AUDITING BASICS – I
This study note includes -
● Evolution of Auditing
● Definitions
● Major Influences of Auditing
● Nature of Auditing
● Scope of Auditing
● Role of Evidence in Auditing
● Auditing Techniques and Practices
● Generally Accepted Auditing Standards
● Concept of Materiality in Auditing
Audit can be traced back in the period 3600-3200 B.C. Initially, the audit was mainly done that
of public accounts only. From historical records it appears that the ancient Egyptians, Greeks
and Romans were used to the government accounts audit.
The accounts of the corporation of the city of London were audited in 12th Century. Later in
Shakespeare’s “Timon of Athens” the steward Flavins makes the remark “If you suspect my
husbandry or falsehood, call me before the exactest auditor, and set me on the proof” which
indicates the existence of an audit in the 14th century also.
In 1314, auditors were officially appointed to check the public accounts in England.
In 1494, Luca Pacioli, a French celebrated mathematician, brought the concept of Double Entry
book-keeping and auditing in practice. Gradually and especially after the Industrial Revolu-
tion in the 18th century, the nature, type and size of business organizations changed. The large
scale business came into existence causing dilution in the regular and direct control of the
proprietor. This made it necessary to get the transactions made by the staff and representatives
of owners, checked and verified by an independent person and this has given rise to concept of
auditing.
In 1866, the England’s Exchequer and Audit Department was created by Act of Parliament. In
AUDITING B1
AUDITING BASICS – I
1870, The Institute of Accountants in the form of a society was formed in England. It got a
Royal Charter in 1880 and was turned into The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England
and Wales, but before that in 1854, with a Royal Charter, The Institute of Accountants and
Actuaries in Glasgow.
In India, the auditing can be traced long back in Ramayana, Mahabharata and even in the
Vedas. Lord Ram asked Bharat about whether his income was more than his expenditure and
vice versa. Likewise, King Yudhisthira ordered Nakula to look after the army’s accounts. The
system of land revenue, currency, trade and control etc. can be traced in Vedas and even in
Manu Smruti. This indicates that the roots of auditing in India were rooted long back in Satya-
Yuga. The sophisticated system of accounting and auditing can be found in the reign of Mauryas,
Guptas and Moughals too. This first legislation relating to companies in India that is the Joint
Stock Companies Act, 1857 introduced the provisions of annual audit but was made optional.
Latter, The Companies Act, 1913, made it compulsory. This Act was replaced in 1956 by the
Indian Companies Act, 1956, the act and the subsequent amendments not only made thee au-
dit compulsory but sought to ensure that only the independent professionals with requisites
qualifications are appointed as statutory auditors of Companies. In 1965, the amendment in
the Act took place and concept of Cost Audit was introduced, while the amendment in the
Income Tax Act, 1961, took place in 1984 introduced the concept of Tax Audit, Sales Tax (VAT),
Trust Act, Co-op Societies Act etc. brought the concept of different audits into practice.
5.2. DEFINITIONS
The term “audit” has been derived from the Latin words “audire” which means to listen. In
those ancient days, the person appointed to check the accounts, used to hear the explanations
required from responsible officers and that’s why, the person who heard the explanations was
called as an “auditor”. However, now a days, due to drastic changes in business, accounting
systems, size and the provisions of different laws, this “hearing” concept of auditing is consid-
erably changed and become more exhaustive and therefore, different authors have defined
“auditing” differently, few of the important definitions are as under-
(b) F.R.M De Paula- “An audit denotes the examination of Balance Sheet and Profit and
Loss Account prepared by others together with the books of accounts and vouchers relat-
ing there to in such a manner that the auditor may be able to satisfy himself and honestly
report that, in his opinion, such Balance Sheet is properly drawn up so as to exhibit a true
and correct view of the state of affairs of the particular concern according to the infomation
and explanations given to him and as shown by the books”.
B2 AUDITING
(c) Prof. Montgomerly- “Auditing is a systematic examination of the books and records of
business or other organization, in order to ascertain or verify and to report upon the facts
regarding its financial operations and the result thereof.
(e) Spicer & Pegler- “Audit such an examination of the books of accounts and vouchers of a
business, as will enable the auditor to satisfy himself that the Balance Sheet is properly
drawn up, so as to give a true and fair view of the state affairs of the business, and whether
the profit and loss account gives a true and fair view of the profit or loss for the financial
period according to the best of his information and explanations given to him and as
shown by the books, and if not, in what respect he is not satisfied”.
In the close scrutiny of the different definitions we found that there are different ways of
expressing the concept auditing but having lot of similarity therein.
AUDITING B3
AUDITING BASICS – I
In the olden days audit was voluntary act of few businessmen having very limited scope, how-
ever the change in the form of organizations after industrial revolution had increased the scope
of audit considerably.
Auditor acts according to the instructions of his client and in case of statutory audits to a cer-
tain extent regulated by the concerned law, the words “certain extent” are meant as the actual
method of performing an audit is not prescribed, and never can be prescribed, and although
professional auditors act on certain well defined lines can be indicated only in a general way.
A very eminent English Judge once described an auditor as a “watchdog” and not a blood
hound’ which expression has been frequently quoted by others equally well informed as to the
nature of an auditor’s work and of the very short period occupied by him, in the performance
of his duties. An erroneous description could not be applied to an auditor, as a watchdog is a
dog kept on premises for the purpose of guarding them from the damages from theft. An
auditor on the other hand only appears on the scene after the damage or theft, if any, has been
perpetrated, and the most he can do is to find out the amount of theft or extent of damages and
also, if possible, the proprietor.
The nature of auditing is such that, the auditor will later on appear in his capacity as a critic of
a book-keeper’s work, may have a great morale effect and thus prevent a cashier or book keeper
from embezzling money. This morale effect has prevented theft in many more cases and is a
more powerful point in favor of auditing.
B4 AUDITING
of auditing has been extended to examination of allied operations to ‘management policies or
stated requirements”. This, whereas the previous definition mainly covers Mautz independent
professional audit, Schlosser’s definition also covers cost audit, internal audit, Goverment audit,
management Audit oparational audit and the like.
The auditor is not supposed to perform the duties which are beyond the scope of his compe-
tence. Accounting is concerned with the recording of the transaction and preparation of state-
ments of account but auditing involves a detailed and critical examination of accounts pre-
pared by others. In fact, auditing begins where accounting ends.
Constraints on the scope of the audit of financial statements that impair the auditor’s ability to
express an unqualified opinion on such financial statement should be set out in the report.
Qualified opinion or disclaimer of opinion should be expressed as appropriate.
According to Schlosser, audit now also covers cost audit, management audit, internal audit,
energy audit, excise audit, VAT audit and government audit too. Today audit is not confined
to the business houses only, but also to non-business organizations. Auditor is in the nature of
a watch-dog and a trustee of the nation’s finances.
According to AAS-2 (Auditing Assurance Standard No. - 2) issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India, also, the scope of an audit of financial statements will be determined by
the auditor having regard to the terms of the engagement, the requirements of relevant
legislations and the pronouncements of the institute. Of course the terms of engagement cannot
restrict the scope of an audit in relation to matters which are prescribed by legislation or by the
pronouncement of the institute. The auditor’s work involves exercise of judgment for example,
in deciding the extent of audit procedures and in assessing the reasonableness of the judgments
and estimates made by the management in preparing the financial statements. Further more,
much of the evidence available to the auditor can enable him to draw only reasonable conclusion
therefrom. Because of these factors, absolute certainty in auditing is rarely attainable.
Hence, it becomes quite clear that the scope of audit is widening and there is a change in
emphasis in audit objectives too.
The concept of evidence is fundamental to auditing. All auditing techniques and procedures
are derived from it. It helps the auditor in perceiving the types of evidence available in an audit
situation, collecting it through the various audit techniques and evaluating its sufficiency and
competency to support accounting data. Development of this concept is therefore, basic to the
understanding of the audit process.
Mautz and Sharaf list the following five stepts in the process of Judgment formation in auditing.
1. Recognition of the propositions to be proved.
AUDITING B5
AUDITING BASICS – I
The audit evidence influences the judgment of an auditor. The evidence need not be only
documentary. Arons and Luobecke have given types of audit evidence- Physical examination,
confirmation, documentation, observation, inquiries of the client, mechanical accounting, and
analytical tests. While Prof.Mautz gives nine types of audit evidence –1) physical examination
by the auditor of the thing represented in the accounts. 2) Written or oral statement by
independent third parties. 3) Authoritative documents- prepared inside or outside the enterprise
4) Formal or informal statement by officers and employees of the enterprise. 5) Calculations
performed by the auditor. 6) Satisfactory internal control procedure. 7) Subsequent actions by
the enterprise and by others. 8) Subsidiary or detailed records with no significant indications
of irregularities. 9) Interrelationship within the data examined. The types of audit evidence can
be grouped under the following two heads—
(a) Analytical evidence— These evidences consist of journals, subsidiary books, allocation
sheets, reconciliation statements, or any other records which supports the data appearing
in the books of accounts.
(b) Corroborative Evidence— This evidence consists of invoices, confirmations, cancelled
cheques or similar documents.
Obtaining Audit Evidence:
Before obtaining audit evidence the auditor should give consideration to what types of evi-
dence available and how to obtain them. What amount of evidence to be collected depends
upon the nature and circumstances & the types of evidence to be collected depends upon the
transaction and relevance of the evidence.
As per AAS-5, auditor obtains evidence in performing compliance and substantive procedures
by any one or more of the following methods-
(a) Inspection
(b) Observation
(c) Inquiry and Confirmation
(d) Computation
(e) Analytical Review
B6 AUDITING
5.7. AUDIT TECHNIQUES AND PRACTICES
Effective auditing is the outcome of systematic audit procedures applied to trade and examine
audit evidence with the help of audit techniques.
According to Moyer, audit techniques are the devices or methods available to the auditor for
obtaining competent evidential matter. While according to statement on audit standards, audit
procedure is the act to be performed, such as reviewing, inspecting and confirming. Practice
refers to the application of principles and techniques in various situations to get the expected
results, on the same line auditing practice means the use of auditing principles, as were already
established and notified by professional pronouncements from time to time, in different audit-
ing situations.
Audit Techniques:
As explained above, audit techniques are the tools used to get reliable evidence while conduct-
ing an audit. According to Prof. Mautz, basically there are following ten techniques avail-
able—
Professional Pronouncements
AUDITING B7
AUDITING BASICS – I
to time, which contain (i) Auditing and assurance standards- uptil now 32 standards are
pronounced (ii) Accounting standards and accounting standards interpretation- uptil now 29
accounting standards are pronounced. (iii) Other statements on accounting and auditing- uptil
now 55 such statements are issued. (iv) Guidance notes (v) Opinions (vi) Research studies/
monographs. The Institute of Cost and Works Accountants of India has also issued number
of pronouncements from time to time, which includes- (i) Cost Accounting Record Rules and
Cost Audit (Report) Rule- uptil now 47 Record Rules and Report Rules have been issued. (ii)
Guidance Notes- uptil now about 26 such guidance notes have been issued. (iii) Research
Publications- uptil now 20 such research publications are issued. (iv) Research Bulletin- Bi-
annual. (v) Cost Accounting Standards- uptil now 5 such standards have been pronounced.
The International Federation of Accountants pronounced – (i) International Standards on
Auditing- uptil now 28 such auditing standards have been issued. (ii) International Accounting
Standards- uptil now about 41 such standards have been issued. (iii) International Financial
Reporting Standards- uptil now about 8 such standards have been issued.
Auditing and Assurance Standards [Originally The Statement on Standard Auditing Prac-
tices
The Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (auditing practices committee, as it was named
earlier in 1982) of the ICA of India, had pronounced following 32 Auditing and Assurance
Standards (AASs)—
B8 AUDITING
AAS 20- Knowledge of business
AAS 21- Consideration of laws and regulations in an audit of financial statements.
AAS 22- Initial engagements- opening balance
AAS 23- Related parties
AAS 24- Audit considerations relating to entities using service organizations.
AAS 25- Comparatives
AAS 26- Terms of audit engagement
AAS 27- Communication of audit matters with those charged with governance.
AAS 28- The auditor’s report on financial statement.
AAS 29- Auditing in a computer information systems environment.
AAS 30- External confirmations
AAS 31- Engagements to compile financial information
AAS 32- Engagement to perform agreed upon procedures regarding financial information
These standards are mandatory and auditor is required to mention in his report, whether he
has followed these standards while conducting audit or not and if not give the reasons thereof.
The ICA of India’s Accounting Standard Board has uptil now issued following 29 accounting
standards. These standards are based on the International Accounting Standards. These stan-
dards are mandatory and, according to Sec 227(3) of the Companies Act, the auditor is required
to state whether accounting standards have been complied with or not; also in case of Tax
Audit u/s 44 AB, of I. Tax Act, 1961, these standards are mandatory. The SEBI also requires the
listed companies to comply with these Accounting Standards. If any company does not follow
these standards, it should be disclosed in financial statements along with (i) The deviation
from accounting standards. (ii) The reasons of such deviation and (iii) The financial effect, if
any, arising from such deviation.
These standards are applicable to all types of organizations whether business oriented or not
except activities like collecting donations and expending on earth quake relief etc. Some enter-
prises whose turnover in the immediately preceding financial year exceeds Rs.40 lakhs but
does not exceed Rs.50 crores or whose borrowings include public deposits exceeds Rs.1 crore
but do not exceed Rs.10 crores and those enterprises whose turnover does not exceed Rs.40
lakhs and borrowings do not exceed Rs. 1 crore are exempted from the applicability of account-
ing standards nos. 3, 17, 18, 21, 23, 24, 25 and 27.
AS 1- Disclosure of Accounting Policies
AS 2- Valuation of Inventories
AS 3- Cash Flow Statements
AS 4- Contingencies and events occurring after the balance sheet date
AS 5- Net profit or loss for the period, prior period items and changes in accounting policies
AS 6- Depreciation Accounting
AUDITING B9
AUDITING BASICS – I
AS 7- Construction Contracts
AS 8- Accounting for research and development (withdrawn)
AS 9- Revenue recognition
AS 10- Accounting for fixed assets
AS 11- The effects of changes in foreign exchange rates
AS 12- Accounting for government grants
AS 13- Accounting for investments
AS 14- Accounting for amalgamations
AS 15- Accounting for retirement benefits in the financial statements of employees
AS 16- Borrowing costs
AS 17- Segment reporting
AS 18- Related party disclosures
AS 19- Leases
AS 20- Earning per share
AS 21- Consolidated financial statements
AS 22- Accounting for taxes on income
AS 23- Accounting for investments in associates in consolidated financial statements
AS 24- Discontinuing operations
AS 25- Interim financial reporting
AS 26- Intangible assets
AS 27- Financial reporting of interest in joint venture
AS 28- Impairment of assets
AS 29- Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets.
The ICA of India had issued following seven statements on accounting and auditing. Out of
these almost all are mandatory. According to these statements auditor is required to verify
whether these statements are complied with or if there is any deviation, he is required to make
disclosure in his report and he should ensure to follow these statements while auditing.
B 10 AUDITING
Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules
The ICWA of India had issued following 47 Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit
Report Rules and these rules are mandatory as were made by the Central Government and
came into force from the date of publication.
(1) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (cement) of 1997
(2) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (cycles) of 1967
(3) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (tyres and tubes) of 1967
(4) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (caustic soda) of 1967
(5) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (air conditioners) of 1967
(6) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (refrigerators) of 1967
(7) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (batteries) of 1967
(8) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (Electric lamps) of 1967
(9) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (Electric fans) of 1969
(10) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (motor vehicles) of 1997
(11) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (electric motors) of 1969
(12) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (aluminium) of 1972
(13) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (vanaspati) of 1972
(14) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (bulk drugs) of 1974
(15) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (sugar) of 1974
(16) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (milk food) of 2001
(17) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (jute goods) of 1975
(18) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (industrial alcohol) of 1975
(19) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (paper) of 1975
(20) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (rayon) of 1976
(21) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (dyes) of 1976
(22) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (soda ash) of 1976
(23) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (polyester) of 1977
(24) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (nylon) of 1977
(25) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (textiles) of 1977
(26) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (Dry battery cell) of 1979
(27) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (sulphuric acid) of 1980
(28) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (steel tubes and pipes) of
1984
(29) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (engineering industries) of
1984
(30) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (electric cables and conduc-
tors) of 1984
AUDITING B 11
AUDITING BASICS – I
(31) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (bearings) of 1985
(32) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (chemical industries) of 1987
(33) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (formulations) of 1985
(34) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (steel plant) of 1990
(35) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (insecticides) of 1993
(36) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (fertilizers) of 1993
(37) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (scraps and detergents) of
1993
(38) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (cosmetics and toiletries) of
1993
(39) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (footwear) of 1996
(40) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (shaving systems) of 1996
(41) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (industrial gases) of 1996
(42) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (mining and metallurgy) of
2001
(43) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (electronic products) of 2001
(44) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (electricity) of 2001
(45) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (plantation products) of
2002
(46) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (petroleum industries) of
2002
(47) Cost Accounting Record Rules and Cost Audit Report Rules (telecommunications) of
2002
These cost accounting record rules are not applicable to a company though it falls under any of
the above (i) if the aggregate value of the machinery and plant installed where in, as on the last
date of the preceding financial year, does not exceed the limits as specified for a small scale
industrial undertaking under the provisions of the Industries (Development and Regulation
Act), 1951 and (ii) the aggregate value of the turnover made by the company from sale or
supply of all of its products during the preceding year does not exceed ten crore rupees. The
auditor has to make mention in his report about whether the enterprise has maintained proper
cost accounting records as prescribed u/s 209(1)(d).
The ICWA of India had pronounced following five cost accounting standards, though these
standards are not mandatory but the cost accountants are required to make a standard ap-
proach towards maintenance of cost accounting record and undertaking cost audit u/s 209(1)d
and sec.233(B) of the Companies Act, 1956. These standards equip the cost accountants with
better guidelines on standard cost audit practice.
B 12 AUDITING
CAS 2- Capacity determination
CAS 3- Overheads
CAS 4- Cost of production for captive consumption
CAS 5- Determination of average (equalized) transportation cost.
The International Federation of Accountants had issued the following 41 accounting standards,
though these standards are not mandatory, these provide a basis for development of accounting
standards in individual country. The Indian Accounting Standards issued by ICAI are largely
based on these international accounting standards—
AUDITING B 13
AUDITING BASICS – I
B 14 AUDITING
IFRS 7- Financial instruments disclosures
IFRS 8- Operating segments
Guidance Note
The ICA of India issued a number of guidance notes on matters raised by its members relating
to auditing. These notes are recommendatory in nature, cost accountant should ordinarily follow
recommendations to an auditing matter but this guidance notes will be superceded by the
accounting standard coming in force (after guidance note).
The ICWA of India issued no. of guidance notes as for the benefit of cost accounts, which
includes (i) guidance note on valuation audit under central excise law (ii) guidelines on
central excise – MODVAT audit (iii) guidelines on cost audit (iv) guidelines on
inventory valuation (v) total cost management in the manufacturing process (vi) guidelines on
transfer pricing (vii) guidelines on CenVAT audit under central excise. (viii) Environmental
audit.
According to AICPA the auditor along with his training, knowledge and experience must be
aware of and understand new authoritative pronouncements on accounting and auditing: He/
she should be intellectually honest, free from any obligation to be recognized as independent.
He should observe the standards in field work and reporting.
(I) General Standards-
(i) Independence- The auditor, in all matters relating to the assignments, should follow
an independent attitude.
(ii) Due Care- In exercising the work of audit, the auditor should exercise due care.
(II) Field Work Standards-
(iii) Planning and Supervision- Before the beginning of an audit, the audit work should
be properly planned and the work assigned to assistants be carefully supervised.
(iv) Internal Control- The internal controls existing in the enterprise be studied and
evaluated before hand.
(v) Evidential Matter- While auditing, auditor should collect the evidential documents
to afford a reasonable basis for forming an opinion on the financial statements.
AUDITING B 15
AUDITING BASICS – I
These formal standards/principles are framed in the context of statutory auditing but the AICPA
suggest that while following these GAAP/GAAS, due consideration be given to “materiality”
and “audit risk”.
The International Federation of Accountants had issued following nine broad GAAP i.e. Ba-
sic Principles governing an audit :
India USA
B 16 AUDITING
2. Fixed Assets & Depreciation 2. Fixed Assets & Depreciation
Revaluation of assets permitted. Revaluation of assets not permitted except
Depreciation is based (usually) on in cases of quasi-re-organisations.
rates set out in Schedule XIV to the Depreciation is over the useful economic
Companies Act, 1956. lives of assets. Depreciation and profit/loss
on sale is based on historic cost.
4. R & D 4. R & D
Costs can be capitalized subject to Costs are expenses as incurred except for
the conditions of the criteria of plant and equipment which are capitaliza-
technical feasibility of the production tion and depreciation if they have
resource availability and existence altemative future uses or expenses as
of market, etc. (AS-8, Research & incurred if they have no altemative
Development, issued by the Institute future uses.
of Chartered Accountants of India)
5. Goodwill 5. Goodwill
Purchased goodwill is capitalized and Treated as any other intangible asset,
amortised over the expected period of and is caspitalized and amortised. The
benefit or charged against available maximum carry forward period is 40 years.
capital reserves.
No standard except for brief references is
AS-10, Fixed Assets and AS-14, Accoun-
ting for Amalgamations Goodwill arising
from amalgamations can be written off
over 5 years.
6. Pre-operative Expenses 6. Pre-operative Expenses
All direct and indirect expenses Concept does not exist. They are expenses
incurred prior to commencement of unless they are capital is nature.
business are treated as pre-operative
expenses and capitalized to the cost
of fixed cost of assets. There are also
allowed to be deferred and written off
over a period of 3-5 years or 10 years.
AUDITING B 17
AUDITING BASICS – I
According to AAS 13, “information is material if its misstatement (i.e. omission or erroneous
statement) could influence the economic decision of user taken on the basic of the financial
information. Materiality depends on the size and nature of the item, judged in the particular
circumstances of its misstatement.
The following are some of the specific requirements in the form of Balance Sheet based materi-
ality cousideration implicit in the very process of prescribing the format in Part I of schedule
VI.
B 18 AUDITING
3. The maximum due by directors or other officers of the company at any time during the
year should be disclosed by way of a note.
Further whenever there is any change in the basis of accounting, the effect thereof must be
disclosed.
AAS 13 on ‘Audit Materiality’ requires that hthe auditor should consider materiality and its
relationship with audit risk when conducting an Audit.
Circumstances of Materiality
(i) Mistake discovered like valuation of stock, calculation of depreciation, calculation of in-
terest, estimation of liability etc.
(ii) Non-disclosure of abnormal and unusual items or non-recurring income or expenditure
etc.
(iii) Non-disclosure of items violating the statutory provisions etc.
A risk occurring due to insufficient or incompetent evidence collected by the auditor to express
his opinion on the financial statement is called as an “audit risk”. In case of debtors appearing
on balance sheets, auditor has to express whether the figure is materially correct or not and for
that he should collect the reliable confirmations from almost all debtors.
According to AAS 6, “audit risk” means, the risk that the auditor gives an inappropriate audit
opinion when the financial statements are materially misstated. This audit risk had three
components as stated above by IFA.
According to AAS 13, there is an inverse relationship between materiality and the degree of
audit risk i.e. the higher the materiality level, the lower the audit risk and lower the materiality
level, the higher the audit risk e.g. the risk that a particular account balance or class of transactions
could be misstated by an extremely large amount might be very less, but the risk that could be
misstated by an extremely small amount might be very high. The auditor takes the inverse
relationship between materiality and audit risk into account when determining the nature,
timing and extent of audit procedure e.g. if after planning for specific audit procedures, the
auditor determines that the acceptable materiality level is lower, audit risk is increased. The
auditor compensates for this by-
AUDITING B 19
AUDITING BASICS – I
(i) Reducing the assessed degree of control risk, where this is possible and supporting the
reduced degree by carrying out extended or additional test of control. OR (ii) Reducing detection
risk by modifying the nature, timings and extent of planned substantive procedures.
If the aggregate of the uncorrected misstatements, that the auditor has identified, approaches
the materiality level or if auditor determines that the aggregate of uncorrected statements cause
the financial information to be materially misstated, he could consider requesting the
management to adjust the financial information or extending his audit procedures. In any event,
the management may want to adjust the financial information for known misstatements. The
adjustment of financial information may involve application of appropriate accounting
principles, other adjustments in amounts or the addition of appropriate disclosures of
inadequately disclosed matters. If the management refuses to adjust the financial information
and the results of extended audit procedures do not enable the auditor to conclude that the
aggregate of uncorrected misstatements is not material, the auditor should express a qualified
or adverse opinion, an appropriate.
B 20 AUDITING
ACID TEST
Q1. State with reasons, whether following statements are true or false:
(i) The concept of evidence is fundamental to all auditing situations as an auditor basi-
cally seeks to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence to form his opinion.
(ii) In all auditing situations, the only evidence available to the auditor is books of ac-
counts and vouchers.
(iii) Not only statutory provisions but also technology and economic changes have in-
fluenced auditing to a great extent.
(iv) The decisions given by Hon. Courts in different cases do not affect the Generally
Accepted Accounting and Auditing Practices and Standards.
(v) Auditing is generally associated with only accounting and financial records.
(vi) The scope of audit depends upon the nature of appointment.
(vii) The statutory audit provides the best means of enhancing the credibility of the ac-
counts.
(viii) Auditor cannot gather sufficient appropriate audit evidence without performance
of compliance and substantive tests.
(ix) Inspection and observation are not only the ways to obtain audit evidence.
(x) US-GAAP are not different than that of INDIA-GAAP.
(xi) Percentage test and past trends are the only criteria to establish the materiality of an
item in financial statements.
(xii) The risk that the auditor gives an inappropriate audit opinion when the financial
statements are materially misstated is called as an “audit risk”.
Q3. Define “audit”. What are the factors which drastically changed the present day auditing
practice and auditor’s responsibilities?
Q5. What is audit evidence? Explain the different types of audit evidence and different meth-
ods of obtaining them.
Q6. “Audit Technique is the device available to the auditor for obtaining competent eviden-
tial matter”. Explain.
AUDITING B 21
AUDITING BASICS – I
Q8. “Audit practices demands the thorough knowledge of different legal provisions and dif-
ferent pronouncements”- Discuss.
B 22 AUDITING