Sword & Spear is a set of wargames rules for large battles set in the Ancients & Medieval period.

They
are suitable for any scale figures and any basing standard. The only requirement is that figures are
organised into units of equal frontage. A typical game consists of about 12 units on each side and
games tae around 2 ! " hours. The rules are designed from a top#down perspective$ focusing on
outcomes rather than detail.
The rules feature a clever and innovative system for activating units that creates interesting and
challenging decisions$ eeps both players involved at all times and has a lot of depth and subtlety. %ach
turn is split into phases$ where players each receive a number of command dice$ which are rolled and
then used to activate their units. The number shown on each dice determines which units it can activate
&with better quality units being easier to activate'$ what the unit can do when activated$ and the
numbers also determine the activation sequence. (ertain dice also give bonuses to combat$ movement
distance or shooting range. So there is a lot to thin about$ and allocating the command dice well is the
ey to success &although rolling lots of si)es helps as well *'.
+n each phase command dice are allocated$ then units are activated in order. ,hen a unit is activated it
does everything ! movement$ shooting and melee combat. So there is no turn sequence to remember
and wor through. A unit cannot be activated more than once in a turn$ and typically most$ but not all$
units can be activated in a turn &although this depends on the quality of the units involved$ so a horde of
poor quality troops will not have so many units activated each turn.'
%ach unit has a type &for e)ample cavalry'$ a discipline rating &depending on the quality of the unit' and
a strength rating. The strength depends on the unit type &for e)ample cavalry are strength "' and
determines both the number of dice rolled in combat and the number of hits required to rout the unit.
Many units will also have some specific weapons or characteristics such as -ows$ Armoured$
Spearmen or +mpact$ although an average level of protection and offensive ability is assumed$ so for
e)ample$ a unit of cavalry may simply be. (avalry /0 S".
The rules are relatively straightforward$ and there are no 1to hit2 tables$ charts or lists of dice roll
modifiers. They can be played using only the one sided playsheet with very little reference to the
ruleboo after the first couple of games. +n fact we find we hardly ever even refer to the playsheet now.
Missile shooting and melee combat use the same mechanics$ with both units &all combat is one unit vs
one unit' rolling a number of dice$ lining the dice up highest to lowest and comparing. %ach lost dice
roll may result in a hit$ which represents a combination of actual casualties$ cohesion and morale loss.
3its can be rallied$ but when the number of hits equals the strength of a unit it is removed as routed.
The number of dice rolled by each in combat is equal to the strength of the unit$ and may be modified
upwards if the unit has impetus$ and also according to a very short list of situations which give a unit
e)tra combat dice &for e)ample being uphill or having e)tra friendly units in contact with the enemy'.
There is not as much roc#paper#scissors in these rules as in many other ancients 4 medieval games$ but
it does appear in the mechanic for impetus. +f a unit involved in a combat has a command dice allocated
to it this phase$ it may have impetus in the combat and will gain one &or sometimes more' e)tra dice.
There is a list of situations where the unit does not get impetus &for e)ample cavalry vs elephants$
mounted vs spears'. This creates differences in the way certain troop types interact together$ and gives
them strengths and weanesses other than their two basic stats. This is probably the most difficult part
of the rules to remember$ but all of the situations should be intuitive to e)perienced ancients &
medieval gamers.
%ach army has a number of leaders$ which are important as units do not perform as well if they are out
of command range and perform better with a general attached.
The rules are very much suited to multiplayer games. Many of our playtest games have involved two
players on each side$ with each player having a command of around 5 ! 16 units.
The strengths of the game are that it gives an e)citing$ interesting and challenging e)perience$ plays
relatively quicly for the si7e of battle that is being depicted$ and the rules are straightforward to learn$
whilst having the depth to retain interest after repeated play.