Andrew Smith EDU 120: Principles of Instructional Design Instructor Buss September 24, 2014
Aligning Experience and Theory 2 Aligning Experience and Theory In this day and age, the word theory gets tossed around so much that people often forget what the word theory actually means. A theory is fact-based, relies on evidence, and is used to explain or describe something. This is why I do not agree with having creationism taught in schools. Evolution is a theory based of scientific research and facts, whereas creationism is based solely on a book. As a teacher, in an educational setting, we rely on theories, such as learning theories and instructional theories. Learning theories are mostly descriptive, meaning they describe how learning occurs, (Smith & Ragan, 2005, P. 23, Par. 5) and instructional theories are mostly prescriptive, meaning they suggest that if instruction includes certain features, it will lead to certain types and amounts of learning, (Smith & Ragan, 2005, P. 23, Par. 5). Behaviorist Learning Theory: The behaviorist learning theory focuses on the aspects of learning that can be directly observed, such as when a student uses the correct response to a particular stimulus. Although most behaviorists did not deny the existence of mental activity, they did not conjecture about these thinking processes, mental states, and other unobservable phenomenon, (Smith & Ragan, 2005, P. 25, Par. 7). This is different from other learning theories because it does not take into account the thought process behind the learning. This learning theory finds that learning has occurred when there is a measurable change in the frequency of observable performance, (Ludescher, n.d., Par. 102). It has been found that the environment plays a critical role in this learning, for instance, how stimuli and consequences or reinforcement is presented. Some instructional uses for behaviorism include flashcards and other drill and practice routines. Behaviorisms positive and negative reinforcement techniques Aligning Experience and Theory 3 can be very effective . . . in treatments for human disorders such as autism and antisocial behavior, (Ludescher, n.d., Par. 142). In working with children with Autism, this learning theory has provided much more results than with others, and the instructional design of the programs ran heavily reflect the behaviorist learning theory. We rely on the stimulus-response principal in order to elicit the proper responses and to decrease or eliminate problematic behaviors. Cognitive Learning Theory: Cognitive learning theory places much more emphasis on factors within the learner and less emphasis on factors within the environment than behavioral theories, (Smith & Ragan, 2005, P. 26, Par. 3). This means that cognitive learning is more focused on how learning occurs rather than observable characteristics of learning. With cognitive learning theories, we focus on how people think, learn, remember, and even forget. In this learning process, the learner is an active participant. They take in the information through listening, seeing, or doing, and incorporate this new knowledge into their thinking. During the learning process, the students ask questions and receive feedback to further develop their understanding. Then the learning is assessed and if needed, further explanation or practice is provided. Using cognitive learning theories, the teacher offers a variety of experiences to approach information, assess understanding and summarize the combination of information and understanding, (McNeeley, 2007, Par. 21). In todays classrooms, instructors focus on cognitive learning because it creates a deeper understand of information. Constructivist Learning Theory: The Constructivist Learning Theory states that people construct their own understanding and knowledge of the world, through experiencing things and reflecting on those experiences, Aligning Experience and Theory 4 (Educational Broadcasting Corporation, 2004, Par. 1). This learning theory is similar to the cognitive learning theory in that is focuses on how we learn, different ways we acquire knowledge, and how we integrate that knowledge into our thinking. However, in constructivist learning, the instructor plays a different role. Instead of presenting information and facts, they act as more of a guide, asking questions and tapping into the students prior knowledge and experience. The goal is for the students to construct their own knowledge and understanding of the material. Although it may sound like it, constructivism does not dismiss the active role of the teacher or the value of expert knowledge. Constructivism modifies that role, so that teachers help students to construct knowledge rather than to reproduce a series of facts, (Educational Broadcasting Corporation, 2004, Par. 6). Social Learning Theory: Social learning theory combines cognitive learning theory (which posits that learning is influenced by psychological factors) and behavioral learning theory (which assumes that learning is based on responses to environmental stimuli), (Psychology Today, n.d., Par. 1). This theory focuses on learning through observation, imitation, and modeling. In social learning, students observe others, and the results of their actions, such as reinforcement. If one student is observed receiving reinforcement from an instructor for getting an answer correct or an appropriate behavior, other students are more likely to give that answer or model that behavior. The opposite is also true, where a student will display an inappropriate behavior and given discipline, or told an answer is incorrect and told to try again, others observing will be less likely to model these behaviors or give the same incorrect answer. Describing the consequences of behavior increases appropriate behavior and decreases inappropriate ones, (Social learning theory, n.d., Par. 17). As a behavior technician for children with Autism, there is a lot of focus on Aligning Experience and Theory 5 appropriate/inappropriate behaviors. Modeling and imitation play a large role in this and through reinforcement, both positive and negative, the students are able to learn what is acceptable and what is not. Conclusion: In conclusion, learning how people learn will make teaching much easier. Not all students learn the same, so instructors should be knowledgeable in the different learning theories. The type of learning or instruction will also depend on the type of learning theory implemented. For instance, children with learning or other disabilities may have difficulty learning through social learning, but could make great strides if the behaviorist learning theory is implemented. Instructors should not limit their teaching to just one theory, but should implement the different learning theories as they are needed.
Aligning Experience and Theory 6
References Educational Broadcasting Corporation. (2004). Constructivism as a paradigm for teaching and learning. Retrieved from http://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/constructivism/ Ludescher, F. (n.d.). Behaviorism. Retrieved March 24, 2014, from http://www2.vobs.at/ludescher/Ludescher/LAcquisition/Behaviourist/seite6.htm McNeeley, R. (2007). Theories of learning. Retrieved from http://web.utk.edu/~rmcneele/classroom/theories.html Psychology Today. (n.d.). Social learning theory. Retrieved March 24, 2014, from http://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/social-learning-theory Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons. Social learning theory. (n.d.). Retrieved March 24, 2014, from http://www.southalabama.edu/oll/mobile/theory_workbook/social_learning_theory.htm