Anda di halaman 1dari 10

9/9/2014 AMD FX-6100 vs FX-6300

http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/295/AMD_FX-Series_FX-6100_vs_AMD_FX-Series_FX-6300.html 1/10
Mini-review
Specifications
Benchmarks
vs A10-5800K
vs FX-4300
vs FX-8100
vs A10-6800K
vs FX-4300
vs FX-6350
vs FX-8120 (95W)
vs FX-8120
SEARCH CPU-WORLD
Search site contents:
Go
News Chips Information Forum Links About
BSP CPU FPU MCU SoC Other ICs Curiosities
AMD FX-6100 vs FX-6300
Mini Review
AMD FX-6100 advantages
None
AMD FX-6300 advantages
Picture
is not
available
In single-threaded tasks, the FX-6300 has 25% better performance.
Multi-threaded performance of the AMD FX-6300 is higher.
In memory-intensive programs, the CPU has 16% better
performance.
In graphics tasks, the AMD FX-6300 processor is about 4% faster.
The microprocessor features F16C and FMA3 instructions. These
extensions are not extensively supported by applications yet, but
their support should improve in future apps.
The FX-6300 has 15% better price/performance ratio than the AMD
FX-6100 CPU.
FX-6100 vs FX-6300 performance comparison
The charts in the section below show relative performance of FX-6100 and FX-6300 CPUs in a few
different kinds of tasks. To calculate displayed numbers we averaged results for a number of tests
for each specific type of task. As such, the shown results may differ from results, that you may
receive in individual benchmarks. We also averaged the numbers for application type specific
benchmarks and all-around performance benchmarks, and presented them in the 'Overall
performance' chart. The 'Price-performance ratio' chart displays how much more performance you
will get per dollar spent. The cost of other system parts is not included in this ratio.
Single-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0


1

1.25


Higher is better
Multi-threaded performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0


1

1.15


Higher is better
Memory-intensive applications
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0


1

1.16


Higher is better
Discrete Graphics performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0


1

1.04


Higher is better
Overall performance
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4


1

1.15

Price / performance ratio
2
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4


1

1.15

Jump to:
CPUIDs
Comments

Popular comparisons:
FX-6100:
vs FX-8320
vs FX-8350
vs Q6600
FX-6300:
vs FX-8320
vs FX-8350
vs i3-3220
vs i3-4130

More comparisons
Compare AMD FX-6100 with...
Other FX-Series CPU:
AMD FX-4100 Go
Any CPU:
Compare AMD FX-6300 with...
Other FX-Series CPU:
AMD FX-4100 Go
Any CPU:
Note: To see differences with any CPU, type in any
combination of the following into the "Any CPU"
field: manufacturer name, full or partial family
name, model number, part number, core name,
socket name, operating frequency, bus speed (must
have FSB suffix), and the last level cache. Here are
some valid searches:
i5-3570K
Intel Celeron 2 GHz
Bulldozer
9/9/2014 AMD FX-6100 vs FX-6300
http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/295/AMD_FX-Series_FX-6100_vs_AMD_FX-Series_FX-6300.html 2/10
0

Higher is better
0

Higher is better
- AMD FX-6100 - AMD FX-6300
Please see the "Benchmarks" tab for full list of benchmarks, demonstrating difference in
performance between FX-6100 and AMD FX-6300 in various types of programs.
FX-6100 vs FX-6300 power consumption and price comparison
Thermal Design Power
110
88
66
44
22
0

95W 95W

Lower is better
Current official price
200
160
120
80
40
0


$112

$112


Lower is better
Detailed side by side comparison of FX-6100 vs FX-6300 specs can be found in the
"Specifications" tab. Even more detailed comparison of internal features of both processors is
located in the "CPUIDs" tab.
Pros and Cons summary
FX-6100

FX-6300
General recommendations:
None

General recommendations:
Performs faster in all application
types,
Insignificantly higher graphics
performance,
Supports F16C / FMA3 instructions,
Somewhat better price / performance
ratio
Drawbacks:
Somewhat lower overall performance,
Slightly slow in graphics programs,
Does not support some instructions,
Somewhat worse price / performance
ratio

Drawbacks:
None
Similar processors
FX-6100

FX-6300
AMD FX-6300 vs FX-4170
AMD FX-6300 vs FX-6120
AMD FX-6300 vs FX-6200

AMD FX-6100 vs FX-4350
AMD FX-6100 vs FX-6350
AMD FX-6100 vs FX-8300
Similar microprocessors use the same socket and architecture as FX-6100 and AMD FX-6300.
Pentium 4 800FSB
AMD 3.3GHz 8MB
Specifications
Please visit AMD FX-6100 and AMD FX-6300 pages for more detailed specifications of both microprocessors.
AMD FX-6100 AMD FX-6300
Market segment Desktop
Manufacturer AMD
Family FX-Series
Basic details
Model number FX-6100 FX-6300
CPU part number FD6100WMW6KGU FD6300WMW6KHK
Box part number FD6100WMGUSBX FD6300WMHKBOX
Introduction date October 12, 2011 October 23, 2012
Current official price $112 (as of Jul 2014)

CPU features
Core name Zambezi Vishera
Platform name Scorpius Volan
Microarchitecture Bulldozer Piledriver
9/9/2014 AMD FX-6100 vs FX-6300
http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/295/AMD_FX-Series_FX-6100_vs_AMD_FX-Series_FX-6300.html 3/10
Technology (micron) 0.032
Data width (bits) 64
Socket Socket AM3+
Frequency (MHz) 3300 3500
Turbo Frequency (MHz) 3900 / 3600 4100
Bus speed (MHz) 2600 (HT/QPI)
L1 cache 192 KB (code) / 96 KB (data)
L2 cache (KB) 6144
L3 cache (KB) 8192
Max temperature (C) 70
TDP (Watt) 95
Cores 6
Threads 6
Multiprocessing 1

Instruction set extensions
AES / Advanced Encryption Standard +
AMD64 / EM64T 64-bit technology +
AVX / Advanced Vector Extensions +
BMI1 / Bit Manipulation - +
F16C / 16-bit Floating-Point conversion - +
FMA3 / 3-operand Fused Multiply-Add - +
FMA4 / 4-operand Fused Multiply-Add +
MMX +
SSE +
SSE2 +
SSE3 +
SSE4.1 +
SSE4.2 +
SSSE3 / Supplemental SSE3 +
XOP / eXtended Operations +

Supported technologies
PowerNow! / Enhanced SpeedStep +
Turbo Core / Turbo Boost +
Unlocked multiplier +
Virtualization +
Virus Protection / Execute Disable bit +

Integrated Graphics
GPU Type None

Integrated Memory Controller(s)
The number of controllers 1
Memory channels 2
Supported memory DDR3-1866
Maximum memory bandwidth (GB/s) 29.9
Notes:
Rows with different specifications or features are highlighted .
For detailed specifications of "AMD FX-6100" or "AMD FX-6300" parts please click on the links in the table header.
Benchmarks
System setup
Below is a complete set of AMD FX-6100 and FX-6300 benchmarks from our CPU benchmark database. Both microprocessors were tested on ASUS
Sabertooth 990FX motherboard with 4GB dual-channel Crucial BallistixPC3-14900 (DDR3-1866) memory, and MSI R6670 1GB GDDR5 (ATI Radeon)
graphics.
All tests were performed at default frequency and voltage, using manufacturer's stock fan/heatsink. None of the components were overclocked.
Motherboard BIOS options were left at default settings.
The results of all benchmarks are broken into four categories: multi-threaded, single-threaded, memory intensive and graphics / gaming.
FX-6100 vs FX-6300 single-threaded benchmarks
Single-threaded benchmarks run on a single CPU core, and do not depend on such features as the number of cores, or Hyper-Threading technology.
Additionally, they do not utilize on-chip caches, dedicated to other cores.
AMD FX-6100 AMD FX-6300
9/9/2014 AMD FX-6100 vs FX-6300
http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/295/AMD_FX-Series_FX-6100_vs_AMD_FX-Series_FX-6300.html 4/10
3DMark03 CPU score benchmark
Uses DirectX software vertex shader to run Wings of Fury and Trolls' Lair games, and calculates a 3DMark03 CPU score based on averaged number of
frames per second, achieved by the CPU/GPU combination.
100%
85.7%
CINEBENCH R10 CPU score (1 core) benchmark
Measures performance of a single-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
77.1%
FLAC encoding - single process benchmark
Reports the number of songs, converted by a single CPU core from WAV to FLAC format using the best possible compression.
100%
79.0%
H.264 video encoding - single process benchmark
Measures the number of frames, converted by one CPU thread from MPEG2 format to H.264 format using high quality settings.
100%
78.5%
LAME MP3 encoding - single process benchmark
Reports the number of MP3 songs, encoded by one CPU core per one minute.
100%
77.6%
AMD FX-6100 AMD FX-6300
PCMark2002 CPU score benchmark
100%
77.7%
Super PI (1M) benchmark
Measures time, required to calculate the first 1 million digits after the decimal point in the number Pi.
100%
91.7%
XVid video encoding - single process benchmark
Reports how many frames per second can be transcoded by a single CPU core from MPEG2 to XVid (MPEG4) format, utilizing single-pass conversion
method.
100%
76.9%
FX-6100 vs FX-6300 multi-threaded benchmarks
Multi-threaded benchmarks utilize all CPU cores and other on-chip resources (on-chip caches, internal buffers, etc). Intel's Hyper-Threading feature also
helps to improve multi-threading performance.
AMD FX-6100 AMD FX-6300
3DMark06 CPU score benchmark
Estimates processor performance based on how fast it runs such CPU-intensive code as game logic, physics and pathfinding AI. The test requires
DirectX 9.0.
100%
84.5%
Apache web server - dynamic pages benchmark
9/9/2014 AMD FX-6100 vs FX-6300
http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/295/AMD_FX-Series_FX-6100_vs_AMD_FX-Series_FX-6300.html 5/10
Shows an average number of dynamic HTML pages served per second by local instance of Apache 1.3.41 web server. The test has much greater error
margin than other tests.
100%
92.8%
Apache web server - static pages benchmark
Shows an average number of very simple static HTML pages served per second by local Apache 1.3.41 web server. The test has much greater error
margin than other tests.
100%
89.7%
Blowfish encryption benchmark
Reports encryption speed of pre-defined 32KB text block. The data is encrypted using Blowfish algorithm.
100%
82.1%
CINEBENCH R10 CPU score benchmark
Measures performance of multi-core rendering of a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
88.4%
AMD FX-6100 AMD FX-6300
CINEBENCH R10 render time (seconds) benchmark
Measures time taken to render a photo-realistic 3D image using CINEMA 4D software engine.
100%
88.4%
CrystalMark ALU benchmark
Runs Fibonacci, Napierian, Eratosthenes and QuickSort integer performance tests on all CPU cores, and reports the sum of results.
100%
81.5%
CrystalMark FPU benchmark
Executes MikoFPU, RandMeanSS, FFT and Mandelbrot FPU-dependent tests using all CPU cores, and reports the sum of results.
100%
87.2%
Euler3D benchmark
100%
81.8%
FLAC encoding - multiple processes benchmark
Reports the number of songs, converted from WAV to FLAC format by all CPU cores using the best possible compression.
100%
90.6%
AMD FX-6100 AMD FX-6300
Fritz Chess Benchmark benchmark
100%
93.8%
H.264 video encoding - multiple processes benchmark
Measures the number of frames, converted by all logical processors from MPEG2 format to H.264 format using single-pass method and high quality
settings.
100%
9/9/2014 AMD FX-6100 vs FX-6300
http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/295/AMD_FX-Series_FX-6100_vs_AMD_FX-Series_FX-6300.html 6/10
87.6%
H.264 video encoding - multithreaded benchmark
Measures the number of frames, converted by all logical processors from MPEG2 format to H.264 format using multi-threading system calls, dual-pass
method and high quality settings.
100%
87.5%
LAME MP3 encoding - multiple processes benchmark
Reports the number of MP3 songs, encoded by all CPU cores per one minute.
100%
89.1%
MySQL 5.0.96 - selecting data benchmark
Shows sustained number of SQL requests per second served by local instance of MySQL server v5.0.96. This test scales well with the number of CPU
cores.
100%
81.5%
AMD FX-6100 AMD FX-6300
PCMark05 CPU score benchmark
100%
81.1%
PCMark05 score benchmark
100%
87.4%
Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) benchmark
Runs Dhrystone test on all cores, and reports estimated integer performance in MIPS (Millions of Instructions Per Second).
100%
97.2%
Sandra MultiMedia Floating Point (it/s) benchmark
100%
90.5%
Sandra MultiMedia Integer (it/s) benchmark
100%
92.4%
AMD FX-6100 AMD FX-6300
Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) benchmark
Runs Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per Second).
100%
91.4%
Sandra Whetstone SSE2 (MFLOPS) benchmark
Runs SSE2-enabled Whetstone test on all cores, and reports estimated floating-point performance in MFLOPS (Millions of Floating-Point Operations Per
Second).
100%
95.0%
XVid video encoding - multiple processes benchmark
Reports how many frames per second can be transcoded by all CPU cores from MPEG2 to XVid (MPEG4) format, utilizing single-pass conversion
method.
100%
9/9/2014 AMD FX-6100 vs FX-6300
http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/295/AMD_FX-Series_FX-6100_vs_AMD_FX-Series_FX-6300.html 7/10
87.4%
wPrime v1.55 (32M) benchmark
wPrime benchmark measures time taken to calculate square roots of numbers from 1 to 33554431.
100%
91.8%
FX-6100 vs FX-6300 graphics benchmarks
Graphics benchmarks depend on the type of integrated or discrete graphics adapter, and to less extent on the processor performance. Because these
benchmarks are synthetic, they may not truly represent gaming performance. However, they still can be used to estimate whether one processor will
perform faster or slower than another CPU in games and other 3D tasks.
AMD FX-6100 AMD FX-6300
3DMark03 game score benchmark
Measures graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs using 4 different game simulations, that have varying level of DirectX
support from version 7 to version 9.
100%
96.0%
3DMark06 3DMark score benchmark
Measures 3D graphics and game performance of CPU/GPU combination by running 4 game simulations, that make extensive use of DirectX 9.0/9.0C
capabilities.
100%
94.7%
3DMark2001 score benchmark
Runs a series of game simulations and feature tests to measure graphics and 3D game performance of discrete and integrated GPUs. It utilizes a single
CPU core, and it is compatible with DirectX 8 and later APIs.
100%
78.0%
CINEBENCH R10 OpenGL score benchmark
100%
78.6%
PCMark05 Graphics score benchmark
100%
97.1%
FX-6100 vs FX-6300 memory performance
Memory-intensive tests or programs move large amounts of data to/from memory, and they depend more on memory throughput and the size of on-
chip caches, rather than on CPU integer/FP/SIMD performance.
AMD FX-6100 AMD FX-6300
7Zip compressing/decompressing speed (1 thread) benchmark
100%
88.2%
CrystalMark Memory benchmark
Evaluates Read, Write, Read/Write and Cache memory bandwidth score. The final result is the sum of measured results.
100%
97.6%
9/9/2014 AMD FX-6100 vs FX-6300
http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/295/AMD_FX-Series_FX-6100_vs_AMD_FX-Series_FX-6300.html 8/10
PCMark05 Memory score benchmark
100%
84.1%
PCMark2002 Memory score benchmark
100%
79.4%
WinRAR compressing/decompressing speed benchmark
100%
87.9%
CPUIDs
The table below compares two random CPUID records for AMD FX-6100 and AMD FX-6300 microprocessors, that were submitted to our CPUID database.
CPUID 1 CPUID 2
Manufacturer AMD
CPU Family FX-Series
Model / Processor Number FX-6100 FX-6300
Frequency 3311 MHz 3511 MHz
CWID version 0.4
Part number FD6100WMW6KGU FD6300WMW6KHK
S-Spec / Stepping Code FA 1137GPM FA 1234PGN

General information
Vendor AuthenticAMD
Processor name (BIOS) AMD FX(tm)-6100 Six-Core Processor AMD FX(tm)-6300 Six-Core Processor
Cores 6
Compute units 3
Logical processors 6
Processor type Original OEM Processor
Core stepping OR-B2 OR-C0
CPUID signature 600F12 600F20
Family 21 (015h)
Model 1 (01h) 2 (02h)
Stepping 2 (02h) 0 (00h)
Socket AM3+

Cache
L1 data: Associativity 4-way set associative
L1 data: Line size 64 bytes
L1 data: Lines per tag 1
L1 data: Size 6 x 16 KB
L1 instruction: Associativity 2-way set associative
L1 instruction: Comments 1 cache per 2 cores
L1 instruction: Line size 64 bytes
L1 instruction: Lines per tag 1
L1 instruction: Size 3 x 64 KB
L2: Associativity 16-way set associative
L2: Comments 1 cache per 2 cores
L2: Line size 64 bytes
L2: Lines per tag 1
L2: Size 3 x 2 MB
L3: Associativity 64-way set associative
L3: Comments Shared between all cores
L3: Line size 64 bytes
L3: Lines per tag 1
Looking For A 100% Open Source
ESB? Try WSO2 ESB - World's
Fastest ESB!
9/9/2014 AMD FX-6100 vs FX-6300
http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/295/AMD_FX-Series_FX-6100_vs_AMD_FX-Series_FX-6300.html 9/10
L3: Size 8 MB

Instruction set extensions
AES +
AMD extensions to MMX +
AVX +
BMI1 - +
F16C - +
FMA - +
FMA4 +
MMX +
SSE +
SSE2 +
SSE3 +
SSE4.1 +
SSE4.2 +
SSE4A +
SSSE3 +
TBM - +
XOP +

Additional instructions
Advanced Bit manipulation +
CLFLUSH +
CMOV +
CMPXCHG16B +
CMPXCHG8B +
FXSAVE/FXRSTORE +
MONITOR/MWAIT +
PCLMULDQ +
POPCNT +
PREFETCH/PREFETCHW +
RDTSCP +
SKINIT/STGI support +
SYSCALL/SYSRET +
SYSENTER/SYSEXIT +
XSAVE/XRESTORE states +

Major features
64-bit / Intel 64 +
NX bit/XD-bit +
On-chip Floating Point Unit +
PowerNow! / Cool'n'Quiet +
Secure Virtual Machine (Virtualization) +
Turbo Core +

Other features
1 GB large page support +
100MHz multiplier control +
128-bit SSE instructions +
36-bit page-size extensions +
Advanced programmable interrupt
controller
+
Core multi-processing legacy mode +
Debugging extensions +
Extended APIC space +
FXSAVE/FXRSTOR optimizations +
Hardware P-state control +
Hardware thermal control +
Instruction based sampling +
LAHF/SAHF support in 64-bit mode +
LBR virtualization +
LOCK MOV CR0 means MOV CR8 +
Lightweight profiling support +
Machine check architecture +
Machine check exception +
9/9/2014 AMD FX-6100 vs FX-6300
http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/295/AMD_FX-Series_FX-6100_vs_AMD_FX-Series_FX-6300.html 10/10
Memory-type range registers +
Misaligned SSE mode +
Model-specific registers +
Nested page tables +
OS visible workaround +
Page attribute table +
Page global extension +
Page-size extensions (4MB pages) +
Physical address extensions +
SVM lock +
Support for NRIP save +
THERMTRIP +
TSC rate is ensured to be invariant across
all states
+
Temperature sensor +
Time stamp counter +
Translation Cache Extension - +
Virtual 8086-mode enhancements +
Watchdog timer support +
+ - feature is supported
- - feature is not supported
Features, not supported by all processors in the table, are not displayed
Comments (0)
Post comment / picture
Last modified: 31 Aug 2014
Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Contact Us (c) Copyright 2003 - 2010 Gennadiy Shvets