Anda di halaman 1dari 2

Figurative Language

Some definitions and examples


Metaphor: A metaphor speaks of something as though it were something else. There are three kinds of
metaphor:
1. The descriptive metaphor speaks of something concrete by referring to something else concrete.
Take for example: "It was a fine day. The trees swayed like dancers lost in reverie. As they
waltzed the afternoon away the breeze continued to wind its mournful tune."
2. ( The abstract metaphor explains an abstract principle by comparing it to something more
concrete. For example: "My cup runneth over." (The writer of this biblical Psalm speaks of the
life that submits to divinity in terms of a cup that is full and continues to be filled.)
3. The embedded metaphor uses a verb or a noun in a non-literal fashion. For example: "The
darkness threw itself upon the land with a sigh of relief." (Obviously darkness cannot really
throw itself upon the land-- it only seems to do so. The metaphor "The darkness threw itself
upon the land" is embedded because it merely suggests that the night is like a lover
overwhelmed after a long absence or a man exhausted after a hard day at work.)
Simile: A simile is a particular kind of metaphor that speaks of something as similar to something else.
You can usually recognize similes by the presence of the word "like" or "as." For example: Alice is a very
beautiful young woman: she is as pretty as a rose.
Hyperbole: A hyperbole is an exaggeration so great that no one could possible take it literally. For
example: "He made my skin crawl." (We don't expect that the speaker in such a case be physically
affected by her encounter with another person: she simply doesn't like him and has expressed the
extent of her dislike by exaggerating).
Understatement: An understatement seeks to express a thought or impression by underemphasizing
the extent to which a statement may be true. Understatement is the opposite of hyperbole and is
frequently employed for its comedic value in articles, speeches, etc. when issues of great importance are
being discussed. For example: "Jen had stolen his watch, put a dent in his car, and kept him from
spending time with his buddies. Needless to say, Jack had acquired a less than favorable opinion of his
ex-girlfriend."
Irony: Irony involves making a statement that means the opposite of what it states literally. Suppose
you happen to be experiencing a streak of bad luck: your house has been robbed, your cat just died,
your best friend is mad at you, and this morning you backed your car into a tree. You cry in
exasperation: "Well that's just great!" Clearly you don't mean that you're happy about this sequence of
events: you have just made an ironic statement. You may also encounter irony in pieces of literature or
anecdotes. One of the most famous examples of literary irony is Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet: it is
ironic that the lovers die as a result of the plan that was meant to ensure their spending the rest of their
lives together.
Synecdoche: In synecdoche a part of something represents the whole. For example: "One does not live
by bread alone." The statement assumes that bread is representative of all categories of food. Or: "All
hands on deck!" The statement equates the workers with the part of the body that performs much of
their work-- the hands.
Metonymy: In metonymy some attribute of what is being described is used to indicate the whole. When
referring to a king, for example, one may instead say "the crown"-- that is, the physical attribute that is
usually identified with royalty.
Some things to watch out for when employing
figurative language:
Beware of clichs! Clichs are usually forms of figurative language ("dead as a doornail," "cutting
edge," "an axe to grind," "a bone to pick," etc.). Clichs often contain antiquated or obscure terms that
do very little to clarify topics of discussion. If you say that an issue is as "dead as a doornail" what does
that mean? What does a dead doornail look like? Is a reader who has heard the phrase a thousand times
going to take the time to make a comparison between the issue and the clich? Avoid extended
metaphors. Occasionally you will come up with a metaphor that illustrates your point so completely
that you want to share your ingenuity with the reader. A metaphor should make one point very quickly:
its purpose is to clarify and stimulate. Extended metaphors tend to make readers less and less
impressed with the comparison the longer it lasts. The same imagery just gets redundant and
uninteresting after a while.
Avoid mixed metaphors. If you attempt to explain a point using a string of three or four metaphors the
reader is likely to get either (1) confused as to which model is the most accurate, or (2) exhausted by
reiterations of an idea that they understood the first time through. If the reader is examining your
argument critically it is also possible that he will observe inconsistencies among the various metaphors.
In any case, you ought to be more interested in discussing the topic directly; figurative language can
help you along, but should never become more important than the argument itself.
Thus, you should never base an argument on figurative language. No analogy is flawless. Things
can be compared on certain levels but there is a point at which every analogy breaks down. If your
reader is paying attention to your rhetoric he will be able to refute the thesis of your paper quite easily.