REFERENCE
Names of Student
Marks
1.
Rahul Kadu
2.
Salman Jainuddin 8
3.
Mayur Mohite
4.
Kiran Pasalkar
5.
Hemant kenjale
6.
Wasim baig
7.
Omakr hanumant 8
8.
Sunil kalbor
9.
Bharat
4
Ram 4
Pasalkar
10.
Rajesh Chitre
11.
Sammer pathan
12.
Ganesh
ramchandra
13.
Prakash
waghmare
14.
Nil;esh raju
15.
Gajanan gaijwad
Mean
X
14
Mean =
=
Mean
Median =
Median
Mode
6+8+4+6+2+6+8+8+4+4+6+2+4+2+4+4
15
70
15
4.7
8,8,6,6,6,6, 4,4,4,4,4,4, 2,2,
=
Post-Test
Sr.
No.
Names of Student
Marks
1.
Rahul Kadu
2.
Salman Jainuddin 8
3.
Mayur Mohite
4.
Kiran Pasalkar
5.
Hemant kenjale
6.
Wasim baig
7.
Omakar
hanumant
8.
Sunil kalbor
9.
Bharat
8
Ram 6
Pasalkar
10.
Rajesh Chitre
11.
Sammer pathan
12.
Ganesh
ramchandra
13.
Prakash
waghmare
14.
Nilesh raju
15.
Gajanan gaikwad 8
Mean
Mean
Mean
X
N
8+8+6+8+6+6+8+8+6+6+8+8+6+6
15
106
15
Mean
Median
7.06
8,8,8,8,8,8,8,8,8 6,6,6,6,6,6,6
Median
Mode
=
=
Scores
Deviation
1d1
1d21
-1.3
1.3
1.69
-3.3
3.3
10.89
0.7
0.7
0.49
-1.3
1.3
1.69
2.7
2.7
7.29
-1.3
1.3
1.29
-3.3
3.3
10.89
0.7
0.7
0.49
0.7
0.7
0.49
-1.3
1.3
1.69
2.7
2.7
7.29
0.7
0.7
0.29
2.7
2.7
7.29
0.7
0.7
0.49
0.7
0.7
0.49
22.1
53.35
1d1 = 22.1
Average deviation
W1
N
= d2 = 53.35
Standard Deviation D
N
= 1.886
22.1
15
= 1.47
53.35
15
3.556
Scores (x)
Deviation
(x-m)
1d1
d2
0.4
0.4
0.16
0.4
0.4
0.16
-1.6
1.6
2.56
0.4
0.4
0.16
0.4
0.4
0.16
-1.6
1.6
2.56
-1.6
1.6
2.56
0.4
0.4
0.16
0.4
0.4
0.16
-1.6
1.6
2.56
-1.6
1.6
2.56
0.4
0.4
0.16
0.4
0.4
0.16
-1.6
1.6
2.56
1.6
1.6
2.56
0.4
0.4
0.16
14.4
19.20
1 d 1 = 14.4
Average deviation
1d1 14.4
=
5
N
= d2 = 19.20
0.96
Standard Deviation D
19.20
15
1.28
= 1.131
3. CO-EFFICIENT OF CO-RELATION
Student
Prete Postt
st
est
Xy
x-m
y.m
Rahul Kadu
1.3
0.4
1.69
0.16
0.52
Salman
3.3
0.4
10.8
0.16
1.32
Jainuddin
Mayur Mohite
0.7
1.6
0.49
2.56
1.12
Kiran Pasalkar
1.3
0.4
1.69
0.16
4.32
Hemant kenjale
2.7
0.4
7.29
0.16
-2.04
Wasim baig
1.3
1.6
1.29
2.56
1.32
Omakar
hanumant
3.3
1.6
10.8
9
2.56
-0.28
Sunil kalbor
0.7
0.4
0.49
0.16
1.12
Ram 4
0.7
0.4
0.49
0.16
2.08
Bharat
Pasalkar
Rajesh Chitre
1.3
1.6
1.69
2.56
-1.08
Sammer pathan
2.7
1.6
7.29
2.56
-1.08
Ganesh
ramchandra
0.7
0.4
0.29
0.16
0.28
Prakash
waghmare
2.7
0.4
7.29
0.16
-4.32
Nilesh raju
0.7
1.6
0.49
2.56
1.12
Gajanan
gaikwad
0.7
1.6
0.49
2.56
-0.28
53.3
5
19.2
0
13.7
6
xy
xx , y2
13.76
53.35 19.20
13.76
1024.32
13.76
32.4
= 0.4246 =
0.43
value
M1 M2
d
M1
Mean Of Posttest
M2
Mean Of Pretest
d
(6 M 1) 2 (6 M 2) 2 2 xm,6 N12
A)
(d1) 2
B)
( d 2) 2
19.20
1.28 = 1.131
N
15
C) M
M2
d
53.35
15
3.55 = 1.884
61
1.884 1.884
0.48
3.873
N1
15
62
1.131 1.131
0.29
=
3.873
N2
15
(6 M 1) 2 (6 M 2) 2 2 6m1 6 N12
0.05702
0.238789.
M1 M2
7.06 4.70
0.238789
t = 9.84
t (cal)=9.84
df1 degree of freedom
= N1+N2-2
= 15+15-2
= 30-2
= 28
t (table) = 2.763
9.84 > 2.763
t (calculate) > t (table) 9.84 > 2.763
The programme is effective Null hypothesis has to rejected
Interpretation = the design statement is effective there is no need
for modification because there is significant difference t (cal) > t
(tab)