When Newton corrected Kepler's equation he solved Planet Mercury Perihelion advance. When Newton Solved Newton's equation of gravitational law wrong he allowed an idiot named Einstein to rig physics to claim a solution for Mercury's perihelion. When i looked at Newton's wrong solution and Kepler's wrong law and Einstein's worthless law; my sugar glider came up with a solution because there are 21 different solutions and none published before discovered by me in High school in 1970's

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

364 tayangan

When Newton corrected Kepler's equation he solved Planet Mercury Perihelion advance. When Newton Solved Newton's equation of gravitational law wrong he allowed an idiot named Einstein to rig physics to claim a solution for Mercury's perihelion. When i looked at Newton's wrong solution and Kepler's wrong law and Einstein's worthless law; my sugar glider came up with a solution because there are 21 different solutions and none published before discovered by me in High school in 1970's

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

- QMReport
- Weak ‘antigravity’ fields in general relativity (WWW.OLOSCIENCE.COM)
- Einstein Conspiracy
- Abhay Ashtekar- Introduction to Loop Quantum Gravity
- How and Why Wonder Book of Stars
- Astrologyclub.org-The Outer Planets as Singletons
- Rtg
- The Art of Reading People - John Cremer
- a2 42 Gravitation
- Planets and Solar System Questions and Answers
- Tha Planets
- New Magicks for a New Age, Volume 4, Book 10
- Lanczos-Lovelock-Cartan Gravity from Clifford Space Geometry
- David Paul Coleman
- Relativity - Book by Herbert Dinglee
- The Galactic Black Hole - Lectures on General Relativity and Astrophysics
- Dr. David Tong - String Theory
- Einstein
- Planet Earth
- Relativistic_Heat_Conduction.pdf

Anda di halaman 1dari 15

joenahhas1958@yahoo.com

It is not only Einstein is wrong but all physicists are wrong for past 400 years. It is time

for change; regime change of annexing quantum mechanics to classical mechanics and

deleting relativity. The elimination of relativity theory is a matter of time and not a matter

of science. Trying to preserve energy fraud symbol E = mc² ended physics and it is time

to End relativity and reinstate physics, real time physics

Real time Physics: We can only measure past events. We can not

measure something that did not happen. We can only measure things

that had happened. What we measure is not what happened. We

measure in present time an event that happened in past time.

Present time = past time + [present time - past time]

Present time = past time + real time delays

Real time physics = event time physics + real time relativistic delays

What one sees is relativistic = what happened in an absolute event + relativistic effects

What happened in an event is absolute = real time physics - real time relativistic effects.

Observer time = observed traveller time + time delays

Real time = absolute time + time delays

Real time = Event time + time delays

Abstract: Newton Changed Kepler's law from T²/a³ = 4 π²/GM to T²/a³ = 4 π²/G (M + m)

and introducing an error like this T² (1)/a³ = 4 π²/GM and T² (2) /a³ = 4 π²/G (M + m)

When Newton changed Kepler's equation he created the advance of perihelion as shown:

T (1) = T (2) √ [M/ (M + m)]

And 2π/ T (1) = [2 π/ T (2)] √ (1 + m/M)

And θ' (1) = θ' (2) √ (1 + m/M)

And θ' (2) = θ' (1) /√ [1 + (m/M)] ≈ [1 - m/ (2M)]

And θ' (2) - θ' (1) ≈ - θ' (1) (m/2M) = - [2 π/T] [m/2M) = - π m/MT radians/T

W " (calculated) = [- π m/MT] (180/π degrees) (3600 seconds) (36526 century); T = days

W' (observed) = (-180 x 36526 x 3600/T) (m/M) seconds of arc /100 years; Newton

= (-180 x 36526 x 3600/88) (0.32 x 1024/2 x 1030) = 43 arc second per century Then

Einstein came and made the same mistake

W " (observed) = [6 π / T (1 - ε²)] (v/c) ² (180/π degrees) (3600 seconds) (36526 (century)

W " (observed) = [1080x 36526x 3600/ T (1 - ε²)] (v/c) ² = 43 arc sec/ 100 years

Einstein

This is Lord Eddington derivation trying to solve the mystery of light bending with

Einstein's using Lorentz contraction formula that has (v/c)². Einstein formula for light

bending was wrong but Eddington needed Einstein to explain his Royal expedition

failures watching the sky and not knowing where the error came from and Lord

Eddington created Einstein's fame to promote himself.

Newton and Einstein made the same mistake because their formula was rigged to cater

for planet Mercury using different reference frames and introducing mistakes. First

mistake was Newton's mistake because using different frames of reference introduces

time delay errors. When Newton changed frames of reference he took mass m and

implemented μ = m [M/ (M + m)] and we stuck with an error or shortage factor in

mathematical form amount to M/ (M + m). After Newton astronomers were puzzled by

the perihelion advance of planet Mercury not investigating its origin. The time delay error

to changing frames of reference is this formula for the angle at closet approach is:

A visual effect model gives 43 arcs second per century

A solution of Newton’s equation in real time or time dependent Newton’s

equation gives 43 second of arc per century

In 1977 I found that there is at least 1001 different formulas that can give

the 43 seconds of an arc per century

1 = 1 self evident

2 = 2 is self evident

Image = image = I is self evident line - 1

Object = object = O = self evident line - 2

And, - Object = - objects = - O = self evident line - 3

I=I line - 1

O=O line - 2

And, - O = - O line - 3

Adding: line - 1 and line - 2 and line - 3

I + O – O = O + (I – O) line - 4

I = O + (I – O); O – O = 0 one left side

(I/O) = (O/O) + (I – O)/O; dividing by on both sides line - 5

Or, (I/O) = 1 + (I – O)/O; O/O = 1 line - 6

(I/O) O = O + [(I – O)/O] O Line - 7

Real time object = event time Object + time delay object

Real time astronomy = event time astronomy + time delay

astronomy

Let us do R1 real time analysis

R2 = R2

R2 = R1 + (R2 – R1)

Dividing by R1

(R2/R1) = (R1/R1) + (R2 – R1)/ R1

Visual measurement scale

(R2/R1) = 1 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1]

Distance R1 when measured using light source and not a measuring tape is

not the same as R1 but is measured as R2. R2 is the visual distance of R1. Using

an eye as an instrument visual distance R2 is smaller than actual distance R1.

The percentage of visual distance R2 to actual distance R1 is equal to (R2/R1).

(R2/R1) = 1 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1] = 1 + [(R2/ R1) – 1]

Percentage = 1 + [percentage – 1]

Multiplying by R1

(R2/R1) R1 = R1 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1] R1

Visual = actual + (Visual – actual)

In clear words when we try to measure the distance R1 using light source

reflected from the car we see a percentage of R1 which is (R2/R1) R1 and that

percentage times R1 is the visual we measure R2

Real time distance = event time distance + delay time distance

Visual distance = distance + visual effect

Visual measurement scale using distance

Real time astronomy scale using distance

(R2/R1) = 1 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1]

Visual measurement scale using Velocity

Real time astronomy scale using distance

(V2/V1) = 1 + [(V2 – V1)/ V1]

Visual measurement scale using angle

Real time astronomy scale using angle

(θ 2/ θ 1) = 1 + [(θ 2 – θ 1)/ θ 1]

Visual measurement scale using angular velocity

Real time astronomy scale using angular velocity

(θ’ 2/ θ’ 1) = 1 + [(θ’ 2 – θ’ 1)/ θ’ 1]

Visual measurement scale using time

Page 4

Real time astronomy scale using time

(t 2/ t 1) = 1 + [(t 2 – t 1)/ t 1]

(V/A) = 1 + [(V – A)/ A]

(I/O) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(I – O)/O] θ’0

Real time physics = event time physics + time delay physics

In old terms

Quantum = classical + relativistic

(R2/R1) = 1 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1]

(R2/R1) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1] θ’0

This is real time astronomy distance scale to measure the angular velocity θ’0

(V2/V1) = 1 + [(V2 – V1)/ V1]

(V2/V1) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(V2 – V1)/ V1] θ’0

This is real time astronomy Velocity Scale to measure the angular velocity θ’0

Planet Mercury angular velocity accumulation in arc second per

hundred years

Or,

Planet Mercury Angular velocity θ’0 = 2 π/Tm = 2(3.1415)/88

x24x3600

Tm = Planet Mercury orbital period = 88 days = 88 x 24 x 3600

seconds

Planet Mercury angular velocity accumulation in arc

second per century is: δ θ’0 = (2 π/ Tm) (1 century/Tm) (180/ π)

(3600)

= (2x3.1415/88x24x3600) (36526days/88days) (180/3.1415)

(3600)

= 70.75

(R2/R1) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1] θ’0

(R2/R1) δ θ’0 = δ θ’0 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1] δ θ’0

What we see = what there is + visual illusion

Modern astronomers see = 70.75 + 43

What there is = 70.75

The visual Illusion is = 43

[(R2 – R1)/ R1] δ θ’0 = 43

As an example: when Astronomers look at planetary motion around

the sun and they saw the angular velocity in arc second per century:

Equal to δ θ’ m = (v m /r m) (180/ π) [36526/T m (days)] (3600)

= 70.75 arc second per century

Astronomers also saw the visual effect

Of: [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = [(r m - r0)/r0] (v m /r m) (180/ π) [36526/T m

(days)] (3600)

And it is equal to [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = 43

Where r m = Mercury – Sun distance = 58.2 X 106km

And v m = Mercury around the sun orbital speed Sun distance = 47.9

km/sec

And r 0 = r e = Earth – Sun distance = 149.6 X 106km

And T m = Mercury around the sun orbital period

Planet Distance r Planet Orbit Less Spin Angular velocity;

X 106km Orbit T speed v Earth speed v/r

in speed km/sec arc sec/ century

km/sec

Mercury 58.2 88 47.9 18.1 .002 70.75

Venus 108.2 224.7 35.05 5.7 6.52 10.86

Earth 149.6 365.26 29.8 .46511 4.1

Mars 227.936 687 24.14 0.2411

Jupiter 778.412 4333 13.06 12.6

Saturn 1,426.725 10760 9.65 9.87

Uranus 2,870.97 30690 6.80 2.59

Neptune 4,498 60180 5.43 2.68

Pluto 5906.4 90730 4.74

Page 5

When astronomers measure the angular velocity from two different

distances they make the following error: [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = 43

When astronomers measure Planet mercury angular speed around

the Sun from Earth r0 and not from the sun r m they make the following

error

Error: [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = 43

If we solve Newton’s equation in real time:

Newton equation is a solved wrong for 350 years

Newton’s unprecedented stupidity

Newton said there is gravity Force F = -GmM/r² whose solution is this

Planet

r

Su

n

And r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)]

But you idiot this solution is wrong

[λ +ỉω ]t

Real time solution is: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)] ℮ (r) (r)

[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1- ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x

[(v°+ v*)/c] ² = 43 arc second per century

All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y,

z) at a location r = r (x, y, z) = r [length, width, height].

The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the

product

S = m r; State = mass x location:

P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment

= change of location + change of mass

= m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate

F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force

= m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r

= m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate

In polar coordinates system

Location = r = r r (1)

Velocity = v = r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)

Acceleration = γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)

F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r

2m'[r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] +

+ (m" r) r (1)

+ (1/mr) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1)

F = F1 + F2

F1 = [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1)

And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 (2)

Page 7

The solution is not

And r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+εcosθ)]

But this solution

[λ +ỉω ]t

Real time solution is: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)] ℮ (r) (r)

[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1- ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x

[(v°+ v*)/c] ² arc second per century

Proof:

All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a

location r = r (x, y, z) = r [length, width, height].

The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product

S = m r; State = mass x location:

P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment

= change of location + change of mass

= m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate

F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force

= m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r

= m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate

In polar coordinates system

Location = r = r r (1)

Velocity = v = r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)

Acceleration = γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)

F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r

F = m [(r"-rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)] +

2m'[r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] +

+ (m" r) r (1)

F = [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1)

+ (1/mr) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1)

F = F1 + F2

F1 = [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1)

F2 = (1/mr) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1)

Kepler's force law is:

F2 = (1/mr) [d (m²r²θ’)/d t] θ (1) = 0

If m is constant then d (m²r²θ’)/d t = 0; and d (r²θ’)/d t = 0

Or, r²θ’ = h = 2 π a b/T; a = mean distance from sun and is called

semi major axis and b is the semi minor axis.

Page 8

Mercury

r

θ

Sun

And the motion of a planet m around the Sun M measured in real time is a rotating ellipse

θ

ψ

Sun S and then Kepler stated the areal velocity law: If Planet p

observed from the sun then the trajectory of planet p will cut equal

areas in equal times.

Page 42

A A

A

A A

A A

P

T T

T

T T

T T

S

When the areas size A are sliced equally it was found that the times spent by

planets orbiting around the Sun and making areas A each are equal also.

Or, r² (0) θ' (0) = r² (1) θ' (1) = r² (2) θ' (2) = r² (3) θ' (3) = --

= location² x [angular speed] = constant

= Areal velocity

If r² θ' = h

Then differentiating with respect to time

Then d (r² θ')/ d t = d h/ d t

And 2 r r’ θ’ + r² θ’’ = 0

Or 2 (r’ /r) = - (θ’’/θ’)

The r = r0 e íωt

And θ’ = θ’0 e

–2íωt

With r = r0 e íωt

With r² (0) θ' (0) = r² (1) θ' (1)

Then θ' (1) = [r² (0)/ r² (1)] θ' (0)

And θ' (1) = {[e í 2 ω t] θ' (0)

And θ’ (1) = {[cosine 2 ω t + í sine 2 ω t] – 1} θ' (0)

Δ θ’ (1) = Δ θ’ (x) + í Δ θ’ (y)

= [cosine 2 ω t + í sine 2 ω t] θ' (0)

Δ θ’ (x) = [cosine 2 ω t] θ' (0)

Δ θ’ (x) = [1 – 2 sine² ω t] θ' (0)

Δ θ’ (x) - θ' (0) = - 2 θ' (0) sine² ω t

Δ W = Δ θ’ (x) - θ' (0) = - 2 θ' (0) sine² ω t

= -2(2π) [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t

And θ' (0) = h/r² (0) = 2 π a b/T a² = 2π√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²

Δ W = - 4 π) [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t

If this apsidal motion is to be found as visual effects, then

With, v ° = spin velocity; v* = orbital velocity

And v/c = (v* + v°)/c = tan ω t

Δ W = -4 π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]}

radians

Multiplication by 180/π to change to degrees

Δ W ° = (-720/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]}

Degrees

And multiplication by 1 century = 36526 days and using T in days

W° (ob) = (-720x36526/Tdays) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x

sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} degrees/100 years

Approximations

With v° << c and v* << c,

Then sine Inverse tan [v°/c + v*/c] ≈ (v° + v*)/c

Δ W ° (calculated) = (-720x36526/Tdays) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x

[(v° + v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years

This is the equation for axial rotations rate of planetary and binary

stars or any two body problem.

The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 - ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²- --.) ≈ 2πa

(1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4)

Page 44

From Newton's inverse square law of an ellipse motion applied to a

circular orbit gives the following: m v²/ r (cm) = GmM/r²

Planet --- r (cm) ----- Center of mass ------- r (CM) --------- Mother

Sun

Planet ------------------- r -------------------------------------- Mother

Sun

Center of mass law m r (cm) = M r (CM); m = planet mass; M = sun

mass

And r (cm) = distance of planet to the center of mass

And r (CM) = distance of sun to center of mass

And r (cm) + r (CM) = r = distance between sun and planet

Solving to get: r (cm) = [M/ (m + M)] r

And r (CM) = [m/ (m + M)] r

Then v² = [GM r (cm)/ r²] = GM²/ (m + M) r

And v = √ [GM²/ (m + M) r = a (1-ε²/4)]

Planet orbital velocity or primary velocity:

And v* = v (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 48.14 km for planet

Mercury

Velocity of secondary or Mother Sun velocity

And v* (M) = √ [Gm² / (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)]

Applications: mercury ellipse and its axis rotation of 43 " /century

1- Planet Mercury axial "apparent" rotation rate

Δ W’’ = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²]/ (1-ε) ²} (v* + v°/c) ² seconds of

arc per century

The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 - ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²- --.)

≈ 2πa (1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4)

Where v* (p) =√ [G M² / (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] ≈ √ [GM/a (1-ε²/4)];

m<<M; Solar system data: G =6.673x10-11; M=2x1030kg;

m=.32x10^24kg; ε = 0.206; T=88days; c = 299792.458 km/sec; a =

58.2km/sec; v° = 0.002km/sec

Calculations yield: v* =48.14km/sec; [√ (1- ε²)] (1-ε) ² = 1.552

Δ W = (-720x36526x3600/88) x (1.552) (48.14/299792)²

=43.0”/century

Δ W’’ = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v* + v°)/c] ²

= 43 seconds of arc per century

[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0

= (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v*m + v° m)/c] ² seconds of

arc per century

Or, Newton is plain stupid? There is no proof of action at a distance?

F = -GmM/r² is not a proof of gravitational pull between planetary

objects but rather the interaction of earth with its atmosphere

G = 1/ (2/5) (4π/3) p T² = √ (2π)/ (4π/3)p T²; ρ = air density =1.2045kg/m³;

and T = Earth rotation period = 23.9333x3600; Then G = 6.6747 x 10-11

G = 1/ (radius of gyration) (sphere) (air density) (Earth spin) ²

G = √ (2 π) / (4π/3) p T² = √ (2π)/ (4π/3)p T²

Suggesting that gravity measured on Earth is local to earth

surface caused by Earth spin motion

Also a rotating Ellipse can be derived from many different

solutions and not necessarily from an inverse square law

W" = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v°+ v*)/c] ² arc seconds /100 years

This is my 1977 equation for advance of perihelion/apsidal motion for any two body

system and it works on binary stars while Newton's and Einstein's does not.

With v* = orbital speed and v° = spin speed of planet and observer depending on spin

orientation. For planet mercury spin is 3 meters per second and can be ignored.

What remains is: W" = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} (v* + v°/c) ² arc

seconds /100 years where v° become is the orbital velocity of the telescope location.

For planet Mercury {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} = 1.522 and (1 - ε²) = 0.957564; ε = 0.2056 and ε

was approximated to ≈ 2.06 and 1.522 x 0.957564 =1.486139328 ≈ 3/2

And {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} was found to be equal (3/2)/ (1 - ε²) and we get

W" = (-720x36526x3600/T) (3/2)/ (1-ε²) [(v°+ v*)/c] ² arc seconds /100 years

W" = [1080x 36526x 3600/ T (1 - ε²)] [(v°+ v*)/c] ² arc seconds /100 years

Einstein never accounted for spin and took v = v* = orbital speed and v° = 0

And the equation become

W" = [1080x 36526x 3600/ T (1 - ε²)] (v/c) ² arc seconds /100 years same as Einstein's

Given these data

Planet Mass Planet Orbit Spin ε [√( 1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²

X Orbit speed speed

10^24kg T km/sec km/sec

Mercury 0.32 88 47.9 .002 0.2060 1.552

Venus 4.9 224.7 35.05 6.52 0.0068 1.00762

Earth 5.98 365.2 29.8 .46511 0.0167 1.0341

6

Mars 0.64 687 24.14 0.2411 0.0934 1.211339

Jupiter 1900 4333 13.06 12.6 0.0483 1.2

Saturn 570 10760 9.65 9.87 0.056 1.1

Uranus 87 30690 6.80 2.59 0.0461 1.09782

Neptune 103 60180 5.43 2.68 0.0097 1.01959

Pluto 5.4 90730 4.74 0.2448 1.716385

8

W" = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v°+ v*)/c] ² arc seconds /100 years

W' (observed) = (-180 x 36526 x 3600/T) (m/M) seconds of arc /100 years; Newton

W " (observed) = [1080x 36526x 3600/ T (1 - ε²)] (v/c) ² arc sec/ 100 years Einstein

Take the spin velocity of earth in European locations as v° = +/-0.3 km/sec.

Planet V* + V° Nahhas' observed Einstein Newton Published

Mercury 47.9 + 0.3 43.102" 43.11" 43.03" 1 [43.03] 43.56"+/-

43.03 0.9"

Venus 35.05 +/- 6.52+/ - 8.27"/ 2.5" 8.63 6.0"[43.03] 8.4+/-4.2

0.3 Normal Eddington 6.0" Notice the

Retrograde 3.7593" 50%

Retro errors

Earth 29.8 + 0.3 2.69" n/a 3.84 4.5"[43.03] 4.6+/-2.7

Mars n/a 1.35 2.56"[43.03]

Jupiter n/a 0.06

Saturn n/a

Uranus n/a

Neptune n/a

Lord Eddington 1921 Article about "Einstein's relativity theory of gravitation" November

11, volume number LXXXII of the Monthly Notes of the Royal Astronomical Society

published his finding of 2.5" arc second for Venus. Later Earth's and Venus' advance of

perihelion was changed to 8.4" +/- 4.2" and 4.6+/- 2.7 to fit Einstein formula. The

published data came after relativity and before relativity they were 43"/2.5" only.

Then a³/ T² = G (M + m)/ 4 π² = GM/ 4 π² + G m/ 4 π²

And Multiplied by (4 π² m)

Then: 4π ² ma²/ T² = Gm M/ a + G m²/ a Energy form

Energy change:

Then: 4π ² ma²/ T² - G m²/ a = Gm M/ a

Divide by mc²

Then: Δ E/ mc² = GM/ a c² Dimensionless Energy form

Or a become twisted 90 degrees in an ellipse then a ~ a c² (1-ε²)

Then: Δ E/ mc² (1-ε²) = GM/ a c² (1-ε²)

Then: Then: 2 π Δ E/ mc² (1-ε²) = 2 π GM/ a c² (1-ε²)

W = 6 π GM/ a c² (1-ε²)

This is space-time dimensionless energy change tripled

I guess not

A good result of the advance of perihelion of Venus Earth and the outer planets of the

solar system is never been taken seriously or done extensively. It has been rigged

extensively to cater for Campus Physicists who needs funding and would say anything

publish anything based on nothing for jobs money prestige and no physics.

W" = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v°+ v*)/c] ² arc seconds /100 years

Nahhas real time solution of Mercury perihelion

[(r m - r0)/r0] (v m /r m) (180/ π) [36526/T m (days)] (3600)

W' (observed) = (-180 x 36526 x 3600/T) (m/M) seconds of arc /100 years; Newton

W " (observed) = [1080x 36526x 3600/ T (1 - ε²)] (v/c) ² arc sec/ 100 years Einstein

- QMReportDiunggah olehBelzebub
- Weak ‘antigravity’ fields in general relativity (WWW.OLOSCIENCE.COM)Diunggah olehFausto Intilla
- Einstein ConspiracyDiunggah olehPerfectKey21
- Abhay Ashtekar- Introduction to Loop Quantum GravityDiunggah olehLopmaz
- How and Why Wonder Book of StarsDiunggah olehkett8233
- Astrologyclub.org-The Outer Planets as SingletonsDiunggah olehValentin Badea
- RtgDiunggah olehbobmarley20161934
- The Art of Reading People - John CremerDiunggah olehisampalis
- a2 42 GravitationDiunggah olehHany ElGezawy
- Planets and Solar System Questions and AnswersDiunggah olehTari Manquirow
- Tha PlanetsDiunggah olehlised123
- New Magicks for a New Age, Volume 4, Book 10Diunggah olehPolaris93
- Lanczos-Lovelock-Cartan Gravity from Clifford Space GeometryDiunggah olehKathryn Wilson
- David Paul ColemanDiunggah oleharpita
- Relativity - Book by Herbert DingleeDiunggah olehmsngr00
- The Galactic Black Hole - Lectures on General Relativity and AstrophysicsDiunggah olehAndras
- Dr. David Tong - String TheoryDiunggah olehjohn_tramp_1
- EinsteinDiunggah oleharghya_bi108
- Planet EarthDiunggah olehDravid Arya
- Relativistic_Heat_Conduction.pdfDiunggah olehJose Daniel Hoyos
- EinsteinDiunggah oleharghya_bi108
- 02 Vacaru Publication List IDEI 2013-07-24 Up-datedDiunggah olehSergiu Vacaru
- The Chemical Composition of an Extrasolar Minor PlanetDiunggah olehardeegee
- Chapter 22Diunggah olehJonalvin KE
- On a Testable Unification of Electromagnetics, GeneralDiunggah olehAnonymous 0ZCG9BQ
- Infinities and the InfiniteDiunggah oleh50_BMG
- 5938.Full +GravitationDiunggah olehEduardo Cordova
- 2012Science-14+- 2Diunggah oleh박찬우
- 1105.0109.pdfDiunggah olehMandric Vlad
- gravitation1.txtDiunggah olehHimank Pathak

- Wave - Particle Duality Illusion SolutionDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- Augustine De Coulomb 1785 error of lightDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistakeDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- The scientifc extermination of the scientifc westDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- CERN 20 meters error faster than the speed of light puzzle solution IIDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- Earth's Axial Tilt of 23.4393 IllusionDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- The Mathematical Construction of Newton's Gravitational ConstantDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- Cavendiah 1798 Earth's Density Historical MistakeDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- Dumbest Time Physicist on Campus Dr Sean CarrollDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- Albert Einstein 1905 E = mc2 historical mistakeDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- Isaac Newton's public E-mail to Prince Charles of walesDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- Alfred Nobel Mafia Code E = mc2 and E = h νDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- NASA knows nothing about spaceDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- Nahhas' Solution of Tyco Brahe's Vertical Mercury's Perihelion PuzzleDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- Nobel Physicist Erwin Schrödinger under investigationDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- Light Constant Velocity Puzzle SolutionDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- Cavendish experiment error of light constant velocityDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- Newtonian Derivation of Cosmological ConstantDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- The Mathematical Construction of the Speed of LightDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- CERN Dario Hutiero 20 Meters Faster Than the Speed of Light Error IVDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- The Mathematical Construction of the Speed of SoundDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- Avogadro's number is one of many of Cavendish's experimental errorDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- Physics embedded error of fine structure constantDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- NASA knows nothing about space IIDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- Fine Structure constant and Mercury's Perihelion solutionDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- Nobel Institution Lars brink dark energy reviewDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- Clock Synchronization Solution of Mercury's PerihelionDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- Faster Than the Speed of Light Puzzle Solution IIIDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- Nahhas' Solution of Cavendish Horizontal Puzzle of Mercury's PerihelionDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas
- Light constant velocity puzzle solutionDiunggah olehJoe Nahhas

- The Planets and Their SymbolsDiunggah olehAnahiti Atena
- 125 Amazing Facts About SpaceDiunggah olehSolehah Mohammad Rodze
- Amshayu+MainDiunggah olehradha235
- 1012.5438.pdfDiunggah olehAmir Hejazi
- microteach lesson plan -spaceDiunggah olehapi-360114305
- 50 Solutions of Mercury's PerihelionDiunggah olehYousef Nahhas
- Pyramids and Stars EquisaionDiunggah olehgamal
- New Microsoft Office Word DocumentDiunggah olehRalph Tiburdo
- youTBBBDiunggah olehPokemon Go
- Sacred Geometry in the Solar System III - The Logos.pdfDiunggah olehChristian Irigaray
- Avast HasDiunggah olehSaurabh Sharma
- Electro Astronomical AtlasDiunggah olehIsmaél Orozco Lanfranco
- IAS syllabeDiunggah olehmohitsinghdangi
- health and physical education integrated lesson planDiunggah olehapi-263388091
- Class- VI_ Sample PaperDiunggah olehManta Singh
- Kant's History and Theory of HeavenDiunggah olehMark Julyan
- 13 moon pocket_calendar.pdfDiunggah olehAfua Oshun
- 1942_The Interpretation of a Horoscope_Marc Edmund JonesDiunggah olehdivya-crawler
- BNN Prediction TechniquesDiunggah olehsnmurthyp
- Solar SystemDiunggah olehdrvopro
- Aspects of Shikiban-Based Mikkyō RitualsDiunggah olehLuke
- (Steven Steele) SolarFire MidPoint InterpretationDiunggah olehSteven Steele
- Studies in Occult Chemistry and Physics.docDiunggah olehjgvieira3751
- smithsillustrat00smit.pdfDiunggah olehFelix De Cunto
- Great Astronomers-Galileo Galilei (1907) by Robert Stawell BallDiunggah olehdharmawisdom
- t2 s 866 Year 5 Planet Earth Differentiated Reading Comprehension Activity Ver 2Diunggah olehDawudBryant
- Natal Retrograde PlanetsDiunggah olehTTamara29
- solar system inquiryDiunggah olehapi-232002863
- Jaydeep Singh Tindori Solar Project for FutureDiunggah olehtindori_jaydeep
- Healing Planetary ForcesDiunggah olehCarla Nilana Lopes Xavier