Anda di halaman 1dari 7

Kurtis Richard Kallenbach

Temporary pickup location


8368 Big Saint Germain Drive
Saint Germain, Wisconsin
Non-Domestic
States Attorney Joe Bruscato
Winnebago County Courthouse
400 West State Street
Rockford, Illinois
RE 673 036 722 US


Dear States Attorney Joe Bruscato,
This registered letter is lawful notification to you upon the soil of Illinois as Winnebago County
States Attorney, pursuant to The Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the United States, as well
as The Constitution, Bill of Rights, and subscribed oath for Illinois, and thus requires your
official and immediate action. Your failure to answer or respond as stipulated, and rebut, with
particularity, everything in this letter with which you disagree is your lawful, legal, and binding
agreement with and admission to the fact that everything in this letter is true, correct, legal,
lawful, and binding, in any court, anywhere in America, without your protest or objection or that
of those who represent you. Your silence is your acquiescence. (See Connally v. General
Construction Company, 269 U.S. 385). Notification of legal responsibility is the first essential
of due process of law. Also, see U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F. 2d. 297. Silence can only be equated
with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left unanswered
would be intentionally misleading.
I gnorantia juris non excusat
Since your office has imposed itself upon my lawful and living wife, Deborah, in her genuine
stead upon the soil of Illinois, the very first question that needs a specific answer is: On behalf of
what state do you act in your official capacity as the States Attorney? Is it on behalf of the
21
st
State of the Republic established December 3, 1818 in Kaskaskia known as Illinois - or - is it
on behalf of the District of Columbia defined as a state via Public Act of Congress in 1864?
Chap. CLXXIII. An Act to provide Internal Revenue to support the Government, to pay Interest
on the Public Debt, and for other Purposes. Sec. 182. And be it further enacted, that wherever
the word state [jurisdiction] is used in this act, it shall be construed to include the
[jurisdictions of the] territories and the District of Columbia, where such construction is
necessary to carry out the provisions of this act. Public Acts of the Thirty- Eighth Congress of
the United States. Sess.1. Ch. 173, 174. 1864. (13 Stat. 223). (emphasis mine)


County courts The powers and jurisdiction of such courts are governed by state
constitutions or statutes; some with strictly administrative, or strictly judicial functions,
or a combination of both; some with only criminal jurisdiction, or only civil, or both;
Some have exclusive jurisdictions, others concurrent jurisdiction; such jurisdictional
powers may, in addition, be either general or specific. Blacks Law Dictionary 5th
Edition



On Friday, January 23, 2014, a little more than two weeks ago, a private attorney, very much to
our shock and surprise, quit her retained services only one day after receiving a written request by
my wife, Deborah, that she, attorney Melinda Jacobson of the private law firm of Sreenan &
Cain, and States attorney/prosecutor, Frank Spataro, must provide substantial evidence of lawful
compliance to Illinois Law via a subscribed oath as lawfully required under the Attorney Act
known as Illinois Law (705 ILCS 205/4) (from Ch. 13, par. 4). Such a reasonable request would
clearly remove any suspicion of attorney Jacobsons lack of lawful compliance, legal capacity,
and proper standing upon the soil of Illinois to act in the genuine stead of my living and lawful
wife, Deborah, as well as prove lawful compliance, legal capacity, and proper standing of the
States attorney/prosecutor, Frank Spataro, who has presumed to engage my wife, Deborah, in
her genuine stead in a highly questionable imposition from upon the soil of Illinois.
From the Attorney Act (705 ILCS 205/4) (from Ch. 13, par. 4)
Sec. 4. Every person admitted to practice as an attorney and counsellor at law shall,
before his name is entered upon the roll to be kept as hereinafter provided, take and
subscribe an oath, substantially in the following form:
I do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be), that I will support the constitution
of the United States and the constitution of the state of I llinois, and that I will faithfully
discharge the duties of the office of attorney and counselor at law to the best of my
ability.
(Source: R.S. 1874, p. 169.)
Subscription The act of writing ones name under a written instrument; the affixing
ones signature to any document, whether for the purpose of authenticating or attesting
it, of adopting its terms as ones own expressions, or of binding ones self by an
engagement which it contains. Blacks Law Dictionary 5th Edition
As it happened, that Friday during a face-to-face meeting at the county courthouse upon the soil
of the Illinois in a small conference room outside the actual court room just moments prior to
going before judge Heaslip, attorney Jacobson informed my wife, Deborah, that she WOULD
NOT ask for physical proof of compliance to Illinois Law 705 ILCS 205/4 from the States
attorney/prosecutor, Frank Spataro, personally stating that she has to work with these people
every day and does not want to make the judge mad, and that she herself DID NOT have a
lawfully required subscribed oath and in the same breath spoke of refunding her fees. The
written request by my wife, Deborah, for physical evidence of compliance to Illinois law was a
sincere and honest inquiry concerning suspected misrepresentation by attorney Jacobson which
ultimately proved to be true when she admitted to having no subscribed oath - thus no lawful or
legal capacity - to act in the genuine stead of my living wife Deborah in any Illinois court.
(See: included (a) dated email and (b) faxed request for evidence of lawful compliance by
State prosecutor Frank Spataro to attorney Melinda Jacobson)
The question is: Did attorney Frank Spataro also misrepresent his lawful capacity to act upon
the soil of Illinois? Do you as attorney Frank Spataros employer have substantial evidence that
he is in fact in lawful compliance with the Attorney Act and Illinois law - 705 ILCS 205/4? Is
Frank Spataro, in fact, an imposter upon Illinois soil? Are there ANY attorneys in the States
attorneys office in compliance with Illinois Law - 705 ILCS 205/4? Can you prove it?
Nemo auditur propriam turpitudinem allegans



Attorney In the most general sense this term denotes an agent or substitute, or one who
is appointed and authorized to act in the place or stead of another. Nardi v. Poinsatte,
D.C.Ind, 46 F.2d 347,348. An agent, or one acting on behalf of another. Sherts v. Fulton
Nat. Bank of Lancaster, 342 Pa. 337, 21 A.2d 18. In its most common usage, however,
unless a contrary meaning is clearly intended, this term means attorney at law,
lawyer or counselor at law.
Attorney means attorney, professional law association, corporation, or partnership,
authorized under applicable law to practice law. Bankruptcy Act, 101(3).
The word attorney includes a party prosecuting or defending an action in person.
New York C.P.L.R. 105. - Blacks Law 5
th
Edition
Attorney in fact A private attorney authorized by another to act in his place and stead,
either for some particular purpose, as to do a particular act, or for the transaction of
business in general, not of a legal character. This authority is conferred by an
instrument in writing, called a letter of attorney, or more commonly a power of
attorney. - Blacks Law 5
th
Edition
Attorney of record Attorney whose name must appear somewhere in permanent records
or files of case, or on the pleadings or some instrument filed in the case, or on the
appearance docket. Person whom the client has named as his agent upon whom service
of papers may be made. Reynolds v. Reynolds, 21 Cal.2d 580, 134 P.2d 251, 254.
An attorney who has filed a notice of appearance (e.g. through a praecipe) and who
hence is formally mentioned in the court records as the official attorney of the party.
Once an attorney becomes an attorney of record, he often cannot withdraw from the case
without court permission.
Every pleading of a party represented by an attorney shall be signed by at least one
attorney of record in his individual name, whose address shall be stated. Fed.R.Civil P.
11. - Blacks Law 5
th
Edition
States attorney An officer who represents the State in securing indictments and in
prosecuting criminal cases. Also called District Attorney or Prosecuting Attorney.
Commonly he is elected in a county election and his authority is county wide. - Blacks
Law Dictionary 5
th
Edition
On or near January 29, 2014, attorney Jacobson attempted to extricate herself and her law firm
from clearly unlawful and non-compliant (illegal) conduct upon the soil of Illinois via formal
motion to withdraw as the attorney of record for my wife. She has called it a breakdown of
attorney-client relationship and a fundamental disagreement when in fact her conduct had
been nothing short of fraudulent, deceitful, and misrepresentative from the beginning. My
question is how can an honest and sincere request to provide substantial evidence of lawful
compliance with the laws of Illinois be considered a breakdown of attorney-client relationship
or fundamental disagreement unless the attorney is in fact NOT WHO THEY REPRESENT
THEMSELVES TO BE? If attorney Jacobson has neither the lawful or legal capacity or standing
upon the soil of Illinois to act in the genuine stead of my wife, then obviously the fundamental
disagreement would be one of LAWFUL ATTORNEY COMPLIANCE WITH ILLINOIS LAW


and not just a difference of opinion as she would have one believe. (See: (c) letter evidencing
withdraw as council by attorney Jacobson)
Compliance Submission; Obedience; Conformance. - Blacks Law Dictionary 5th
Edition
Lawful Legal; warranted or authorized by the law; having the qualifications
prescribed by law; not contrary to not forbidden by the law.
The principal distinction between the terms lawful and legal is that the former
contemplates the substance of law, the latter the form of law. To say of an act that it is
lawful implies that it is authorized, sanctioned, or at any rate not forbidden, by law.
To say that it is legal implies that it is done or performed in accordance with the forms
and usages of law, or in a technical manner. In this sense, illegal approaches the
meaning of invalid. For example, a contract or will, executed without the required
formalities, might be said to be invalid or illegal, but could not be described as unlawful.
Further, the world lawful more clearly implies an ethical content than does legal.
The latter (legal) goes no further than to denote compliance, with positive, technical, or
formal rules; while the former usually imports a moral substance or ethical
permissibility. A further distinction is that the word legal is used as the synonym of
constructive, which lawful is not. Thus legal fraud is fraud implied or inferred
by law, or made out by construction. Lawful fraud would be a contradiction in terms.
Again, legal is used as the antithesis of equitable. Thus, we speak of legal assets,
or lawful estate. But there are some connections in which the two words are used as
exact equivalents. Thus, a lawful writ, warrant, or process is the same as a legal
writ, warrant, or process. - Blacks Law 5
th
Edition
Capacity Legal qualification, competency, power or fitness. Ability to understand the
nature and effects of ones acts. The ability of a particular individual or entity to use, or
to be brought into, the courts of a forum.
When my wife Deborah and I first sat across the desk of attorney Jacobson, we were living
breathing people upon the soil of Illinois and speaking in plain English when we asked her if she
could help us. She responded from the soil of Illinois in plain English to living breathing people
that she, in fact, could help. We have since found out that she in fact deceived us. With that said,
any presumed agreement or contract between my wife Deborah and attorney Jacobson is void on
its face for it was completely founded upon deception, misrepresentation, and lacks the full
disclosure of her non-compliance with Illinois law 705 ILCS 205/4. Thus, all acts involving
attorney Jacobson are tainted from the beginning and must be considered void.
Deceit A fraudulent and deceptive misrepresentation, artifice, or device, used by one or
more persons to deceive and trick another, who is ignorant of the true facts, to the
prejudice and damage of the party imposed upon. To constitute deceit, the statement
must be untrue, made with knowledge of its falsity or with reckless and conscious
ignorance thereof, especially if the parties are not on equal terms, made with intent that
plaintiff act thereon or in a manner apparently fitted to induce him to act thereon, and
plaintiff must act in reliance on the statement in the manner contemplated, or manifestly
probable, to his injury.
Misrepresentation Any manifestation by words or other conduct by one person to
another that, under the circumstances, amounts to an assertion not in accordance with


the facts. An untrue statement of fact. An incorrect or false representation. That which,
if accepted, leads the mind to an apprehension of a condition other and different from
that which exists. Colloquially it is understood to mean a statement made to deceive or
mislead.
In a limited sense, an intentional false statement respecting a matter of fact, made by one
of the parties to a contract, which is material to the contract and influential in producing
it. A misrepresentation, which justifies the rescission of a contract, is a false statement
of a substantive fact, or any conduct which leads to a belief of a substantive fact material
to proper understanding of the matter in hand, made with intent to deceive or mislead.
The extradition of a man from his true lawful venue or genuine forum originis is always
negatively prejudicial towards the so-called defendant for such an act is only for an individual
who has already been accused or convicted of an offense outside its own territory and within
the territorial jurisdiction of another. Thus, for a man to ignorantly surrender to such
erroneous conduct and waive lawful venue without an objection could be viewed or considered
by a court as an indirect admission of guilt or willful participation. It is obvious to anyone
having the mental capacity to comprehend reality that my living and lawful wife is not subject to
extradition as an it i.e. a nonhuman entity, animal, or abstraction - or - legal construction,
conversion, or conveyance, and that from the beginning her unique living manifest essence
(DNA) has always been self-evident proof of life here and now - thus lawful standing - upon
the soil of Illinois. (See: (d) Secretary of State/ Registered letter # RE 673 036 183 US)
Forum originis The court of ones nativity. The place of a persons birth, considered
as a place of jurisdiction. - Blacks Law 5
th
Edition
Venue Formally spelled visne. In common law pleading and practice, a neighborhood;
the neighborhood, place, or county in which an injury is declared to have happened. 3
Bl.Comm. 294. -
The particular county, or geographic area, in which a court with jurisdiction may hear
and determine a case. Venue deals with locality of suit, that is, with question of which
court, or courts, of those that possess adequate personal and subject-matter jurisdiction
may hear the specific suit in question. It has relation to convenience of litigants and may
be waived by consent of parties. Iselin v. La Coste, C.C.A.La., 147 F.2d 791, 795.
Venue does not refer to jurisdiction at all. Arganbright v. Good, 46 Cal.App.2d Supp.
877, 116 P.2d 186. Jurisdiction of the court means the inherent power to decide a
case, whereas venue designates the particular county or city in which a court with
jurisdiction may hear and determine the case. Stanton Trust and Savings Bank v.
Johnson, 104 Mont. 235, 65 P.2d 1188, 1189. As such, while a defect in venue may be
waived by the parties, lack of jurisdiction may not. - Blacks Law 5th Edition - (emphasis
mine)
My wife, Deborah, vehemently objected in writing to the waiving of proper and lawful venue
by way of a request to provide substantial evidence of lawful compliance to Illinois Law via a
subscribed oath as lawfully required under the Attorney Act known as Illinois Law (705
ILCS 205/4) (from Ch. 13, par. 4). Clearly attorney Jacobson evidenced her true allegiance to an
alternate jurisdiction, forum, standard, or State with her acts of deception and
misrepresentation. Her obvious efforts to effectively remove my wife from her lawful and proper
venue in order to sacrifice her person or property (without full disclosure, willful participation,


or true consent) upon the altar of some foreign State terminated the moment Illinois Law was
invoked via demand for the lawfully required subscribed oath. (See: Register letter # RE 673
036 722 US Constructive Notice /Assisted Suicide.)
It becomes obvious to any man of reason that there are many less than honorable attorneys
currently working upon the soil of Illinois transacting millions of dollars of unknown foreign or
private business far beyond the truly lawful lands, venue, geographic boundary, and
consciousness - thus consent - of those whom they pretend to represent. This bait and switch
is used by attorneys who prey caveat emptor upon living men or women lost in legal land by
intentionally misleading the so-called client directly into the hands of a foreign government,
jurisdiction, forum, etc. Such conduct places every living man or woman at risk of life and limb
the moment they mistakenly walk into a so-called court of justice. Not only are such
misrepresentative acts despicable, reprehensible, or immoral, they are, in fact, unlawful.
"The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one
of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress." -
U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873)
We have in our political system a government of the United States and a government of
each of the several States. Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and
each has citizens of its own... United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)
...he was not a citizen of the United States, he was a citizen and voter of the State,
One may be a citizen of a State and yet not a citizen of the United States. - McDonel v.
The State, 90 Ind. 320 (1883)
"The state citizen is immune from any and all government attacks and procedure, absent
contract." see, Dred Scott vs. Sanford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 or as the Supreme Court
has stated clearly, every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by
nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his
consent.- CRUDEN vs. NEALE, 2 N.C. 338 2 S.E. 70
Illinois defined as Adopted at Kaskaskia in convention, August 26, 1818.
THE people of the Illinois territory, having the right of admission into the general
government as a member of the Union, consistent with the constitution of the United States,
the ordinance of congress of 1787, and the law of congress approved April 18th , 1818,
entitled "An act to enable the people of the Illinois territory to form a constitution and state
government, and for the admission of such state into the Union, on an equal footing with the
original states, and for other purposes;" in order to establish justice, promote the welfare,
and secure the blessings of liberty to themselves and their posterity, do by their
representatives in convention, ordain and establish the following constitution or form of
government; and do mutually agree with each other to form themselves into a free and
independent state, by the name of the State of Illinois. And they do hereby ratify the
boundaries assigned to such state by the act of congress aforesaid, which are as follows, to
wit: Beginning at the mouth of the Wabash river, thence up the same, and with the line of
Indiana to the northwest corner of said state; then east with the line of the same state, to the
middle of Lake Michigan; thence north, along the middle of said lake, to north latitude 42
degrees and 30 minutes; thence west to the middle of the Mississippi river, and thence
down, along the middle of that river, to its confluence with the Ohio river; and thence up
the latter river, along its northwestern shore, to the beginning.


As it now stands, there is no evidence of lawful compliance to Illinois law 705 ILCS 205/4 by
any attorney - prosecutor or otherwise - practicing within the 17
th
Judicial Circuit court upon the
soil of Illinois. The laws of Illinois are very clear in their requirement that every attorney must
provide a subscribed oath in order to be in lawful compliance upon the soil of Illinois. That is
what the laws of Illinois require and that is what I demand. My wife has been terrorized by an
unlawful and quite possibly foreign forensic justice system for the better part of four years now
and it is time for the lawful Illinois court(s) to stand upon the laws of Illinois. The law is the law.
Unlawful That which is contrary to, prohibited , or unauthorized by law. That which is
not lawful. The acting contrary to, or in defiance of the law; disobeying or disregarding
the law; While necessarily not implying the element of criminality, it is broad enough to
include it. - Blacks Law 5
th
Edition
Contrary Against; opposed or in opposition to; in conflict with.
Contrary to law Illegal; in violation of statute or legal regulations at a given time. In
respect of verdict, in conflict with the law contained in courts instructions.
You, attorney Bruscato, as the States attorney are now in a position respondeat superior to
clear up all the confusion once and for all regarding the legal capacity and lawful standing of all
attorneys working for the prosecution upon the soil of Winnebago county within the geographic
boundaries of the 21
st
State of the Republic established December 3, 1818 in Kaskaskia known as
Illinois. Many questions have been posed throughout this writing that requires your immediate
attention and answers. Every attorney within the scope of your office, which includes you
attorney Bruscato, is hereby requested to provide a subscribed oath proving lawful compliance
to Illinois law as required by Illinois law 705 ILCS 205/4 - also known as the Attorney Act.

You have 3 days from receipt of this registered letter to provide via fax number 715-542-2882 all
requested material which would in fact prove lawful compliance to work or act upon Illinois soil.
Your silence or your failure to provide such proof of lawful Illinois compliance within the time
allotted will be considered a default by you, your office, and the State of your employ -
ultimately evidencing non-compliance in toto ab initio to the laws of Illinois.

Govern yourself accordingly.

Sincerely,



Cc:
Illinois State General Assembly
Illinois States Representative
Illinois State Senator
Illinois Attorney General
Illinois Secretary of State
Illinois Governor
United States Attorney General Alien Property Custodian
Her Majestys Attorney General for England and Wales

Anda mungkin juga menyukai