0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
27 tayangan4 halaman
A Long range plan covers many years perhaps even decades common range plans are for five years or more. A short range plan is a plan developed to operationalise any other kind of plan.
A Long range plan covers many years perhaps even decades common range plans are for five years or more. A short range plan is a plan developed to operationalise any other kind of plan.
A Long range plan covers many years perhaps even decades common range plans are for five years or more. A short range plan is a plan developed to operationalise any other kind of plan.
Planning : It involves selecting mission and objectives and the
actions to achieve them to require decision making, that is choosing from among alternative future course of action Kinds of Organizational Plan: 1. Strategic Plan: A general plan outlining decisions of resource allocation, prioritites and action steps necessary to reach strategic goals. 2. Tactical Plan: A plan aimed at achieving tactical goal and developed to implement specific parts of strategic plan 3. Operational Plan: A plan that focuses or carrying out tactical plan to achieve operational goal. Time frame for planning: 1. Long rage plan: A plan that covers many years perhaps even decades common range plans are for five years or more. 2. Intermediate plan: A plan that especially convers periods from one to five years 3. Short range plan: A plan that generally covers a span of one year of less. There are two basic kind of short range plan: Action plan: A plan used to operationalie any other kind of plan eaction plan: A plan developed to react to an unfroseen circumstance. Sa!"asachi #os$ ! "ecturer, #epartment of $usiness Administration % esponsi!ilites for planner 1. Planning staff: &ome large organiation develop a professional planning staff. "ike 'eneral (otors, #isney, )ord 2. Panning Tas% &orce:*rganiation &ometives use a planning task force to help develop plans. &uch task force often companies line managers with a special interest in the relevant area of planning. 3. #oard of 'irectors: Among its other responbilities, the board of directors estabilishes the corporate mission and strategy. (. )hief *+ec$ti,e Officer: The e+ecutive committee is usually composed of the top e+ecutives in he organiation working together as a group. -. Line .anagement: The final component of most organiations planning activities is line management. Steps of planning: $eing Aware of *pportunities ,stablising objectives Leadership #eha,ior and St"les: "eaders can be categoried as applying three basic styles- A. The A$tocratic Leader commads and e+pect, compliance is dogmatic and positive and leads by the be ability to whithhold or give rewards and punishment. #. The 'ecocratic or Participati,e Leader consults with subordinates on proposed actions and decisions and encourages participation from them. This type of leader ranges from the peron who does not take action without subordinates concurrences to the Sa!"asachi #os$ ! "ecturer, #epartment of $usiness Administration . one who makes decissions but consult whith subodinates before doing so. ). The &ree/rein Leader uses his or her power very little giving subordinates a high degree of independence in their operatiions. &uch leaders depend largely on the subordinates to set their own goals and the means of achieving them and they see their role as one of aiding the operations of followers by furnishing then with information and acting primarilty as a contact wih the gropu/s e+ternal environment. Li%ert0s &o$r S"stems of .anagement : "ikert and his associates at the 0niversity of (ichigan have studied ther patterns of styles of leaders and managers for three decades. "ikert has developed certain ideas and approcaches important to understanding leadership behavior. 1e see an effective manager as strongly oriented to subordinates. 2elying on communication to keep all parties working as a unit. All members of the group including the manager or leader adopt a supportive attitude in which they share motivations. "iker views this apporach the most effective way to lead to group. Li%ert has s$ggested fo$r s"stems of management S"stem11 *+ploti,e/A$thoritati,e: Its managers are highly autocratic, have little trust in subordinates movivate people though fear and punishment and only occasional rewards engage in downward communication and limit deceion making to the top Sa!"asachi #os$ ! "ecturer, #epartment of $usiness Administration 3 S"stem 21 #ene,olent/A$thoritati,e: Authoritative its manager have a patroniing contudence and turst in subordinates, motivate with reward and some fear and pusinishment permit some upward communication, solict some ideas and opinions from subordinates and allow some delegation for decision making but with close policy control. S"stem 31 )ons$ltati,e: (anagers in this system have substantial but not complete confidence and trust in suboradinates, usually try to make use of subordinates ideas and opinons use reward for motivation with occasional punishment and some participation engage in communication flow both down and up make broad policy and general decisions at the top while allowing specific decisions to be make at lower levels and act consultatively in other ways. S"stem (1 Participati,e/2ro$p: (anagers have complete turst and confidence in subordinates in all matters4 they always get ideas and opinions from subordinates and contructively use them. They also give economic rewared on the basis of group participation and involvement in such areas as setting goals and appraising progress toward goals. They engage in much communication down and up and with peers, encourage decision making throughout the organiation and operate among themselves and with their subordinates as a group. 55555... Sa!"asachi #os$ "ecturer of #$A (ob:6%7%%8398:; Sa!"asachi #os$ ! "ecturer, #epartment of $usiness Administration <