Important! Statutory construction principles hold true only when
there is doubt or ambiguity in the law and not when the law itself is clear and free from doubt, leaving no room for interpretation. Expresso unius est exclusio alterius Express mention of one person, thing, or consequence implies the exclusion of all others DEPENDS ON LEGISLATIE INTENT !anons of restricti"e interpretation #ase$ on the rules of logic an$ the natural %or&ings of the human min$ Pre$icate$ upon one's o%n "oluntar( act an$ not upon that of others Premise) Legislature %oul$ not ha"e ma$e specifie$ enumerations in a statute ha$ the intention #een not to restrict its meaning an$ confine its terms to those expressl( mentione$ Opposite of $octrine of necessar( implication ariations) 1) Expressum facit cessare tacitum *hat is expresse$ puts an en$ to that %hich is implie$ *here a statute, #( its terms, is expressl( limite$ to certain matters, it ma( not, #( interpretation or construction, #e exten$e$ to other matters 2) Exceptio firmat regulam in casibus non exceptis A general expression follo%e$ #( exceptions therefrom implies that those %hich $o not fall un$er the exceptions come %ithin the scope of the general expression A thing not #eing excepte$ must #e regar$e$ as coming %ithin the pur"ie% of the general rule +axim of recogni,e$ utilit( is the rule that the express exception, exemption or sa"ing exclu$es others 3) Exceptio firmat regulam in casibus non exceptis Expression of one or more things of a class implies the exclusion of all not expresse$, e"en though all %oul$ ha"e #een implie$ ha$ none #een expresse$ -asis) in human experience, min$s of parties are usuall( a$$resse$ speciall( to the particulari,ation, an$ generalities are use$ in contemplation of that upon %hich the min$s of the parties are centere$ Generall( use$ in the construction of statutes granting po%ers, creating rights an$ reme$ies, restricting common rights, an$ imposing penalties an$ forfeitures, as %ell as those statutes %hich are strictl( construe$ Not a rule of la% nor of uni"ersal application #ut a mere auxiliar( tool of statutor( construction or a means of ascertaining the legislati"e intent !annot #e use$ to $efeat plainl( in$icate$ purpose of legislature, rule not #eing inflexi#le nor a mechanical or technical tool Limitations . %hen it $oes not appl() /0 *here other circumstances in$icate that the enumeration %as not inten$e$ to #e exclusi"e 10 *here the enumeration is #( %a( of example or to remo"e $ou#ts onl( 20 If its application %ill result in incongruities or a "iolation of the equal protection clause of the !onstitution If there is some special reason for mentioning one thing an$ none for mentioning another %hich is other%ise %ithin the statute, so that the a#sence of an( mention of such other %ill not exclu$e it In case a statute appears upon its face to limit the operation of its pro"ision to particular persons or things #( enumerating them, #ut no reason exists %h( other persons or things not so enumerate$ shoul$ not ha"e #een inclu$e$ an$ manifest in3ustice %ill follo% #( not inclu$ing them 40 If a$herence thereto %oul$ cause incon"enience, har$ship, an$ in3ur( to the pu#lic interest Argumentum a contrario Also &no%n as the negati"e5opposite $octrine *hat is expresse$ puts an en$ to that %hich is implie$ Dissimilum dissimilis est ratio Of things $issimilar, the rule is $issimilar Casus omissus pro omisso habendus est A person, o#3ect or thing omitte$ from an enumeration must #e hel$ to ha"e #een omitte$ intentionall( Procee$s from reasona#le certaint( that P,O,T has #een omitte$ from a legislati"e enumeration Operates an$ applies onl( if an$ %hen the omission has #een clearl( esta#lishe$, an$ in such a case %hat is omitte$ in the enumeration ma( not, #( construction, #e inclu$e$ therein6 !ourt cannot suppl( omission e"en though it ma( ha"e resulte$ from ina$"ertence or #ecause case %as not foreseen nor contemplate$6 Does not appl( %here it is sho%n that the legislature $i$ not inten$ to exclu$e the P,O,T from the enumeration6 If such legislati"e intent is clearl( in$icate$, court ma( suppl( the omission if to $o so %ill carr( out the clear intent of the legislature an$ %ill not $o "iolence to its language6 Ubi lex non distinguit, nec nos distinguere debemus *here the la% $oes not $istinguish, courts shoul$ not $istinguish There shoul$ #e no $istinction in the application of a statute %here none is in$icate$ 7oun$e$ on logic Assumption) Legislature ma$e no qualification in the use of a general %or$ or expression !orollar( of principle that general %or$s an$ phrases in a statute shoul$ or$inaril( #e accor$e$ their natural an$ general significance !orollar( rule) %here the la% $oes not ma&e an( exception, courts ma( no except something therefrom, unless there is compelling reason apparent in the la% to 3ustif( it Applies not onl( in the construction of general %or$s an$ expressions use$ in a statute #ut also in the interpretation of a rule lai$ $o%n therein *here the legislature has clearl( lai$ $o%n a rule for one class of cases it is not rea$il( to #e suppose$ that, in the same act, a $ifferent rule has #een prescri#e$ for another class of cases %ithin the same as the first !ourts ma( $istinguish %hen there are facts an$ circumstances sho%ing that the legislature inten$e$ a $istinction or qualification 8as in Gar"i$a "s6 Sales S9 mem#er or official age limit0 Reddendo singula singulis ariation of the $octrine of last antece$ent :eferring each to each; referring each phrase or expression to its appropriate o#3ect, or let each #e put in its proper place, that is, the %or$s shoul$ #e ta&en $istri#uti"el( :equires that the antece$ents an$ consequences shoul$ #e rea$ $istri#uti"el( to the effect that each %or$ is to #e applie$ to the su#3ect to %hich it appears #( context most appropriatel( relate$ an$ to %hich it is most applica#le Doctrine of Necessary Implication Ex necessitate legis < from the necessit( of the la% =T(pe text> Statutory Construction Agpalo No statute can #e enacte$ that can pro"i$e all the $etails in"ol"e$ in its application6 There is al%a(s an omission that ma( not meet a particular situation6 So5calle$ gaps in the la% $e"elop as the la% is enforce$6 *hat is implie$ in a statute is as much a part thereof as that %hich is expresse$ E"er( statute is un$erstoo$, #( implication, to contain all such pro"isions as ma( #e necessar( to effectuate its o#3ect an$ purpose, or to ma&e effecti"e rights, po%ers, pri"ileges or 3uris$iction %hich it grants, inclu$ing all such collateral an$ su#si$iar( consequences as ma( #e fairl( an$ logicall( inferre$ from its terms 8to ma&e the la% effecti"e an$ operati"e0 E"er( statutor( grant of po%er, right or pri"ilege is $eeme$ to inclu$e all inci$ental po%er, right or pri"ilege #ecause the greater inclu$es the lesser (in eo quod plus sit, simper inest et minus) Limitations) /0 Exclu$es %hat is merel( plausi#le, #eneficial or $esira#le +a( not #e use$ to 3ustif( the inclusion in a statute of %hat to the court appears to #e %ise an$ 3ust, unless it is at the same time necessaril( an$ logicall( %ithin its terms 10 +a( not #e emplo(e$ to support an interpretation $estructi"e of the o#3ect or purpose of the la% *hat ma( #e necessaril( implie$ from a statute shoul$ #e consistent %ith, an$ not contrar( to, the !onstitution or to existing la%s Implication %hich is "iolati"e of the la% is un3ustifie$ or un%arrante$ Provisos Office of a pro"iso is either to limit the application of the enacting clause, section, or pro"ision of a statute, or to except something therefrom, or to qualif( or restrain its generalit( Primar( purpose is to limit or restrict the general language or operation of the statute, not to enlarge it !ommonl( foun$ at the en$ of a section, or pro"ision of a statute, an$ is intro$uce$, as a rule, #( the %or$ ?Pro"i$e$@ or #( some other %or$s or phrases such as ?#ut nothing herein@ *AAT DETE:+INES %hether a clause is a pro"iso is its SB-STAN!E rather than its form, a question of legislati"e intent General rule) qualifies or mo$ifies onl( the phrase imme$iatel( prece$ing it or restrains or limits the generalit( of the clause that it imme$iatel( follo%s, unless it is clear that the legislature inten$e$ it to ha"e a %i$er scope Shoul$ #e construe$ as to harmoni,e, not to repeal or $estro(, the main pro"ision of the statute *hen there is irreconcila#le conflict #et%een pro"iso an$ main pro"ision of statute, that %hich is locate$ in a later portion of the statute pre"ails, unless there is legislati"e intent to the contrar( or such construction %ill $estro( the %hole statute itself6 This is so #ecause the later pro"ision is the latest expression of the intent of the legislature6 Other functions of pro"iso) /0 +a( enlarge scope of la% +a( enlarge, instea$ of restrict or limit, %hat other%ise is a phrase of limite$ import ha$ there #een no pro"iso qualif(ing it 10 +a( assume the role of a$$itional legislation A clear an$ unqualifie$ purpose expresse$ in the opening statement of a section of a statute comprising se"eral su#$i"isions has #een construe$ as controlling an$ limiting a pro"iso attache$ to one of the su#$i"isions, %here the pro"iso, if segregate$ therefrom, %oul$ mean exactl( the re"erse of %hat it necessaril( implie$ %hen rea$ in connection %ith the limitation Eception !lauses !onsists of that %hich %oul$ other%ise #e inclu$e$ in the pro"ision from %hich it is excepte$ !lause %hich exempts something from the operation of a statute #( express %or$s Generall( expresse$ as ?EC!EPT,@ ?BNLESS OTAE:*ISE,@ an$ ?SAALL NOT APPLD@, %or$s use$ to ta&e out of the enactment something %hich %oul$ other%ise #e part of its su#3ect matter Exception if it remo"es something from the operation of a pro"ision of la% 7unction neither to color nor to $ominate nor to $estro( the general rule #ut rather, to confirm the general rule6 Shoul$ not #e construe$ to qualif( the %or$s or phrases constituting the general rule6 Express mention of exceptions operates to exclu$e other exceptions, %hich means those not enumerate$ are inclu$e$ in the general rule General rule) strictl( #ut reasona#l( construe$; exten$ onl( insofar as their language fairl( %arrants; all $ou#ts shoul$ #e resol"e$ in fa"or of the general pro"isions rather than the exception Eception !lauses vs. Provisos /0 As to operation of statute E) exempt something a#solutel( from the operation of a statute #( express %or$s in the enacting clause P) $efeats its operation con$itionall( 10 As to limitation E restriction of statute E) ta&es out of the statute something that other%ise %oul$ #e a part of the su#3ect matter of it P) a"oi$s them #( %a( of $efeasance or excuse 20 As to nature "is5F5"is enactment E) Generall( a part of the enactment itself, a#solutel( exclu$ing from its operation some su#3ect or thing that other%ise %oul$ fall %ithin its scope P) enactment is mo$ifie$ #( engrafting upon it a ne% pro"ision, #( %a( of amen$ment, pro"i$ing con$itionall( for a ne% case E G P similar in that the( #oth except something from an enacting clause Saving !lauses !lause %hich operates to except from the effect of the la% %hat the clause pro"i$es, or to sa"e something %hich %oul$ other%ise #e lost Bsuall( use$ to except or sa"e something from the effect of a repeal of a statute o Legislature ma( preser"e right of state to prosecute an$ punish offenses committe$ in "iolation of a repeale$ la% o *here existing proce$ure is altere$ or su#stitute$ #( another, usual to sa"e procee$ings pen$ing un$er the ol$ la% at the time the ne% la% ta&es effect !onstrue in the light of the legislati"e intent an$ purpose, principal consi$eration #eing to effectuate such intent or carr( out such purpose Either li#eral or strict construction $epen$ing upon the &in$ of interpretation that shoul$, consi$ering its nature, #e gi"en to the statute as a %hole =T(pe text> Statutory Construction Agpalo !onstruction of Statute as a "hole Statute is passe$ as a %hole an$ not in parts or sections an$ is animate$ #( one general purpose an$ intent Intent or meaning of a statute shoul$ #e ascertaine$ from the statute ta&en as a %hole an$ not from an isolate$ part or pro"ision thereof Purpose or context as controlling gui$e o A statute must recei"e such reasona#le construction as %ill ma&e all its parts harmoni,e %ith each other an$ ren$er them consistent %ith its scope an$ o#3ect6 Gi"ing effect to statute as a %hole o E"er( part of a statute shoul$ #e gi"en effect #ecause a statute is enacte$ as an integrate$ measure an$ not as a ho$gepo$ge of conflicting pro"isions o Ut res magis valeat quam pereat = construction is to #e sought %hich gi"es effect to the %hole of the statute . its e"er( %or$ o *here a statute is suscepti#le of more than one interpretation, the court shoul$ a$opt such reasona#le an$ #eneficial construction as %ill ren$er the pro"ision thereof operati"e an effecti"e an$ harmonious %ith each other *here there is a particular or special pro"ision an$ a general pro"ision in the same statute an$ the latter in its most comprehensi"e sense %oul$ o"errule the former, the particular or special pro"ision is construe$ as an exception to the general pro"ision6 La% shoul$ #e interprete$ %ith a "ie% to uphol$ing rather than $estro(ing it (Interpretatio fienda est ut res magis valeat quam pereat) Presumption) Legislature has enacte$ a statute %hose pro"isions are in harmon( an$ consistent %ith each other an$ that conflicting intentions in the same statute are ne"er suppose$ or regar$e$6 La% enacte$ is complete #( itself, that the legislature $i$ perform its function %ell an$ that it inten$e$ to impart to its enactment such a meaning as %ill ren$er it operati"e an$ effecti"e6 *here a#solute harmon( #et%een parts of a statute is $emonstra#l( not possi#le, the court must re3ect that one %hich is lease in accor$ %ith the general plan of the %hole statute o In case of irreconcila#le conflict #et%een t%o pro"isions of the same statute, the last in or$er of position is frequentl( hel$ to pre"ail unless it clearl( appears that the intent of the legislature is other%ise o The circumstances of their passage, among other ai$s to construction, shoul$ also #e inquire$ into to $etermine %hich shoul$ pre"ail !onstruction in #elation to $ther Statutes Statute shoul$ #e construe$ in harmon( %ith, an$ not in "iolation of, the fun$amental la%6 Legislature presume$ to ha"e a$here$ to the constitutional limitations6 o If there is $ou#t or uncertaint( as to the meaning of the legislature, that interpretation %ill #e a$opte$ %hich %ill a"oi$ the effect of unconstitutionalit(, e"en though it ma( #e necessar(, for this purpose, to $isregar$ the more usual or apparent import of the language emplo(e$6 Ao%e"er, court cannot, in or$er to #ring a statute %ithin the fun$amental la%, amen$ it #( construction6 Statutes in pari materia o *hen the( relate to the same person or thing, or ha"e the same purpose or o#3ect, or co"er the same specific or particular su#3ect matter o Statute shoul$ #e so construe$ not onl( to #e consistent %ith itself #ut also to harmoni,e %ith other la%s on the same su#3ect matter as to form a complete, coherent an$ intelligi#le s(stem o Interpretare et concordare leges legibus est optimus interpretandi modus < #est metho$i of interpretation is that %hich ma&es la%s consistent %ith other la%s; e"er( statute must #e so construe$ an$ harmoni,e$ %ith other statutes as to form a uniform s(stem of 3urispru$ence o istingue tempora et concordabis !ura < $istinguish times an$ (ou %ill harmoni,e la%s o Presumption) all la%s are consistent %ith each other o Assumption) *hene"er the legislature enacts a la%, it has in min$ the pre"ious statutes relating to the same su#3ect matter, an$ in the a#sence of an( express repeal or amen$ment, the ne% statute is $eeme$ enacte$ in accor$ %ith the legislati"e polic( em#o$ie$ in those prior statutes6 Later statutes are supplementar( or complimentar( to the earlier enactments6 o Huestion is %hether the later act has implie$l( amen$e$ or repeale$ the earlier statute6 In case of $ou#t, the $ou#t %ill #e resol"e$ against implie$ amen$ment or repeal an$ in fa"or of harmoni,ation of all the la%s on the su#3ect6 o Statute %ill not #e construe$ as repealing a prior act on the same su#3ect in the a#sence of %or$s to that effect unless there is an irreconcila#le repugnanc( #et%een them or unless the ne% la% is e"i$entl( inten$e$ to superse$e all prior acts on the matter an$ to comprise itself the sole an$ complete s(stem of legislation on the su#3ect General an$ special statutes o General . one %hich em#races a class of su#3ects or places an$ $oes not omit an( su#3ect or place naturall( #elonging to such class; one of uni"ersal application affecting the entire communit( o Special . one %hich relates to particular persons or things of a class or to a particular portion or section of the state onl( o 7act that one la% is special an$ the other general creates a presumption that the special act is to #e consi$ere$ as remaining an exception of the general act, one as a general la% of the lan$ an$ the other as the la% of the particular case; perio$ %hen the special la% %as passe$ is irrele"ant o *here t%o statutes are of equal theoretical application to a particular case, the one $esigne$ therefor speciall( shoul$ pre"ail o :eason) Legislature in passing a la% of special character has its attention $irecte$ to the special facts an$ circumstances %hich the special act is inten$e$ to meet o Presumption) General la% refers to the su#3ect in general an$ the special la% treats the same su#3ect in particular6 o Exceptions) /0 *here the legislature clearl( inten$e$ the later general enactment to co"er the %hole su#3ect an$ to repeal all prior la%s inconsistent there%ith, the general la% pre"ails o"er a special la% on the su#3ect6 Special la% repeale$6 10 *here the special la% merel( esta#lishes a general rule %hile the general la% creates a specific an$ special rule, general la% pre"ails6 :eference statutes o A statute %hich refers to other statutes an$ ma&es them applica#le to the su#3ect of legislation o Incorporation in a statute of another statute #( reference o 7requentl( use$ to a"oi$ encum#ering the statute #oo&s of unnecessar( repetition o A$option #( reference of a statute that %as pre"iousl( repeale$ re"i"es the statute o A$option ta&es the a$opte$ statute as it exists at the time of a$option an$ $oes not inclu$e su#sequent changes or mo$ification of the statute so ta&en, unless it $oes so expressl( =T(pe text> Statutory Construction Agpalo o !onstrue$ as to harmoni,e %ith, an$ gi"e effect to, the a$opte$ statute Supplemental statutes o One inten$e$ to suppl( $eficiencies in an existing statute an$ to a$$ to, complete, or exten$ the statute %ithout changing or mo$if(ing its original text :eenacte$ statutes o Statute %hich reenacts a pre"ious statute or the pro"isions thereof; one in %hich the pro"isions of an earlier statute are repro$uce$ in the same or su#stantiall( the same %or$s o Legislati"e expression of intention to a$opt the construction as %ell as the language of the prior act o *hen a statute or a pro"ision thereof has #een construe$ #( the Supreme !ourt an$ the same is su#stantiall( reenacte$, the legislature ma( #e regar$e$ as a$opting such construction, an$ the construction #ecomes an integral part of the reenacte$ statute %ith the force an$ effect of a legislati"e comman$ o *here a statute pro"i$es that all la%s not inconsistent %ith the pro"isions thereof are $eeme$ incorporate$ an$ ma$e integral parts thereof #( reference, such pre"ious la%s on the same su#3ect matter are $eeme$ reenacte$ A$opte$ statutes o A statute patterne$ after, or copie$ from a statute of a foreign countr( o Presumption) Legislature a$opte$ such construction an$ practices %ith the a$option of the la% #ut $oes not appl( to construction gi"en the statute su#sequent to its a$option, although it has persuasi"e effect on the interpretation Strict and %iberal !onstruction 9in$ of construction $epen$s upon the nature of the statute, the purpose to #e su#ser"e$ an$ the mischief to #e reme$ie$; that %hich %ill #est accomplish the en$ $esire$ an$ effectuate legislati"e intent Strict construction o !onstruction accor$ing to the letter of a statute, %hich recogni,es nothing that is not expresse$, ta&es the language use$ in its exact meaning, an$ a$mits no equita#le consi$eration o Scope shall not #e exten$e$ or enlarge$ #( implication, inten$ment, or equita#le consi$eration #e(on$ the literal meaning of its terms o !lose an$ conser"ati"e a$herence to the literal or textual interpretation Li#eral construction o Such equita#le construction as %ill enlarge the letter of a statute to accomplish its inten$e$ purpose, carr( out its intent, or promote 3ustice o Does not mean enlargement of a pro"ision %hich is clear, unam#iguous an$ free from $ou#t for a statute %hich is plain an$ clear is not su#3ect to construction o Statute %ill #e gi"en a li#eral interpretation so as to sa"e the statute from o#literation Li#eral construction "s6 Iu$icial legislation o !onstruction) court from the language use$, the su#3ect matter, an$ the purpose of the legislature %ill #e a#le to fin$ out the true meaning of the statute; legitimate exercise of 3u$icial po%er o Legislation) act of the court in engrafting upon a la% something %hich it #elie"es ought to ha"e #een em#race$ therein; for#i$$en #( the tripartite $i"ision of po%ers !onstruction shoul$ promote social 3ustice . constitutional man$ate !onstruction shoul$ promote general %elfare or gro%th of ci"ili,ation o :eason of the la% is the life of the la% o "alus populi suprema lex < "oice of the people is the supreme la% o "tatuta pro publico commodo late interpretantur < statutes enacte$ for the pu#lic goo$ are to #e construe$ li#erall( Strict !onstruction :emem#er that rules of interpretation are rules of construction, not $estruction Penal statutes against the state o Test is %hether a penalt( is impose$ for the punishment of a %rong to the pu#lic or for the re$ress of an in3ur( to an in$i"i$ual o Strictl( construe$ against the state an$ li#erall( in fa"or of the accuse$ o *here a statute penali,es the omission of an act on certain specific occasions, it cannot #e construe$ to penali,e it on all occasions o No person shoul$ #e #rought %ithin the terms of a statute %ho is not clearl( %ithin them, nor shoul$ an( act #e pronounce$ criminal %hich is not clearl( ma$e so #( the statute o :eason) safeguar$ the rights of the accuse$ an$ at the same time preser"e the o#"ious intention of the legislature; purpose is to pro"i$e a precise $efinition of for#i$$en acts o Acts in an$ of themsel"es innocent an$ la%ful cannot #e hel$ to #e criminal unless there is a clear an$ unequi"ocal expression of the legislati"e intent to ma&e them such o #ctus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea < the act itself $oes not ma&e a man guilt( unless his intention %ere so o #ctus me invito factus non est meus actus < an for the support of the go"ernmentact $one #( me against m( %ill is not m( act o !onstruction $epen$s upon the intent of the legislature, ta&ing into consi$eration the nature of the offense, the purpose to #e accomplishe$ an$ such other factors as %ill thro% light upon the meaning of the language o Limitations) /0 *here the language is plain an$ positi"e, %illful intent an$ purpose, nothing is left to interpretation 10 *here a literal meaning %oul$ lea$ to a#sur$it(, contra$iction, in3ustice, or %oul$ $efeat the clear purpose of the la%, the court shoul$ consi$er the spirit an$ reason of a statute6 Strict construction of a criminal statute $oes not mean such construction as to $epri"e it of the meaning inten$e$6 Statutes in $erogation of rights against the state o State ma( enact legislations curtailing or restricting en3o(ment of certain rights 8inherent, guarantee$ #( !onstitution or protecte$ #( la%0 in the exercise of its police po%er o *here there are t%o reasona#l( possi#le constructions, one %hich %oul$ $iminish or restrict a fun$amental right of the people an$ the other %hich %oul$ not $o so, the latter construction must #e a$opte$ so as to allo% full en3o(ment of such fun$amental right Statutes granting pri"ileges to certain entities against the grantee o Those %ho in"o&e a special pri"ilege grante$ #( a statute must compl( strictl( %ith its pro"isions or lose them o $rivilegia recipiunt largam interpretationem voluntati consonam concedentis < pri"ileges are to #e interprete$ in accor$ance %ith the %ill of him %ho grants them o ura lex sed lex < the la% ma( #e harsh, #ut that is the la%; applie$ in the matter of rights an$ pri"ileges grante$ su#3ect to con$itions Legislati"e grants to local go"ernment units against the grantee =T(pe text> Statutory Construction Agpalo o Grants of a pu#lic nature 8usuall( a gratuitous $onation of pu#lic mone( or propert(0 %hich result in an unfair a$"antage to the grantee o Narro%l( restricte$ in fa"or of the pu#lic Statutor( groun$s for suspension or remo"al of pu#lic officials o :eme$( of remo"al is a $rastic one an$ penal in nature o Strictl( construe$ to pre"ent in3ustice an$ harm to the pu#lic interest o Distinguishes #et%een the character of the man an$ the character of the officer, an$ limits the groun$s for remo"al to onl( those as enumerate$ Naturali,ation la%s against the applicant o :ight to #ecome a citi,en #( naturali,ation is statutor(, not natural Statutes imposing taxes an$ customs $uties most strongl( against the state o -ur$ens are not to #e impose$ nor presume$ to #e impose$ #e(on$ %hat statutes expressl( an$ clearl( import o :eason) #ur$ens personal an$ propert( rights of the people; taxation a $estructi"e po%er Statutes granting tax exemptions against the taxpa(er o Taxation life#loo$ of nation an$ as such, is the rule an$ exemption the exception o -asis) to minimi,e the $ifferent treatment an$ foster impartialit(, fairness, an$ equalit( of treatment among taxpa(ers o Limitations) /0 *here the la% pro"i$es no qualification for the granting of tax exemption, the court is not at li#ert( to suppl( one 10 Does not appl( in tax exemptions in fa"or of the go"ernment itself or its agencies 8exemption is the rule, taxation the exemption0 Statutes concerning the so"ereign o :estricti"e statutes imposing #ur$ens on the pu#lic treasur( strictl( construe$ o Do not em#race the so"ereign unless the so"ereign is specificall( mentione$ Statutes authori,ing suits against the go"ernment o -asis) There can #e no legal right as against the authorit( that ma&es the la% on %hich the right $epen$s (%ullum tempus occurrit regi) o Su#3ects the state to incon"enience an$ loss of go"ernmental efficienc( o +a( not #e circum"ente$ #( $irecting the action against the officers of the state instea$ of against the state itself o !onsent to #e sue$ shoul$ not #e interprete$ to authori,e garnishment of pu#lic fun$s to satisf( a 3u$gment against the State or the issuance of a %rit of execution against go"ernment propert( Statutes prescri#ing formalities of %ill against testator o *ill must #e execute$ in accor$ance %ith statutor( requirements or else entirel( "oi$ o !ourt is see&ing to ascertain an$ appl( legislators' intent, not testator's Exceptions an$ Pro"isos against exceptions an$ in fa"or of general pro"isions o Preference is an exception to the general rule %iberal !onstruction General %elfare legislation in fa"or of those %hom the la% inten$e$ to #enefit o Statutes enacte$ to implement the social 3ustice an$ protection5 to5la#or pro"isions of the !onstitution o La#or la%s, tenanc( la%s, lan$ reform la%s, social securit( la%s General %elfare clause on the po%er of local go"ernments in fa"or of LGBs o 1 #ranches) /0 +ain trun& of municipal authorit( Or$inances an$ regulations necessar( to carr( into effect an$ $ischarge the po%ers an$ $uties conferre$ upon local legislati"e #o$ies #( la% 10 In$epen$ent of the specific functions enumerate$ #( la% Or$inances necessar( an$ proper to pro"i$e for the health an$ safet(, promote the prosperit(, impro"e the morals, peace, goo$ or$er, comfort, an$ con"enience of the LGB an$ the inha#itants thereof, an$ for the protection of propert( therein o +ore po%ers to LGBs in promoting economic con$ition, social %elfare an$ material progress of the people in the communit( o Elastic an$ must #e responsi"e to "arious social con$itions Statutes prescri#ing limitations on taxing po%ers in fa"or of LGBs o /JK2 !onstitution gi"es LGBs po%er to create its o%n sources of re"enue an$ to le"( taxes, etc6 Statutes prescri#ing prescripti"e perio$ to collect taxes in fa"or of taxpa(ers o -eneficial to #oth go"ernment 8tax officers o#lige$ to act promptl(0 an$ citi,ens 8securit( against unscrupulous tax agents0 o :eme$ial measure to #ring a#out #eneficial purpose of affor$ing protection to taxpa(ers Statutes imposing penalties for nonpa(ment of tax in fa"or of go"ernment o Supporte$ #( strong reasons of pu#lic polic( an$ imperati"es of pu#lic %elfare o Inten$e$ to hasten tax pa(ments or to punish e"asions or neglect of $ut( in respect thereto o Shoul$ #e construe$ to a"oi$ the possi#ilities of tax e"asions Election la%s to gi"e effect to the express %ill of the electorate o Inten$e$ to safeguar$ the %ill of the people in their choice of their representati"es; in"ol"es pu#lic interest o Technicalities shoul$ not #e sanctione$ %hen it %ill #e an o#stacle in the $etermination of the true %ill of the electorate Amnest( proclamations in fa"or of amnest( o Purpose) encourage the return to the fol$ of the la% of those %ho ha"e "eere$ from it o Amnest( an$ par$on s(non(mous thus, grant of par$on shoul$ li&e%ise #e construe$ li#erall( in fa"or of those par$one$ Statutes prescri#ing prescriptions of crimes in fa"or of the accuse$ o Statute of limitation or prescription of offense in the nature of an amnest( grante$ #( the state after a certain time has passe$ o Li#eralit( of construction #elongs to all acts of amnest( an$ grace A$option statutes in fa"or of the a$opte$ o Li#eral concept that the statutes hol$ the interest an$ %elfare of the chil$ to #e of paramount consi$eration o Li#erall( construe$ to promote the no#le an$ compassionate o#3ecti"es of the la% eteran an$ retirement pension la%s in fa"or of pensioners o :eme$ial in character o Expression of gratitu$e to an$ recognition of those %ho ren$ere$ ser"ice to the countr( #( exten$ing to them regular monetar( #enefit o Li#erall( construe$ to the en$ that their no#le purpose is #est accomplishe$ #ut shoul$ pre"ent a person from recei"ing $ou#le pension or compensation unless the la% pro"i$es other%ise =T(pe text> Statutory Construction Agpalo o 8case la%0 A$ministrati"e regulations a$opte$ un$er legislati"e authorit( #( a particular $epartment must #e in harmon( %ith the pro"isions of the la%, an$ shoul$ #e for the sole purpose of carr(ing into effect its general pro"isions :ules of !ourt in fa"or of litigants o Proce$ural in character o Purpose) the proper, 3ust, spee$( an$ inexpensi"e $etermination of a litigation o Shoul$ not #e interprete$ to sacrifice su#stantial rights of a litigant at the altar of technicalities to the consequent impairment of the principles of 3ustice o Litigants shoul$ #e gi"en ample opportunit( to pro"e their respecti"e claims an$ a possi#le $enial of su#stantial 3ustice $ue to legal technicalities shoul$ #e a"oi$e$ Other statutes o :eme$ial in nature o :e$emption la%s purpose) to ena#le the $e#tor to ha"e his propert( applie$ to pa( as man( of his lia#ilities as possi#le o !onstruction in fa"or of exemption from execution 8#eneficent an$ humane purpose0 o La%s on attachment to promote their o#3ects an$ assist the parties in o#taining spee$( 3ustice o *arehouse receipt la%s in fa"or of bona fide hol$ers of such receipts o Pro#ation la% #( exten$ing the #enefits thereof to an(one not specificall( $isqualifie$ 8purpose is to gi"e offen$ers a secon$ chance to maintain his place in societ( through the process of reformation0 o Statute granting po%ers to a !onstitutional agenc( for the a$"ancement of the purposes an$ o#3ecti"es for %hich it %as create$ &andatory and Directory Statutes !lassification is important in resol"ing the question of %hat effect shoul$ #e gi"en to the man$ate of a statute No a#solute test for $etermining classification #ut primar( o#3ect is to ascertain legislati"e intent %hich must #e o#taine$ from all the surroun$ing circumstances 8entire statute, nature, o#3ect, purpose, legislati"e histor(, in connection %ith other relate$ statutes, consequences in construing it one %a( or the other0 Does not $epen$ on form of statute #ut on its effect Depen$s on %hether the thing $irecte$ to #e $one is of the essence of the thing require$ or is a mere matter of form Determine$ primaril( from the language of the statute; ?shall@ an$ ?ma(@ rule is not a#solute A negati"e statute is man$ator( o One expresse$ in negati"e %or$s or in the form of an affirmati"e proposition qualifie$ #( the %or$ ?onl(,@ sai$ %or$ ha"ing the force of an exclusionar( negation o !annot #e $irector( since onl( one %a( to o#e( Distinction applica#le to #oth fun$amental an$ statutor( la%s &andatory Statutes +atter of su#stance Legislati"e intent that compliance essential to the "ali$it( of an act Statute %hich contains %or$s of comman$ or of prohi#ition (s&all, must, oug&t, s&ould, cannot, s&all not, oug&t not) *here a statute pro"i$es for the $oing of some act %hich is require$ #( 3ustice or pu#lic $ut(, or %here it "ests a pu#lic #o$( or officer %ith po%er an$ authorit( to ta&e such action %hich concerns the pu#lic interest or rights of in$i"i$uals *hat la% $ecrees must #e o#e(e$ against pain of sanction or $eclaration of nullit( of %hat is $one in $isregar$ thereof Statutes conferring po%er o !onstrue$ as imposing rather than conferring pri"ileges since for #enefit of thir$ persons, not of pu#lic officers Statutes granting #enefits o *hen certain con$itions are require$ #efore #enefits can #e a"aile$ of, con$itions man$ator( Statutes prescri#ing 3uris$ictional requirements o Statutor( requirements #( %hich courts or tri#unals acquire 3uris$iction to hear an$ $eci$e particular actions must #e strictl( complie$ %ith #efore the courts or tri#unals can ha"e authorit( to procee$ Statutes prescri#ing time to ta&e action or to appeal o In$ispensa#le to the pre"ention of nee$less $ela(s an$ to the or$erl( an$ spee$( $ischarge of #usiness o Necessar( inci$ent to the proper, efficient, an$ or$erl( $ischarge of 3u$icial functions o :equire strict, not su#stantial, compliance an$ are not %ai"a#le nor can the( #e su#3ect to agreements or stipulations o Iuris$ictional 8proce$ural0 in nature o :eason) soun$ pu#lic polic( $eman$s that 3u$gments shoul$ #ecome final at some $efinite $ate fixe$ #( la% (Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium < pu#lic interest requires that #( the "er( nature of things there must #e an en$ to a legal contro"ers() Statutes prescri#ing proce$ural requirements o E"er( act %hich is 3uris$ictional, or of the essence of the procee$ings, or is prescri#e$ for the protection or #enefit of the part( affecte$ Election la%s on con$uct of election o Affects the con$uct of the elections an$ those %hich $irect or require election officials to $o or perform certain acts; proce$ural in nature o Purpose) to preser"e the sanctit( of the #allot an$ carr( out the %ill of the electorate o +an$ator( #efore the elections; $irector( after especiall( if "oters %ill #e $epri"e$ of their "otes %ithout an( fault on their part if man$ator( Election la%s on qualification an$ $isqualification o +an$ator( %hether #efore or after elections Statutes prescri#ing qualifications for office o Eligi#ilit( to a pu#lic office is of a continuing nature an$ must exist at the commencement of the term an$ $uring the occupanc( of the office o If a person is not qualifie$ at the time he assume$ office, or he loses such eligi#ilit( or qualifications $uring the continuance of his incum#enc(, he ma( #e ouste$ from office Statutes relating to assessment of taxes o +an$ator( %hen inten$e$ for the securit( of the citi,ens, to insure the equalit( of taxation, for certaint( as to the nature an$ amount of each other's tax o Director( %hen merel( for information or $irection of officers or to secure metho$ical an$ s(stematic mo$es of procee$ings Statutes concerning pu#lic auction sale o In $erogation of propert( rights an$ $ue process o +an$ator( %ith respect to the prescri#e$ proce$ure Directory Statutes +atter of con"enience No su#stantial rights $epen$ on it, no in3ur( can result from ignoring it, an$ the legislati"e intent can #e accomplishe$ in a =T(pe text> Statutory Construction Agpalo manner other than that prescri#e$ %ith su#stantiall( the same result Statute %hich is permissi"e or $iscretionar( in nature (ma') Noncompliance not necessar( to "ali$it( of the act !onstitutional pro"isions are $irector( %here the( refer to matters merel( proce$ural Statutes prescri#ing gui$ance for officers o Do not limit their po%er or ren$er its exercise in $isregar$ of the requisitions ineffectual o :egulations $esigne$ to secure or$er, s(stem an$ $ispatch in procee$ings Statutes prescri#ing manner of 3u$icial action o :equirements that 3u$ges shoul$ follo% in the $ischarge of their functions o Purpose) to pro"i$e an or$erl( proce$ure for the con$uct of pu#lic #usiness o Proce$ure merel( secon$ar( to su#stanti"e right Statutes requiring ren$ition of $ecision %ithin prescri#e$ perio$ 8!onstitutional time pro"isions0 o Director( unless language of the statute contains negati"e %or$s or sho%s that the $esignation of the time %as inten$e$ as a limitation of po%er, authorit( or right o Groun$ of expe$ienc() less in3ur( results to the general pu#lic #( $isregar$ing than enforcing the letter of the la% o 7ailure to compl( %ithin prescri#e$ perio$ $oes not $epri"e 3u$ges of 3uris$iction #ut the( %ill face a$ministrati"e sanctions Prospective and #etroactive Statutes Presumption) All la%s operate prospecti"el(, unless inten$e$ other%ise #( express $eclaration or necessar( implication, %hether the statute is in the form of an original enactment, an amen$ment or a repeal o (ex prospicit, non respicit < la% loo&s for%ar$, not #ac&%ar$ o (ex de futuro, !udex de praeterito < la% pro"i$es for the future, the 3u$ge for the past o %ova constitutio futuris formam imponere debet non praeteritis < a ne% statute shoul$ affect the future, not the past :eason) a la% is a rule esta#lishe$ to gui$e actions %ith no #in$ing effect until it is enacte$; has no application to past #ut onl( to future times Presumption stronger %ith reference to su#stanti"e la%s affecting pen$ing actions or procee$ings La% ma( #e ma$e operati"e partl( on facts that occurre$ prior to the effecti"it( of such la% %ithout #eing retroacti"e Prospecti"it( applies to statutes, a$ministrati"e rulings an$ circulars an$ 3u$icial $ecisions 8e"i$ence of %hat the la%s mean0 General rule $oes not appl( to statutes relating to reme$ies or mo$es of proce$ure %hich neither create ne% nor ta&e a%a( "este$ rights #ut onl( operate in furtherance of the reme$( or confirmation of rights alrea$( existing an$ is presumpti"el( applica#le to all actions *or$ ?shall@ implies that the la%ma&ers inten$ the enactment to #e effecti"e onl( in the future *hen la% expressl( pro"i$es that it shall #e retroacti"e #ut it "iolates an( of the constitutional restrictions, it shall #e applie$ prospecti"el( to sa"e it from #eing $eclare$ unconstitutional Prospective Statutes One %hich operates upon facts or transactions that occur after the statute ta&es effect, one that loo&s an$ applies to the future Penal statutes o %ullum crimen sine poena, nulla poena sine legis < there is no crime %ithout a penalt(, an$ there is no penalt( %ithout a la% o Art6 1/ :P! Ex post facto la% o :etroacti"e application prohi#ite$ #( !onstitution #ut limite$ in scope an$ applies onl( to penal matters, not to la%s %hich concern ci"il procee$ings generall( or %hich affect or regulate ci"il or pri"ate rights or political pri"ilege o Test) Does the la% sought to #e applie$ retroacti"el( ta&e from an accuse$ an( right that %as regar$e$ at the time as "ital for the protection of life an$ li#ert(L Des < EP7 la% /0 La% %hich ma&es criminal an act $one #efore the passage of the la% an$ %hich %as innocent %hen $one, an$ punishes such act 10 La% %hich aggra"ates a crime, or ma&es it greater than it %as, %hen committe$ 20 La% %hich changes the punishment an$ inflicts a greater punishment than that annexe$ to the crime %hen committe$ 40 La% %hich alters the legal rules of e"i$ence, an$ authori,es con"iction upon less or $ifferent testimon( than the la% require$ at the time of the commission of the offense M0 La% %hich assumes to regulate ci"il rights an$ reme$ies onl(, #ut in effect imposes penalt( or $epri"ation of a right for something %hich %hen $one %as la%ful N0 La% %hich $epri"es a person accuse$ of a crime of some la%ful protection to %hich he has #ecome entitle$, such as protection of a former con"iction or acquittal, or a proclamation of amnest( -ill of attain$er prohi#ite$ #( !onstitution o Legislati"e act %hich inflicts punishment %ithout 3u$icial trial; has EP7 features o !haracteristics) singling out of a $efinite minorit(; imposition of a #ur$en on it; legislati"e intent; retroacti"e application to past con$uct o Essence) su#stitution of a legislati"e for a 3u$icial $etermination of guilt o Purpose of constitutional #ar) implement the principle of separation of po%ers #( confining the legislature to rule5ma&ing an$ there#( forestalling legislati"e usurpation of 3u$icial functions o Aistor() -oA emplo(e$ to suppress unpopular causes an$ political minorities Statutes su#stanti"e in nature o La% %hich creates, $efines or regulates rights concerning life, li#ert( or propert( an$ $uties %hich gi"e rise to a cause of action, or the po%ers of agencies or instrumentalities for the a$ministration of pu#lic affairs; that %hich $eclares %hat acts are crimes an$ prescri#es the punishment for committing them 8as applie$ to criminal la%0 o Su#stanti"e right < one %hich inclu$es those rights %hich one en3o(s un$er the legal s(stem prior to the $istur#ance of normal relations o +a( not #e construe$ retroacti"el( %ithout someho% affecting pre"ious or past rights or o#ligations o +a( not retroact to go"ern pen$ing procee$ings in the a#sence of clear contrar( legislati"e intent an$ no "este$ rights are impaire$ o :ule) case must #e $eci$e$ in the light of the la% as it exists at the time of the $ecision #( the appellate court, %here the statute changing the la% is inten$e$ to #e retroacti"e an$ to appl( to pen$ing litigations; true though it ma( result in the re"ersal of a 3u$gment %hich %as correct at the time it %as ren$ere$ #( trial court #ut su#3ect to limitation concerning constitutional restrictions against impairment of "este$ rights Statutes affecting "este$ rights =T(pe text> Statutory Construction Agpalo o este$ right or interest < some right or interest in propert( that has #ecome fixe$ or esta#lishe$ an$ is no longer open to $ou#t or contro"ers(; a#solute, complete, an$ uncon$itional, in$epen$ent of a contingenc( o Inchoate rights %hich ha"e not #een acte$ on are not "este$ o Prospecti"e operation to sustain its constitutionalit( %here a retroacti"e application %ill pro$uce in"ali$it( #( impairing or interfering %ith "este$ or existing su#stanti"e rights Statutes affecting o#ligations of contract o !ontract must #e in accor$ance %ith the applica#le la% at the time of execution o !onstitution prohi#its enactment of a la% impairing the o#ligation of contracts o If a contract is legal at its inception, it cannot #e ren$ere$ illegal #( a su#sequent legislation o 7or a right to accrue is one thing; enforcement thereof #( actual pa(ment is another :epealing an$ amen$ator( acts o General rule on prospecti"e operation of statutes also applies to amen$ator( acts e"en if the( are generall( construe$ as #ecoming a part of the original act as if it ha$ al%a(s #een containe$ therein o After an act is amen$e$, the original act continues to #e in force %ith regar$ to all rights that ha$ accrue$ prior to such amen$ment Statutes relating to prescription o Proce$ural in nature o General rule) applies to all actions file$ after its effecti"it( o Prospecti"e in the sense that it applies to causes that accrue$ an$ %ill accrue after it too& effect an$ retroacti"e in the sense that it applies to causes that accrue$ #efore its passage o Legislature usuall( manifests its intent to appl( a statute of limitation retroacti"el( Statutes relating to appeals o :ight to appeal from a$"erse 3u$gment statutor( an$ ma( #e restricte$ or ta&en a%a( o :eme$ial or proce$ural in nature an$ applies to pen$ing actions at time of enactment o Statute shortening the perio$ for ta&ing appeals prospecti"e in the a#sence of clear legislati"e intent to the contrar( an$ ma( not #e applie$ to pen$ing procee$ings in %hich 3u$gment has alrea$( #een ren$ere$ at the time of enactment #etroactive Statutes La% %hich creates a ne% o#ligation, imposes a ne% $ut( or attaches a ne% $isa#ilit( in respect to a transaction alrea$( past :eme$ial or curati"e statutes as %ell as statutes %hich create ne% rights are inten$e$ to #e retroacti"e #( their nature an$ $o not impair contractual or "este$ rights Penal la%s %hen fa"ora#le to the accuse$ o -asis) foun$e$ on the "er( principles on %hich the right of the state to punish an$ impose penalt( is #ase$; exception foun$e$ on principles of 3ustice, not on political consi$erations o Exception 3ustifie$ #( conscience an$ goo$ la% o Assumption) t%o la%s affecting the lia#ilit( of the accuse$ . one in force at the time of the commission of the crime an$ the other enacte$ $uring or after the trial of the criminal action o Limitations) /0 Accuse$ a ha#itual $elinquent 10 Later statute expressl( pro"i$es that it shall not appl( to existing actions or pen$ing cases 20 Accuse$ $isregar$s the later la% an$ in"o&es the prior statute un$er %hich he %as prosecute$ Proce$ural la%s o A$3ecti"e la% < prescri#es rules an$ forms of proce$ure of enforcing rights or o#taining re$ress for their in"asion; rules of proce$ure #( %hich courts can properl( a$minister 3ustice o Statutes regulating the proce$ure of the courts applica#le to actions pen$ing an$ un$etermine$ at the time of their passage . retroacti"e in that sense an$ to that extent o As a general rule, no "este$ right ma( attach to, nor arise from, proce$ural la%s o An a$ministrati"e rule %hich is interpretati"e of a pre5existing statute an$ not $eclarati"e of certain rights %ith o#ligations thereun$er is retroacti"e as of the $ate of the effecti"it( of the statute o 8case la%0 Litigants cannot #e permitte$ to choose a forum of con"enience6 Iuris$iction is impose$ #( la% an$ not #( an( of the parties to such procee$ings6 o +a( not #e applie$ retroacti"el( to pen$ing actions if expressl( $eclare$ or #( necessar( implication, impairs "este$ rights, not feasi#le or %oul$ %or& in3ustice, in"ol"es intricate pro#lems of $ue process or impairs the in$epen$ence of the courts !urati"e statutes o One %hich cures $efects an$ a$$s to the means of enforcing existing o#ligations o Inten$e$ to suppl( $efects, a#ri$ge superfluities in existing la%s, an$ cur# certain e"ils o Purpose) to gi"e "ali$it( to acts $one that %oul$ ha"e #een in"ali$ un$er existing la%s, as if existing la%s ha"e #een complie$ %ith o !an cure pen$ing actions #ut not that %hich has attaine$ finalit( o ?%ill result in neither impairment of an( contractual o#ligation, $istur#ance of an( "este$ right nor #reach of some constitutional guarant(@ ()rivaldo vs* +,-E(E+) Police po%er legislations o Statutes %hich are enacte$ in the exercise of police po%er to regulate certain acti"ities o :eason) non5impairment of contractual o#ligations or "este$ rights must (iel$ to the legitimate exercise of the po%er #( the legislature to prescri#e regulations to promote the health, morals, peace, e$ucation, goo$ or$er, safet( an$ general %elfare of the people o :eser"ation of the essential attri#utes of so"ereign po%er $eeme$ rea$ into e"er( statute or contract as a postulate of the legal or$er Prescription in criminal an$ ci"il cases o !i"il) statute enacte$ #( legislature as impartial ar#iter #et%een t%o conten$ing parties; no inten$ment to #e ma$e in fa"or of either part(; no rights grante$ an$ thus, construction presumption against no grantor o !riminal) state is grantor, surren$ering #( act of grace its right to prosecute; li#erall( construe$ an$ is also retroacti"e if fa"ora#le to accuse$ 'mendment, #evision, !odification and #epeal 'mendment !hange or mo$ification, #( a$$ition, $eletion, or alteration, of a statute %hich sur"i"es in its amen$e$ form +a( #e express or implie$ amen$ment $one through enactment of amen$ator( act Po%er to amen$ an( existing la% inherent in the legislature o Authorit( part of legislati"e po%er to enact, alter an$ repeal la%s o S! no authorit( . legislati"e exclusi"e prerogati"e =T(pe text> Statutory Construction Agpalo Amen$ment #( implication o Neither presume$ nor fa"ore$ o Bsuall( sho%n #( a statement in the later act that an( pro"ision of la% inconsistent there%ith is mo$ifie$ accor$ingl( o Operates as long as there is an irreconcila#le repugnanc( #et%een the earlier an$ later la% o *here a part of a prior statute em#racing the same su#3ect as the later act ma( not #e enforce$ %ithout nullif(ing the pertinent pro"ision of the latter . prior act $eeme$ amen$e$ to the extent of the repugnanc( Ta&es effect /M $a(s after pu#lication in OG or ne%spaper of general circulation unless $ifferent $ate is specifie$ therein !onstruction of amen$ment o As if the original statute has #een repeale$ an$ a ne% an$ in$epen$ent act in the amen$e$ form ha$ #een a$opte$ o As if the statute has #een originall( enacte$ in its amen$e$ form o As a continuation of the existing la% an$ not as a ne% enactment o Shoul$ #e $ifferent from that of original statute since presume$ that legislature %oul$ not ha"e amen$e$ if $i$ not %ant to change its meaning o Suppression of excepting clause amounts to %ith$ra%al of the exemption allo%e$ un$er the original act General rule) prospecti"e unless contrar( pro"i$e$ or proce$ural la% 8relating to proce$ure in courts0, at %hich case applica#le to pen$ing an$ un$etermine$ actions at time of amen$ment :ights %hich ha"e #ecome "este$ un$er a statute #efore its amen$ment ma( not #e affecte$ #( such Effect of amen$ment on 3uris$iction o Iuris$iction of a court to tr( cases $etermine$ #( the la% in force at the time the action is institute$ an$ remains %ith the court until the case is finall( $eci$e$ therein o Su#sequent statute amen$ing a prior act %ith the effect of $i"esting the court of 3uris$iction ma( not #e construe$ to operate to oust 3uris$iction that has alrea$( attache$ un$er the prior la% else it %ill #e a su#"ersion of the 3u$icial process o Also applies to quasi53u$icial #o$ies Amen$ator( act, if complete #( itself, %ill #e consi$ere$ as an original or in$epen$ent act *here amen$ator( act is $eclare$ unconstitutional, it is as if the amen$ment $i$ not exist, an$ the original statute #efore the attempte$ amen$ment remains unaffecte$ an$ in force #evision and !odification Purpose) to restate the existing la%s into one statute, simplif( complicate$ pro"isions, an$ ma&e the la%s on the su#3ect easil( foun$ Pro#lem) %hat meaning or significance ma( #e attache$ to an( of the mo$ifications or changes 8insertion or omission of pro"isions, change in phraseolog(, rearranging of sections0 !onstruction to harmoni,e $ifferent pro"isions o Presumption) author has maintaine$ a consistent philosoph( or position o !o$e is enacte$ as a single, comprehensi"e statute an$ is to #e consi$ere$ as such, not as a series of $isconnecte$ articles or pro"isions o Irreconcila#le conflictL That %hich is #est in accor$ %ith the general plan6 No %a( to $etermineL That %hich is later in ph(sical position, #eing the latest expression of legislati"e %ill *hat is omitte$ is $eeme$ repeale$ unless pro"i$e$ other%ise o :eason) re"ision or co$ification, #( its "er( nature an$ purpose, inten$e$ to #e a complete enactment on the su#3ect an$ an expression of the %hole la% thereon o Intent on part of legislature to a#rogate those pro"isions of the ol$ la%s that are not repro$uce$ in the re"ise$ statute or co$e o Possi#le onl( if the re"ise$ statute or co$e %as inten$e$ to co"er the %hole su#3ect to #e a complete an$ perfect s(stem in itself o Ne% repeals ol$ if it re"ises the %hole su#3ect matter of the ol$, #oth intent an$ scope e"ince the i$ea of a repeal, clear intention that ne% is su#stitute of ol$ !on$ensation a necessit( in re"ision E co$ification o Neither an alteration in phraseolog( nor the omission or a$$ition of %or$s in the later statute shall #e hel$ necessaril( to alter the construction of the former acts !onstrue$ as a continuation of existing la%s o Presumption) co$ifiers $i$ not inten$ to change the la% as it formerl( existe$ o :earrangement of sections or parts of statute, #rea&ing up of a single section into separate sections $oes not necessaril( change the operation, effect or meaning of the statute unless legislati"e intent is clear an$ unmista&a#le #epeal Legislature has plenar( po%er to repeal, a#rogate or re"o&e existing la%s o Po%er to repeal as complete as po%er to enact o !annot enact irrepeala#le la%s or limit future legislati"e acts o S! no po%er to repeal . can onl( promulgate rules of proce$ure 9in$s of repeal) /0 Total "s6 Partial T) statute ren$ere$ re"o&e$ completel( P) lea"es the unaffecte$ portions of the statute in force 10 Express "s6 Implie$ E) $eclaration in a statute that a particular an$ specific la%, i$entifie$ #( its num#er or title, is repeale$; i$entifies or $esignates the act or acts that are inten$e$ to #e repeale$ I) all other repeals not express 7ailure to a$$ specific repealing clause in$icates that intent %as not to repeal an( existing la% unless an irreconcila#le inconsistenc( an$ repugnanc( exist . falls un$er implie$ repeal Presumption) legislature &no%s existing la%s so that if a repeal is inten$e$, proper step is to express it La%s are repeale$ onl( #( the enactment of su#sequent la%s o Not repeale$ #( $isuse or customs an$ practice to the contrar( o iolation or nono#ser"ance not excuse$ o !hange in con$ition an$ circumstances after passage of la% %hich #rought a#out the statute $oes not operate to repeal prior la% :epeal #( implication o Premise) *here a statute of later $ate clearl( re"eals an intention on the part of the legislature to a#rogate a prior act on the su#3ect, that intention must #e gi"en effect6 Intent must #e clear an$ manifest6 o General rule) Later act is to #e construe$ as a continuation of, an$ not a su#stitute for, the first act an$ %ill continue so far as the t%o acts are the same from the time of the first enactment o Not fa"ore$6 Presumption against inconsistenc( an$ repugnanc( an$ accor$ingl(, against implie$ repeal6 E"er( effort must #e use$ to ma&e all acts stan$6 If, #( an( reasona#le construction, the( can #e reconcile$, the later act %ill not operate as a repeal of the earlier6 T%o categories of repeal #( implication) /0 ?-( irreconcila#le inconsistenc(@ *here pro"isions in the t%o acts on the same su#3ect matter are in an irreconcila#le conflict, the later act to the extent of the conflict constitutes an implie$ repeal of the earlier one6 =T(pe text> Statutory Construction Agpalo *hen t%o statutes co"er the same su#3ect matter; clearl( inconsistent an$ incompati#le %ith each other that the( cannot #e reconcile$ or harmoni,e$; #oth cannot #e gi"en effect, one la% cannot #e enforce$ %ithout nullif(ing the other Shoul$ em#race same su#3ect an$ ha"e same o#3ect 7act that a later enactment ma( relate to the same su#3ect matter is not of itself sufficient to cause an implie$ repeal6 The ne% statute ma( merel( #e cumulati"e or a continuation of the ol$ one6 *hat is necessar( is a manifest in$ication of legislati"e purpose to repeal6 Inconsistenc( ne"er presume$ *hen the later la% nullifies the reason or purpose of the earlier act, so that the earlier act loses all meaning an$ function !ar$inal rule) T%o inconsistent la%s on the same su#3ect cannot co5exist in one 3uris$iction6 Either the( are reconcile$ or the later la% repeals the prior la%6 (eges posteriors priores contrarias abrogant < a later la% repeals a prior la% on the same su#3ect %hich is repugnant thereto 10 ?-( re"ision or co$ification of the former la%s@ If the later act co"ers the %hole su#3ect of the earlier one an$ is clearl( inten$e$ as a su#stitute, it %ill operate to repeal the earlier la%6 Onl( possi#le if the re"ise$ statute or co$e %as inten$e$ to co"er the %hole su#3ect to #e a complete an$ perfect s(stem in itself A su#sequent statute is $eeme$ to repeal a prior la% if the former re"ises the %hole su#3ect matter of the former statute6 *hen #oth intent an$ scope clearl( e"ince the i$ea of a repeal, all parts omitte$ from the re"ise$ act are $eeme$ repeale$6 *here a ne% statute is inten$e$ to furnish the exclusi"e rule on a certain su#3ect Other forms of implie$ repeal o +ost po%erful implication of repeal is that %hich arises %hen the later of t%o la%s is expresse$ in the form of a uni"ersal negati"e o :epealing effects of affirmati"eEnegati"e statutes /0 A) $oes not implie$l( repeal prior la% unless intention to effect repeal is manifest 10 N) repeals all conflicting pro"isions unless contrar( intention $isclose$ o *here something is enacte$ in general terms an$ after%ar$s another is passe$ on the same su#3ect intro$ucing special con$itions or restrictions, former statute regar$ing the matter co"ere$ #( the su#sequent act consi$ere$ repeale$ #( implication o Enactment of a statute on a su#3ect %hose purpose or o#3ect is $iametricall( oppose$ to that of an earlier la% on the same su#3ect, there#( $epri"ing it of its reason for #eing, prior la% repeale$ #( implication General repealing pro"ision < clause %hich pre$icates the inten$e$ repeal un$er the con$ition that a su#stantial conflict must #e foun$ on existing an$ prior acts of the same su#3ect matter; intent not to repeal an( existing la% unless an irreconcila#le inconsistenc( an$ repugnanc( exists o Significance) presence in$icates legislati"e intent to repeal all prior inconsistent la%s on the su#3ect matter, e"en if prior la% is a special la% unless the general la% contains a sa"ing clause o Later general la% %ill or$inaril( not repeal a prior special la% on the same su#3ect as special la% is generall( regar$e$ as an exception :epeals of statutes #( implication are not fa"ore$6 Presumption against inconsistenc( an$ repugnanc(6 :epeals #( implication %ill not #e $ecree$ unless it is manifest that the legislature so inten$e$6 E"er( effort must #e use$ to ma&e all acts stan$6 If, #( an( reasona#le construction, the( can #e reconcile$, the later act %ill not operate as a repeal of the earlier6 As #et%een t%o la%s on same su#3ect matter, that %hich is passe$ later pre"ails since it is the latest expression of legislati"e %ill o Applies e"en if the later act is ma$e to ta&e effect ahea$ of the earlier la% o Point of contention is passage, not effecti"it( o Presumption) legislature &ne% ol$er la% an$ inten$e$ to change it General la% usuall( $oes not repeal prior special la% unless legislature inten$e$ to $o so o Presumption against implie$ repeal e"en though the terms of the general act are #roa$ enough to inclu$e the matter co"ere$ #( the special statute o .eneralia specialibus non derogant < general la% $oes not nullif( a specific or special la% o General la% (iel$s to the special la% in the specific an$ particular su#3ect em#race$ in the latter, irrespecti"e of the $ate of passage o :eason) special la% e"inces the legislati"e intent more clearl( than the general statute o Special laterL Hualification of the general one6 General laterL Special la% exception to its terms6 Special or general la% repeals the other o *here the later act is a special la%, there is al%a(s a partial repeal of the general la% to the extent of the repugnanc( or exception o General la% %hen legislati"e intent is clear 8general repealing clause; language %oul$ #e useless if special la% not repeale$ nor mo$ifie$; so #roa$ in its terms an$ so clear an$ explicit in its %or$s as to sho% that it inten$e$ to co"er the %hole su#3ect an$ $isplace the prior statute, etc60 o No prohi#ition against the repeal e"en #( implication of a special or specific act #( a general or #roa$ la%, 3ust not fa"ore$ Example) A charter must (iel$ to the constitution an$ general la%s of the state6 *hen a charter is enacte$, it is $eeme$ to incorporate therein the general la%s affecting local go"ernments6 A chartere$ cit( is not an in$epen$ent so"ereignt( although its charter remains supreme in all matters not purel( local6 Effects of repeal o :en$ers statute inoperati"e as of the $ate the repealing act ta&es effect o *hat a repeal $oes NOT $o) /0 Statute %as in"ali$ from $ate of its enactment 10 Bn$o the consequences of the operation of the statute %hile in force 20 :en$ers illegal %hat un$er the repeale$ act is legal or "ice "ersa Effect on 3uris$iction o :epeal or expiration of statute granting 3uris$iction $oes not ma&e $ecision su#sequentl( ren$ere$ in actions pen$ing a$3u$ication null an$ "oi$ for %ant of authorit( unless other%ise pro"i$e$ o !riminal cases) Iuris$iction pre"iousl( acquire$ cannot #e ouste$ unless the contrar( is pro"i$e$, express prohi#itor( %or$s are use$, or the criminal la% "iolate$ is itself repeale$ Effect on actions, pen$ing or other%ise =T(pe text> Statutory Construction Agpalo o General rule) repeal of a statute $efeats all actions an$ procee$ings #ase$ on such statute, inclu$ing those still pen$ing o Appellate court %ill $ispose of a question accor$ing to the la% pre"ailing at the time of $isposition, not accor$ing to la% pre"ailing at the time the appeale$ 3u$gment %as ren$ere$ Effect on "este$ rights o :epeal of statute $oes not $estro( or impair rights that accrue$ or "este$ un$er ol$ la% then in force o !onstitution for#i$s state from impairing "este$ rights or o#ligations of contract #( enacting or repealing statutes except in the legitimate exercise of police po%er o *here a statute gi"es an appellant right to appeal from a$"erse $ecision, repeal of such statute after appeal has #een perfecte$ %ill not $estro( his right to prosecute the appeal nor $epri"e the appellate court of the authorit( to $eci$e the appeale$ case Effect of repeal of tax la%s o :epeal $oes not preclu$e collection of taxes assesse$ un$er the ol$ la% #efore it %as repeale$, unless other%ise pro"i$e$ o General rule) :epeal prospecti"e Effect of repeal an$ reenactment o :eenactment neutrali,es repeal an$ continues la% in force %ithout interruption o Simultaneous repeal an$ reenactment of statute $oes not affect rights an$ lia#ilities accrue$ un$er original statute o !riminal cases) %hen reenactment of repeale$ la% not simultaneous 8continuit( #ro&en0, repeal $epri"es court of its 3uris$iction o"er "iolations of the ol$ la% prior to its repeal Effect of repeal of penal la%s o *hen repeal a#solute such that crime no longer exists or %here the repealing statute %holl( fails to penali,e the acts %hich constitute$ the offense in the repeale$ la%, court loses 3uris$iction o"er "iolations of repeale$ la% o :eason) repeal a legislati"e act of ren$ering legal %hat is pre"iousl( $ecree$ as illegal o Exceptions) /0 *here the repealing act reenacts the statute an$ penali,es the same act pre"iousl( penali,e$ un$er the repeale$ la% 10 *here the repealing act contains a sa"ing clause pro"i$ing that pen$ing actions shall not #e affecte$ :epeal "s6 Expiration of la% . their effects o A#solute :epeal) crime is o#literate$, stigma of con"iction for "iolation of penal la% #efore its repeal erase$ o Expiration of criminal statute #( its o%n force Effect of repeal of municipal charter o General rule) :epeal of a charter $estro(s all offices un$er it an$ puts an en$ to the functions of the incum#ents Effect of repeal or nullit( of repealing la% o *hen a la% %hich expressl( repeals a prior la% is itself repeale$, the la% first repeale$ shall not there#( #e re"i"e$, unless expressl( so pro"i$e$6 o *here a la% %hich repeals a prior la% #( implication is repeale$, the prior la% is re"i"e$ unless the language of the repealing statute pro"i$es other%ise6 o *here a repealing statute is $eclare$ unconstitutional, it %ill ha"e no effect of repealing the former statute %hich %ill continue to remain in force6 =T(pe text>