School of Psychology, University of Western Australia
Clare Mein, Shannon Byrne, Chiara Horlin and Romola Bucks for the undergraduate unit PSYC1101 Mind and Brain (2012, 4 th ed.). Revised by Andrew Page and Adelln Sng
APA STYLE (6 th Edition) APA style is the format and style requirements outlined in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA). It is simply a set of standardised guidelines for setting out your written work. It covers format, structure, punctuation, spelling, abbreviations and referencing. APA style is accepted worldwide as the standard for writing in the discipline of psychology. Standardising the writing style across the discipline of psychology means consistency between papers. When everyone uses the same style conventions it makes it easy for a reader to understand what has been written and compare one set of findings with other findings. As a student of psychology, APA style guidelines also apply to you. At this introductory level, you are expected to apply at least the key elements of APA style.
4
THE RESEARCH REPORT What is a research report? The aim of a research report is to explain a study that you have conducted. It tells a reader why you did the experiment, how you did it, what you found and what the results mean. Structure of a research report A research report has a set structure that must be followed. You are disseminating to others the results of an original experiment; you are contributing to psychological knowledge. Your report therefore needs to adhere to the same conventions that all other researchers use when reporting their results. Your research report will have these main sections: Title Outline the relationship between the key variables or highlight the main issue Abstract Give a very concise overview of the contents of your report Introduction Critically evaluate past research Explain why you conducted the study Describe what you expected to find Method Describe how you conducted the study Results Report what you found Discussion Suggest some conclusions that one might draw from your findings Reference list Provide a list of the sources you have cited in your report.
RULE OF THUMB Your Introduction and Discussion sections should each make up about a third of the word count. Your Method and Results sections, combined, should make up the remaining third. 5
TITLE Your title should be no more than 10-15 words long. Aim to summarise the main idea so your reader can quickly comprehend what your report is about. A good title should either outline the relationship between the key variables or highlight the main issue. Some examples of good titles from UWA researchers: The Relationship between motor coordination, executive functioning and attention in school aged children. From brief gaps to very long pauses: Temporal isolation does not benefit serial recall. The effects of diazepam on cognitive processing. The influence of phoneme position overlap on the phonemic similarity effect in nonword recall. Intelligence and development: A cognitive theory Attractiveness in men does not provide cues to semen quality Effects of a red background on magnocellular functioning in average and specifically disabled readers Anxiety and the allocation of attention to threat Automatic and controlled activation of stereotypes: Individual differences associated with prejudice COVERSHEET Your lab report must include a coversheet that contains the following information; a. Your full name b. Your student number c. The title of your lab report d. An EXACT word count e. A signed (initialled) declaration of originality A coversheet template is available on LMS for you to copy and paste into the front page of your lab report.
RULE OF THUMB Avoid unnecessary words like "A Report on a Study of . . ." or "An Experiment to Examine . . ."
6
ABSTRACT An abstract is a very concise overview of the contents of your report. It should be no longer than 120 words. A good abstract should: a. Define the research problem b. Outline your method c. Describe key findings d. Discuss key implications You may notice that these key points correspond to information from/a summary of each section of the report. Some examples of good abstracts:
Abstract The emphasis on greater intra and inter-disciplinary collaboration in Australian universities has stimulated research in to strategies of facilitation success in cooperative endeavours in the research sector. Sixty-six academics, making up 33 collaborative dyads, were jointly exposed to humorous or bland audio-visual material over a period of eight weeks. Those jointly exposed to the humorous material reported significantly higher ratings of enjoyment and productivity in the collaboration, but no significant difference in perceived satisfaction. Implications for further research are discussed, particularly the need for the development and implementation of an objective, standardized measure of productivity.
Abstract This study examined the effects of short-term food deprivation on two cognitive abilities: concentration and perseverance. Undergraduate students (N = 51) were tested on a concentration task and a perseverance task after one of three levels of food deprivation: none, 12 hours, or 24 hours. It was predicted that food deprivation would impair both concentration scores and perseverance time. Food deprivation had no significant effect on concentration scores. Participants in the 12-hour deprivation group spent significantly less time on the perseverance task than those in both the control and 24-hour deprivation groups, suggesting that short-term deprivation may affect some aspects of cognition and not others.
TIP You may find it easier to come back and write the Abstract after you have written the report, when your experiment and its results and implications are clear in your mind.
YOUR ABSTRACT WILL BE GIVEN A MARK OUT OF 5 Have you concisely summarised your studys rationale, method, findings and implications? Have you stuck to the 120 word limit?
7
INTRODUCTION Think of your introduction as a funnel into your experiment. You start relatively broad and general, by introducing your topic and mentioning relevant background information. Then narrow down to explain theories and empirical findings especially relevant to your experiment. Then narrow down further to point out gaps in the exisiting research literature and establish the rationale for conducting your particular experiment. Then finish by very specifically stating your aims and hypotheses.
Provide background information Introduce the topic your study addresses and the theoretical framework that underlies your study. Define any key terms you will be using. Review relevant literature Outline previous studies done in the area, their findings and conclusions. Only go into detail about those studies that are central to understanding why you did your experiment. Avoid providing a shopping list of studies (e.g. Study A did this. Study B did that. Then Study C did this). Instead, try and identify common themes/findings from the studies (e.g. Studies A and B found this... However Study C found the opposite). Start general
Finish specific
Specific 8
Establish your rationale Based on your review of the literature, you need to state how your study will add to the current body of knowledge. State what is already known from previous research. Then, state the questions that remain unanswered and how you research will contribute beyond what is already known. State your aims Tell your reader exactly what you are investigating. What are you interested in finding out? For example: This study aimed to determine whether same-sex friends are more similar than same-sex strangers in their attitudes. State your hypotheses A hypothesis is an (informed) guess about how the world is. Hypotheses are often expressed in a form such as It was hypothesised that .... Before you conducted the experiment, what did you think the answer to your research question was? It was hypothesised that same-sex friends would have more similar attitudes to the environment, abortion, multiculturalism, and law and order than would same-sex strangers.
REMEMBER Everything about the participants and what you did in the experimental session belongs in your Method section, not in the Introduction.
YOUR INTRODUCTION WILL BE GIVEN A MARK OUT OF 20 Have you clearly introduced the motivation for the experiment? Does your introduction culminate in a statement of the hypotheses? REMEMBER Your lab report title is the heading for your Introduction section. There is no heading Introduction
9
WHATS IN AN AIM? When writing your introduction, its easy to get confused between your aim, your hypothesis and your experimental predictions. Heres a rough guide to distinguishing these concepts.
Aim Your aim is what you are interested in finding out. Youll often use the word whether when writing your aim. This study aimed to determine whether anxiety is associated with an attentional bias to threat. Hypothesis Your hypothesis is your informed guess about how the world is. It was hypothesised that social trait anxiety is characterised by enhanced attentional engagement with threat. Prediction Your prediction (or expectation) is what you expect to happen in your experiment if your hypothesis was true/correct. It was expected that people with high trait anxiety would react faster to images of angry faces than would those with low trait anxiety. 10
METHOD The purpose of the method is to explain how you conducted your study. The Method usually contains three sections: Participants, Materials and Procedure. Participants Who participated in your study? How many people completed the experiment? Include information that demonstrates the degree to which your sample is generalisable to the wider population; such as age, gender ratios, level of education, nationality. Some of this information will not be relevant to the variables that you are investigating in your study, and do not have to be reported. Do not include guesses about the demographic characteristics of your sample if these characteristics were not measured. Mention how your participants came to be involved in the study (e.g., were they volunteers recruited from nursing homes via an advertisement, undergraduate students who took part as a course requirement, inpatients from a particular hospital who were referred by their doctor?) Were there any selection criteria? (e.g., were participants screened for anxiety level? Did they have to meet criteria for a particular disorder? Did they have to be a particular gender, age or ethnicity?) Materials What materials did you use in the study? Describe any standardised tasks or questionnaires your participants completed. Include information about any unusual items or specialist equipment you used (e.g., audio recording equipment). Theres no need to provide details about common items such as pens, pencils, chairs For example, it may be important to mention that participants completed a task at a computer, but only include details about the computers brand, speed, screen resolution and size if it is relevant. Procedure What did the participants do? In what order? Include information such as how participants were divided into groups, the instructions they were given, the tasks they performed. REMEMBER Your Method section is concerned only with what you and the participants did during the experimental session. Any mention of your results should be saved for the Results section.
YOUR METHOD SECTION WILL BE GIVEN A MARK OUT OF 20 Is your method divided into appropriate sections? Could someone replicate this experiment, based on what you have written here? RULE OF THUMB There should be sufficient detail in your Method section that the reader could replicate your experiment. BUT do not include every detail only what is relevant. co9in
11
RESULTS The purpose of the Results section is to present, but not yet discuss, the outcome of your experiment. What did you find? Present descriptive statistics Present the means, standard deviations and standard error for the major variables. To do this, either write the results in the text OR use a table OR a figure, but remember to report the actual data only once. You must choose which format presents the data to the reader in the most accessible way. Think about which you would find easier to interpret. Pictures are often quicker to process, so it may be best to choose a figure over a table whenever possible. Tables and figures are usually better than giving lots of numbers in the text. However, all figures and tables must be introduced and discussed in the text. Point out the important patterns in the data, but do not repeat the specific numbers in your text (as they are already in your table or figure). For example: Figure 1 shows that participants with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder scored more highly on the BDI than participants with Generalised Anxiety Disorder.
REMEMBER You dont need to present every participants score. When you present descriptive statistics (means and standard deviations etc.) you are summarising the raw data for your reader. REMEMBER In your Results section, you are concerned only with numbers and patterns in your data. Do not say here what you think the data mean about people and the world. This goes in your Discussion.
12
Report inferential statistics There are different types of inferential statistics that you may have to report when presenting your findings in the results section. The inferential statistic(s) that we choose depends on the research question.
Reporting group differences. You may wish to use a figure or a table here to illustrate group differences. In addition, you should describe in the text: a. Which group mean (or average) is bigger? By how many units? b. State whether it is likely to be a real difference between the two groups scores (consider the degree of overlap between the separate distributions of scores).
Reporting associations between variables You may wish to use a figure or a table here to present correlations. In addition, you should describe in the text: a. What you are correlating with and why. b. Whether there is an association between these two variables. In which direction? c. How strong is the association? State how much of the variance in scores on your second variable is explained by scores on your first variable.
TIP. If you are confused about standard deviation, standard error or other statistics, dont worry, you will learn how to analyse your data in your Week 4 tutorial.
TIP. For more information about correlations, go to the Bernstein link on LMS, select Chapter 2 and then select Connect the Dots.
13
Formatting tables Tables are a clear way to present lots of data. Your table should help to illustrate your narrative it shouldnt repeat what is said in the text. Avoid using a table if your data could be presented more succinctly in a couple of sentences. For tables, APA format stipulates you: - Use Times New Roman font, size 12pt - Double space your whole table, including the title. - Put a label and number above your table (e.g., Table 1 ) - Give your table a title. This should be a concise description of the data it presents. Use italics. - Put an unbroken horizontal cell border under the title, under the row headers, and under the last row of the table. - If you present means, include standard deviation
Table 1 Means (SD) for the distracted and control groups on two working memory tasks. Distracted group Control group Task A 37.3 (4.9) 60.7 (5.2) Task B 40.5 (6.7) 78.0 (9.2)
RULE OF THUMB Place your table or figure close to (preferably immediately after) the text that refers to it. TIP Check your table: Is the table necessary? Have you introduced and discussed the table in the text? Are all the tables in your report presented consistently? Are all abbreviations explained? Are the table and title of the table together on the same page? TIP Use the Insert Table command in Windows (or download this table from LMS to use as a template). YOUR RESULTS SECTION WILL BE GIVEN A MARK OUT OF 20 Have you reported your descriptive and inferential statistics clearly? If you presented your results in a table OR figure, did you explain them in text without repeating the results? Did you make sure NOT to interpret or discuss the findings in this section? 14
Formatting figures
For figures, APA format stipulates you: - Use Times New Roman 12pt for the title. - Use Helvetica or Arial font within the figure ( e.g. for the legends and axis titles). - Put a label and number below your figure. Use italics. - Give your figure a title. This should be a concise description of the data it presents. - Join the x and y axes to form a box around the data - Label each axis. Include units in parentheses - Use the horizontal (x) axis for the independent variable, and the vertical (y) axis for the dependent variable. - Use only black and white. Use various shading patterns (in greyscale) to differentiate groups. - Mark standard error bars above and below the mean. - Include a legend if necessary.
Figure 1. Mean working memory scores for participants in distracted and control conditions. Error bars represent standard error of the mean.
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 Control Distracted M e a n
w o r k i n g
m e m o r y
s c o r e
Condition TIP Check your figure: Have you mentioned the figure in the text? Are all figures in your report presented consistently? Are all abbreviations explained? Are the figure and the title of the figure together on the same page? 15
DISCUSSION The purpose of the discussion is to review your findings and consider their implications. Think about the structure of your Discussion as the reverse of your funnel Introduction: you start more specifically and gradually get broader in scope.
Summarise your findings What did you find? Start by restating your aims and then summarise the important results and comment on whether they supported the hypotheses. Do not repeat actual values; these are already in your Results section. Instead, talk about trends (e.g., Group A scored more highly than Group B on measure X.) This first paragraph should be understood by a reader who is unfamiliar with your study. Restating your aim(s) and hypotheses at the beginning of the Discussion is also helpful because some readers may have forgotten what they were!
Start specific
Finish general
Specific 16
Discuss the meaning of the findings For each separate hypothesis discuss the meaning of your findings. Consider the main similarities and differences between your findings and comparable previous studies (i.e., the studies you mentioned in your Introduction). Have you replicated any previous findings? Do your findings contradict previous findings? If so, what differences in the method could explain these differences in results? Summarise the theories each finding supports. How do your results contribute to the body of research on this topic? Do they support/contradict a theory? Consider alternative explanations that that could accommodate your findings. (e.g., could methodological problems also explain your results?) Consider the implications of your findings Now, if you have not already done this above and considering all your findings, discuss the broader theoretical implications and practical applications of your results. What is important about the findings of your study? Have your findings contributed to our theoretical understanding of the topic? In particular, do your findings have a practical application? (e.g., could they be useful to society and how, or do they demonstrate a need for future research?) Dont just repeat information you have already discussed. At this point, dont introduce new findings that you have not previously mentioned.
Consider limitations of your study and suggest directions for future research Are there any methodological flaws that may have impacted on your results? Mention limitations, but remain positive (e.g., you could cite previous research that suggests this limitation is unlikely to have influenced your results OR offer suggestions for future researchers to follow to overcome the limitations). It is not enough to just say future research is necessary your ideas need to be concrete and specific. Remember this is one of the last things your marker reads so dazzle them with your brilliance.
Conclude In a few sentences, summarise the theories your study has supported, and the implications of your findings. Your conclusion should leave the reader with a concise understanding of the main theoretical consequences of the results. Note that your conclusion is not a separate section, but a paragraph within your Discussion.
TIP Your Discussion section is an opportunity to be original! Your marker will reward you for creative ideas, as long as they are not unreasonable or fanciful.
17
YOU PROVE NOTHING!
Avoid altogether the word prove. Contrary to popular belief, science does not prove things. Science investigates, explores, describes phenomena and produces evidence that is consistent or inconsistent with a theory. Even when you find a difference in scores between groups or a correlation between two variables, there is still a slim possibility that those results turned out the way they did, just by chance alone. Thus, you have not proven a phenomenon exists, you have just found some evidence that is consistent with that phenomenon existing. So, while anti-wrinkle creams and hair replacement treatments on TV advertisements might claim to have proven results, the closest thing a good scientist will come to proving anything is concluding that it is the most likely explanation, given what we know so far.
Some alternate phrases: results were consistent/inconsistent with the hypothesis that... as expected/contrary to expectation... results indicate support for/failed to support the hypothesis that...
15 MARKS WILL GO TOWARDS OVERALL QUALITY Does your report flow logically and fluently? Have you found references beyond those we have given you? YOUR DISCUSSION SECTION WILL BE GIVEN A MARK OUT OF 20 Have you made a statement about your results in relation to your original hypotheses? Have you discussed what the results mean in relation to the broader theoretical issues raised in the introduction? Have you considered directions for future research?
18
REFERENCING Why reference? In academic writing, you use references to support your argument. The general process is: 1. Read the literature Consider: - theoretical models of the phenomenon you are investigating - the results of previous empirical studies. 2. Decide your argument, based on what you have read. Consider: - Which of the arguments you have read is most convincing? - Which conclusions are flawed (and how)? - Which hypotheses have the most logical theoretical support? - Which hypotheses have the most valid and reliable empirical support? 3. Use the evidence you have collected from your reading to support your argument; referencing is critical to justifying the reasonableness of your position. How to reference Your reader must be able to find the source to which you are referring. A citation must appear in two places in your essay: 1. in the body of your text (abbreviated citation) 2. in your References section at the at the end of your paper (full reference with all publication details). In text citation After referring to someone elses idea or to someone elses research, reference! APA style stipulates two main ways of doing this: 1. Insert the authors(s) surname or surnames and the year of publication in parenthesis at the end of your sentence. Note that the citation comes BEFORE the full stop because the citation forms part of your statement: A recent study demonstrated links between these two factors (Jones & Smith, 2008). 2. If the surname of the author makes up part of your narrative, put only the year in parentheses. This goes immediately after the authors surname: Whiteman (2008) compared smokers and nonsmokers 19
Two or more authors If you cite a paper with two or more authors, use the ampersand (&) symbol if the authors surnames are in parentheses A recent study examined whether introspective reports predict performance (Black & Richardson, 2008). Use the word and if the authors surnames make up part of your narrative Kelson and Smith (1991) found that children with autism Three to five authors If you cite a paper with three to five authors, list ALL the authors surnames the first time the work is cited (Note the comma before the word and): Crabbs, Thatcher, Collins, and Gibson (1999) examined On second and subsequent citings, abbreviate the citation by using only the first authors surname and the words et al. A full stop must be used after et al. as et al. stands for et alia (and all) in Latin. Crabbs et al. (1999) argued that Six or more authors If you cite a paper with six or more authors, abbreviate the citation by using only the first authors surname and the words et al. even on the first citation. Karver et al. (2008) proposed Direct quotes If you use direct quotes, use quotation marks, and include the associated page number(s) in your citation. Use p. if it the quotation is on one page, pp. if it spans two pages. Jeffers et al. (2000) hypothesised that direct quotation (p. 24). Jeffers et al. (2000) reported that direct quotation (pp. 34-35) RULE OF THUMB Try to avoid direct quotations. If it is possible to put something into your own words then do so. The overuse of quotations breaks the flow of your writing and comes across as lazy. Aim for no more than two per assignment. 20
REFERENCE LIST Your Reference list should begin on a new page after your Discussion, and be titled References. APA style references should be formatted with a hanging indent. They should not be bullet pointed or numbered. Here is how to format references for the main kinds of texts you will encounter. Pay close attention to which parts are italicised and to the exact placement of full stops, parenthesis and commas. Journal article Author, initial. (Year). Article title. Italicised Journal Title, Volume (Issue), page-page. Erceg-Hurn, D. M. (2008). Drugs, money, and graphic ads: A critical review of the Montana Meth Project. Prevention Science, 9(4), 256-263. Authored book Author, initial. (Year). Italicised book title. Place of publication: Publisher. Rhodes, G. (1996). Superportraits: Caricatures and recognition. Hove: Psychology Press. Edited book Editor, initial. (Ed.). (Year). Italicised book title. Place of publication: Publisher. Anderson, M. (Ed). (1999). The development of intelligence. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press Chapter in an edited book Author, initial. (Year). Chapter title. In Initial. Editor (Ed.). Italicised book title (pp. page- page). Place of publication: Publisher. MacLeod, C. (1998). Implicit perception: Perceptual processing without awareness. In K. Kirsner & C. Speelman (Eds.), Implicit and explicit mental processes (pp. 57-78). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Locke, V., & Johnston, L. (2001). Stereotyping and prejudice: A social cognitive approach. In M. Augoustinos & K. J. Reynolds (Eds.). Understanding prejudice, racism, and social conflict (pp 107-125). London: Sage. You will find more information on referencing at http://libguides.is.uwa.edu.au/apa.
REMEMBER Only reference papers that you have cited in text. Papers you read but didnt refer directly to in your report are left out. 21
RULE OF THUMB There is no rule about how many references you should have. But reading beyond the literature provided to you is highly encouraged. Extra reading is likely to result in a well- informed Introduction and Discussion and so increases your chance of getting a good mark!
RULE OF THUMB Dont ever reference Wikipedia, Dolly Doctor, The West Australian, your friends blog or anonymous websites. Unless your topic specifically calls for you to mention whats in the popular media, stick to articles in genuine scholarly journals and textbooks these are peer-reviewed by other psychologists and therefore carry more credibility. 22
FORMATTING Layout APA format stipulates you: - Use Times New Roman font, size 12pt - Use double spacing (24pt line spacing) for your whole report - Set your margins at: 2.54cm (i.e. 1 inch) at the top, bottom, left and right. Lab report layout. Your Abstract is on its own page. Your four main sections (Introduction, Method, Results, and Discussion) flow on from one another; do not start a new page for each section. Your References start on a new page. 23
Headings Use headings to divide your work into sections. APA format uses levels of headings; use the same level of heading for topics of similar importance. Do not number your headings. APA style requires particular formatting for each level of heading. The levels you are likely to use at this stage are: Level 1: Centred, Boldface, Uppercase and Lowercase Heading Level 2: Flush to Left Margin, Boldface, Uppercase and Lowercase Heading Level 3: Indented, boldface, lowercase paragraph heading ending with a full stop.
Header and page numbers The top right corner of each page should have the page number while the top left corner should contain a 2-5 word header (also known as running head). The header is the topic of your report (i.e., an abbreviated version of your title) and is presented in uppercase. Use Times New Roman font, size 12pt, as for the rest of your report.
Body text Your text should be left aligned (not justified). Indent each paragraph by 1.25cm on the first line. Double space your lines. For example: The current study aimed to examine whether increased mirth would facilitate collaborative relationships and lead to greater productivity by recruiting pairs of academics from a large metropolitan university who were about to embark on new collaborations. Given the findings by Python (1954), it was hypothesised that the dyads jointly exposed to regular comedy would report greater perceived cooperation and personal satisfaction with the collaboration. It was also hypothesised that the self-judged productivity of the collaboration would be significantly greater in the dyads exposed to regular comedy compared to the control condition. 25
Abbreviations Do not use abbreviations or acronyms in the main body text. The only exceptions are: a. If you explicitly introduce your abbreviation when it first appears. This study measured reaction time (RT). Results showed that RT differed across conditions b. For units of measurement, you may abbreviate.
c. Within parentheses you may use standard Latin abbreviations. Do not use these in the main text. (e.g., ) (i.e., ) (c.f., )
Word Abbreviation minute min hour hr second s metre m
Standard deviation SD Standard error SE Mean M Number N Correlation coefficient r 26
Numbers Write numbers between zero and nine in words. Use numerals for all other numbers. There were six conditions... Participants pressed each key 18 times. There are three exceptions: If the number is a measurement it is always in numerals. 4 min If the number begins a sentence, it is always in words. Sixty eight volunteers were selected... If you are directly comparing a single digit number to a larger number, use numerals. In the control condition, 3 of 19 participants withheld their data.
Italics Use italics only for foreign words or for the first use of a technical term or a term with a specific meaning within your study. ipso facto Bavelas also acknowledges a functional role for generic responses - those acts like nodding or generic vocalisations (e.g., mhm, u-huh or yeah). These generic responses do not convey narrative content, but
27
WRITING STYLE Dont be pompous If theres a simpler word, use it.
Dont be flowery Avoid all unnecessary words. Too flowery Better owing to the fact that because at this point in time now give consideration to consider the majority of most on a daily basis daily until such time as until three different groups three groups Use the active voice Say: Someone did something, rather than: something was done by someone. The active voice is clear, direct, and easy to read and understand; the passive voice is more obscure and difficult to read. Information processing speed has been linked by researchers to scores on IQ tests. Researchers have linked information processing speed to scores on IQ tests.
Too pompous Better ascertain examine, test commencement start termination end utilise use concerning about TIP Remove unnecessary information from your report. Try writing your topic down and sticking it next to your computer; refer to it often and ask Does this sentence help answer my question/topic?. If the answer is no, dont include it.
28
Avoid jargon. Dont be tempted to use fancy, specialist terminology just to sound competent, especially if youre not sure of the exact meaning of the word. This will backfire. Be non-discriminatory Cite attributes such as age, gender, religion, race, sexual preference, marital status only if they are relevant to your analysis. Avoid labelling people People shouldnt be defined by one aspect of their personality, situation or lifestyle. Labelling Better at-risk students students who are at risk of. depressed people people with depression autistic children children with autism schizophrenics people with schizophrenia
Psychologists test participants, not subjects Acknowledge your human participants consensual participation by replacing the term subjects with a more descriptive term: Participants Volunteers Students Children Respondents Individuals with
RULE OF THUMB Be direct, clear, precise and concise. In psychology report writing, wordiness is not valued.
29
RECCOMENDED READING OShea, R., Moss, S., & McKenzie, W. (2006). Writing for Psychology. Melbourne, Australia: Thomson Learning.
BIBLIOGRAPHY American Psychological Association. (2009). Publication manual for the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Curtis, G., Palermo, R., & Lewandowsky, S. (2004). Psychology 101 guide to writing a lab report. (Available from the School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA 6009). OShea, R., Moss, S., & McKenzie, W. (2006). Writing for Psychology. Melbourne, Australia: Thomson Learning. Owens, R., Bucks, R., Bogdanovs, J., Farrant, B., Horlin, C. Lampard, A. & Webster, K. (2008) Lab report checklist. (Available from the School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA 6009).
USEFUL STUFF ON LMS
Follow the link from LMS to the Downloadable eBook version of your textbook: Bernstein, D.A., Penner, L.A., Clarke-Stewart, A., & Roy, E.J. (2008). Psychology (9 th .ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
If you have any queries about how to write your lab report, you can ask your tutor .
See your Psychology 1101 Handbook for information about how many marks your lab report is worth, how to apply for an extension and plagiarism.
Dont forget to go to LMS and do the Online quiz on how to write a lab report. The marks for this quiz will contribute towards your participation mark. Good luck!