...
,{J""
U
8'Pi
i'
:r
<t': ..
III
:r
III o ' q,1i ...
\ 0 a:
..
$\0 ..
r-
S
. ,
0
J:
m
34
r:
III ..I
n
m
...
C
n
s
III
otP\V C
..
s
:JD
J:
III
:JD
m
... -750
32
Ci
m
:I
s
:-4
:I
:-4
30 500 30
6
6 10 104 18 22
%50, BY VOLUME. %50, BY VOLUME.
GRAPH "E"
Log" K. \'I. TEMPERATURE
FOR REACTION: S0, + SO,.
+
+1
0
il
500 700 900 1100 1,3pO h
l.7oo 1900 2100
I
TEMPERATURE C.
'-1
100
80
Z
0
-60
iii
II:
'" >
Z
0
--40
U
~
20
101
GRAPH "F"
EQUILIBRIUM TEMPERATURE VI. % CONVERSION.
5
4
Z ~
0
0ll'
~
< ~
0ll'
'" 9
>
z
0
U
2
~
5 1,100
TEMPERATURE C.
GRAPH "G"
VARIATION OF EQUILIBRIUM TEMPERATURE WITM
SO, CONCENTRATION AT LOW CONVERSION PERCENTAGES.
BOO 1000 12 20
TEMPERATURE C.
2
102
Mr. Dymond said that they were indebted to the
authors for this very important paper: . He expressed
the view that the standard of papers at the Congress
was very high. This paper provided data that had
been wanted for many years.
Mr. Main agreed and said that the paper was a
most valuable addition to the technical knowledge.
He referred to Maxwell's book on sulphur burning
which was now out of print. Since then he had not
found anything as valuable as the paper presented.
He hoped that it might be possible to provide
illustrations.
Mr. Hogarth said the point had been discussed
and photostat copies of a paper dealing more
especially with one type of sulphur burner could be
made. He hoped that these could be fairly generally
distributed.
Mr. Rohloff said he thought the three types of
sulphur burners could be classed as three separate
stations in the development of sulphur burners.
Much the same could besaid about the development
of boilers. He drew a parallel between the different
types of sulphur burners and the different types of
boilers. This development seemed to suggest that
the trend was towards greater flexibility and he
thought it was fit to mention this, as it indicated
a desire to make sulphur burners for the Sugar
Industry more flexible and more applicable to sugar
production. Mr. Rohloff said that they had asked
the S.M.R.I. about the Acme burner and were told
that this had been investigated, but the type of
sulphur used in the Industry was not applicable to
this burner.
Mr. Hogarth .said the sulphur supplied to the
Sugar Industry did not vary in composition froin the
sulphur used overseas and presumably used in
Acme burners.
Mr. Perk said that speaking from memory, he
had told Mr. Rohloff that the method of storing
sulphur in Natal precluded the sulphur being used
in the closed type of burner used in J ava. In order
to operate these burners for months without loss
of capacity or interruption for cleaning, the sulphur
had to be kept free from dust and moisture. It
was therefore routine at the Java factories to store
the sulphur in a separate compartment, and
particularly not in the store-room where lime was
kept.
Mr. Main expressed the view that sulphur storage
conditions did not materially affect the sulphur
used in burners in Natal.
Mr. Hogarth said he was inclined to agree with
Mr. Main, as the contaminants in the sulphur
supplied to the Sugar Industry were very small
indeed.
Mr. Rault said the problem in the Sugar Industry
was not only to burn the sulphur but also to absorb
it. He asked whether there was a more modern,
compact' and controllable absorbtion system than
the "eye sore" and dirty plant called the sulphur
tower, commonly used in our factories.
Mr. Hogarth said that the absorption of SO2 was
a most complicated question, but there was equip-
ment available which would assist in the absorption
more efficiently than was done at the moment in
the Industry. He offered to, supply this inform-
ation to Mr. Rault.
Mr. Dymond agreed that the problem of hot
gases going into the juices required further in-
vestigation and he hoped this would be done by the
S.M.R.I.
Mr. Barnes referred to the possibility of using
S02 instead of raw sulphur in the Sugar Industry, as
increasing quantities of SO2 were being generated
by industry.. He thought the possibility of using
cold gases should be investigated more thoroughly.
He referred to the use of liquid ammonia as a
fertiliser and said it was not many yeCjlrs since this
had been thought impossible, but today most of the
nitrogen used in Louisiana was applied in the form
of gas or liquid. He felt the same might apply to
gaseous S02 in the Sugar Industry.
Mr. Dymond concluded by calling for a hearty
vote of thanks to Mr. Hogarth for hisexcellent paper.