ing S.ill" nternet Tessol" htt)755*"*"*" Sil" org"
De)di.bud" %;;9" Pedoman Khusus Pengem-angan Sila-us dan Penilaian"
htt)755***")us.ur"net
De*ar! 4*en" 2#$$;3" Board 4ame for 'ids7 Do they ma.e .ids smarter8
nternet Tessol" htt)755 *"*"*" Board game for .ids" html
Fathurrahman" #$$;" De$eloping Students/ ;reati$ity in Speaking Skill Through
Slang Language to the Ele$enth <rade of S+A. 2 Selong in the School (ear
,00=1,0&0" ST'1P St" Didayati" D i Selong7 Fn)ublished"
Faui! Ahmad" 2#$%#3" Producti$e >oca-ulary +astery and Speaking A-ility for
the Ten Students of +A .) Pancor in the School (ear ,0&&1,0&,. ST'1P
St" Didayati" D i Selong" Fn)ublished" SE% Thesis
4ebhard! C" 4" #$$$" Teaching English as a 6oreign or Second Language"
America7 the Fni-ersity of @ichigan Press"
4erlach Gernon! S M D"P Ely" %;=$" Teaching and +edia% Systematic Approach"
Be* Cersey7 Prentice Dall"
Damond! Dan" 2#$%%3" Design CurnalW$%7 The Conce)t of Board 4ame. nternet
Tessol! htt)7 55Board 4amege." Com"
66
Didayati! Siti" 2#$$93" The Efeect of Poc.et Chart To*ard Students S)ea.ing
Achie-ement for the Second Hear of @Ts @u/allimin B( Pancor in the
School Hear #$$95#$$=
Dornby A" S 2%;;$3" ?9ford Ad$ance Learner/s Dictionary of ;urrent English"
London7 0+ford Fni-ersity Pres"
Dornby A" S" 2%;;>3" ?9ford Learner/s Dictionary of ;urrent English" London7
0+ford Fni-ersity Pres"
1slamiyah! Suaibatul" 2#$$93" Teaching Speaking Through >;D for the Second
(ear Students of S+P. & La-uan !aji in the School (ear ,00@1,004" ST'1P
St" Didayati" D i Selong" Fn)ublished" SE% Thesis
'artono" 2#$%#3" ncreasing Students/ A-ility in )ritting Descripti$e Te9t -y
Using Students/ Photos for the Se$enth graders of S+P. & La-uan !aji in
the School (ear ,0&&1,0&," ST'1P Danan*adi Selong" Fn)ublished" SE%
Thesis"
@cDonough! Co M Sha*! C" #$$&" +aterials and +ethod in ELT" @alden7
Blac.*ell Publishing Ltd"
@unir! Ahmad" 2#$$>3" ;ommunication Strategies To#ard Students/ Speaking
A-ility% A ;lassroom Study of Speaking" Selong ST'1P St" Didayati" D i" SE%
Thesis" Fn)ublished"
Burgiyantoro! Burhan" %;;>" Penilaian dalam Pengajaran :ahasa dan Sastra"
Hogya.arta7 BPFEEH04HA'ARTA
Bur.encana! ( and Sumartana PPB" %;;:" E$aluasi Pendidikan" Surabaya"
Usaha .asional.
Poer*adarminta" (CS" 2%;=>3" Kamus Umum :ahasa ndonesia" Ca.arta7 Balai
Pusta.a"
Santyasa! (" 1" #$$9" +etodologi Penelitian Tindakan Kelas 3PTK'. The paper
#as presented in )orkshop Tentang Penelitian Tindakan Kelas -agi para
<uru S+P , dan A di .usa Penida Klungkung* pada tanggal 20 .opem-er
s.d & Desem-er ,004" Fni-ersitas Pendidi.an 4anesha7 Singara?a"
Sharma! Robina" 2#$%$3" @acro S.ill of S)ea.ing. ntrenet Tessol! htt)755*"*"*"
Eho*" Com"
Sud?ana! Bana" #$$6" Tuntunan Penyusunan Karya lmiah 3+akalah* Skripsi*
Tesis* Disertasi'" Bandung7 Sinar Baru Algensindo 0ffset"
6>
Sugiyono" #$$;" Statistika untuk Penelitian" Bandung7 Alfa Beta
Suharsimi! Ari.unto" 2#$$#3" +anajemen Penelitian" Hogya.arta7 PT" Rine.a Ci)ta"
Suharsimi! Ari.unto" 2#$$:3" Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik"
Ca.arta7 PT" Rine.a Ci)ta"
Suharsimi! Ari.unto" 2#$%$3" Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek"
Ca.arta" PT" Rine.a Ci)ta"
Sunardi" 2#$$63" Producti$e >oca-ulary +astery and Speaking A-ility of The
Second (ear Students of +A +u/allimin .) Pancor. n the school year
#$$&5#$$6" Selong ST'1P St" Didayati" D i" SE% Thesis" Fn)ublished
Tarigan! Denry 4untur" 2%;;$3" Prinsip7Prinsip Dasar Sastra" Bandung7 PT
A.sara"
Fr! Penny" %;;:" A ;ourse in Language Teaching% Practice and Theory"
Cambridge7 Cambridge Fni-ersity Press"
6:
69