quantum dots
Zhou Long, Jia Jia, Shanling Wang, Lu Kou, Xiandeng Hou, Michael J.
Sepaniak
PII:
DOI:
Reference:
S0026-265X(13)00154-9
doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2013.08.013
MICROC 1818
To appear in:
Microchemical Journal
Received date:
Accepted date:
20 August 2013
24 August 2013
Please cite this article as: Zhou Long, Jia Jia, Shanling Wang, Lu Kou, Xiandeng Hou, Michael J. Sepaniak, Visual enantioselective probe based on metal organic framework incorporating quantum dots, Microchemical Journal (2013), doi:
10.1016/j.microc.2013.08.013
This is a PDF le of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.
As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.
The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof
before it is published in its nal form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could aect the content, and all legal disclaimers that
apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
IP
SC
R
Zhou Longa, Jia Jiaa, Shanling Wanga, Lu Koub, Xiandeng Hou*a,b, Michael J.
NU
Sepaniak*c
Analytical & Testing Centre, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064, China.
MA
TE
U.S.A.
CE
P
Abstract
A new method was developed for visual enantioselective sensing based on quantum
dots (QDs) doped metal organic framework (MOF), which firstly combined the chiral
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1. Introduction
The study of chiral recognition has received compelling attention in recent years, which
IP
SC
R
catalysis [2], and the development of chiral separation [3] and sensing [4]. During the
past few years, considerable efforts have been devoted to the development of simple,
NU
effective and low-cost enantioselective sensors [5], while the design of visual
discrimination of enantiomers, which is more convenient, direct, and low-cost for no
MA
analytical instrument needed, still remains challenging. By present, only a few examples
of visual chiral recognition have been reported, by discernable colour change or
precipitate formation caused by the interactions between target enantiomers and the
TE
sensing platforms using modified nanoparticles [6] or gels [7]. Further exploration of
CE
P
AC
decade, FL probes involving QDs have been employed for bio/chemical sensing [8],
following the turn-off mechanism through FL quenching of QDs caused by the
interaction between QDs and target analytes [9]. The broad absorption band in the
visible region of QDs makes it easy to achieve visual sensing [10]. MOFs are extended
crystalline structures wherein metal cations or clusters of cations are connected by
multitopic organic strut or linker ions or molecules [11], and they have already been
used in asymmetric catalysis [12], separation [13] and chromatography [14]. Moreover,
its intrinsic chiral topology, cavity confinement effect and conformational rigidity,
make MOF become an ideal sensing platform for chiral recognition. Up to now, only a
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
few examples concerning MOF-based enantioselective sensors have been reported [15],
but the research goal of visual chiral recognition employing MOF has rarely been
realized. Buso et al. [16] lately incorporated QD within MOF for visual molecular
IP
discrimination based on molecular size, but a high level of visual chiral specificity
SC
R
needs to be achieved by both shape and size selectivity, which will be accomplished by
NU
MA
2.1. Apparatus
The microwave reactor (Uwave-1000) was purchased from Sineo Microwave Chemistry
Technology (Shanghai, China). The microwave working frequency was at 2450 MHz
TE
and the probe ultrasonic working frequency was between 26-28 KHz. The FL data were
CE
P
collected from an F-7000 FL Spectrometer (Hitachi, Japan) with a 390 nm optical filter.
The powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns were obtained from an X'Pert Pro MPD
(Philips, Netherlands) using Cuka radiation. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
AC
images were obtained from a JEOL model JSM-7500F scanning electron microscope.
The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained from an FEI Tecnai
G2 F20 S-TWIN transmission electron microscope.
2.2. Reagents
All of the chemicals used are AR grade. Ultrapure water (18.25 Mcm) produced with
a purification water machine (PCWJ-10, Pure Technology Co. Ltd, Chengdu, China)
was used throughout this work. Sodium tellurite, mercaptopropionic acid, D- and Ltartaric acid, D- and L-dimethyl tartrate, D- and L-mandelic acid, were purchased from
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
obtained from Kelong Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. (Chengdu, China); D-camphoric acid
IP
and 4, 4-dipyridyl were ordered from Juhui Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. (Chengdu,
SC
R
China). All chemicals and standards were kept at 4 oC in a refrigerator until use.
NU
The QDs were prepared with a procedure similar to the one-pot synthetic method
MA
reported previously [17]. 0.5 mmol CdCl22.5H2O and 200 mg trisodium citrate
dehydrate were dissolved in 50 mL water, followed by instant addition of 52 L
mercaptopropionic acid (MPA). The pH of the solution was adjusted to 10.5, followed
TE
by the addition of 0.1 mmol Na2TeO3 and 50 mg NaBH4. The solution was then placed
CE
P
in a microwave reactor set at 100 oC to produce the QDs capped with MPA, with no
extra pressure applied. With the increase of reaction time, the FL emission was red
shifted (Fig. 1). The obtained solution containing the QDs was then concentrated by
AC
reducing the volume to 10 mL, mixed with the same volume of ethanol and then
centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 15 min. Dark red powder was obtained at the bottom of the
solution, which was then collected and dissolved in water.
Fig.1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
demonstrate our idea. The intrinsic structure of D-camphoric acid leads to its easy
bending, which is conducive to forming an enantioselective interface due to an easily
distorted pattern of secondary building unit (SBU) [19] (Fig. 2). The MOF precursors
IP
were prepared by mixing 0.2 mmol Zn(NO3)26H2O, 0.2 mmol D-camphoric acid and
SC
R
NU
150 min. Then, light red powder crystals could be observed. After cool down to room
temperature, the obtained red powder was washed several times with DMF and
MA
ultrapure water.
TE
Fig. 2
CE
P
Compared with previous work about the synthesis of QD@MOF composites [16, 20], a
simple synthesis procedure with less time was developed. Small and homogenouslyQD@MOF
AC
sized
particles
were
obtained,
and
cheaper
dispersant
of
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
MOF cavities based on their size, so it can be expected that the proposed method would
have practical utility.
The QD@MOF started to grow due to high affinity between the carboxyl group of
IP
MPA and the Zn-rich metal centres, which was conducive to organized adsorption of D-
SC
R
camphoric acid, formation of SBUs, and the ultimate embedding of the QDs within the
formed MOF framework [23]. The obtained QD@MOF particles appeared light red,
NU
which were thoroughly rinsed with DMF and water. Moreover, no obvious change in
FL signals of the QDs was seen upon the addition of any reactant, which demonstrates
MA
that the QDs kept stable all through the synthesis process of the QD@MOF.
In Fig. 3a&3b, it can be obviously seen that the QDs (dark spots with similar size)
TE
microscope (TEM) images of the QD@MOF, while no similar dark spots were
CE
P
observed in the TEM image of the MOF (Fig. 3c). It should also be mentioned that
Yang et al. [24] lately showed the TEM images of ZnO QDs inside porous carbon,
which looked very similar to those in Fig. 3d, while QDs (Fig. 3e) on the surface look
AC
different, showing clear lattice lines that images of the QD@MOF do not have.
Moreover, according to the spectra of powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) (Fig. 4), the
dominating peaks of the MOF were consistent with previously reported [13], which
also remained in the spectra of the QD@MOF regardless of some emerging peaks of
the QDs. This demonstrates that the chiral topology structure of the MOF was well
retained even with the QDs caged inside.
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
suspension with a density of 60 g/mL, which appeared red (Fig. 5a). For the
IP
suspension, with excitation at 365 nm, two emission bands were obtained at 463 nm
SC
R
(MOF) and 615 nm (QD), which are significantly blue shifted compared to that of
MOF (472 nm) and QD (643 nm), respectively (Fig. 6). This blue shift relates to the
NU
increase of the band gap correlated to QD particle size (quantum-size effect) [25]. 10
L of 5 mg/mL of each of six enantiomers (D- and L-tartaric acid, D- and L-dimethyl
MA
tartrate, D- and L-mandelic acid) in DMF was added into 1 mL of the afore-mentioned
suspension. After 4 h, only L-tartaric acid caused the colour change from red to blue
(Fig. 5a), while the others did not cause any obvious colour change at all. The
TE
phenomena highly suggest that the QD@MOF can be employed for enantioselective
CE
P
sensing of tartaric acid. Furthermore, eleven tartaric acid solutions of varied e.e.% were
added into eleven same QD@MOF suspension, one for each. After 4 h, it can be
observed that the colour of the suspensions changed from red to blue (inset of Fig. 7) as
AC
e. e.% increased from -100% to 100% due to different QD quenching extents, and each
specific tartaric acid gave a unique appearance. Moreover, several different dispersants
were tested, with DMF giving the best result. The phenomena indicate that the proposed
QD@MOF-based visual enantioselective sensing method can not only accomplish fast
qualification of specific enantiomer but also provide useful information for preliminary
quantification.
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Fig. 7
In order to validate the chiral recognition of the QD@MOF, several experiments based
IP
similar size to MOF cavity diffuse in, they are very easy to be stuck inside the
SC
R
NU
radiative decay was increased, all of which can cause FL intensity of MOF increased
[26]. Moreover, from Fig. 8, it can be seen that even 12 h after the addition of L-tartaric
MA
acid, the MOF structure was well maintained because the FL signal of the MOF stayed
high and the wavelength of the MOF peak did not change. Or else, FL would be
quenched if the MOF structure were destroyed. As far as our experiments are concerned,
TE
DMF might act as a collisional quencher [27], and upon the replacement of DMF by
CE
P
any enantiomer diffusing in, the quenching effect might be eliminated, which can also
result in the increase of FL intensity of the MOF. For the FL experiments performed,
firstly, the QD quenching was studied by adding each enantiomer into 1 mL of 0.1 mM
AC
QD solution (without the MOF). The QDs were quenched immediately and the FL
intensity of the QD solution decreased by about 95% (Fig. 5b) except D- and Ldimethyl tartrate. Secondly, D- and L-tartaric acid, and D- and L-mandelic acid was
added into the QD@MOF suspension, respectively. On one hand, the addition of Dand L-mandelic acid did not cause obvious change in FL intensity of even after 12 h
(Fig. 8), most probably because it was difficult for them to diffuse into the framework
based on size selectivity of the MOF. On the other hand, significant difference was
observed in the FL signal change after the addition of D- and L-tartaric acid,
respectively. FL intensity of the QDs decreased sharply less than 0.5 h after the addition
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
of L-tartaric acid (Fig. 5c), while the decrease of FL intensity of the QDs was much less
even 4 h after the addition of D-tartaric acid (Fig. 5d). The mostly possible explanation
is that L-tartaric acid could diffuse faster and more easily into the MOF and quench the
IP
QDs caged in the frameworks than D-tartaric acid based on chiral selectivity of the
SC
R
MOF. Thirdly, with the increase of L-tartaric acid concentration (Fig. 9) or e.e.% of
tartaric acid (Fig. 7), FL intensity of the MOF increased and QD decreased in a linear
NU
fashion, respectively, which illustrates that the proposed method is applicable for
quantification of the enatiomers, even without preliminary separation. Fourthly, D-
MA
dimethyl tartrate and L-dimethyl tartrate, the according ester enantiomers of D- and Ltartaric acid, were tested as well. The change of FL intensity of the MOF caused by the
addition of L-dimethyl tartrate was much more than D-dimethyl tartrate (Fig. 8) with
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
AC
CE
P
TE
the same concentration, which further validates the enantioselectivity of the MOF.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
enantiomers. First, one specific MOF has been proved to be able to accomplish the
IP
chiral separation for quite a few pairs of enantiomers, with varied mobile phase
SC
R
NU
more than one pair of enatiomers which can cause QD quenching. Second, the catalogue
of MOF materials with various chiral topology is growing fast, and some of them have
MA
as long as the right MOF is found or prepared. In short, the proposed strategy herein
CE
P
TE
will have good perspective for visual enantioselective sensing in the future.
Acknowledgements
AC
China (No. 21205083), Sichuan Bureau of Science and Technology (11DXYB353SF027) and Sichuan University (No. 2011SCU11070), and assistance from our Analytical
& Testing Centre for SEM, TEM and PXRD data.
References
[1] X. Xiao, X. Liu, S. Dong, Y. Cai, L. Lin and X. Feng, Asymmetric synthesis of 2,3dihydroquinolin-4-one derivatives catalyzed by a chiral bisguanidium salt, Chem. Eur.
J., 18 (2012) 15922-15926.
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[2] S.-Y. Li, Y.-W. Xu, J.-M. Liu and C.-Y. Su, Inherently chiral Calixarenes: synthesis,
optical resolution, chiral recognition and asymmetric catalysis, Inter. J. Mol. Sci., 12
(2011) 429-455.
IP
[3] M.-J. Paik, J. S. Kang, B.-Y. Huang, J. R. Carey and W. Lee, Development and
SC
R
NU
[4] K. Hirose, Y. Yachi and Y. Tobe, Novel chiral recognition beyond the limitation due
MA
to the law of mass action: highly enantioselective chiral sensing based on non-linear
response in phase transition events, Chem. Commun., 47 (2011) 6617-6619.
[5] a) Z. Dai, J. Lee and W. Zhang, Chiroptical switches: applications in sensing and
TE
CE
P
sensing using stereodynamic probes with distinct electronic circular dichroism output,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 42 (2013) 5408-5424.
[6] W. Wei, L. Wu, C. Xu, J. Ren and X. Qu, A general approach using spiroborate
AC
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
IP
SC
R
NU
MA
TE
chiral porous solids containing only achiral building blocks, Nat. Chem., 2 (2010) 353-
CE
P
361.
AC
2 (2010) 838-846.
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
(2011) 3831-3833.
IP
SC
R
NU
[17] Z. Sheng, H. Han, X. Hu and C. Chi, One-step growth of high luminescence CdTe
quantum dots with low cytotoxicity in ambient atmospheric conditions, Dalton Trans.,
MA
39 (2010) 7017-7020.
TE
CE
P
AC
[20] N. Chen, M.-X. Li, P. Yang, X. He, M. Shao and S.-R. Zhu, Chiral coordination
polymers with SHG-active and luminescence: an unusual homochiral 3D MOF
constructed from achiral components, Cryst. Growth. Des., 13 (2013) 2650-2660.
[21] T.-T. Gan, Y.-J. Zhang, N.-J. Zhao, X. Xiao, G.-F. Yin, S.-H. Yu, H.-B. Wang, J.B. Duan, C.-Y. Shi and W.-Q. Liu, Hydrothermal synthetic mercaptopropionic acid
stabled CdTe quantum dots as fluorescent probes for detection of Ag+, Spectrochim.
Acta. A., 99 (2012) 62-68.
[22] Y.-S. Xia and C.-Q. Zhu, Interaction of CdTe nanocrystals with thiol-containing
amino acids at different pH: a fluorimetric study, Microchimica Acta, 164 (2009) 29-34.
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
IP
[24] S. J. Yang, S. Nam, T. Kim, J. H. Im, H. Jung, J. H. Kang, S. Wi, B. Park and C. R.
SC
R
NU
(2013) 7394-7397.
MA
Fischer, GaN@ZIF-8: selective formation of gallium nitride quantum dots inside a zinc
methylimidazolate framework, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 133 (2011) 16370-16373.
TE
Hupp, Metalorganic framework materials as chemical sensors, Chem. Rev., 112 (2011)
CE
P
1105-1125.
[27] H. Wang, W. Yang and Z.-M. Sun, Mixed-ligand Zn-MOFs for highly luminescent
AC
Figures
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
SC
R
IP
NU
Fig.1 Normalized CdTe QD (QD) FL emission spectra at different reaction time ranging
AC
CE
P
TE
MA
Fig.2 The secondary building units of the Zn2camph2bipy (MOF). The pink balls stand
for Zn atoms, the sky blue balls stand for O atoms, and the gray balls stand for C atoms.
H atoms are omitted. The figure is drawn with the Diamond software (version 3.2i,
Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany).
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
NU
SC
R
IP
Fig. 3 TEM image of the QD@MOF (a, b and d), the MOF (c) and the QDs (e), as well
MA
as scanning electron microscope image of the QD@MOF (f). Scale bar: 20 nm for (a),
AC
CE
P
TE
10 nm for (b) and (c), 2 nm for (d) and (e), and 100 nm for (f).
Fig. 4 PXRD spectra of the synthesized MOF (black) and the QD@MOF (green). The
red bars were stimulated based on the according CheckCIF file of the MOF.
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
NU
SC
R
IP
MA
Fig. 5 (a) Time evolution of UV-excited (292 nm) QD@MOF fluorescent photographs
with injection of L-tartaric acid; (b) Time evolution of QD percentage (%) FL intensity
with the injection of tartaric acid; (c, d) 3D time-resolved evolution of normalized FL
TE
intensity of the QD@MOF after the injection of L-tartaric acid (c) and D-tartaric acid
AC
CE
P
(d).
Fig.6 FL emission spectra of the MOF (blue), the QD (red) and the QD@MOF (black), excited at
365 nm.
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
SC
R
IP
NU
CE
P
TE
MA
Fig. 8 FL spectra of the QD@MOF 12 h after the addition of D- and L-mandelic acid;
AC
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
CE
P
TE
MA
NU
SC
R
IP
Fig. 9 FL spectra of the QD@MOF suspension 4 h after adding L-tartaric acid with
different concentrations (top), and the calibration plot of the FL intensity of the MOF
(middle) and the QD (bottom) changing with the increase of L-tartaric acid
concentration.
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
CE
P
TE
MA
NU
SC
R
IP
Highlights
Combining size and shape selectivity of MOF and sensing of QD quenching for visual
enantioselective sensing;
A simple synthesis procedure with much less reaction time for small and
homogenously-sized QD@MOF particles;
Direct and convenient for visual enantioselective sensing.
20