The community-based Olmstead County, Minnesota, study evaluated a random sample of 477 white men aged 40 to 79 years
with no previous prostate surgery or prostate cancer [5]. Men with prostate volumes above 50 mL were more likely to have
moderate to severe symptoms of BPH, adjusted for age (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.6-7.5). Based upon the clinicians diagnosis in the
medical record, the annual incidence of new diagnoses of BPH in Olmsted County increased from 727 per 100,000 men in 1987
to 1212 in 1992 and then decreased to 546 in 1997 [6]. The rise in incidence prior to 1992 is attributed to widespread introduction
of PSA determinations and prostate screening in the United States, and part of the fall since then may be related to individuals
being diagnosed at an earlier stage in the previous years. Although the Olmsted County study was a population-based
prospective study, most of the men were white. It is unclear whether the results translate to other racial and ethnic groups.
The Massachusetts Male Aging Study evaluated men 40 to 70 years of age in communities surrounding Boston and assessed
them for the prevalence of BPH for the periods between 1987 and 1989 and 1995 and 1997 [7]. This study primarily involved
white men. Patients were considered to have BPH if they had frequent or difficult urination and had been told by a health
professional that they had an enlarged prostate, or if they had undergone surgery for BPH. The overall prevalence of BPH was
19.4 percent in men over age 38.
A study from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, which samples community hospitals in the United States, found that the
age-adjusted prevalence of BPH as a primary diagnosis decreased from 0.88 to 0.48 percent from 1998 to 2008 [8]. Discharges
for BPH surgery decreased 51 percent and discharges for primary BPH with acute renal failure increased more than 400 percent.
There were no significant changes in discharges for primary BPH with urinary retention, bladder stones, or urinary infection.
High values occur in men with prostatic diseases other than cancer, including BPH.
Some men with prostatic cancer have serum PSA concentrations of 4.0 ng/mL (a widely used cut-off value) or less. (See
"Screening for prostate cancer", section on Effect of lowering PSA cutoffs.)
The natural history of BPH is becoming more clearly understood. Age, LUTS, PSA, prostate volume, and peak flow rates can help
Clinical manifestations and diagnostic evaluation of benign prostatic hy... http://www.uptodate.com/contents/clinical-manifestations-and-diagnost...
4 de 8 09/09/2014 11:02 p.m.
Use of UpToDate is subject to the Subscription and License Agreement.
Topic 6889 Version 14.0
predict progression of BPH. (See Natural history above.)
History, physical examination, and laboratory tests can provide reasonable certainty of the diagnosis. Urinalysis should be done
and serum creatinine and PSA should be measured in all patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. (See Diagnostic approach
above and Recommended tests above.)
The American Urologic Association symptom score (assessing for frequency, nocturia, weak urinary stream, hesitancy,
intermittence, incomplete emptying, and urgency) is useful for quantifying the patients symptoms after the diagnosis of BPH has
been made. (See American Urologic Association symptom score above.)
Measurements of maximal urinary flow rate, post-void residual urine, and urine cytology are optional, but are useful in most men.
The performance of other tests (pressure-flow studies, urethrocystoscopy, intravenous urography, ultrasonography, and
abdominal x-rays) should be reserved for unusual patients and for those being considered for invasive treatments. (See Optional
tests above.)