0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
82 tayangan9 halaman
AAKANKSHA JAIN, student of LLM enrolled with REF.NO. 3249 of KURUKSHETRA UNIVERSITY has worked under my guidance and supervision in the preparation of her dissertation entitled'COPYRIGHT and ITS GLOBAL aspects' which is a partial requirement for the degree of master of laws.
AAKANKSHA JAIN, student of LLM enrolled with REF.NO. 3249 of KURUKSHETRA UNIVERSITY has worked under my guidance and supervision in the preparation of her dissertation entitled'COPYRIGHT and ITS GLOBAL aspects' which is a partial requirement for the degree of master of laws.
AAKANKSHA JAIN, student of LLM enrolled with REF.NO. 3249 of KURUKSHETRA UNIVERSITY has worked under my guidance and supervision in the preparation of her dissertation entitled'COPYRIGHT and ITS GLOBAL aspects' which is a partial requirement for the degree of master of laws.
Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the
Award of the Degree of Master of Laws
BY
Aakanksha Jain Ref. no.-3249 LL.M., 2nd year
Supervisor Dr. Arvind P. Bhanu Associate Professor
Kurukshetra University Batch 2012-2014
CERTIFICATE
Is is to certify that Ms AAKANKSHA JAIN, student of LLM enrolled with REF.NO. 3249 of KURUKSHETRA UNIVERSITY has worked under my guidance and supervision in the preparation of her dissertation entitled, ' COPYRIGHT AND ITS GLOBAL ASPECTS' which is a partial requirement for the degree of Master of Laws. The Dissertation is worthy of consideration.
Dr. Arvind P. Bhanu Associate Professor IITM & School of Law (GGSIP University, Delhi.)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
It gives me immense pleasure to express my gratitude and deep sense of indebtedness to Dr. Arvind P. Bhanu, Professor,IIMT, School of Law for encouraging and supporting me with this opportunity of writing dissertation on COPYRIGHT AND ITS GLOBAL ASPECTS.
I am thankful to my Supervisor Dr. Arvind P. Bhanu, for his continuous support and guidance and valuable suggestions at various stages of this work without which completion of this dissertation would not have been possible.
The readiness on the part of the Staff of our Library in furnishing the required available material really deserves appreciation. I take an opportunity to thank library Staff of Ideal Law School for their readiness and willingness to help in every possible way that one can do.
The writing of this dissertation would have never been possible to complete without untiring support from my family and friends. I acknowledge my heartiest gratitude to my parents and friends for their assistance and guidance. I received from them for the successful completion of this Dissertation work.
At the end I would like to thanks all the teachers of law department of IIMT, School of Law for the knowledge, corporation and guidance throughout, which in my opinion will go a long way in creating my future in legal field . I am highly indebted to all.
AAKANKSHA JAIN REF. NO. 3249 LL.M., 2nd Year
Table of Contents
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT & EVOLUTION OF COPYRIGHT LAW COPYRIGHT IN INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT IN NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE CHAPTER II DIGITIZATION & CHALLENGES TO COPYRIGHT COPYRIGHT ISSUES IN DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT EFFORTS FOR COPYRIGHT PROTECTION IN DIGITAL ERA LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS AROUND THE WORLD INDIAN POSITION IT ACT 2000 VIS-A-VIS COPYRIGHT PROTECTION IN DIGITAL ERA MORAL RIGHTS AND ITS FACET OF PROTECTION CHAPTER-III INFRINGEMENT AND THE CONCEPT OF FAIR DEALING INFRINGEMENT EXCEPTIONS TO INFRINGEMENT (FAIR DEALING) RIGHT TO INFORMATION & COPYRIGHT CHAPTER IV
ENFORCEMENT
ENFORCEMENT PROBLEMS IN ENFORCEMENT
CHAPTERV CONCLUSION & SUGGESTIONS
BIBLIOGRAPHY List of Cases (In alphabetical order)
A & M Records, Inc v. Napster Inc., 239 F.3d 1004 (2000). Amar Nath Sehgal v.Union of India, 2005(30) P.T.0 253 (Del). Anton Filler KG v Manufacturing Processes Ltd, [1976] 1 Ch. 55. Associates Publishers v. K Bashyam, AIR 1961 Mad 114. Autodesk Inc.v.A.V.T. Shankardass, 2008 (37) PTC 581. Barbelivien v. Agence Business, [2005] F S C, ECC 42. Beloff v. Pressdram Ltd, [1973] 1 All ER 241. Bernstein v. Matadoret Pathe Cinema D.H.,1933.533 Bharat Law House v. Wadhwa and Co. Pvt. Ltd and Other, AIR 1988 Del 68. Blackwood and Sons Ltd. v. A N Parasuraman, AIR 1959 Mad 410. Brinks Mat v. Elcombe, [1988] 1 WLR 1350 (CA). CBS Songs Ltd. and Others v. Amstrad Consumer Electronics Plc. and Another, 1988 A. C.1013 (HL). Civic Chandran v Amini Amma , 1996 Patent and Trademark Reporter 142. Claydon Architectural Metahvork Ltd. v. DJ Higgins and Sons, [1997] FSR 475. Columbia Picture Industries v Robinson, [1987] 1 Ch 38. Costar v. Loopnet, 373 F 3D 544 (4 th CIR 2004). De Garis v. Neville Jeffress Pidler Pvt. Ltd., 1990 (18) IPR 291. Eastern Book Co. v. Navin J. Desai, 2001 . (21) PTC 57 (Del). Fateh Singh Mehta v 0.P.Singha1 and Others, AIR 1990 Raj 8. Garapati Prasad Rao v. Prarnandi Saroja A.I.R. 1992 SC 233. General Education, Manipal V. B.Manini MaIlya,2009(39) PTC393 (SC).
Gramophone Co. v. Mars Recording Gramophone Co. of India Ltd v. Mars recording Pvt Ltd., (2000) PTC 117. Gramophone Company of India Ltd, v Shanti Film Corporation Ltd., AIR 1997 Cal 63. Hubbard v. Vosper, [1972] 1 All ER 1072. Hunter v Fitzroy, 1978 FSR 167. J H Mendler v Winterland Productions, 207 F.3d 119 (9 th Cir.2000). John Richardson Computers Ltd. v. Flanders, 1993 FSR 497. Joy Music Ltd v. Sunday Pictorial Newspapers, [1960] 1 All ER 703. Ladbroke (Football) Ltd v. William Hill (Football) Ltd., [1964] 1 All ER 465. Lewis Trust v. Bombers Stores, [1983] FSR 453. Mannu Bhandari v. Kala Vikas Picure Ltd, A.I.R. 1987 Del 13. Merson v. Banque de France, D.H 1936.2.246. Metro Goldwyn Mayer Studios Inc v. Grokster Ltd, 2005 US 545. Mohanlal Gupta v The Board of School Education Haryana, 1978 IPLR 83. Music choice India Pvt. Ltd. V. Phonographic Performances Ltd. 2009 (39) PTC 597 (Born). Neha Bhasin v. Anand Raaj Anand, 2006 (32) PTC 779 (Del) Pasterfield v Denham, [1999] FSR 168. Penguin Books Ltd., England V. Indian Book Distributors, 1984 (4) PTC 285. Periyar Self Respect Propaganda Institution v. Periyar Dravidar Kazhagam, 2009 (41) PTC 448 (Mad). Phonographic performance Ltd v.Hotel Gold Regency, 2008(37) PTC 587 (Del). Pillalamarri Lakshamikantam v Ramakrishna Pictures, AIR 1981 AP 224 Potton Ltd. v Yorkelose Ltd, [1990] FSR 11 Ram Sampath v. Rajesh Roshan, 2009 (40) PTC 90 (Born). RG Anand v Deluxe Films AIR 1978 SC 1613. Srimagal v. Books (India), AIR 1973 Mad 49. Super Cassette Industries v. Nirulas Corner House (P) Ltd, 2008(37) PTC 237 (Del). Syndicate of Press, University of Cambridge v. Kasturi Lal & Sons, 2006 (32) PTC 487 (Del). Ticket Master Corp v. Tickets.com Inc, 2004 F.S.R 523. Tidy v Trustees of Natural History Museum, [1996] 3 EIPR 81. Universal Music Australia Pvt Ltd. v. Sharman Networks, 2005 FCA 242. Union of India v.. R. Gandhi, President of the Madras Bar Association, MANU/ SC/7711/2007. Ved Prakash v. Manoj Pocket Books, A.I.R. 1992 A.P. 230. Video Master v. Nishi Productions 1998 IPLR (23) 388. Work Model Enterprises Ltd v. Ecosystem Ltd, [1996] FSR 356.
List of Abbreviations DRM Digital Rights Management. DSU Dispute settlement Understanding. DVD Digital Versatile Disk. EC Electronic Commerce. ERMI Electronic Rights Management Information. EU European Union. GATT General Agreement on Trade and Tariff. HTML Hyper Text Machine Language. ILO International Labour Organization. ISP Internet Service Provider. NAFTA North American Free Trade Agreement. RAM Random Access Memory. TRIPS Agreement on Trade related Aspects of intellectual Property Rights. UCC Universal Copyright Treaty. UNCITRAL United Nations Commission for International Trade Law. UNESCO United Nation Educational scientific and cultural Organization. URL Uniform Resource Locator. WIPO World Intellectual Property Organization. WTO World Trade Organization.