0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
38 tayangan31 halaman
MTBE has NEVER been classified as toxic or carcinogenic by any regulatory body anywhere in the world. MTBE is a safe and beneficial gasoline component When used and handled properly. The eu conducted a 3-year MTBE risk assessment based on 20+ years of European MTBE usage and research.
MTBE has NEVER been classified as toxic or carcinogenic by any regulatory body anywhere in the world. MTBE is a safe and beneficial gasoline component When used and handled properly. The eu conducted a 3-year MTBE risk assessment based on 20+ years of European MTBE usage and research.
MTBE has NEVER been classified as toxic or carcinogenic by any regulatory body anywhere in the world. MTBE is a safe and beneficial gasoline component When used and handled properly. The eu conducted a 3-year MTBE risk assessment based on 20+ years of European MTBE usage and research.
April 23, 2013 Doha, Qatar Middle East MTBE Workshop CLEAN FUEL, CLEAN AIR Working closely with fuel policymakers, regulators and stakeholders in the fuel industry, ACFA promotes and advances the use of cleaner automotive fuels based on principles of sound science, cost efficiency and sustainability of the environment. Who is ACFA? MTBE has NEVER been classified as toxic or carcinogenic by any regulatory body anywhere in the world. MTBE Facts 3 MTBE Facts 1. The European Union conducted a 3-year MTBE risk assessment based on 20+ years of European MTBE usage and research. Conclusion: MTBE is a safe and beneficial gasoline component When used and handled properly, MTBE is not expected to have any harmful impact on human health and the environment. Potential to cause odour and taste problems in water, need to consider a risk reduction strategy for groundwater and drinking water Proposals mainly dealing with the construction and operation of petrol underground storage and distribution facilities at service stations 4 MTBE Facts 2. WHO reviewed the impact of MTBE use on public drinking water. Conclusions: MTBE is non-genotoxic Insufficient data to reach any conclusions about its potential to cause human cancer Did not see any reason to restrict the use of MTBE in gasoline 5 All these reputable bodies have found no sufficiently compelling reason to classify MTBE as a possible cancer-causing agent for humans: 6 The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (in the US) established the Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) program, which included an oxygenate mandate. The requirement for oxygenates could be met with either ethanol or MTBE MTBE captured approx. 85% of the oxygenate market. MTBE was a product approved and mandated by the federal government. California found MTBE in groundwater and drinking water supplies in 2000/2001, and moved to ban the use of MTBE in 2003. Let us go back to where it all started 7 The Energy Policy Act of 2005 removed the oxygenate mandate for RFG and instead established the Renewable Fuel Standard, requiring ethanol content in gasoline. Once the oxygenate mandate expired, refiners stopped blending MTBE in the U.S. for liability concerns. In considering the Energy Policy Act, the Congress REJECTED an amendment calling for a federal ban on the use of MTBE. While a number of states maintain MTBE bans on their books, there is NO federal ban on the use of MTBE. In fact, there is still MTBE production in the U.S. for export markets in Mexico, Venezuela and Europe. The facts of MTBE in the USA 8 The Initial Problem: Public Perception versus Reality Lack of focus on true problem: leaking gasoline tanks Overestimation of risk to water resources Overreaction to odor/taste thresholds Convergence of political influence of powerful lobbies The Result: Adverse public reaction particularly in California & Northeast Incorrectly framed issue as a choice between clean air and clean water MTBE became a convenient scapegoat The U.S. Experience: Sound Science vs. Political Science 9 According to statistics compiled by the U.S.A. Oxygenate Fuels Association, the introduction of MTBE in gasoline has resulted in the reduction of common air pollutants. 20-25% less carbon monoxide 20-30% less benzene 5% less nitrogen oxides 15% less evaporative emissions 30% less particulate matter 10-15% less unburned hydrocarbons US Experience: MTBE Reduce Air Pollutants 10 THE RELEVANCE OF MTBE 1990s: Middle East and Asia/Pacific. The main driving force in Middle East was the need of MTBE for lost octane from lead phase out and as high sulphur levels are gradually reduced in gasoline. In Asia/Pacific the main driving force was the real necessity of clean air through cleaner fuels legislation. MTBE begun to be commonly imported in Taiwan, Thailand, and largely produced and consumed in Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Singapore and Malaysia. Clean Gasoline 12 Most Immediate: Cutting Vehicle Emissions 13 13 in 15 of the worlds most polluted cities are in Asia. Emission Standards (New Light Duty Vehicles) Notes: *The level of adoption vary by country but most are based on the Euro emission standards Italics under discussion; a gasoline; b diesel; c Entire country; d Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai, Hyderabad, Bangalore, Lucknow, Kanpur, Agra, Surat, Ahmedabad, Pune and Sholapur; Other cities in India are in Euro 2; e Beijing [Euro 1 (Jan 1999); Euro 2 (Aug 2002); Euro 3 (2005); Euro 4 (1 Mar 2008); Euro 5 (2012)], Shanghai [Euro 1 (2000); Euro 2 (Mar 2003); Euro 3 (2007); Euro 4 (2010)] and Guangzhou [Euro 1 (Jan 2000); Euro 2 (Jul 2004); Euro 3 (Sep-Oct 2006); Euro 4 (2010)]; f Equivalent to Euro 4 emissions standards; g for gasoline vehicles only Source: CAI-Asia. September 2012. Emission standards for new light-duty vehicles Gasoline Specifications (Asia) 15 As at Target Markets Sep 2011 2012-2014 Bangladesh Pre Euro Pre Euro Brunei Pre Euro Euro II Burma Pre Euro Pre Euro Cambodia Pre Euro na Nepal Pre Euro Pre Euro Pakistan Pre Euro Pre Euro Sri Lanka Pre Euro Euro II Indonesia Euro II Euro II Malaysia Euro 2M Euro 4M Philippines Euro II Euro IV Thailand Euro II Euro IV Laos Euro II Euro II Vietnam Euro II Euro IV India (national) Euro II Euro II India (cities) Euro IV Euro IV China (national) Euro IV Euro IV Hong Kong Euro IV Euro IV Taiwan Euro IV Euro V Japan Euro V Euro V S. Korea Euro V Euro V Octane replacement due to fuel quality improvements (lead phase- out, reduction in sulphur, benzene, aromatics, olefins). Expanding vehicle fleet and growing gasoline demand. Vehicle technology advances need cleaner fuels to meet the stricter emissions standards and to operate as designed. Increase in minimum octane grade. Growing demand for higher grade gasoline. Market is octane-short (especially clean octane.) Octane Trends 2007-2020 16 Benefits of MTBE Overnight improvement in air quality Vapor pressure improver Gasoline pool volume extender Excellent blending octane value Refinery blending flexibility Economic/cost effectiveness advantages Avoids heavy capital investment Lower operating costs Fully compatible with transport/handling systems Improves vehicle performance (such as drivability & cold starting) Readily available world-wide and locally produced 17 MTBE: Impact on Emissions Source: Hart Downstream Energy Services, 2003 18 The octane number improvement with MTBE in general depends on the base gasoline. Clear octane numbers for MTBE are relatively high and therefore MTBE is used widely to improve the octane rating for gasoline. MTBE Enhances Octane 19 MTBE Lowers RVP of Gasoline Source: Hart Energy 20 $0 $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 $14 $16 B i l l i o n
U S $ Base Case w/ MTBE Flex Case- without MTBE 2003 Cases 2006 Cases 2012 Cases APEC: Chinese Refining Capital Investment 21 APEC: Korean Capital Investment Requirements Impact of MTBE 22 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 2003 2006 2012 Million US $ With MTBE Without MTBE MTBE GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES Asia and Middle East to boost MTBE demand South and Central America and Africa Scope for further penetration of MTBE, paving the way for potential increase in demand in the future. Growing gasoline markets in developing markets Gasoline blending was the major consumer of MTBE at global level, followed by solvents and chemical reagent applications. Improved gasoline quality requirements Phase out of metallic octane boosters Low biofuels penetration rate in developing nations Global MTBE Demand Drivers 24 Growing emphasis on renewable fuels / sustainability Risk of reduction of gasoline consumption in general MTBE may be edged out in gasoline pool as not produced from renewable sources Biofuels mandates in EU and USA. Risks of declining gasoline consumption in developed nations FFV and alternative energy Fuel economy improvement Dieselization Market maturity and aging demography Groundwater concerns Global MTBE Demand Constraints 25 Global MTBE Market Demand (2011 vs 2020) 26 Source: GBI report on MTBE Global Markets to 2020, 2012 Demand share (tons) Region Year 2011 % of total Year 2020 % of total Forecast Growth Asia-Pacific 7,437,747 61% 13,738,018 68% 6,300,271 Middle East & Africa 2,435,501 20% 3,832,612 19% 1,397,111 Europe 1,644,630 14% 2,041,513 10% 396,883 South & Central America 545,624 5% 631,559 3% 85,935 North America 40,164 0% 9,766 0% -30,398 Global 12,103,666 20,253,468 8,149,802 In the report, Asia-Pacific refers to China, Taiwan, Thailand, South Korea, Malaysia, Singapore and India only; Europe refers to Germany, Belgium, Italy, Russia and the UK only; South and Central America refers to Mexico, Brazil and Argentina only; the Middle East and Africa refers to Saudi Arabia and Iran only. Regulatory impact on MTBE use in Asia 27 Legislation / Regulation Impact on MTBE use Markets Clean Air Act Opportunity for MTBE to be used All Lead phase-out Clean octane replacement Almost all except Laos, Myanmar, Cambodia and Sri Lanka Strict emissions standards Opportunity for MTBE to be used All Ultra-low or low sulphur requirements MTBE widely used China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, South Korea Limits on benzene, aromatics and olefins Opportunity for MTBE to be used All No MTBE restrictions Opportunity for MTBE to be used All Biofuels mandates Low to no MTBE usage Thailand, Philippines, Japan High RON requirement Opportunity for MTBE to be used All Tax subsidies on gasoline alternatives Competition for MTBE-blended gasoline Thailand, India, China China: Asias fastest growing and largest MTBE market 28 0000 tonnes China MTBE Consumption (2006-2011) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 4.85 (yoy +4%) Euro IV (Gasoline) 29 MTBE has NEVER been classified as toxic or carcinogenic by any regulatory body anywhere in the world. Safe and beneficial gasoline component. Responsible care is critical to the long term sustainability of the MTBE industry When used and handled properly, MTBE is not expected to have any harmful impact on human health and the environment. Tighter vehicle emission standards and fuel quality legislation will support MTBEs long term viability and sustainability in the fuels landscape in the Middle East and Asia. Concluding Remarks 30 Thank You! If you have any queries, please contact Clarence Woo clarence@acfa.org.sg (65) 6430 6658
Soy Estrogen Myth False - DR Mercola Caught by Federal Authorities Spreading False Health Info - (Soy Found Not To Contain Estrogen, Soy Does Not Lower Men's Testosterone, Fraudulent Claims)