2
4% $2,000,000 $40,000. Now the balance in the
building account for tax purposes has declined to $2,000,000 $40,000 $1,960,000.
The $1,960,000 remaining balance is the amount that is undepreciated for tax purposes
and is called the undepreciated capital cost (UCC) of the building. For the second year,
the maximum CCA deduction is 4% UCC balance 4% $1,960,000 $78,400.
One difference is that the CCA rate is 4%, while the amortization rate is 5%.
Another big difference in this example is that amortization expense is constant over 20
years. At that point, amortization expense ends because the asset is fully amortized. On
the other hand, CCA is calculated on a declining balance method. The CCA amount
36 Chapter 2 AccountingThe Language of Business
TABLE 2.2 25-Year Comparison Between CCA in Tax Return and Amortization
Expense in Income Statement
Amortization Expense
Opening CCA at Closing (Straight-Line Net
Year UCC 4% UCC Over 20 Years) Book Value
1 $2,000,000 $40,000 $1,960,000 $100,000 $1,900,000
2 1,960,000 78,400 1,881,600 100,000 1,800,000
3 1,881,600 75,264 1,806,336 100,000 1,700,000
4 1,806,336 72,253 1,734,083 100,000 1,600,000
5 1,734,083 69,363 1,664,719 100,000 1,500,000
6 1,664,719 66,589 1,598,130 100,000 1,400,000
7 1,598,130 63,925 1,534,205 100,000 1,300,000
8 1,534,205 61,368 1,472,837 100,000 1,200,000
9 1,472,837 58,913 1,413,924 100,000 1,100,000
10 1,413,924 56,557 1,357,367 100,000 1,000,000
11 1,357,367 54,295 1,303,072 100,000 900,000
12 1,303,072 52,123 1,250,949 100,000 800,000
13 1,250,949 50,038 1,200,911 100,000 700,000
14 1,200,911 48,036 1,152,875 100,000 600,000
15 1,152,875 46,115 1,106,760 100,000 500,000
16 1,106,760 44,270 1,062,489 100,000 400,000
17 1,062,489 42,500 1,019,990 100,000 300,000
18 1,019,990 40,800 979,190 100,000 200,000
19 979,190 39,168 940,023 100,000 100,000
20 940,023 37,601 902,422 100,000
21 902,422 36,097 866,325
22 866,325 34,653 831,672
23 831,672 33,267 798,405
24 798,405 31,936 766,469
25 766,469 30,659 735,810
02Ch02_Atrill.QXD 2/29/08 9:58 AM Page 36
gradually declines each year (except for the increase in the second year caused by the
application of the half-year rule in the first year), because the same CCA rate is applied
to a declining UCC balance. Notice that the CCA amounts continue for Years 21 to 25,
while the amortization is zero for those years.
Unless explicitly stated to the contrary, most problems, cases, examples, and situa-
tions described in this text assume that the amount of CCA taken in a year is the same
as the amortization reported. The reason for making this simplifying assumption is to
clearly focus on the particular issue we are studying, without complicating it too much
with extra tax issues.
Disposal of the Only Asset in a CCA Class
Theoretically, the CCA will go on forever, as long as there are assets remaining in the
CCA class, because the UCC balance never quite gets to zero. However, when the last
asset in a CCA class is sold, there are usually income tax implications because the CCA
class has been terminated. Depending on the selling price of the asset, there are four
possible income tax scenarios.
Case 1: No further income tax impact Assume the building in Table 2.2 is sold at the
beginning of Year 26 for $735,810. Since this amount exactly matches the opening
UCC balance, the proceeds from the sale reduce UCC to zero. No further CCA can be
claimed and there are no further tax implications.
Chapter 2 AccountingThe Language of Business 37
` Opening Closing
Year UCC CCA UCC Comments
25 $766,469 $30,659 $ 735,810
26 (735,810) Proceeds from sale
26 nil Adjusted opening balance
26 nil nil nil
Opening Closing
Year UCC CCA UCC Comments
25 $766,469 $30,659 $ 735,810
26 (400,000) Proceeds from sale
26 335,810 Adjusted opening balance
26 (335,810) Terminal loss
26 nil nil nil
Case 2: Terminal loss reduces income taxes Assume the building in Table 2.2 is sold
at the beginning of Year 26 for $400,000. Now there is a balance of $335,810 when the
proceeds are subtracted from the opening UCC balance. This is a terminal loss because
there are no more assets remaining in this class and there is a positive UCC balance in
the class. Terminal losses are fully deductible on the tax return and therefore reduce
income tax payable. Terminal losses also reduce the UCC balance to zero.
The tax saving on this terminal loss is the tax rate multiplied by the terminal loss,
as shown in Equation 2.6.
Tax saving Tax rate Terminal loss 2.6
02Ch02_Atrill.QXD 2/29/08 9:58 AM Page 37
Assuming a tax rate of 40%, the tax saving for this terminal loss would be $134,324
(i.e., 40% $335,810).
Case 3: CCA recapture increases income taxes Assume the building in Table 2.2 is
sold at the beginning of Year 26 for $1,500,000. Now there is a negative balance of
$764,190, when the proceeds are subtracted from the opening UCC balance. The nega-
tive balance, representing a credit balance in UCC, is called recaptured CCA.
The CCA recapture amount is added to income in the tax return and results in
higher income tax for the company. The rationale for having to pay more income tax is
that the company must not have paid enough tax in the past, due to its CCA deductions
being too high in past tax returns (although within legal limits). The evidence for this
conclusion is that the buildings value has not really depreciated down to $735,810, since
it was sold for such a high price.
38 Chapter 2 AccountingThe Language of Business
Proceeds from sale $2,500,000
Original cost 2,000,000
Capital gain $ 500,000
Taxable portion 50%
Taxable capital gain $ 250,000
The additional tax would amount to $305,676 (i.e., 40% $764,190), using
Equation 2.6, which also applies in this case.
Case 4: Taxable capital gain plus CCA recapture Assume the building in Table 2.2 is sold
at the beginning of Year 26 for $2,500,000. There are now two components generating
additional taxesthe capital gain and the CCA recapture.
The proceeds from the sale exceed the original cost of the building. This generates a
capital gain of $2.5 million $2 million $500,000. Capital gains are valued highly by
both individuals and corporations because only half of the capital gain is subject to
income tax. Therefore, the taxable capital gain in this case is 50% $500,000 $250,000,
as shown in the following calculation.
Additional tax on the taxable capital gain amounts to $100,000 (i.e., 40% $250,000).
In addition there is the CCA recapture amount of $2,000,000 $735,810
$1,264,190. This is added to taxable income. The maximum amount of proceeds that
can be deducted from the opening UCC balance to determine the amount of CCA
recaptured is the original cost of the asset.
Opening Closing
Year UCC CCA UCC Comments
25 $766,469 $30,659 $ 735,810
26 (1,500,000) Proceeds from sale
26 (764,190) Adjusted opening balance
26 764,190 CCA recapture
26 nil nil nil
02Ch02_Atrill.QXD 2/29/08 9:58 AM Page 38
Chapter 2 AccountingThe Language of Business 39
Opening Closing
Year UCC CCA UCC Comments
25 $766,469 $30,659 $ 735,810
26 (2,000,000) Proceeds from sale are limited
to the original cost for UCC
calculations
26 (1,264,190) Adjusted opening balance
26 1,264,190 CCA recapture
26 nil nil nil
ACTIVITY 2.2
Assume the data in Table 2.2 represented two different buildings instead of one large building.
Consider each of the following situations independently.
Required:
(a) What is the tax impact of selling one building at the beginning of Year 26 for $300,000?
(b) What is the tax impact of demolishing one of the two buildings due to faulty construction?
(c) What is the tax impact of selling one of the two buildings for $900,000?
Solution
Since there are two buildings in this tax class, these transactions generally do not result
in an empty UCC class.
(a) The proceeds from the sale reduce the UCC in this asset class. The same 4% CCA
rate is now applied on the adjusted opening balance. Thus the result of selling an
asset when other assets remain in the asset class is to reduce the undepreciated
capital cost (UCC) of the asset class and reduce future capital cost allowance (CCA).
This results in an increase in taxes paid.
CCA for Year 26 is $17,432 after the sale of one building, whereas CCA would have
been 4% $735,810 $29,432 if the building had not been sold.
Additional tax on the recaptured CCA amounts to $505,676 (i.e., 40% $1,264,190).
If other assets remain in the same tax class, then 50% of any capital gain is added to
taxable income in the usual manner, and the rest of the proceeds are used to reduce the
UCC of the class, so that future CCA is reduced.
Opening Closing
Year UCC CCA UCC Comments
25 $766,469 $30,659 $ 735,810
26 (300,000) Proceeds from sale
26 435,810 435,810 Adjusted opening balance
26 435,810 17,432 418,378 CCA is reduced
02Ch02_Atrill.QXD 2/29/08 9:58 AM Page 39
40 Chapter 2 AccountingThe Language of Business
Opening Closing
Year UCC CCA UCC Comments
25 $766,469 $30,659 $ 735,810
26 900,000 Proceeds from sale
26 (164,190) Adjusted opening balance
164,190 CCA recaptured
26 nil Adjusted balance
26 nil nil nil
INCOME TAXES
Corporate Taxes
Income taxes are an unusual type of expense because they are based on net income,
which is determined by subtracting expenses from revenues. Net income serves as
the starting point in the determination of income taxes payable and then income tax
expense. Net income is adjusted to arrive at taxable income according to the legal
requirements of the Income Tax Act. The income taxes payable are determined
using Equation 2.7.
Taxes payable Corporate tax rate Taxable income 2.7
The federal corporate tax rates in Canada for 2008 start out at 38% and through
a series of reductions are reduced to 20.5%, further reducing to 20% for 2009.
Provincial and territorial corporate income taxes add an extra 10% to 16% for active
business income and investment income, depending on the province. Some
jurisdictions further reduce corporate income tax rates on manufacturing and
processing income in an effort to attract more industry. For example, the combined
L.O. 5
(b) Since no proceeds were involved in demolishing the building, the asset class contin-
ues with the same opening UCC balance for Year 26 as at the end of Year 25. In other
words, CCA for Year 26 amounts to 4% $735,810 $29,432 and continues just
as if the building had never been demolished.
(c) Selling one building for $900,000 results in additional taxable income equal to the
recaptured CCA of $164,190. This will increase income tax payable in Year 26 by
$65,676 (i.e., 40% $164,190). Further CCA will not be available since the UCC
balance is zero for this class.
Opening Closing
Year UCC CCA UCC Comments
25 $766,469 $30,659 $735,810 No adjustment needed
26 735,810 29,432 706,378 CCA continues
Template for Tax
02Ch02_Atrill.QXD 2/29/08 9:58 AM Page 40
federal and provincial tax rate for Ontario corporations for 2008 is 20.5% 14%
34.5%, with the rate dropping to 32.5% for manufacturing and processing income.
Taxable Income
We have already seen that amortization expense is one of the major adjustments needed
to transform accounting net income into taxable income on the companys tax return.
Amortization expense is not permitted in the Income Tax Act. However, as we have seen
earlier, a similar deductible expense, called capital cost allowance, is permitted.
Other adjustments often include moving from an accrual basis in accounting to a cash
basis in the tax return. The government does not want a company to lower its tax bill by
making high estimates for its expenses. These estimated expenses, which are required in
accounting, are often not deductible in the tax return. Instead, only the cash payments are
tax-deductible. Two examples of this are estimated warranty expenses and pension
expense. Only actual cash warranty expenses paid, not estimates, are allowable deductions
in the tax return. Similarly, the actual cash pension funding paid to the companys pension
fund trustee, not the unfunded portion of the expense, is tax-deductible.
Another adjustment for corporations is that dividends received from other
Canadian corporations are not taxable. Since corporations pay dividends out of after-
tax income, taxes have already been paid for these dividends. So, they are not taxed
again in the hands of another corporation.
As noted previously, capital gains are a valuable source of income because only half
of the capital gain is included in taxable income.
Activity 2.3 focusses on determining taxable income and taxes payable.
Chapter 2 AccountingThe Language of Business 41
ACTIVITY 2.3
The Montreal Furniture Company Ltd. earned an accounting income before income taxes of
$550,000 in 2008. Amortization expense was $100,000. The capital cost allowance permit-
ted in 2008 is $150,000. This is the only temporary difference between accounting net income
and taxable income. The combined federal and provincial tax rate is 40%.
Required:
(a) Calculate taxable income for Montreal Furniture for 2008.
(b) Calculate income taxes payable for Montreal Furniture for 2008.
Solution
(a) Accounting income before income taxes $550,000
Adjustments to determine taxable income:
Add back: Non-deductible amortization expense 100,000
Deduct: CCA for 2008 (150,000)
Taxable income for 2008 $500,000
(b) Taxable income for 2008 (from part (a)) $500,000
Tax rate for 2008 40%
Taxes payable for 2008 (40% $500,000) $200,000
02Ch02_Atrill.QXD 2/29/08 9:58 AM Page 41
42 Chapter 2 AccountingThe Language of Business
Who Said There Is No Such Thing as Negative Taxes?
Nortel Networks is a large Brampton, Ontariobased global communications equipment maker. The following are
extracts from its recent financial statements:
REAL
WORLD
2.1
(U.S. $ millions)
2005 2004
I ncome statement
Loss before income taxes (2,586) (240)
Income tax benefit 56 230
After tax loss (2,530) (210)
Balance sheet
Assets
Future income taxesnet 377 255
Nortel is showing that its losses in 2005 and 2004 have been reduced by US$56 million and US$30 million,
respectively, due to the negative income tax expense effect, which Nortel calls an income tax benefit. The balance
sheet shows a huge future tax asset in both years for the benefit of being able to apply these losses carried forward
to reduce future income tax payable.
Source: 2005 Nortel Networks annual report.
Tax Loss Carry-Backs and Carry-Forwards
Since net income and taxable income can be negative in a year with a loss, income tax
payable and income tax expense can in fact also be negative. Firms can carry a taxable
loss back to the previous three years and obtain a refund of the taxes paid in these
years. If the loss is so large that it cannot all be used up against the previous three years
taxable income, the unused loss can be carried forward and used in any of the next
20 years to reduce taxable income. For accounting purposes, the future tax rate multi-
plied by the amount of the loss carry-forward is reported on the balance sheet as a
future income tax asset. A future income tax asset is a valid asset because real cash
savings are created by deducting the current years loss carry-forward from future
income. The offset to the future income tax asset account (dr) is negative income tax
expense (cr). Accounting issues in the preparation of income taxes are often complex
and confusing; we are only touching on them in this text. Students specializing in
finance or accounting will usually take an entire course dedicated to this subject.
Real World 2.1 shows how one company was able to reduce its loss before income
taxes by applying tax loss carry-back and carry-forwards.
Individual Taxes
Canada has a progressive income tax system in place for individuals. That is, the higher
your income, the higher your tax rate. Table 2.3 shows the 2007 federal income tax
brackets for various amounts of taxable income.
In addition to the federal rates, provincial and territorial income tax rates range
from 5.7% to 24%, depending on the tax bracket and the jurisdiction.
The higher tax rate percentage only applies to the income amount starting at the tax
rates lower threshold level. Income up to this threshold point is taxed at the previous
02Ch02_Atrill.QXD 2/29/08 9:58 AM Page 42
Chapter 2 AccountingThe Language of Business 43
On the first $37,178 15.5% $37,178 $ 5,762.59
On the next $70,000 $37,178 $32,822 22.0% $32,822 7,220.84
Total taxes payable $12,983.43
tax brackets rate. For example, assume Jackie Bishop earned a gross income of $80,000,
which reduced to a taxable income of $70,000 in 2007 after deductions. $70,000 falls
into the second tax bracket, with a 22.0% tax rate in Table 2.3. However, the higher tax
rate of 22.0% only applies to the income amount from $37,179 up to $70,000. The first
$37,178 of income continues to be taxed at the lower 15.5% rate. The calculation for the
taxes payable is:
TABLE 2.3 2007 Federal Income Tax Rates for Individuals
Tax Rate Taxable Income
15.5% $0$37,178
22.0% $37,179$74,357
26.0% $74,358$120,887
29.0% Over $120,888
The average tax rate is given by Equation 2.8:
2.8
Jackie Bishops average tax rate is $12,983.43 $80,000 100%16.2%.
The marginal tax rate is given by Equation 2.9:
2.9
Jackie Bishops marginal tax rate is 22.0%, considerably higher than her average
tax rate. The marginal tax rate should always be used for making decisions. For
instance, assume that Jackie is offered the chance to work overtime. If accepted, it
would boost her income to $95,000 and her taxable income to $85,000. Notice that this
amount puts her into the 26% federal income tax bracket for most of the overtime.
Furthermore, assume this puts her into a 17% income tax bracket in her province. Her
combined federal and provincial marginal tax bracket is 26% 17% 43%. Since she
only gets to keep 57% (i.e., 100% 43%) of most of the overtime dollars earned, she
might decide to refuse the overtime work.
Dividends
From an individual shareholders point of view, dividends present a double taxation
problem because dividends are paid out of retained earnings, which is the accumulated
net income less dividends. However, the corporation has already paid taxes on its net
income, adjusted to taxable income in the tax return. So the dividend received by the
individual is actually paid out of income less taxes. The individual shareholder must
again pay taxes on dividends received. To grant some relief from this double taxation
motif, dividends are grossed up and a dividend tax credit is allowed in the individuals
tax return. As a result, dividends are taxed more lightly than ordinary income in
the hands of individuals. These are complicated manoeuvres that are designed to try to
overcome double taxation problems with dividends.
Marginal tax rate = Tax rate on the last dollar of income
Average tax rate =
Total taxes payable
Gross income
02Ch02_Atrill.QXD 2/29/08 9:58 AM Page 43
Significant Accounting Terms
Asset: something the company owns.
Liability: amount the company owes.
Shareholders equity: residual amount belong-
ing to the shareholders.
Working capital: current assets less current
liabilities.
Revenues: sales earned when the product is
delivered to the customer or the job is completed.
Expenses: costs incurred to generate the sales.
Expenses are matched to revenues.
Dividends: distribution of profits to the share-
holders.
Accrual Accounting, Cash Flows, and the
Matching Principle
Accrual accounting
Reporting sales when made, not when the
cash is collected.
Reporting expenses when incurred, not when
paid.
Cash flows: the measurement and timing of
cash inflows and cash outflows in a business.
Matching principle: expenses in a period
are matched to the same period in which the
related revenues were generated.
Financial Statements
Income statement: measures the earnings of a
company during a period.
44 Chapter 2 AccountingThe Language of Business
Statement of retained earnings: measures the
changes in retained earnings for the period.
Balance sheet: presents the financial position of
the company at a certain date by showing its
assets, liabilities, and shareholders equity.
Cash flow statement: shows where cash was
obtained and where it was spent during the
period.
Amortization and Capital Cost
Allowance
Amortization: the apportionment of part of the
cost of a capital asset each year to the income
statement as an expense.
Capital cost allowance: the tax returns equiva-
lent to amortization expense.
CCA rates are specified in the Income Tax Act
for various asset classes.
CCA presents additional tax complications at the
end of the useful life of an asset and especially
when the entire asset class is terminated.
Income Taxes
Taxable income is determined by starting with
net income and making adjustments to arrive at
taxable income.
Taxes payable equal the sum of, for each tax
bracket, the applicable tax rate multiplied by the
applicable slice of taxable income.
Asset
Liability
Shareholders equity
Working capital
Revenues
Balance sheet
Cash flow statement
Amortization
Capital cost allowance
(CCA)
K E Y T E R M S
S U M M A R Y
Expenses
Dividends
Matching principle
Income statement
Statement of retained earnings
2.1 Assets = Liabilities + Shareholders equity
2.2 Working capital = Current assets Current liabilities
2.3 Net income = Revenues Expenses
L I S T O F E Q U A T I O N S
02Ch02_Atrill.QXD 2/29/08 9:58 AM Page 44
Chapter 2 AccountingThe Language of Business 45
P R O B L E M S A N D C A S E S
2.1 Your company is reviewing the following accounts:
Bonds payable Inventory
Dividends Accounts payable
Cash Accounts receivable
Accumulated amortizationCars Income taxes payable
Common shares Net income
Required:
Group the preceding accounts as asset, liability, or shareholders equity accounts.
2.2 The Jamery Goods Company has the following account balances:
Bonds payable, due 2016, $100,000
Inventory 30,000
Dividends 10,000
Accounts payable 20,000
Cash 200,000
Accounts receivable 60,000
Accumulated amortizationCars 30,000
Income taxes payable 15,000
Common shares 120,000
Net income 50,000
Cars 75,000
Opening retained earnings 40,000
Required:
Prepare a statement of retained earnings using whichever of the preceding accounts you need from the
December 31, 2008, books of the Jamery Goods Company.
R E V I E W Q U E S T I O N S
Answers to the Review Questions can be found on
the Companion Website that accompanies this text
at www.pearsoned.ca/atrill.
2.1 Why is the shareholders equity section of the
balance sheet sometimes called the residual?
2.2 What makes the balance sheet balance?
2.3 Does the matching principle mean that expenses
have to equal revenues? Explain.
2.4 Explain why net income is not the same as
taxable income.
2.5 Executives would prefer to show lower earn-
ings per share because the companys tax bill
will be reduced. Discuss.
2.4 Sales = Price Quantity
2.5 Closing retained earnings = Opening retained earnings + Net income Dividends
2.6 Tax saving = Tax rate Terminal loss
2.7 Taxes payable = Corporate tax rate Taxable income
2.8
2.9 Marginal tax rate = Tax rate on the last dollar of income
Average tax rate =
Total taxes payable
Gross income
02Ch02_Atrill.QXD 2/29/08 9:58 AM Page 45
Required:
2.3 Using the data from Problem and Case 2.2, prepare a balance sheet as at December 31, 2008, for the
Jamery Goods Company.
2.4 Rain Coast Adventures Ltd. acquired a new ski lift on January 1, Year 1, for $1,500,000. It has an estimated
useful economic life of 10 years with no residual value. The ski lift has a CCA rate of 20%.
Required:
Compare accounting straight-line amortization and net book value and tax return CCA and UCC for the 10-year
life of the ski lift.
2.5 Tims Bits and Drills Inc. has had the following results over the past five fiscal years.
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Net income $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000
Taxable income $ 52,000 $ 75,000 $ 98,000 $121,000 $144,000
Tax rate 30% 34% 45% 48% 28%
Required:
(a) Calculate income taxes payable for each year.
(b) Describe two things that might cause the difference between net income and taxable income.
2.6 Maritime Breweries Limited reported the following results for 2008.
Earnings before income taxes $5,025,000
Amortization expense $1,250,000
UCCBuildings, Jan. 1, 2008 $3,000,000
CCA rateBuildings 4%
UCCMachines, Jan. 1, 2008 $5,600,000
CCA rateMachines 20%
UCCVehicles, Jan. 1, 2008 $ 800,000
CCA rateVehicles 30%
Required:
(a) Calculate taxable income for 2008.
(b) Calculate taxes payable for 2008, assuming a corporate tax rate of 35%.
2.7 The president of Fallen Down Gold Mines stated, The company does not have sufficient cash to pay
its $2 million dividend in 2008. During his speech, he said that cash inflows from operations are
expected to be $2,500,000, cash outflows from investing are expected to be $(1,400,000) and cash
inflows from financing are expected to be $500,000.
Required:
(a) How might you determine if the presidents statement is accurate?
(b) What is the minimum amount of the opening cash balance required in order to pay the $2 million
dividend and remain with a cash balance of $350,000 at the end of this year?
46 Chapter 2 AccountingThe Language of Business
02Ch02_Atrill.QXD 2/29/08 9:58 AM Page 46